三明体检手术医院哪家较好(许昌部能做哪些检查) (今日更新中)

When the DNC originally announced that Ocasio-Cortez would only be granted a 60-second speech during the convention, progressive Democrats accused the party of attempting to silence them while granting more time to moderates and Republicans, like Colin Powell and John Kasich. Ocasio-Cortez responded by tweeting the words to "I only have a minute," a poem by Dr. Benjamin E. Mays. 381

WHY IT MATTERSCurrently, marijuana is classified as a Schedule 1 drug, the same ranking as heroin. While federal laws haven't prevented 15 states from legalizing recreational marijuana, it does impact businesses. For instance, businesses can't use banks like other companies. Businesses also remain at risk for federal prosecution. Additionally, the classification of cannabis as a Schedule 1 drug prevents taxes from being collected and research from taking place. Federal employees can still be fired for using marijuana if they fail various drug tests. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?While supporters have called Friday's vote "historic," for the moment, it is only symbolic. That's because Republicans control the United States Senate and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has repeatedly blocked any repeal or decriminalization legislation from taking place. The MORE Act will likely not even get a vote under McConnell's leadership, although anything is possible in Washington. WHAT COULD CHANGE? It is possible Democrats could take control of the Senate after the January 5 runoff elections in Georgia. That would give the MORE Act a chance at a vote on the Senate floor, but even then, current rules require 60 votes for passage. The odds of that remain slim. President-elect Joe Biden could, however, take action once he assumes office in January. The president-elect could provide more flexibility to federal employees to use marijuana. Biden could appoint an attorney general who has a hands-off approach. Biden also could pardon Americans with convictions while also attempting to reclassify the drug as a Schedule 3 or Schedule 4 drug with lesser penalties for use. 1670

While the Trump administration continues to give the Saudi explanation at least some benefit of the doubt, some of the US' longest-standing allies have been sharply critical of the Kingdom's version of events.British minister Dominic Raab said Sunday that the Saudi explanation of Khashoggi's death was not credible."The British government will want to see people held to account for that death," the minister for Brexit told the BBC's Andrew Marr show.Canada released a brief statement, calling Riyadh's statement into question."The explanations offered to date lack consistency and credibility," Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland said in a statement."We reiterate our call for a thorough investigation, in full collaboration with the Turkish authorities, and a full and rigorous accounting of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Khashoggi's death."Those responsible for the killing must be held to account and must face justice."U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was "deeply troubled" by the explanation, his spokesman said.And in a sharp rebuke, German Chancellor Angela Merkel rejected the Saudi statement, saying that her government expected "transparency in terms of death and background. Those responsible must be held accountable. The information given at the consulates in Istanbul is insufficient."The European Union, in a statement from its high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Federica Mogherini, said it insists on "the need for continued thorough, credible and transparent investigation, shedding proper clarity on the circumstances of the killing and ensuring full accountability of all those responsible for it." 1677

Witnesses told responding officers that they saw a driver dressed as Santa ditch his car after the crashes, leaving behind an injured passenger who was apparently ejected from the Crosstrek onto the street. 206

Yovanovitch, who testified that she had been removed from her post after a "campaign of disinformation" from the President's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, told lawmakers she felt threatened when she learned that Trump had said on his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that she was "going to go through some things.""I was shocked and devastated that I would feature in a phone call between two heads of state, in such a manner where President Trump said that I was 'bad news' to another world leader and that I would be going through some things," Yovanovitch said. "It was a terrible moment."While Yovanovitch's testimony is not directly tied to the freezing of aid and dangling of a White House meeting amid a push for Ukraine to open investigations into Trump's political opponents, Democrats say her removal marks the start of the shadow diplomacy campaign that sparked their impeachment inquiry into Trump and Ukraine.Trump's tweet draws immediate reactionDemocrats raised the notion that the President's tweet was another sign of witness intimidation -- an offense that could wind up included in potential articles of impeachment against the President."It may get to that," House Majority Whip James Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat, said when asked whether witness intimidation should be part of articles of impeachment.Rep. Eric Swalwell, a California Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said witness tampering "will be considered, if there's evidence of that," adding that he believed there was "strong evidence" of it.But the President's Republican defenders brushed off his tweet, blaming his frustration with Democrats."Look, the President has been frustrated with this relentless attack on him by the Democrats that started even before he was President. I think the American people can relate to the frustration," said Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan. "Democrats started in July 2016 with their crazy investigation and now they move into this, so I think that's what drives that."Rep. Lee Zeldin, a New York Republican who attended Friday's hearing, said the tweet was intended "to ensure that the entire story is getting out there," accusing Schiff of reading only part of the tweet to Yovanovitch.One Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, however, said the President shouldn't be attacking Yovanovitch."I disagree with the tweet," said Rep. Elise Stefanik, of New York. "I think Ambassador Yovanovitch is a public servant, like many of our public servants in the foreign service."White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham pushed back against accusations of witness intimidation."The tweet was not witness intimidation, it was simply the President's opinion, which he is entitled to," Grisham said in a statement. "This is not a trial, it is a partisan political process - or to put it more accurately, a totally illegitimate, charade stacked against the President. There is less due process in this hearing than any such event in the history of our country. It's a true disgrace."Trump's tweet included an accusation that Yovanovitch was to blame for problems in Somalia, which was her first foreign assignment, as well as claiming his "absolute right" to appoint ambassadors."Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a US President's absolute right to appoint ambassadors," Trump tweeted. "They call it 'serving at the pleasure of the President.' "Asked at the hearing to respond to the tweet, Yovanovitch said, "I mean, I don't think I have such powers, not in Mogadishu, Somalia, and not in other places."Ukraine policy 'hijacked'Democrats say Yovanovitch's ouster, which Trump directed following a smear campaign from Giuliani and his associates, set the stage for the push for Ukraine to investigate Trump's political rivals."The question before us is not whether Donald Trump could recall an American ambassador with a stellar reputation for fighting corruption in Ukraine, but why would he want to?" Schiff said in his opening statement."The powers of the presidency are immense, but they are not absolute and cannot be used for a corrupt purpose," added Schiff. "The American people expect their President to use the authority they grant him in the service of the nation, not to destroy others to advance his personal or political interests."Yovanovitch said Giuliani's accusations against her that led to her dismissal were false, including the notion that she had a "do not prosecute" list and that she had bad-mouthed the President to embassy officials. The effort, Yovanovitch said, showed that "foreign and corrupt interests apparently hijacked our Ukraine policy.""I do not understand Mr. Giuliani's motives for attacking me, nor can I offer an opinion on whether he believed the allegations he spread about me," Yovanovitch said. "Clearly, no one at the State Department did. What I can say is that Mr. Giuliani should have known those claims were suspect, coming as they reportedly did from individuals with questionable motives and with reason to believe that their political and financial ambitions would be stymied by our anti-corruption policy in Ukraine." 5318

来源：资阳报