北京强直脊柱炎该怎么治疗(山东什么治强制性脊柱炎) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — A California woman is claiming officials with the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) treated her like an animal.Amanda Sams said Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials failed to provide the medical care required to treat her serious medical needs while she was in their custody.In a lawsuit filed against the government, Sams and her civil attorneys claim, "This practice of DHS agents forcing arrestees and pretrial detainees to detox and withdraw from high amounts of alcohol and/or opiates in holding cells near the border, has happened with alarming frequency. Indeed, Ms. Sams is believed to be one of dozens of other individuals forced to endure these conditions in recent months."Sams Arrest and DetentionSams was arrested in January for charges related to bringing an undocumented immigrant in the United States illegally.According to court documents filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office, Customs and Border Protection officers found a person in a hidden compartment in the vehicle Sams was driving.Court records show after Sams was arrested, she told officers that she is an alcoholic and uses drugs.RELATED: Allegations people in the government's custody enduring unsafe conditionsAccording to her lawsuit, after spending the night in a holding cell at the border, Sams was transported to the Metropolitan Correction Center (MCC) in downtown San Diego. The lawsuit says officials at MCC rejected her due to her unstable medical condition.Her lawsuit alleges, "Rather than taking Ms. Sams to a hospital, as recommended by MCC officials and as (presumably) required by DHS policies and procedures, the CBP Defendants returned Ms. Sams to a DHS holding facility at or near the San Ysidro Port of Entry."Team 10 obtained four days of surveillance video from Sams' cell, an experience she described as one of the worst times of her life."When I first walked in, you could smell urine, and you could hear kids crying," Sams said. "You could hear people screaming. There was garbage in the corner."The video obtained by Team 10 shows her eating, sleeping, pacing, hyperventilating and vomiting."No human being should be treated like that," Sams said. "Like they are nothing. Like they are a nobody."Sams told 10News she was given only a solar blanket and a thin mat to sleep on.RELATED: Call for SD jail reform after former inmate's cheek was bitten by mentally ill inmateShe said she began to experience symptoms of withdrawal while in the cell."I was sick to my stomach," Sams recalled. "I had cold chills, then I'd get hot. I'd get cold. I'd have these sweats."Team 10 Investigator Adam Racusin asked Sams if she remembered the medical staff at the facility ever checking her vital signs."Nothing," Sams said.According to court documents: "For five days, she languished in a holding cell at the port of entry while enduring severe symptoms of alcohol withdrawal and detox without access to medical care. She was forced to sleep on the concrete floor of a cell for four nights with only a solar blanket to keep her warm from the cold. She was not allowed to change her clothing and denied access to basic hygiene, including a shower, toothbrush, toothpaste, soap, a water cup, or feminine hygiene products. She was never allowed to make a call or speak with legal counsel."RELATED: SD whistleblower reveals threat of gun reporting 'loophole' for mentally ill service membersSams attorney Trenton Lamere said the government breached its duty of care when they failed to provide minimally necessary services."Really minimum levels of care here that we would expect from a civilized society," Lamere said.According to Sams' lawsuit, "California law imposes a duty of care on law enforcement and custodial officers to protect the health and safety of pretrial detainees, which includes a duty to ensure pretrial detainees' serious medical risks and needs are properly evaluated and treated. Despite the objectively serious nature of the medical risks and needs Plaintiff was facing, and the CBP Defendants' subjective awareness of the same, the CBP Defendants breached their duty to protect Plaintiff's health and safety, by failing to provide the medical care required to evaluate and treat Plaintiffs' serious medical risks and needs while Plaintiff was in the custody, and under the supervision, of the government."Sams said she saw a judge five days after she was arrested.RELATED: Petition: DOD standards don’t translate into state mental health evaluation, treatment laws"When I asked for help, I really needed somebody's help," she said. "I feel that no one should have to feel that alone or go through something like that alone ever in their life."Sams' criminal attorney tried to get the case against her thrown out based on what she called outrageous conduct by the government. The judge in her criminal case did not agree.Sams' trial is scheduled for April 2020.Government ResponseA spokesperson for Customs and Border Protection said the agency can't comment on pending litigation.The U.S. Attorney's Office also didn’t comment on Sams' criminal case.However, in court documents, the government claims Sams indicated to her interrogators that she was not intoxicated and that she was not using drugs.Court documents say "The San Ysidro Port of Entry is not a hospital with doctors like API (Alvarado Parkway Institute). However, physicians assistants work at the San Ysidro Port of Entry for approximately 16-20 hours a day. The physician's assistants can render medical aid to detainees as necessary. There are also CBP Officers trained as Emergency Medical Responders and Emergency Medical Technicians who are able to provide medical attention while on duty at the port of entry."RELATED: Innovative open jail design changes San Diego inmate experienceThe government stated that records from Sams' detention at the San Ysidro Port of Entry show that officers conducted dozens of welfare checks, and at no point did CBP ever make the determination that she was in a state of medical emergency.They also claimed Sams indicated to a Customs and Border Protection Supervisory Officer that she wanted to go to Court and did not need medical attention.Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin asked Sams why at certain points she told officers she was not detoxing."So they'd take me out of there," she explained. "They'd take me to jail take me to another facility. I just wanted help."Other people going through withdrawalSams is not the only one making allegations of mistreatment in a border holding cell.Earlier this month 10News spoke to Jesus Centeno-Paredes from behind the walls of a detention facility just outside of San Diego.Centeno said he was arrested at the border then held for nearly three days in a potentially dangerous medical state. According to court documents, "Mr. Centeno was kept in a small cell where the lights were on the entire time. Mr. Centeno was not given a change of clothes during the nearly three days while he was at the Port of Entry. The cell where Mr. Centeno was held did not have a bed, and Mr. Centeno was given a thin foil blanket and a torn yoga mat to lie on. There was no soap, no toothbrush, and no hygiene products."Documents obtained by Team 10 allege others have gone through detox at the San Ysidro Land Port of Entry.Team 10 obtained what's known as the "No Body Active List" or "Federal Defender No Body Report."A No Body Active List from March of this year shows two additional people involuntarily detoxing from heroin were kept at the San Ysidro Port. Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin has also seen other No Body Active Lists from different dates showing other people marked as detoxing at the San Ysidro Port of Entry.Team 10 tried to get all No Body Active Lists from the start of this year, but so far, the U.S. Attorney's Office has not turned them over and said they aren't public documents. 7908

