青岛羊癫疯病儿童医院青岛羊羔疯病医院专科,山东省治疗好羊癫疯要多少钱,全国治癫痫病医院哪里比较好,威海专治癫痫是什么医院好,山东什么是抽搐,枣庄治好癫痫病要多少钱,枣庄治疗癫痫病最佳办法

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - All this week we have been sharing stories about our 10News initiative called "Making it in San Diego." It's our commitment to work with you to find solutions to our rising costs of living. We asked for your input, and you didn't hold back. That's topic of this week's Let's Talk.  318

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- An attorney for a man charged with killing a South Bay music producer told a jury that her client took steps to dispose of the 28-year-old’s body out of fear of being accused of the murder, but did not actually carry out the brutal stabbing himself.Both the defense and the prosecution gave closing statements Monday in the high-profile murder trial of 54-year-old Timothy John Cook. Cook is charged with killing his Chula Vista housemate, Omar Medina, whose body was found in a 55-gallon drum floating in San Diego Bay in 2017.RELATED: Family of man found in barrel works to find closure, thanks Chula Vista PD for their efforts“Just because someone disposes of somebody, or even if they moved a couple things or tried to clean up a couple things, that does not mean the person killed them,” said deputy public defender Kara Oien. “He was trying to avoid the very predicament that we're in today.”Prosecutors have largely built their case against Cook on evidence of his activities after the murder, saying he launched a “monumental effort” to cover his tracks, clean up blood, and dispose of the body.Deputy District Attorney Cherie Somerville said cell phone evidence and other records show Cook lied about his whereabouts, and surveillance video shows him and co-defendant Derrick Spurgeon hauling the 55-gallon drum to San Diego Bay.RELATED: Man whose body was found in a barrel had been stabbed 66 times; suspect pleads not guiltySpurgeon is charged with being an accessory for allegedly driving the boat used to dump the victim's body. Cook alone is charged with carrying out the stabbing.“Hatred, disrespect, and ultimately cold hard cash” motivated the killing, Somerville said.Prosecutors say Cook was after an ,000 settlement Medina had been awarded and was tired of his sloppy household behavior.The defense is expected to finish closing arguments Tuesday, at which point the jury will begin deliberations. 1949

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A teenager is publicly apologizing after admitting to vandalizing a park in Scripps Ranch last December. Jerabek park was vandalized on December 8, 2018. Days later, the Scripps Ranch Civic Association offered a reward to find the person who vandalized the field. Neighbors said they believed a large truck drove in circles on the field, destroying the turf. In the association’s August newsletter, the unidentified teenager admits to vandalizing the grass. RELATED: Scripps Ranch community offers reward to find vandal who damaged field“I was at the park that night, along with some friends, and we thought it would be cool to drive on the grass,” the teen writes. “This poor decision caused damage that adversely affected many people who use that park and for that I am truly sorry,” the letter continues. The teen says they grew up playing sports at the park, making the decision "particularly negligent."It’s unclear if the teen will face any charges following the incident. 1007

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Amid rising health care costs, some San Diegans are turning to telehealth appointments. On a Monday afternoon, young Josephine sits in an exam room. She's come down with cold-like symptoms after recovering from enlarged tonsils. So her mom, Josie Ruiz, brought her to their neighborhood clinic, La Maestra Community Health Center in City Heights. For this appointment, one doctor is waiting in the exam room, and another is on a computer screen.Dr. Anthony Magit is an Ear, Nose and Throat specialist and pediatrician at Rady Children's Hospital. As he watches from his office, the clinic's Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Javier Rodriguez, conducts an exam. Cameras and camera-equipped scopes feed real-time data to the specialist, who then asks questions. The exam is part of La Maestra's telehealth program, which offers virtual appointments to underserved patients."Before telehealth, my previous appointments ... some of them I had to cancel or reschedule," said Ruiz.Ruiz is a single mom who works full time."This is great because in my case I don't have to request a day off to take her to the hospital, which I can't afford to do," said Ruiz.Most of the patients at this clinic don't own cars. For them, getting to Rady Children's Hospital means hours on buses, which can lead to major issues related to work and child care.Six years ago, doctors at the clinic discovered many referrals to Rady Children's Hospital weren't showing up. That has changed. No-show rates went from about 50% to 13% within two years. Across the county, other hospitals are tuning in to telemedicine, from home appointments for rural patients to consultations with specialists across the country. In some cases, the only doctor is on a screen.List of links for local telehealth programs:https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/hawaii/why-kp/experience/telehealth?kpSearch=TELEHEALTHhttps://health.ucsd.edu/specialties/telehealth/Pages/default.aspxhttps://www.sharp.com/patient/phone-or-video-visits.cfm 2008

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Among the propositions that will be on the November ballot in California, Proposition 17 will ask voters to decide whether or not to allow individuals on parole to vote.Voters will vote "yes" or "no" on the proposition, which is an amendment to the state's constitution introduced by Sacramento Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, according to BallotPedia.In California, those who are "mentally incompetent or imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony" for a state or federal sentence are not allowed to vote.The passage of Proposition 17 would instead direct the state to only disqualify those who are currently serving a sentence for the conviction of a felony and allow those on parole for a felony conviction to vote."Parole is not an extension of punishment. It's a reintegration time for someone to come back in their community," says Shay Franco-Clausen, the Yes on Prop 17 Campaign Manager. "What better way to make them feel that they have a stake in the community is there than giving the right to them."Those who support Prop 17 argue, "when a person completes their prison sentence, they should be encouraged to reenter society and have a stake in their community. Restoring their voting rights does that. Civic engagement is connected to lower rates of recidivism. When people feel that they are valued members of their community, they are less likely to return to prison," according to the official support statement.19 other states, plus Washington DC currently allow ex-felons to vote while they're on parole. And the Yes on Prop 17 campaign points to a 2011 study by the Florida Parole Commission that showed parolees who are given the right to vote are less likely to commit another crime."If you're invested in your community and you feel like you are stakeholders, you're part of it. You don't want to do harm," say Franco-Clausen.Opponents to the Proposition declined interview requests by ABC 10News, pointing to their published literature instead.In it, they say, "Parole is an adjustment period when violent felons prove their desire to adjust to behaving properly in a free society. Their every move is monitored and supervised by a trained state officer. If the state does not trust them to choose where to live or travel, with whom to associate and what jobs to do, it MUST NOT trust them with decisions that will impact the lives and finances of all other members of society..."Proposition 17 will allow criminals convicted of murder, rape, sexual assault against children, kidnapping, assault, gang gun crimes, and human trafficking to vote before completing their sentence including parole."Proposition 17 started as ACA 6, and passed the State Assembly and Senate with 70% approval. It now needs a simple majority to become law. 2794