宜宾隆鼻的医院宜宾眼睑重睑术,宜宾双眼皮恢复过程,宜宾隆鼻针多少钱,宜宾哪家韩式双眼皮好,宜宾激光开眼角,宜宾胡子脱毛,宜宾开眼角图片

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Republicans in Congress have one final option to challenge the 2020 presidential election outcome. Still, an expert from UC San Diego says it's "entirely impossible" that it would succeed.On Jan. 6, both houses of Congress will meet to vote on the Electoral College results. It's a Constitutional formality that gives Congress the ultimate, final say in who will be the next president."Normally, this is what marks an election as over," says UC San Diego Political Science Department Chair Thad Kousser. "But with this year, everything is different."If one Representative and one Senator object to the Electoral College results during that vote, both houses have to go to their separate chambers and vote on the objection. If both agree to the objection, electoral votes can be thrown out.Alabama Republican Rep. Mo Brooks has already said he will object. He's looking for a Senator to join him."In my judgment, if only lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens are counted, President Trump handily won the electoral college and a second term as president," Brooks said in a speech to the House of Representatives on Dec 3.In that speech, he claimed, without presenting evidence, that millions of non-citizens voted in the election in several states."As such, it is my duty, under the U.S. Constitution, on January 6th, if the required one Senator will join me, to object to and later vote to reject electoral college submissions from states whose election systems are so badly flawed as to render their vote submissions unreliable, untrustworthy, and unworthy of acceptance," he said.Even if he files the objection, Kousser says it's just a political stunt."It's entirely impossible that the Democratic-controlled House will object to (electoral votes)," says Kousser. "And it's very unlikely the Republican-held Senate will as well."Kousser says moderate Republicans in the Senate, like Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney, and Susan Collins, have already said they won't vote to reject electoral results.Kousser believes Brooks' objection and any support it receives is a way to pander to outgoing President Trump, who still has control over a large following and can impact future Republican elections.Kousser says it would also lay the groundwork for another four years of political divisiveness in Washington, D.C."It's really about partisan gain," he says. "I think you have one side that wants to use every tool in its toolbox to de-legitimize the winner of this election, no matter what the costs."Democrats in the House filed similar objections in 2001, 2005, and 2017. None were voted upon.Earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Republicans not to file objections. But Brooks has said he still plans to pursue the challenge. 2784

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - San Diego Police officers were forced to abandon a pursuit Tuesday after learning a child was in the suspect's vehicle.The pursuit began after the suspect rear-ended an SDPD vehicle along 17th Street downtown around 1 p.m., according to police. The officer in the vehicle hit was fine.Police pursued the driver but terminated the pursuit after learning a child was in the car.SDPD ran the suspect's plates and found the vehicle was also stolen. During the pursuit, the suspect's vehicle collided with at least one other vehicle - losing the front right tire.No injuries were reported.The vehicle was abandoned in the 1300 block of Angelus Ave. in Lemon Grove. Police have yet to locate the suspect.The owner of the vehicle told 10News the car was stolen from Lakeside two days ago. He said he and his 12-year-old son worked on the vehicle as a project together. 943

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — San Diego District Attorney Summer Stephan is objecting to the early release of a man convicted of driving off the Coronado Bridge and crashing in Chicano Park, killing four people.Richard Anthony Sepolio, 27, was convicted of four counts of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and one count of DUI causing injury in the crash on Oct. 15, 2016. He was sentenced to nine years and eight months in prison. He is set to be released early after serving two years and 10 months of his sentence. Monday, the CDCR notified victims in the case of the release, citing prison credits for good behavior and the state's policy on release amid COVID-19. Stephan wrote a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), calling the release a "miscarriage of justice.""This very early release is unconscionable," Stephan wrote. "CDCR’s decision is re-victimizing the family and friends of the four people killed and seven injured who have been devastated by their loss and continue to deal with the financial, emotional, mental and physical trauma caused by the defendant. This inmate continues to deny and minimize the crime by refusing to admit he was speeding and denying being impaired while arguing with his girlfriend on the phone, which resulted in the devastating crash."The crash killed Annamarie Contreras, 50, and Cruz Contreras, 52, of Chandler, Ariz.; and Hacienda Heights residents Andre Banks, 49, and Francine Jimenez, 46. Seven other people were also seriously injured.Sepolio was traveling between 81 and 87 miles per hour when he lost control and plunged over the bridge, landing in the park below where a motorcycle rally had attracted nearly 1,000 people, according to Stephan. Sepolio had testified that another vehicle would not let him over into the left-hand lane, so he sped up twice to pass before the crash occurred. 1912

