Ê×Ò³ ÕýÎÄ

APPÏÂÔØ

Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò˱öÄļҺÃ(Ò˱ö¿ªÄÚÑ۽ǻáÁô°ÌÂð) (½ñÈÕ¸üÐÂÖÐ)

¿´µã
2025-06-02 01:57:16
È¥AppÌýÓïÒô²¥±¨
´ò¿ªAPP
¡¡¡¡

Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò˱öÄļҺÃ-¡¾Ò˱öº«ÃÀÕûÐΡ¿£¬yibihsme,Ò˱öÄı߿ªË«ÑÛÆ¤ºÃ,Ò˱ö¼¤¹âÍÑë»áÌÛÂð,Ò˱ö²»¿ªÑ۽ǵÄË«ÑÛÆ¤,Ò˱ö²£ÄòËᡱǼ۸ñ¸ßÂð,Ò˱öÎüµñË«ÑÛÆ¤ÊÖÊõ¹ý³Ì,Ò˱öÀ­Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò½ÔºÄÄÀï±È½ÏºÃ

¡¡¡¡Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò˱öÄļҺà ¡¡¡¡

In late September, after racist slurs were found on the message boards of five black cadet candidates at the Air Force Academy Preparatory School, the school's superintendent was angry.Lt. Gen. Jay Silveria told cadets to line up and pull out their phones to remember his message, and he forcefully denounced racism and intolerance."If you're outraged by those words, then you're in the right place. That kind of behavior has no place at the Prep School," Silveria said.The speech was posted on Air Force Academy's Facebook page and quickly went viral. The Air Force launched an internal investigation to find the culprit.But on Tuesday, Air Force Academy officials said that one of the black cadet candidates actually wrote the racist messages."We can confirm that one of the cadet candidates who was allegedly targeted by racist remarks written outside their dorm room was actually responsible for the act," the Academy said in a written statement. "The individual admitted responsibility and this was validated by the investigation."The vandalism was written in black marker on a dorm whiteboard with the phrase "go home (expletive)."Lt. Col. Allen Herritage, director of public affairs with the Academy, said that the cadet responsible admitted his guilt when confronted. The individual has "received administrative punishment" and is no longer at the preparatory school, Herritage said.The four other students that were the target of the vandalism are still at the Prep School, which is on the same campus in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the Air Force Academy. The Prep School helps ready about 240 cadets each year to enter the academy.'This is our institution'Silveria, the Academy's superintendent, made clear in his speech in September that there would be no tolerance for racist rhetoric at the Academy."If you can't treat someone from another gender, whether that's a man or a woman, with dignity and respect, then you need to get out," he said. "If you demean someone in any way, then you need to get out. And if you can't treat someone from another race or different color skin with dignity and respect, then you need to get out.""This is our institution, and no one can take away our values," Silveria added. "No one can write on a board and question our values. No one can take that away from us."Although the hateful graffiti was revealed to be a hoax, the Air Force Academy affirmed that same message of dignity respect in a statement on Tuesday."Racism has no place at the Academy, in any shape or form. We will continue to create a climate of dignity and respect for all, encourage ideas that do so, and hold those who fail to uphold these standards accountable."Silveria said in a statement on Tuesday that his speech remained relevant despite the investigation's outcome."Regardless of the circumstances under which those words were written, they were written, and that deserved to be addressed," he said. "You can never overemphasize the need for a culture of dignity and respect and those who don't understand those concepts aren't welcome here."The-CNN-Wire 3091

¡¡¡¡Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò˱öÄļҺà ¡¡¡¡

INDIANAPOLIS -- Former Subway pitchman and convicted child predator Jared Fogle is continuing his quest to be released from prison early ¨C most recently by asking a federal judge allow him to withdraw his guilty plea.Fogle pleaded guilty in 2015 to federal charges of conspiracy to distribute/receive child pornography and of traveling to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor. He also agreed, as part of his plea, to pay 0,000 each to fourteen unnamed juvenile victims as restitution.Judge Tanya Walton-Pratt sentenced Fogle to serve more than 15 years in prison on the charges. Fogle has been serving that sentence at the federal penitentiary in Englewood, Colorado.Since his sentencing, however, Fogle has filed dozens of motions seeking to have his sentence either reduced or thrown out altogether.Last month, Fogle, who is now representing himself in the case, argued that Pratt ¡°has bias¡± against him because she was the mother of two teenage daughters at the time of his sentencing. That claim was easily disproven, though: Pratt has only one daughter, and said daughter was 24 at the time Fogle pleaded guilty.Fogle¡¯s most consistent claim ¨C which he has repeated in multiple filings and is now pursuing in two separate cases (Fogle v. Walton-Pratt et al and Fogle v. USA) ¨C is that he was wrongfully allowed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge in the case. Fogle contends that no such charge exists under federal law.Fogle¡¯s claim appears to stem from a reading of the statute under which he was sentenced ¨C 18 U.S. Code ¡ì 2252(a)(2) ¨C that overlooks or ignores a latter passage that states, ¡°Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years¡­¡±Fogle, as noted in the plea agreement he signed, is accused of conspiring to violate paragraph (2) of subsection (a).In a filing to the court on March 5, Fogle excerpts section (a) of the statute, while omitting section (b) entirely.In another filing under his ¡°conspiracy¡± argument, Fogle included portions of letters between former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and former Republican U.S. Rep. Karl M. Le Compte dated 1946 ¨C along with a portion of the Communist Control Act of 1954.Fogle also included portions of a transcript from the 2016 United States v. Frank Edwin Pate case in which he appears to have underlined sections containing language about ¡°aiding and abetting.¡± Pate ¨C who is incarcerated at the same prison as Fogle on a 2015 conviction for wire and mail fraud ¨C was ultimately unsuccessful in that case.Although Fogle asks the court to ¡°take judicial notice¡± of the facts presented in his filing, he does not make clear what, if anything, he believes the information presented within has to do with his case ¨C nor is it immediately apparent.A previous attempt by Fogle to appeal his sentence in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago was rejected by the court, which dismissed Fogle¡¯s arguments in June 2016 as ¡°unpersuasive.¡±In addition to Judge Pratt, Fogle¡¯s request on Monday for immediate release and a hearing on the constitutionality of the charges he pleaded guilty to was also addressed to the warden of the Englewood Federal Correctional Institute and to President Donald Trump. It was not made clear in the filing what, if anything, he hoped President Trump could do for him. 3436

