玉溪正规医院无痛人流(玉溪哪家医院可以人流) (今日更新中)

A federal judge in Mississippi expressed deep skepticism on Tuesday about a state law that bans abortion as early as six weeks of pregnancy, sending a signal that attempts across the country to pass near total bans on abortion might not easily withstand judicial scrutiny.During a hearing, US District Judge Carlton Reeves expressed anger at times, especially over the fact that the law has no exception for rape or incest. He pointed out that six months ago he struck down a 15-week ban and the legislature responded with an even more restrictive law, suggesting the new law "smacks of defiance" to the court."You said, 'We can't do 15 weeks so by God we will do six weeks,'" Reeves said at one point. He then rhetorically asked if the state legislature would call a special session and then pass a four-week or two-week ban.Supporters of abortion rights say the law collides with Supreme Court precedent, violating a woman's right to seek an abortion prior to viability.The hearing comes as emboldened Republican-led states across the country are attempting to push through restrictive laws with the hope of overturning or cutting back on the landmark 1973 opinion, Roe v. Wade. Similar six-week bans have been introduced in 15 states although none are currently in effect.Last fall, Reeves struck down the Mississippi law that banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, holding that the state was "wrong on the law" and that its Legislature's "professed interest" in women's health amounted to "pure gaslighting."Tuesday, the judge also read out loud part of the Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, the decision which upheld the core holding of Roe v. Wade.Reeves asked if the Supreme Court had ever sustained a "previability" ban and he noted that sometimes a woman does not even know she is pregnant as early as six weeks.At the end of arguments, just before he said he would take the case under advisement, Reeves pressed the state on the fact that the law had no exception for rape or incest."So a child who is raped at 10 or 11 -- who has not revealed to her parents that the rape has occurred... the child must bring this fetus to term under the statute?" he asked.In court papers, Hillary Schneller of the Center for Reproductive Rights, representing the Jackson Women's Health Organization, said that at six weeks "no embryo is capable of surviving for a sustained period outside the womb, with or without medical intervention." She pointed out that women who are breastfeeding or who use hormonal contraceptives may not realize they have missed a period."The Supreme Court has reaffirmed many times over nearly 50 years, and as recently as 2016, that a woman has the right to decide whether to continue her pregnancy at any point before viability," said Schneller.The law is slated to go into effect on July 1. State officials, including Thomas E. Dobbs of the Mississippi State Health Office, say it was passed to further the state's interest in regulating the medical profession in order to "promote respect for life."They acknowledge Supreme Court precedent on viability but argue that once a fetal heartbeat is detected, the "chances of the fetus surviving to full term are 95%-98%."The law is meant to "prohibit procedures that destroy the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being," the officials say in court papers. It does not amount to a total ban on abortion in part because sometimes a fetal heartbeat is not detectable until as late as 12 weeks, particularly if an abdominal ultrasound is performed, they argue.Because the bill allows for exceptions, it can't be compared to previous opinions, Mississippi argues. Since 1992, the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals "has not decided a case involving a law which prohibited some but not all abortions, and has not considered a law that restricts abortions based on the existence of a fetal heartbeat or beyond a specific gestational age," the state says."Instead of banning abortion, S.B. 2116 regulates the time period during which abortions may be performed," the filing adds. "As such, it is akin to laws regulating the time, place, or manner of speech, which have been upheld as constitutional.Asked by Reeves about the fact that the Supreme Court has yet to down a previability law, a state lawyer responded in court by saying the '"fact that it hasn't happened yet" doesn't mean that it would not.Reeves displayed a keen understanding of the current composition of the court and even made clear that he had been paying attention last week when the conservative majority struck down some 40-year-old precedent in a case unrelated to abortion. He wondered out loud if that decision, and other recent ones where the conservatives struck precedent in the area of voting rights, campaign finance and labor unions should impact his thinking. 4861