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — San Diego officials will request that Gov. Gavin Newsom discount coronavirus cases in San Diego State students from the county's case rate.Supervisor Greg Cox said the county will send a letter to the governor formally asking that the state not include SDSU's case numbers in the county's total coronavirus case rate.Gov. Newsom said during a press conference Wednesday that he will not allow San Diego County to do that."You can't isolate, as if it's on an island, the campus community that is part of a larger community. So the answer is no," Newsom said in regards to whether he would consider a special exemption for the county.RELATED: San Diego County could backslide to more coronavirus-related restrictionsTuesday, County Public Health Officer Wilma Wooten said during a Board of Supervisors meeting that if the campus' cases were removed from the equation, the county's case rate would be lower.As of Monday, SDSU reported 667 confirmed cases and nine probable cases.According to county Medical Director Dr. Eric McDonald, less than 10 coronavirus cases have been directly linked to the campus. Of those, McDonald said three cases are county residents with direct connections with SDSU students and four non-county residents with direct connections to students.McDonald added that the county is aware of four residential outbreaks related to SDSU students in the College Area, but there have not been any other outbreaks in other settings related to students."The reality is, the number of cases in ICU and hospitalizations is not being impacted because of those cases from SDSU," Cox said. "We think there's justification for not including those numbers from SDSU and, frankly, other campuses in San Diego as they reopen."San Diego County public health officials voice worried that the region could be moved back a tier after registering at least one week's worth of data in California's most stringent reopening tier.While the county's testing positivity has sat in the third tier (orange) for two weeks now, in the last week, the county's case rate has crossed above the 7.0 cases per 100,000 residents threshold. Wednesday, county health officials said the region was at a 4.5% testing positivity and 7.9 cases per 100,000 people.Under the state's guidance, a county only needs to register above a threshold in at least one metric for two weeks to be pushed back a tier, while to move up, the county needs to meet both metrics for 14 consecutive days."At a minimum, counties must remain in a tier for at least 3 weeks before moving forward ... To move forward, a county must meet the next tier’s criteria for two consecutive weeks. If a county’s metrics worsen for two consecutive weeks, it will be assigned a more restrictive tier," the state's website says.If San Diego is required to move back to California's first business reopening tier, businesses would need to adjust to more restrictive capacity levels. More detailed information by county and business type can be found at https://covid19.ca.gov/safer-economy. 3060

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- San Diego County’s District Attorney Monday warned of price gouging amid the coronavirus. During a declared state of emergency, it’s illegal for a business to increase prices for essential goods or services by more than 10 percent. The only exception is if businesses can prove their own costs have increased. On March 4, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency throughout California. RELATED: Santa Clara County announces first coronavirus deathThe San Diego County Board of Supervisors also extended a state of emergency for an additional 30 days on February 19. “We want county residents to know that we stand ready to protect their consumer rights under the law,” District Attorney Summer Stephan said. “We will strictly enforce violations related to price gouging.”Violations of the price gouging statute could face up to a year in prison and a fine of up to ,000. "We're going to go out when we get citizen complaints and provide them notice and explain to them what the law is," said Damon Mosler, Chief of the Economic Crimes Division for the DA's office. "then we're going to monitor them if they continue to do that, we're going to charge them with a crime."RELATED: Grand Princess cruise ship passengers to be quarantined at MCAS Miramar amid coronavirusIt’s also a misdemeanor for a hotel or motel to increase regular rates by more than 10 percent during a declared emergency. "Do not take advantage of people during the time of crisis or perceived crisis," said Mosler. "The idea is for us to all work together and hopefully get through this very difficult situation."Check the list below for items that are covered under the law: Food and drink, including for animalsEmergency supplies like water, flashlights, radios, batteries, candles, blankets, soaps, diapers, toiletriesMedical supplies such as prescription and nonprescription drugs, bandages, gauze, isopropyl alcohol, and antibacterial productsThe public can report suspected price gouging to the District Attorney’s Consumer Protection Unit at (619) 531-3507 or to the California Attorney General’s Office here.Mosler said at least one case of suspected price gouging is being investigated in San Diego. 2221