宜宾眼部整形大概多少钱(宜宾好的双眼皮医生) (今日更新中)

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, one of President Donald Trump's closest allies, on Wednesday described Trump's resolve to hold out for billion in border wall funding as "very firm" as the partial government shutdown entered its fifth day.Having spoken to the President since Saturday, the North Carolina Republican described Democrats as "misreading" Trump if they thought he would compromise on funding for the wall."I can tell you, if they believe this President is going to yield on this particular issue, they're misreading him, misreading the American people," Meadows told CNN's Manu Raju on "Inside Politics."Trump, speaking to reporters hours later during a trip to Iraq to visit US troops, indicated his position had not changed.Asked how long the shutdown would last, the President responded that it would go on for "whatever it takes" for him to get wall funding. "We need a wall," Trump said. "So when you say how long is it going to take? When are they going to say that we need border security?"Negotiations between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration over the President's demands for a border wall have so far not yielded an agreement, and the shutdown will continue until at least Thursday, when the Senate returns to Washington.Trump is demanding that the bill funding the Department of Homeland Security include billion for the border wall. The House passed a bill that included the funding and declined to take up a Senate-passed plan that would have kept the government open through February 8. The Senate declined to take up the House's bill before the shutdown. Democrats are refusing to include that much funding for the wall in the bill.Both sides seem entrenched in their opposing stances and it's possible parts of the government could remain closed until the new Congress is seated in the first week of January, when Democrats will take control of the House.Further illustrating how far apart Democrats and the President are from each other, Meadows said, "I see no evidence that would suggest he would come even close to 1.3" billion dollars in spending for the wall. Meadows added, "I don't see that as a reasonable counteroffer."Behind the scenes, Meadows said, Trump "was fully engaged up through the Christmas break getting on the phones with different senators and members of Congress trying to find some kind of path forward."In his own conversations with his Democratic colleagues, Meadows said, "Most of what we've faced is really a wall of sorts with the Democrats."The-CNN-Wire? & ? 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. 2646

Harvey Weinstein has lost a longshot bid to move his sexual assault trial out of New York City.A state appellate panel rejected the request Thursday. It dismissed the movie mogul's concerns that he wouldn't get a fair trial in the world's media capital.The five-judge panel issued the decision after reading submissions from Weinstein's lawyers and prosecutors. The panel didn't give a reason for the decision.Weinstein is due to stand trial in Manhattan in January on charges he raped a woman in 2013 and performed a forcible sex act on a different woman in 2006.The 67-year-old producer has pleaded not guilty and is free on million bail. He maintains any sexual activity was consensual.Weinstein's lawyers didn't immediately comment on Thursday's ruling. Prosecutors declined comment. 802

Hundreds of deadly infant sleepers that have been recalled are still for sale online secondhand on websites like Craigslist, Facebook Marketplace and eBay, 168

High-tech crooks have figured out a way to get around two-factor authentication and access some customers’ bank, email and cell phone accounts.Two-factor authentication is the process where your bank, email provider or other business texts you a one-time code that must be entered to get access to your account after you enter your password. Without the code, a user cannot log into an account.Businessman Robert Ross says crooks got his cell phone company to change his SIM card without his knowledge so calls, texts and two-factor authentication messages no longer went to his cell phone, but instead to one the hacker had in his possession. A SIM card is the little chip in most phones that tells a cellular company which handset should receive a call or text.“Hackers stole million from me,” Robert Ross said.A 21-year-old man was later arrested.Ross says 0,000 was stolen first and then 0,000 again later."What the hackers did is they called up AT&T and they impersonated me, and they said, ‘Hi my name is Rob Ross and I got a new phone with a new SIM card. And could you please change the SIM card number in my account,’” Ross said.AT&T would not confirm or deny the specifics of Ross situation.The hacker never touched Ross’ cell phone, he says but was able to route all his calls and texts to the hacker's phone. This included two-factor authentication texts needed to get into Ross’ bank accounts and Gmail account."I look up from my phone, to my laptop and I saw that in real time, my Gmail was going from being logged in to logged out and then I looked back down at my phone. I clicked through the lock screen and I saw that I had no service," he said.He says preventing messages from reaching his Gmail might have delayed him finding out that money has been moved from his account.Metropolitan State University of Denver professor Steve Beaty, who is a cybersecurity and information technology expert, says sometimes crooks can get into a customer’s cell phone account by knowing the answers to security questions."What's your mother's maiden name? What is your pet's name? The problem is, all of those can be found out very easily through breaches and through social media," Beaty said.Beaty says the growing number of breaches shouldn't deter you from using two-factor authentication for your Gmail and bank accounts. He says, instead make it harder for people to impersonate you."I recommend lying about your secret security questions so that you’re not using your mother's maiden name, not your pet name, not your favorite car. I can figure out all of those things about you on Facebook and Twitter," Beaty said.The suspect who police say broke into Robert's accounts has been caught. He's from New York City and faces 21 charges.In Ross’ case, his money was stored in a virtual currency.He doesn’t expect to get his money back.AT&T sent the following statement:“We continually look for ways to enhance our policies and safeguards to protect against these sorts of scams. When our customers are victims of identity theft, we strive to reverse activity related to their account with us and restore service as quickly as possible.”AT&T has a web page with news and information about SIM swaps here: 3250

Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller told Congress on Wednesday that his investigation did not "totally exonerate" President Donald Trump as the President has claimed."The finding indicates that the President was not as exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed," Mueller said. "It is not what the report said."But beyond that response, Mueller's exchanges with lawmakers were at times shaky, with answers that were often halting and stilted in the face of rapid-fire questions. Mueller frequently referred them back to the report, asked for questions to be repeated and answered with short "true" or "that's correct" responses.Mueller is testifying at the most highly anticipated hearing of the Trump presidency, with the potential to reset the narrative about his two-year investigation into the President's conduct.After weeks of negotiations, twists and turns over Mueller's appearance and a pair of subpoenas, the former special counsel is now answering questions about his probe for the first time before the House Judiciary Committee, and will appear at noon ET before the House Intelligence Committee.The former special counsel's testimony is the closest thing to a make-or-break moment as it gets for Democrats in their investigations into the President. It's a potential turning point for the House Democratic impeachment caucus that's banking Mueller can reset the conversation about the special counsel investigation and convince the public -- and skeptical Democratic colleagues -- that the House should pursue an impeachment inquiry into Trump.Democrats have pointed to Mueller's report as a reason to take up impeachment, but he declined to engage on the question."Is it true that there's nothing in Volume II of the report that says the President may have engaged in impeachable conduct?" asked Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican."We have studiously kept in the center of our investigation, our mandate," Mueller responded. "And our mandate does not go to other ways of addressing conduct. Our mandate goes to what — developing the report and turning the report into the attorney general."Democrats walked Mueller through the key passages of his report, while Republicans sought to undercut the special counsel investigation, raising questions about his decision to write a lengthy report about the President's conduct when he did not decide to prosecute the Trump on obstruction of justice."Volume two of this report was not authorized under the law," charged Rep. John Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and a former prosecutor. "I agree with the chairman, this morning, when he said Donald Trump is not above the law. He's not. But he damn sure shouldn't be below the law, which is where this report puts him."In his opening statement, Mueller defended the work that his team did."My staff and I carried out this assignment with that critical objective in mind: to work quietly, thoroughly, and with integrity so that the public would have full confidence in the outcome," Mueller said.But Mueller also telegraphed that he would not engage on many of the questions both Democrats and Republicans will want him to answer, from the origins of the investigation to how he decided whether or not to prosecute the President."As I said on May 29: the report is my testimony. And I will stay within that text," Mueller said.Even if there isn't a bombshell revelation, Democrats are hopeful that the recitation of the key points of Mueller's investigation and what it uncovered about the President can move the needle."Although Department policy barred you from indicting the President for this conduct, you made clear that he is not exonerated. Any other person who acted this way would have been charged with a crime. And in this nation, not even the President is above the law," House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said in his opening statement."We will follow your example, Director Mueller. We will act with integrity. We will follow the facts where they lead. We will consider all appropriate remedies. We will make our recommendation to the House when our work concludes," Nadler added. "We will do this work because there must be accountability for the conduct described in your report, especially as it relates to the President."But if Mueller's testimony fails to shift the conversation, it could spell the beginning of the end for 4385

来源：资阳报