宜宾双眼皮哪里做得好宜宾假体隆鼻的危害,宜宾玻尿酸隆鼻能维持多长时间,宜宾抽脂双眼皮多少钱,宜宾割眼皮大概多少钱,在宜宾割双眼皮后遗症眼睛闭不严,宜宾隐形祛眼袋医院,宜宾割双眼皮一般花费用

Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Thursday dramatically restricted Roger Stone's ability to speak publicly about his case after he published an Instagram post with what appeared to be the crosshairs of a gun drawn behind her head.Stone may now not speak publicly about the investigation or the case or any participants in the investigation or the case."Period," Jackson said.The development will in effect silence one of the most outspoken and politicized former advisers of President Donald Trump, as Stone fights against special counsel Robert Mueller in a case related to his interactions in 2016 with Russians and the Trump campaign.Jackson made her revision to her previous court order that had prevented Stone from speaking in and around the courthouse. Jackson's new mandate came swiftly and sternly in a court hearing in which Stone got tripped up by his own story and apologies.Four days ago, Stone had posted then removed a photo of Jackson on Instagram that had crosshairs -- or what Stone called a "Celtic cross" -- behind her head. His lawyers had drawn up a written apology to Jackson Monday, which Stone said he signed but did not write. That's when Jackson ordered him to court, prompting Stone to fly in from Florida to Washington, DC, Thursday morning.His defense counsel kicked off the hearing by having Stone reiterate his apology -- this time under oath, from the witness box. But as soon as Jackson jumped in to question Stone, he began to contradict his explanations for the post and for his remorse.Jackson said she did not believe his testimony, and believed he understood how inflammatory the image he posted was, especially among his followers."Roger Stone fully understands the power of words and the power of symbols. There's nothing ambiguous about crosshairs.""What he chose," she said, "had a more sinister message.""In the world of social media, there's no such thing as a take-back," she added.Ultimately, Jackson said Stone from now on could issue no more statements on the radio, no press releases, no blogs, no media interviews, no Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Snapchat posts about the case, which has drawn him several interviews and media attention since his January 25 arrest. No statements can be made on his behalf by spokespersons, family members or even "many volunteers," either, Jackson said, citing some of the people around him whom Stone tried to say found the offensive photo and had access to his cell phone.As he listened to the judge tighten his speech restrictions, Stone closed his eyes, leaning back with his head in his hands. Several times, he attempted to argue his side over the judge's questioning, or grimaced, gestured broadly and licked his lips while he spoke.His time on the witness stand had not gone smoothly, and Jackson had grown impatient with his imprecise and changing answers as testimony.At one point, Stone tried to explain that he didn't select the image with the crosshairs for any particular reason -- that it was random, and he wasn't thinking what it could mean. On the same day, prosecutors pointed out at the hearing, Stone criticized the judge and spoke about his case to the media, including on the conservative radio show "Infowars," and even claimed the media had unfairly targeted him because of the post.Still, he offered a full mea culpa to Jackson in court. "I don't offer any rationalization or excuse or justification. This is just a stupid lack of judgment," Stone testified in the dramatic 90-minute hearing in a packed courtroom."I regret it," the longtime Republican political operative and self-described "dirty trickster" added. Jackson did not accept Stone's explanation, at one point using air quotes when she said the word "apologize.""Thank you, but the apology rings quite hollow," she said."No, Mr. Stone, I'm not giving you another chance," she added.If Stone violates her order again, Jackson said, he could be detained."This is not baseball," she added. "There will not be a third chance."Stone did not comment to reporters upon leaving the courthouse. He is currently out on bail and able to travel in and around Washington, New York City and in South Florida, where he lives.Instagram postStone testified that a volunteer working for him had downloaded the picture of Jackson, but he himself wrote the post and published it. He said he did not know who the person was — no one among his bevy of helpers would confess to finding the photo, which appeared to come from a conspiracy website, nor could he remember who his helpers were on Monday, he testified.The first post was a picture of Jackson with what appeared to be the crosshairs of a gun drawn behind her head. Stone's caption called special counsel Robert Mueller a "Deep State hitman," said his case was a "show trial" and implied that Jackson was biased as an Obama appointee and because she had ruled on a Benghazi-related case and "incarcerated Paul Manafort." "#Fixisin," Stone added to his post.Soon after, he replaced the post with a cropped image of Jackson, this time with the crosshairs cut out. He also slightly altered the text about Mueller and added a few more hashtags.Then, the post got pulled.Jackson brought printouts of the posts into court Thursday. She began the hearing reviewing both a gag order she had placed on Stone's case last Friday, and the terms of his release as he awaits a criminal trial. One of the terms following his arrest is that he cannot attempt to intimidate others, including judges and other officers of the court.Gag order in Manafort caseJackson has been down this road before. In the criminal case against Stone's longtime colleague Paul Manafort, Jackson revoked Manafort's bail and sent him to jail eight months after his arrest because prosecutors accused him of attempting to reach out to witnesses.Manafort, Donald Trump's former campaign chairman, had been on house arrest.Stone's attorneys had argued for him to keep the ability to speak broadly about his case and politics. Writing and public speaking were essential parts of who Stone is, they said. Again on Thursday, Stone's defense attorney Bruce Rogow argued the Instagram post was indefensible, and that Stone wouldn't cross the line again.Stone was charged in late January for lying to congressional investigators about his efforts to communicate with WikiLeaks as he sought to help the Trump campaign damage Hillary Clinton in 2016. He also faces charges of obstruction and witness tampering. Jackson so far has been especially sensitive to the witness intimidation allegation, reminding Stone multiple times that he cannot contact potential witnesses in his case.He has pleaded not guilty to the charges. 6703

