宜宾哪里开双眼皮好宜宾哪家医院整双眼皮好,宜宾脱毛激光好还是冰点好,宜宾硅胶丰胸要多少钱,宜宾线雕隆鼻子,宜宾哪家医院做双眼皮好,宜宾麦格假体隆鼻,宜宾光子嫩肤整形美容医院

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Thousa---nds of businesses across California have permanently closed their doors due to the COVID-19 pandemic.According to Yelp's local economic report, restaurants and retail continue to struggle, and total closures nationwide have started to increase.The September report noted more than 19,000 businesses in California have permanently closed."The states with the most closures are home to the hardest-hit metros: Las Vegas in Nevada, Honolulu in Hawaii, and several of the largest California urban areas all are among the metro areas with the highest total closure and permanent closure rates (San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Los Angeles and others), with roughly 20 businesses per thousand temporarily or permanently closing their doors since March 1," the report stated.The report said professional services and solo proprietors generally have been able to weather the storm and maintain a relatively low fraction of closures since March 1."Small business, the one thing you know for sure is you're going to have to adapt and figure out real quick what you have to do no matter what comes your way," said AJ Williams, of Hammonds Gourmet Ice Cream.Williams said he remembers the exact moment he learned about the initial stay at home order."I saw the news flash come across and immediately told my entire staff, hey, in the middle of a shift, shut the doors and close things down," he said.Williams said he kept Hammonds Gourmet Ice Cream closed for the first few weeks of the stay at home order. As an essential business, he was able to slowly reopen with new restrictions and safety measures in place.Through a steady stream of customers and some cost-cutting measures, Williams has been able to keep the lights on."If you compare it to when COVID-19 started, we're doing great," he said. "If you compare it to where we were last year, not so great."Williams considers himself lucky. Not every business has survived."We've lost permanently now 13 percent of our businesses," said Jason Wells, executive director of the San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce. "That's about 97 businesses."Wells explained that COVID is having an impact on the border businesses, but in that region, it’s the border restrictions put in place because of COVID that's keeping tens of thousands of shoppers from doing business.In March, the United States restricted all non-essential travel across its borders. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), "non-essential" travel includes travel that is considered tourism or recreational in nature.On Twitter, acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf released a statement saying, "We continue to work with our Canadian and Mexican partners to slow the spread of COVID-19. Accordingly, we have agreed to extend the limitation of non-essential travel at our shared land ports of entry through October 21.”Wells said if the government extends the restrictions, it could have dire consequences."If those restrictions aren't lifted in October, more than half of our 786 businesses are at risk just because of the sheer dependence we have on the holiday season and the Mexican shopper," Wells said.Businesses OpeningWhile some businesses are struggling to not close, there are others in California opening for the first time."When this thing happened (Coronavirus), I decided it was time to go out on my own and go for it," said Colin Duncan, owner of Colin's Barber Shop. "Take all my savings and just see what happens."Duncan said he got the keys to what's now Colin's Barber Shop in San Luis Obispo at the end of March. He opened in June and hasn't looked back."It’s been a roller coaster that's for sure," Duncan said. "It's pretty scary, but we've managed to make it work".The city of San Luis Obispo said after reviewing the entire list of business licenses from March to the present, there have been 108 new businesses, 67 of those are commercial, and 41 operate from home. 3935

