吉林哪个医院能治好龟头敏感(吉林前列腺炎物理疗法) (今日更新中)

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) -- The California Assembly has voted to ban the manufacture and sale of new fur products.Animal welfare groups have rallied around the bill, arguing the fur industry is inhumane and pointing to alternatives like faux fur.But opponents of the bill have countered that the proposed law would devastate fur retailers and manufacturers.Some California cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco and Berkeley, have already passed ordinances banning the sale of fur.The New York City council has also considered banning fur sales in America's biggest city.The bill would not include used fur products or furs used for traditional purposes. Leather, cowhide and shearling would be exempt, too.The measure, Assembly Bill 44, now goes to the state Senate. 782

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A San Diego judge has agreed to not sentence the wife of Republican U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter until after her husband's Jan. 22 corruption trial, where she is expected to testify against him.U.S. District Court Judge Thomas J. Whelan in court documents filed Tuesday moved the date for Margaret E. Hunter's sentencing hearing from December to April 13.Federal prosecutors and the defense attorneys had asked for the change.Margaret Hunter pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy. Prosecutors say she and the California lawmaker misspent 0,000 in campaign funds on everything from family trips to tequila shots.In her plea deal, Margaret Hunter agreed to testify against her husband. Rep. Hunter has pleaded not guilty and called it a partisan witch hunt. He is running for reelection. 812

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) -- California State legislators announced Wednesday that they have agreed to reverse the proposed cuts in education in next year's budget, assuming that the federal government will step in with a stimulus package. Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom said the coronavirus pandemic resulted in a billion shortfall, which included an billion cut in education. But on Wednesday, Senate pro Tempore Toni Atkins announced in a joint statement:"Acknowledging the strong likelihood of additional federal relief, the plan would use reserves to avoid overcutting now, while still keeping reserves on hand for the future, and ensuring full funding of k-14 schools.""We are tremendously encouraged by the news that we are hearing," San Diego Unified School District Superintendent Cindy Marten said. But school board vice president Richard Barrera said that is only the first step.The San Diego Unified School District serves its 105,000 students on a .3 billion annual budget. But with challenges mounted by the pandemic, Barrera said they would need at least 0 million more to reopen schools safely. "We'll need more staff, more nursing support, more counseling support, more custodial support to clean the classrooms regularly, and physical protective equipment for the staff," Barrera said. Barrera added, with less federal funding, the longer students will have to continue distance learning. But Marten said other factors also contribute to a full reopening come fall. "Starting school back up again, it's not going to be a flipping of a switch. It's a dimmer switch because there are different models. There's a money side to it, there's a health guideline side to it, and their personal preference side to it," Marten explained. Some students with compromised immune systems will continue to require robust distance learning. But the district's goal is to return to a mostly in-person teaching curriculum. "The whole country knows that we need our schools open," Marten said. "It gets the economy up and running again. It allows parents to go back to work. But more importantly, it gets kids the education they need so that there is not that additional learning loss that students have already endured because of this pandemic."State legislators have until June 15, 2020, to finalize the budget proposal. Based on that, the San Diego Unified School District will build its annual budget by June 30, 2020. 2445

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (AP) — A jury on Monday recommended the death penalty for a Southern California man convicted of killing a family of four with a sledgehammer and burying their bodies in shallow desert graves.Jurors in San Bernardino made the recommendation for Charles "Chase" Merritt, 62, in a case that puzzled investigators for years after a couple and their two young sons vanished from their home in 2010. Their bodies were found three years later.Merritt supported his head on his fists and closed his eyes as the verdicts were read. He also spoke briefly to his attorney.He was convicted this month of the murders of his former business associate Joseph McStay, McStay's wife Summer, and their 4- and 3-year-old sons, Gianni and Joseph Jr.Merritt had pleaded not guilty and his lawyers didn't offer witnesses during the penalty phase of his trial, insisting he is innocent.San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge Michael A. Smith set a Sept. 27 hearing to formally sentence Merritt. He thanked the jurors after the verdicts were read, saying he knew the decision was "extremely difficult."Authorities said they believed Merritt killed the family as McStay was cutting him out of his business making and selling custom water fountains. When the family disappeared, there were no signs of forced entry at their San Diego County home and their car was found parked at a strip mall near the Mexico border.For years, no one could figure out what happened to them. In 2013, their bodies were found in shallow graves in the desert after an off-road motorcyclist discovered skeletal remains in the area. Authorities also unearthed a rusty sledgehammer that they said was used to kill the family.Merritt was arrested the following year. Authorities said they traced his cellphone to the area of the desert graves in the days after the family disappeared and to a call seeking to close McStay's online bookkeeping account. Merritt also had referred to McStay in the past tense during an interview with investigators.Authorities concede the case against Merritt largely focused on circumstantial evidence and that questions remain about what happened at the McStay home.During the trial's penalty phase, prosecutor Britt Imes asked jurors to consider any possible motive for the killing of two young boys, whether they could have been witnesses to the murder of their parents or simply victims of callous killings."There is no motive that can be ascribed to the killer of a 4-year-old and a 3-year-old that passes muster," he said.Merritt's attorneys didn't call any witnesses during the penalty phase, instead appealing to any lingering doubts jurors may have had about killings they say their client didn't commit."From the very beginning, this case screamed doubt," defense attorney Raj Maline told jurors. "This case is filled with unanswered questions."California has not executed anyone since 2006. Voters approved a ballot measure to speed up executions in 2016, but Gov. Gavin Newsom this year placed a moratorium on executions while he's in office. 3072

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — The death toll from the wildfires raging on the West Coast stands at least 33, with authorities saying nearly all of the dozens of people reported missing after a devastating blaze in southern Oregon have been accounted for. The flames have destroyed neighborhoods, leaving a barren, gray landscape in their wake, driven tens of thousands of people from their homes and cast a shroud of smoke over the region. The crisis has come amid the coronavirus outbreak, the economic downturn and nationwide racial unrest that has led to protests in Portland for more than 100 days. 599

来源：资阳报