Floyd the mastiff went for a hike with his owner up the Grandeur Peak trail near Salt Lake City on Sunday. But when it was time to come down, Floyd was too exhausted and just sat down.Thanks to the Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office search and rescue team, the 190-pound dog made it home by being carried back down the trail.The rescue team was called around 6:30 p.m. after other hikers passed Floyd on the trail and saw his owner needed help. The 3-year-old dog wouldn't budge and temperatures in the area were quickly dropping, according to police."The team is completely volunteer," Sgt. Melody Gray of the 622

For the past decade, "likes" have been the chief currency of Facebook. It's the way we've determined how many people think our babies are cute, believe our jokes are funny and recognize our new jobs are impressive.Facebook itself has been so synonymous with likes that the thumbs up icon for the like button 320

HOUSTON — Country/rap singer Justin Carter has died after an accidental shooting that occurred while he was filming a music video.The Texas-based singer was shot and killed at his apartment in Houston, a 216

If President Donald Trump invokes a "national emergency" at the US border and uses emergency powers to bypass Congress and obtain funding to build his long-promised border wall, a battle in the courts over the questionable legality of spending those dollars would be virtually guaranteed.But the United States is no stranger to national emergencies.In fact, the US has been in a perpetual state of declared national emergency for four decades, and the country is currently under 31 concurrent states of emergency about a spectrum of international issues around the globe, according to a CNN review of documents from the Congressional Research Service and the Federal Register.The federal government is well into its third week of a partial shutdown over funding for the President's wall along the border with Mexico. The White House and Democrats in Congress are locked at an impasse: Trump is demanding .6 billion, while House Democrats have vowed not to give him a dollar."I may declare a national emergency dependent on what's going to happen over the next few days," Trump told reporters on Sunday morning, floating using the National Emergencies Act of 1974 to activate special power during a crisis.House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" that Trump doesn't have the authority to do so. "If Harry Truman couldn't nationalize the steel industry during wartime, this President doesn't have the power to declare an emergency and build a multibillion-dollar wall on the border. So, that's a nonstarter."But acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney defended the possibility: "I'm actually heavily involved with it and have been working with all of the Cabinet secretaries to try and find money that we can legally use to defend the southern border," he said on the same program. "Presidents have authority to defend the nation."Not all national emergency declarations are so controversial. Trump has already issued three national emergency declarations during his tenure, most prominently a national emergency meant to punish foreign actors who interfere in American elections, though the move garnered bipartisan criticism for not going far enough. He's also invoked emergency powers to slap sanctions on human rights abusers around the globe and on members of the Nicaraguan government amid corruption and violent protests there.Here's a full list of the 31 active national emergencies under the National Emergencies Act, dating back to the Carter administration:1. Blocking Iranian Government Property (Nov. 14, 1979)2. Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Nov. 14, 1994)3. Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process (January 23, 1995)4. Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources (March 15, 1995)5. Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers (October 21, 1995)6. Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba (March 1, 1996)7. Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan (November 3, 1997)8. Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans (June 26, 2001)9. Continuation of Export Control Regulations (August 17, 2001)10. Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks (September 14, 2001)11. Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism (September 23, 2001)12. Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe (March 6, 2003)13. Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest (May 22, 2003)14. Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria (May 11, 2004)15. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus (June 16, 2006)16. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (October 27, 2006)17. Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions (August 1, 2007)18. Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals (June 26, 2008)19. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia (April 12, 2010)20. Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya (February 25, 2011)21. Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations (July 25, 2011)22. Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen (May 16, 2012)23. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine (March 6, 2014)24. Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan (April 3, 2014)25. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic (May 12, 2014)26. Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela (March 9, 2015)27. Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities (April 1, 2015)28. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi (November 23, 2015)29. Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption (December 20, 2017)30. Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election (September 12, 2018)31. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua (November 27, 2018) 5757