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - A 16-year-old boy with a remote-controlled car tried to send 50 packages of methamphetamine across the border, U.S. Border Patrol agents said Tuesday. Agents were guarding the U.S.-Mexico border Sunday at 12:30 a.m. when they saw a person with two duffel bags walking along the secondary border wall. One of the agents who responded to the scene saw the boy hiding in thick brush. He had a remote-controlled car and 55 pounds of meth, agents said. The boy was arrested and will face smuggling charges. RELATED STORIES:Video shows panga boat landing on San Diego County beach during smuggling attemptMother tries to smuggle meth with young children in SUV, Border Patrol saysBorder officials say the wall is working, drug smuggling shifting to the seaThe drugs had a street value of more than 0,000, according to the Border Patrol. “I am extremely proud of the agents’ heightened vigilance and hard work in stopping this unusual smuggling scheme,” said San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent Douglas Harrison. A similar smuggling attempt using a remote-controlled drone was foiled in 2017. 1115

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - The state Supreme Court Thursday ruled that a San Diego citizens' initiative that cut back city employee pensions was illegally placed on the ballot, and ordered an appeal court to consider a remedy.Proposition B, initially approved by voters in 2012, eliminated guaranteed pensions for new city employees, except police officers, and replaced those benefits with 401(k)-style retirement plans.In 2015, one of the city's largest public sector unions challenged the benefit system, alleging former Mayor Jerry Sanders and other officials illegally placed the measure on the ballot without conferring with labor groups. The Public Employees Relations Board ruled with the union, but the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the decision in April 2017.Now, the appeal court's decision is overturned."We reverse the Court of Appeal's judgment and remand for further proceedings to resolve issues beyond the scope of this opinion," wrote Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan in Thursday's decision, in agreement with the other five justices.A city spokesperson couldn't be reached for comment.The court ruled that although it was a citizens' initiative, Sanders' support of Prob B as policy warranted engagement with the unions under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, which gave city and county employees the right to collective bargaining in 1968.Governing bodies "or other representatives as may be properly designated" need to engage with unions "prior to arriving at a determination of policy or course of action," according to the act.Sanders had said he supported the measure as a private citizen, not a public employee. The Supreme Court ruled that Sanders did use the power of his office to push the initiative, however."He consistently invoked his position as mayor and used city resources and employees to draft, promote and support the Initiative. The city's assertion that his support was merely that of a private citizen does not withstand objective scrutiny," Corrigan wrote.In overturning the Public Employees Relations Board ruling in 2017, the appeal court took an "unduly constricted view of the duty to meet and confer," according to the Supreme Court ruling.The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal court address an "appropriate judicial remedy" for the illegal placement of the initiative on the ballot.The Public Employees Relations Board had previously ruled the city must pay employees "for all lost compensation" related to lost pension benefits, which would cost millions of dollars.The 401(k)-style system was originally intended to save taxpayers money by reducing future pension liabilities. Approved by 65 percent of voters, the system was the first of its kind among California municipalities. 2742

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -  Despite protest from residents against a storage facility for homeless individuals in Logan Heights, city leaders have approved the facility.The facility, proposed at 116 South 20th street, would supply up to 1,000 storage bins for people living on San Diego's streets. The facility would be similar to one currently located on 16th Street."This storage facility must deliver for both the clients it will serve and the neighborhood that 489

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Military families sent 10News letters discussing a myriad of issues their students faced when they transferred from out of state into San Diego Unified School District.One student, who didn't want to be identified, sent a letter that read in part, "I would dread getting up everyday knowing that this was going to be a continuous process," explaining he didn't get the same treatment in an assistance program here, compared to where he previously lived.Another letter discusses a woman's special needs children, "It took over a week to even get my children placed in classrooms to start school with no updates as to why. After calling several times we were able to get placements for our children. I know that special needs children have to be placed in certain classrooms and things like that, but for it to take that long is a little excessive." She continued stating in the letter, "two of our children are waitlisted (with no foreseeable date of service) for speech therapy with a letter stating that it is because there is a "lack of available therapists" in the area."Erika Bradley said her daughter had trouble transferring AP and Honors credits, and once she was pulled out to be home schooled, she was told her daughter couldn't participate on the Varsity Soccer team."It put her in a tailspin... We had many instances of panic attacks," she said."We have upwards of 8,000 military dependent students within our district," Jennifer Coronel, Program Manager of Children and Youth in Transition at SDUSD said. That's about 7% of the district's student population.On SDUSD's website, you can find numerous resources for military families. The district gets anywhere from ,000,000 to ,000,100 in military student funding per year. "We have four Intervention Counselors that work out of the Department of Children and Youth in Transition and all of them have a specific area within San Diego Unified and assist with all matters related to military students," Coronel said. She says rules and maybe even federal laws need to change to make a smoother transition for military students.Bradley says many military families pull their students for homeschooling to get around transfer issues, but Bradley says she wants more oversight to ensure military families are taken care of in the future. 2327

来源：资阳报