玉溪哪可以做无痛人流玉溪做无痛人流,玉溪可靠的无痛人流价格,玉溪怀孕三个月打胎多少钱,玉溪那家医院人流好点,玉溪哪家医院可以引产,玉溪人流专业的医院,玉溪怀孕去哪里人流医院好

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- It’s one of San Diego’s most iconic parks, but there’s a push to change its name and possibly everything it stands for.In September, two very different sides clashed at Chicano Park. The clash required police to break it up.The park is the heart of Barrio Logan and its murals are a colorful reminder of its history.Jorge Gonzales says it’s symbolic of the civil rights movement of the 70s. “These murals tell the story of the Civil Rights era. Right? That went far and beyond Barrio Logan and Chicano Park,” said Gonzales.Five people questioned that history in September at what was called the Patriotic Picnic.Police had to protect them from dozens of people who surrounded them in protest. “The murals are revolutionary. They're anti-American,” said activist Roger Ogden.Ogden was at the picnic and says political radicals and militants run Chicano Park. “It shouldn't be called Chicano Park. They could call it Hispanic Park, Latino Park and celebrate all the Hispanics and not just the militants. If you go down there and wave the US Flag, if I go down there I'm probably going to get beat up.”Ogden and several others shared the video from the picnic and their thoughts with the San Diego City Council on Tuesday.“You can celebrate the Hispanic culture but it should be broader and more inclusive. A lot of Hispanics wouldn't want to be called Chicano because it has a militant aspect to it,” said Ogden.Gonzales says the patriotic picnickers need to have a conversation with someone who understands the murals and who can translate the stories behind the paint.“I think there's a lot of miseducation. People have eyes and love for this park,” said Gonzales.That conversation could become another colorful reminder of the park’s history. 1771

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Kristin Elliott is CEO of Precision Engineering in Vista, a company that creates water quality sensors for oceans and lakes, "we sell these to universities around the world, work with Scripps Institution of Oceanography," Elliott described.Her work is her passion but so is her team, so when the pandemic hit she said it was her goal not to layoff any employees, taking a pay cut so her team could stay paid."We wanted to save our team through this," she said. Then, there was the announcement kids would be returning to school online."We have this space that we're not gonna be utilizing because no one's having in-person conferences, we're all over zoom these days," turning the room into a classroom. "It's large enough to fit 3 or 4 kids and that's exactly the number of kids we have with our employees. We're going to have a little reading area where kids can switch places to relax and reset. All the things you can normally find in a classroom, a bookshelf with all the interests they might have." Elliott even went to great lengths, hiring an accredited teacher's assistance to help."It's definitely a relief. I know they were just thinking about homeschooling and working, trying to manage that. There's so many emotions involved and so much anxiety and stress, and my goal was to reduce that for our employees."Elliott has followed all CDC protocols and guidelines for her 15 employees working in office, and she'll do the same when their kids come fall."We're still getting the room set up because we want to ensure social distancing between the children and the teacher. We're also bringing in the PPE that the CDC is requiring and kind of recommending for opening these." 1712

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Law enforcement agencies across San Diego County must comply with a new law designed to increase transparency of police misconduct.Senate Bill 1421 requires departments to release records of officer-involved shootings and major uses of force, officer dishonesty and confirmed cases of sexual assault to the public.Earlier this year several police associations in San Diego County sued to block the release of records, arguing Senate Bill 1421 doesn’t contain any express provision or language requiring retro-activity or any clear indication that the legislature intended the statue to operate retroactively.They claimed the bill eliminates the longstanding statutory confidentiality of specified peace officer or custodial officer personnel records.In March a judge ruled the bill applies retroactively to all personnel records of peace officers not only now but before January 1, 2019.The Judge ruled no records could be released before March 29 giving the unions time to appeal if they want. It does not appear any have appealed.Some agencies tell 10News they plan to start releasing records this week.10News is still waiting to hear from other local agencies about when they are planning to release records. 1238

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — In a scientific 10News/Union-Tribune poll, 500 adults were surveyed on their thoughts on the response to the coronavirus thus far.Adults were asked whether they trusted news about the virus coming from government officials and media, and if they've started to stockpile supplies in response.Overall, a majority of San Diegans surveyed are concerned about the virus, but many also believe the government is making it seem less dangerous while the media is making it seem more dangerous.Most San Diegans who participated also say they have not started to stockpile supplies like toilet paper and hand sanitizer in response.Here's a look at some of the survey's results:How concerned are you about the coronavirus?Extremely: 23 percentSomewhat: 38 percentOn The Fence: 14 percentNot Very Concerned: 19 percentNot At All Concerned: 6 percentNot Sure: 1 percentBased on what you know, do you believe each of the following is telling the truth about the coronavirus? Making the coronavirus seem more dangerous than it actually is? Or making the coronavirus seem less dangerous than it actually is?The World Health Organization, or WHO, in Switzerland:Telling The Truth: 48 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 30 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 7 percentNot Sure: 15 percentThe US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, in Atlanta:Telling The Truth: 47 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 29 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 12 percentNot Sure: 12 percentPresident Donald Trump: Telling The Truth: 22 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 16 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 47 percentNot Sure: 15 percentState health officials:Telling The Truth: 39 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 33 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 13 percentNot Sure: 16 percentGovernor Gavin Newsom:Telling The Truth: 29 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 26 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 10 percentNot Sure: 35 percentNational news media:Telling The Truth: 22 percentMaking It Seem More Dangerous: 64 percentMaking It Seem Less Dangerous: 5 percentNot Sure: 9 percentDo you support or oppose the use of Marine Corp Air Station Miramar as a place to quarantine those who have or may have been exposed to the coronavirus?Support: 57 percentOppose: 22 percentNot Sure: 21 percentAs a result of the coronavirus, have you ... Bought extra hand sanitizer?Yes: 28 percentNo: 72 percentBought extra toilet paper?Yes: 16 percentNo: 84 percentBegun to stockpile non-perishable food items?Yes: 14 percentNo: 86 percent 2554

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — In a scientific 10News/Union-Tribune poll, more than half of respondents said they supported California's Proposition 13.At least 51 percent of 907 respondents said they intend to vote "yes" for the proposition. Another 32 percent said they plan to vote "no," and 17 percent were not sure how they would vote yet. If passed, Proposition 13 would authorize the state to issue billion in bonds for repairs, construction, and modernization at public preschools, K-12 schools, community colleges, and universities.RELATED: Everything you need to know about Proposition 13Under the bond, billion would be used for preschool and K-12 schools, billion will go to universities, and billion will be used for community colleges.In total, the California Legislative Analyst says the state would pay billion in total, after billion in interest, over 35 years. The analysis also shows the proposition could cost taxpayers an additional 0 million per year for 35 years.Here's how those bonds would fund California education: billion for preschool and K-12.8 billion for new construction of school facilities.2 billion for modernization of school facilities0 million for providing school facilities to charter schools0 million for facilities for career and technical education programs billion for universities billion for capital outlay financing needs of the California State Universities billion for capital outlay financing needs of the University of California and Hastings College of LawCommunity colleges billion billion for capital outlay financing needs of community colleges 1643