A judge has upheld the Virginia governor's ban on all types of weapons at a pro-gun rally planned for next week. Gov. Ralph Northam had announced the ban on Wednesday as he declared a state of emergency over threats of “armed militia groups storming our Capitol." The judge's order Thursday came hours after the FBI announced the arrest of three alleged white supremacists in Maryland. Virginia's solicitor general told Richmond Circuit Court Judge Joi that law enforcement identified "credible evidence" that armed out-of-state groups planned to come to Virginia with the possible intention of participating in a "violent insurrection." The emergency, which was declared by executive order, will span Friday, January 17 at 5:00 p.m. until Tuesday, January 21 at 5:00 p.m.“Law enforcement intelligence analysts have identified credible threats of violence surrounding the event, along with white nationalist rhetoric and plans by out-of-state militia groups to attend,” said a statement from Northam’s office.Northam tweeted that the order was to protect citizens and lawmakers.“We support citizens’ rights to peacefully protest and express their views to their elected officials. But we must also keep the public, as well as those who work around Capitol Square, safe,” the governor tweeted.Northam, a Democrat elected in 2018, now enjoys partisan support from the Virginia House and Senate. Following the 2019 election, Democrats have the majority in the Virginia House of Delegates for the first time in more than two decades.With Democrats holding the bicameral legislature, there has been a push to enact gun control.While a bill to ban assault weapons was dropped earlier this week, other bills are still being considered. One is limiting the purchases of firearms to one a month.Earlier this month, Northam signed legislation to prohibit firearms inside of the Capitol building and adjacent legislative office building. The law does not prohibit guns from the grounds near the Capitol, which is why Northam signed an executive order for this weekend.The response to gun legislation in Virginia has been swift, prompting an expected protest for this weekend. Many counties in Virginia have enacted “second amendment sanctuary” laws, also in response to Democratic proposals. 2292

WASHINGTON -- Aileen is a dreamer – in other words, an immigrant who entered the United States illegally with her parents many years ago. “We came to the United States when I was about one year old. I was a little baby so when I say this is home, it is home for me,” Aileen said. Aileen says her family was trying to escape violence in Mexico. “They just wanted to make sure that I grew up in an environment that would help me thrive, and their decision was the United States,” Aileen said. Graduating second in her high school class, Aileen says she’s been able to experience opportunity her parents were never afforded. Now she hopes to help others, so she’s studying to become a mental health counselor. “I mean just waking up every day in a country that doesn’t want you here takes its toll,” Aileen said. In the Immigration Services office, she’s already using her education and expertise as a student employee. “A lot of the times students come in just wanting to vent,” Aileen said. Right now, Aileen and other DACA recipients say they’re experiencing a lot of anxiety as the Supreme Court deliberates on their fate. DACA – which stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – is an immigration policy that was established during the Obama Administration. Applicants who don’t have a serious criminal history can live and work legally in the U.S. for renewable two-year periods. However, the Trump Administration has been criticizing it for years, saying it’s unlawful. And now the Supreme Court is considering whether or not the program should continue. “It’s important to know that it’s never 100% known what the Supreme Court is going to decide,” attorney Jerry Lopez said. DACA recipients have been meeting with immigration attorneys trying to understand the impact the Supreme Court’s decision could have on their lives. Although a final decision isn’t expected until late spring or early summer of 2020. “The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case challenging the ability of President Trump to end DACA,” attorney David Fine said. David Fine is on the general counsel at MSU Denver. He’s been keeping a close eye on the Supreme Court proceedings. “Based on briefings I’ve received and the reports about oral argument that I’ve seen, my guess is the Supreme Court likely will uphold President Trump’s ability to end DACA, but the basis of that decision will be important,” Fine said. He says depending on what the court decides, current DACA students might be able to keep their status until their two years are up. Or, their status and protection could end immediately. “Technically yes, a DACA recipient could be deported after the program has ended,” Fine said. As the country waits for the Supreme Court’s decision, dreamers are trying to hold onto hope. If DACA is taken away, there’s still a chance congress could pass the DREAM Act, which would actually give dreamers a path to citizenship – something DACA can’t do. Aileen says she knows where she belongs, and she’s optimistic she will eventually get the documentation so many take for granted.“I’ve grown into the person I am now by being here in America, and I can’t even imagine like being in another country that doesn’t necessarily feel like home anymore,” Aileen said. 3269

@VerizonSupport @verizon Same here...mobile data works but can't make calls - all circuits busy. Rebooted phone, same result. https://t.co/UPwRS5cr6f— ??serendipity-blue?? (@lcd57) December 18, 2019 211

...We look forward to continuing our positive dialogue with China on a comprehensive Trade Deal, and feel that the future between our two countries will be a very bright one!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 1, 2019 237

来源：资阳报