¡¡¡¡Ë«ÑÛÆ¤Ò˱öÄļҺà ¡¡¡¡

It took Congress almost nine months, but they have finally agreed on another stimulus pkg. The deal provides a one-time stimulus check, extends the eviction mortarium another month, and adds an additional 0 supplemental to extended unemployment benefits.In total, it¡¯s a 0 billion plan that now protects roughly 40 million Americans from potentially being evicted from their homes and prevents 12 million Americans from losing out on unemployment benefits.¡°It is a success and a win because that won¡¯t happen,¡± said Stephanie Freed, ¡°Beyond that, it¡¯s not much of a win.¡±Stephanie Freed is among millions of Americans who are unemployed and have already expired out of unemployment benefits. Under the new deal, she will be able to now apply for unemployment again and will be eligible for the additional 0 weekly supplemental. However, even with reinstated and slightly higher benefits, it will still be a struggle to get by.¡°The 0 is half of what people needed to survive, and the bigger problem is that it is not retroactive,¡± said Freed. ¡°There has been five months with no additional benefit, state UI is not a livable wage.¡±Freed has created an online organization called ExtendPUA in order to help others who are also struggling with unemployment during the pandemic. There are members of Extend PUA that have been getting as little as a week in unemployment benefits since the 0 federal supplemental dropped off in July.Grant McDonald is the co-founder of Extend PUA and knows firsthand that state unemployment benefits alone are not enough to survive. Like many, he has had to drain his savings and take on significant debt to just keep him barely afloat.¡°Personally, I have not kept up with the number because I have just been trying to keep up with it all,¡± said McDonald. ¡°I am just trying to pay as much as I can and watch my savings slowly disappear.¡±In the latest stimulus package, Congress did agree on a 0 stimulus check that some say could help with debt accumulated.¡°I think 0 is what rich people think poor people think is a lot of money, when in reality, that additional 0 plus the 0, one-time, is not going to help anyone pay any of the accumulated debts,¡± McDonald added.For Freed, McDonald, and the thousands of unemployed people who have reached out to Extend PUA, the new stimulus deal is something, but nothing close to what they¡¯ve been waiting nearly nine months for.¡°We understand there are some wins here but mostly it means that we have to keep fighting,¡± said Freed.The Biden administration has called this latest package a ¡°down payment¡± to the American people, signaling an expectation for yet another more robust stimulus deal. Members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, have also mentioned a need for another stimulus deal soon. However, similar messaging was heard after the passage of the CARES Act, and then it took nearly nine months to see a significantly smaller relief package. 2965

¡¡¡¡

In post-Brexit Britain, trips to the European Union will get a little more expensive for millions of Brits in search of a continental break.The European Commission confirmed on Friday that UK travelers will be required fill out an online form and cough up €7 (.90) for visa-free travel, which will be valid for three years.Natasha Bertaud, a spokeswoman for the commission's President Jean-Claude Juncker, likened the "simple form" to the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) scheme used by the United States -- which requires travelers to pay to apply for permission to enter the country.She also pointed out that the EU's version, called ETIAS, will be "way cheaper."But this all comes with a major caveat. If the UK crashes out of the EU with no agreement in place, Brits will be required to get a visa to travel to the EU, a commission spokeswoman told Reuters on Friday.ETIAS, which is expected to come into force in 2021, will apply to countries outside the EU whose citizens can currently travel in Europe visa free. There are currently 61 such countries, including the United States, Israel and Singapore.It will cover the so-called Schengen group of 26 European countries that share largely open land borders.The electronic visa waiver system was conceived to "identify any security or irregular migratory risks posed by visa-exempt visitors traveling to the Schengen area while at the same time facilitate crossing frontiers for the vast majority of travelers who do not pose such risks,"?according to the commission. 1554