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - This week, Team 10 was given an exclusive look inside a controversial nonprofit North County horse rescue, after it announced in April it was shutting down. 10News Investigative Reporter Jennifer Kastner interviewed the founder, who claims that both she and the horses are victims in this tragic ending.“I've always said I thought this should be a movie or a show because it's more dramatic than anything you see on television,” says Michelle Cochran of HiCaliber Horse Rescue in Valley Center.RELATED: Questions of fraud and abuse at prominent horse rescue in San Diego CountyWith her “f-bombs”, tattoos and piercings, Cochran is the black sheep of horse rescue. Yet beneath the tough exterior, she feels crippled over the fate of her highly criticized nonprofit. Even after announcing its closure in April, Cochran says she is still overwhelmed by cyberbullies who track her every move.“[They want to know] where I'm going, what I'm doing, how I’m doing it and what I'm dressed like. Did I gain weight? Did I lose weight? What does my makeup look like? My teeth? Did I get a nose job? A boob job? Nothing is off limits," she explains.Just this Thursday, 10News saw a meme posted on Facebook, attacking Cochran.10News’ first visit to HiCaliber Horse Rescue was in February when Cochran was embroiled in accusations of fraud and abuse. She would post videos at horse auctions, begging for money to buy sickly livestock that she said would otherwise ship to slaughterhouses in Mexico. After collecting donations, horses would come home with her. Some would be rehabilitated. Others were shot.“You're accused of buying horses that can't be saved, raising money to save them and then shooting them,” we told her in February. She replied, “It costs money to save them. It costs money to diagnose them. It costs money to haul them. It costs money to get their body removed."Gunshot euthanasia is legal in California. Cochran claims it's cheap, quick, easiest on horses, and more compassionate than sending them to slaughter. However, her critics have ripped her apart for her practices and the property's conditions.In February, horse trainer Abby Kogler told us, “We’re against getting horses from the abusers and then taking trusting people's money who think they're saving horses from this nonexistent slaughter pipeline and then they're just put down.”Despite arguments from some people that Cochran was stealing donor money, tax records appear to reveal that 96% of the ,017,523 brought in over a year, went to operational expenses.Even though a county investigation came up mostly clean, HiCaliber's reputation was still ruined from the social media frenzy.“There was really no option but to close down because we were assumed to be guilty before anyone gave us the chance to be innocent,” says Cochran.She tells us that donations dropped by more than 65 percent and volunteers dropped by 85 percent. While she’s managed to adopt out more than 50 horses, she still has more than 100 horses to find homes for. The problem is that there are reportedly very few takers.“It's a struggle but it's what I signed up for,” she adds.San Diego County Code Enforcement will continue to fine HiCaliber Horse Rescue if it doesn't keep reducing its horse population. The next milestone placed on the rescue is to reduce to 113 horses by the end of July.Cochran adds,” The real enemy here is slaughter. If you're trying to fight the battle of keeping America's horses out of the slaughter pipeline, you have to consider euthanasia as one of the answers to the problem.”The California Veterinary Medical Board is still conducting an investigation into the practices at HiCaliber Horse Rescue.Cochran says she’ll reconsider keeping the rescue open if she can find a donor to buy the ranch or help the nonprofit find a more affordable location.Correction: An earlier version of this article reported that San Diego County Animal Services will implement the fines. San Diego County Code Enforcement is the correct sector.  4073

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — There could be as many as 78 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines available by the end of 2020, according to the most optimistic timeline in leaked documents from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.But assuming that the vaccine will require two doses per individual, that figure would only be enough to inoculate the highest priority individuals, based on draft guidelines released this week from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.“We’re not even going to get through Phase 1 people” in 2020, said Dr. Mary Barger, an epidemiologist at the University of San Diego.There are an estimated 44 million people in NASEM’S Phase 1 group: frontline healthcare workers, first responders, people with multiple high-risk factors, and adults living in nursing homes and other group settings.Based on leaked CDC guidance to states published by the New York Times, if two vaccine candidates become available in October, there would be enough doses for 39 million people by the end of 2020 -- not quite enough to cover the entire Phase 1 group.If only one vaccine is available by October, the projections suggest there could be enough doses to cover 13 to 26 million people.That might only be enough for frontline healthcare workers and first responders, of which there are an estimated 17 million.Healthcare workers and first responders get the highest priority, which NASEM calls Phase 1a, so they can maintain the integrity of the healthcare system.“When there’s a pandemic, you want to make sure you have enough people to take care of those that are sick,” said Dr. Abisola Olulade of Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group.Phase 1b includes individuals with multiple underlying conditions, like cancer, chronic kidney disease, and serious heart conditions.Approximately 75% of adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in the U.S. between March 1 and August 15 had at least two underlying conditions, according to data from the COVID-19 Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network cited in the NASEM guidelines. More than 60% of hospitalized adults had three or more underlying conditions.“It would make sense that you would include a segment of the population that’s at risk of doing the worst,” said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease specialist at UC San Francisco.There are an estimated 27 million people in the Phase 1b category.Critical workers in high-risk industries like grocery store clerks, mail carriers, and bus drivers would be in Phase 2, along with teachers, homeless people, prisoners, people with moderately risky underlying conditions, and anyone over the age of 65.“Even though people 65 and older make up less than 20% of the population, there have been 80% of COVID-19 deaths in this age,” Dr. Olulade said.Risk factors including high blood pressure, liver disease, or moderate-to-severe asthma would qualify an individual for Phase 2.There are an estimated 27 million people in this phase.In Phase 3, NASEM recommends inoculating people who are at lower risk of a bad infection but may be vectors for the spread of disease, including young people and children.NASEM noted that it will be “critical to conduct additional trials to gain better understanding of safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine among children before they receive the vaccine.” Currently, there are no COVID vaccine trials that include children.Other essential workers at moderate risk of exposure would also be included in Phase 3, including employees in restaurants, hotels, hair salons, and exercise facilities.Phase 4 includes everyone else. 3589