¡¡¡¡

In yet another aggressive attempt to bypass federal appeals courts, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to hear a challenge to President Donald Trump's policy that bars most transgender individuals from military service.The policy, first announced by the President in July 2017 via Twitter and later officially released by Secretary of Defense James Mattis, blocks individuals who suffer from a condition known as gender dysphoria from serving with limited exceptions. It also specifies that individuals without the condition can serve but only if they do so according to the sex they were assigned at birth.District courts across the country have so far blocked the policy from going into effect. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in one challenge earlier this fall and the DC Circuit will hear arguments in early December.On Friday, Solicitor General Noel Francisco filed petitions asking the justices to take up the issue in three separate cases that are still in lower courts so it could be decided definitively this term. Francisco argues that lower court rulings imposing nationwide injunctions are wrong and warrant immediate review.He writes because of the injunctions, "the military has been forced to maintain that prior policy for nearly a year" despite a determination by Mattis and a panel of experts that the "prior policy, adopted by (Defense Secretary Ash Carter), posed too great a risk to military effectiveness and lethality."House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi vowed to "fight this discriminatory action" in a statement Saturday."The President's ban is a cruel and arbitrary decision designed to humiliate transgender Americans who have stepped forward to serve our country," she added. "This bigoted ban weakens our military readiness and our country, and shows this president's stunning lack of loyalty to those who risk all to defend our freedoms."Earlier in the month, the Department of Justice warned the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that it planned to ask for emergency relief to lift the nationwide injunction.The filing comes after Chief Justice John Roberts and Trump got into a public dispute about the independence of the judiciary this week. Roberts issued a rare statement on Wednesday criticizing the President for calling one lower court judge who ruled against him an "Obama judge." The President responded via Twitter criticizing Roberts and accusing the American judiciary of undermining national security.Under normal circumstances, the Supreme Court does not like to take up an issue before it has made its way through the lower courts. The justices like to have issues percolate below so that they can benefit from the opinions of lower court judges.Francisco has moved aggressively at times to get cases before a Supreme Court that is more solidly conservative with the addition of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.Francisco asked the justices to step in to review the lower court's decision in a case related to the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. He also asked them to review an adverse lower court opinion blocking the proposed phase-out of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. 3198

À´Ô´£º×ÊÑô±¨

·ÖÏíÎÄÕµ½
˵˵ÄãµÄ¿´·¨...
A-
A+
ÈÈÃÅÐÂÎÅ

Ë­ÖªµÀÒ˱ö¼¤¹âìî°ßÄÄÀï×öµÄºÃ

Ò˱ö³£ÖÝÏßµñ¡±Ç

Ò˱öÄļÒË«ÑÛÆ¤Ò½Ôº×ö×îºÃ

Ò˱öÀ­Ë«ÑÛÆ¤´ó¸Å¼Û¸ñ

Ò˱öÄÚË«×öÄÄÖÖË«ÑÛÆ¤ÊÖÊõ

Ò˱öÄļÒ¡±ÇÒªºÃ

Ò˱ö¸îË«ÑÛÆ¤ÄļҺõã

Ò˱öÖ¬·¾Â¡ÐضàÉÙÇ®

Ò˱öÕûÈÝ¡±ÇÒª¶àÉÙÇ®

Ò˱öÔõôÄܳ¹µ×ÍÑë

Ò˱ö¸îË«ÑÛÆ¤ÐÞ¸´¼Û¸ñ

Ò˱öÕûË«ÑÛÆ¤Ò»°ã¶àÉÙÇ®

Ò˱öß®í¶É½¿ªË«ÑÛÆ¤

Ò˱öÀ­Ë«ÑÛÆ¤¼Û¸ñ

Ò˱öÒ¸ÏÂÔõÑùÍÑë

Ò˱ö¿ªË«ÑÛÆ¤Ê²Ã´Ò½ÔººÃ

Ò˱öË«ÑÛÆ¤¼ÛǮһÀÀ±í

Ò˱öÂñÏß·¨¸îË«ÑÛÆ¤

Ò˱ö¿ªÑÛ½ÇÃÀÈÝÒ½Ôº

Ò˱ö¼ÙÌå·áÐØÐèÒª¶àÉÙÇ®

Ò˱öÊÖÊõ¿ªË«ÑÛÆ¤±£³Öʱ¼ä

Ò˱ö×ÔÌåÈí¹Ç¡±ÇµÄ¼Û¸ñ

Ò˱öÂñÏßË«ÑÛÆ¤ÊÖÊõÄĺÃ

Ò˱ö±ÇÁºÌ®Ëú×ö΢Õû¿ÉÒÔÂð

Ò˱öÄÚË«¸îË«ÑÛÆ¤×ÔÈ»Âð

Ò˱öË«ÑÛÆ¤Ñ¹Ïß