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The ridesharing company, Lyft, is donating hundreds of thousands of dollars in ride credits to immigration groups throughout the country, including one in San Diego County. The company made the donation announcement on Monday, donating 0,000, calling the campaign "America is an Idea, Not a Geography." The Minority Humanitarian Foundation in Spring Valley received roughly ,000 in ride credits. The foundation's founder, Mark Lane, says the company's donation is a game changer for his organization. Lane explains that the money previously spent on rides can now go towards other things like food, clothing and other supplies. 10News spoke to multiple Lyft drivers in San Diego who said they wouldn't mind providing rides to migrants, as long as their pay didn't change. A few Lyft users told 10News they don't agree with Lyft's donation but said they would still continue to use the service.During the month of July, Lyft is also matching donations to RAICES up to ,000. Lyft also released a series of films that highlight the work of immigrant organizations. To watch, click here. 1120

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- There are more concerns about vacation rentals in the Bankers Hill area, following action taken by the City Attorney’s office to shut down what they called a COVID party Airbnb on 2nd Avenue.The civil enforcement action cited concerns over gatherings during coronavirus-related restrictions and numerous other violations, from lack of permits to not obtaining proper tax licenses. According to the complaint the homeowner David Contreras Curiel, did not pay required taxes or fees to operate a vacation rental. It also alleges Curiel illegally made numerous renovations to the home.“From packing a party house during a pandemic to illegally renovating an entire property, the conduct of the defendants in this case is egregious and unacceptable,” City Attorney Mara Elliott said in a news release Friday.On Monday, ABC 10News spoke to a neighbor who lives next to another Airbnb rental on 3rd Avenue. Records show the rental is also owned by David Curiel. The home is listed as The Alfred Mansion on Airbnb’s website.“It’s disruptive every weekend,” one neighbor told ABC 10News. He did not want to be identified, but he said the parties picked up at The Alfred Mansion a few months ago.“Two weekends ago, there was a wedding there with at least 40 people. Nobody had a mask on,” the neighbor said. He added that he has made several complaints to police and the City of San Diego, but nothing had been done. He also had not heard anything from Airbnb regarding his concerns.Curiel did not return requests for comment. Early Monday afternoon, ABC 10News contacted Alex Mendez, the person who helps manage the property and deal with guests.On Monday evening, Mendez called the allegations against the Airbnb properties “unwarranted.”Regarding the city action taken against The Ashley, Mendez said that he and the owner were willing to work with the city. When he asked to reschedule a meeting with code enforcement a couple months ago due to Curiel’s travels, Mendez said the city was not willing to be flexible.Instead of a code enforcement officer calling him back, someone from the City Attorney’s office contacted him, Mendez said.He and Curiel were both caught off guard by the city’s allegations.“We, by no means, have a party house. The house rules are very strict,” Mendez said.Mendez said he has been willing to work with any neighbors who have had issues with the Airbnb properties. “We’re very responsible,” he said, adding that it is also not fair for “neighbors to complain any time there’s any little noise and mischaracterize it.”A spokesperson for the City Attorney’s office could not say whether or not the property on 3rd Avenue was being investigated, but told ABC 10News that the case against The Ashley could affect the other rentals owned by Curiel.“If granted, our injunctive relief would apply to any properties within the county owned by Mr. Curiel that have one or more of the same-type violations that are listed in our complaint,” a spokesperson said.Airbnb has not responded to this latest allegation, but previously told ABC 10News that hosts are not allowed to authorize parties where current public health orders prohibit gatherings, like in San Diego County. 3217