宜宾埋线双眼皮全过程宜宾冰点激光脱毛要多少钱,宜宾那医院双眼皮好,宜宾变成双眼皮,宜宾哪个整容医院比较好的医院,宜宾鼻部奥美定取出,宜宾眼袋要多少钱,宜宾拉双眼皮多钱

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Effective August 31, some businesses throughout San Diego County are allowed to reopen under newly-issued state guidance.Beginning Monday, places of worship, restaurants, museums, gyms, and hair and nail salons, are among entities that can begin operating indoors.Organizations that plan to reopen under the new guidance are advised to update their safe reopening plan. The county says plans won’t need to be approved before businesses are allowed to move forward.RELATED: San Diego salon owner booked for weeks as she reopens againSee the list below for rules on capacity and hours of operation:Restaurants, dine-in. 25% capacity or 100 people, whichever is lower. They still need to close at 10 p.m.Places of worship. 25% capacity or 100 people, whichever is lower.Movie theaters. 25% capacity or 100 people, whichever is lower.Museums. 25% capacity.Gyms and fitness centers. 10% capacity.Dance studios. 10% capacity.Yoga studios. 10% capacity.Zoos and aquariums. 25% capacity.Hair salons and barbershopsNail salonsBody waxingTattoo parlorsPiercingSkincare and cosmetologyGovernor Gavin Newsom unveiled the changes Friday, offering some relief for businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic.The beauty industry has been one business sector hit especially hard during the pandemic."It seems salons are not at risk any longer for this whole toggling between inside, outside which is definitely what we were advocating for," said Corinne Lam, the owner of Salotto Salon in Rancho Bernardo. "We knew we were a safe industry."RELATED: New guidance offers some hope for San Diego museumsLam and other salon owners have limited hours of operation and spent many days working outside in the heat to be in compliance with the state and county public health orders."We had a lot of heat rash when we working outside," said Elise Ha, the owner of Master Hair & Nails in Ramona. She and other stylists worked during San Diego County's recent heatwave where temperatures soared over 100 degrees. "Sweating all day long," said Ha. "We hope that we don’t have to be outside again."Both Lam and Ha have moved their equipment back inside and will reopen for indoor services on Monday.California's full guidance for each business sector can be read online here. 2283

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that would have required the State Justice Department to verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife before approving a firearm sale to a person under 21.The proposed legislation came after ABC 10News uncovered that suspected Poway Synagogue shooter John Earnest purchased the weapon used in the April 2019 attack with an invalid hunting license that went unchecked. Earnest was only 19 at the time he bought the assault-style weapon from San Diego Guns, when the state's age-limit was 21. The age limit, however, remained 18 for those who possessed a valid, state-issued hunting license. The Justice Department does not verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife, instead leaving it to the gun shop to make the only determination. The governor said creating the verification system would require a 30-month information technology project and could disrupt other firearm technology systems in development under seven other bills. "I am concerned that adding an information technology project will impede DOJ's ability to perform the work it has already been tasked," Newsom said in a veto statement. In an interview Wednesday, State Sen. Anthony Portantino expressed shock and disappointment that Newsom vetoed the legislation. "It's a loophole that needs to be closed," he said. "You can't have a system that relies on the validity of a license not being checked to make sure that that license is actually valid. The whole goal is to keep guns out of the wrong hands. This shooter in Poway got a gun based on a faulty license."Portantino vowed to continue pushing for the change, either through the governor's budget in January or a new bill next year. When making the purchase, Earnest presented a state hunting license that was not valid until July 1, 2019, two months after the alleged attack. That technicality meant the sale should have been rejected, Portantino said. It was Portantino's law that raised California's purchase age limit to 21 but created the hunting-license exemption for those 18 and older. Portantino's bill, Senate Bill 914, would have required the Justice Department to verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife before approving a firearm sale to someone under 21. The bill passed both houses of the state Legislature before failing on the governor's desk.Still, legislators and Newsom did act in the aftermath of the shooting, by eliminating the hunting-license exemption for semi-automatic, center fire weapons. It still exists, however, for other guns, including bolt-action rifles and semi-automatic rimfire weapons. Israel Dahan, whose daughter Noya was injured by shrapnel during the attack, declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation related to the shooting. He said, however, that Noya, now 10, will likely need another minor surgery. He said physically she is holding up okay, but is still dealing with the aftermath psychologically.Earnest allegedly carried out the shooting the day after he picked up the gun, killing one congregant and injuring three others, including a child.A worker who answered the phone at San Diego Guns declined to comment Wednesday. 3176

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — From the confrontation in a Los Angeles Trader Joe's to a showdown in a San Diego Starbucks, there have been a lot of customers claiming businesses can't legally require them to wear a mask.Some customers even carry a card threatening fines and citing the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA. But there are three things to consider before making an ADA claim, according to lawyers.First, to bring a successful ADA lawsuit, attorneys say the person without a mask must truly have a disability. Businesses can ask if a person has a disability, but not much beyond that.RELATED: Confrontation over wearing a mask at Coronado coffee shop"You can't delve into someone's medical condition and ask them a bunch of questions," said attorney Colin Harrison. "I would not advise businesses to ask for any type of documentation."If the person says they have a disability, the ADA requires businesses to make reasonable accommodation. So what's reasonable?"A reasonable accommodation might be to ask the person to wear a face shield, which is about an inch and away and probably wouldn't restrict their ability to breathe," says attorney Steven Elia.RELATED: GoFundMe started for San Diego barista after woman posts about not wearing mask at StarbucksElia says other accommodations might include curbside pickup, but the ADA has limits: businesses don't have to fundamentally alter the way they operate."Customer says I don't want to wear a mask, I want you to deliver to my home. If the business doesn't already provide delivery service, that would be a major fundamental alteration of their business, one they would not be required to do," Harrison said.Both attorneys suggested businesses try to make accommodations first.RELATED: Feds warn of phony cards claiming face mask exemptionBut what happens if those accommodations won't work? There's a third component in the ADA: Subsection 36.208 allows businesses to turn disabled people away if they pose a direct threat to the health and safety of others."Someone not wearing a mask, they might think they're not infected, but they could be and pose a direct threat to spread the virus to many people," Elia said.The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said COVID-19 does constitute a direct threat, so our experts say the threat of a successful lawsuit in a case like this is low.That said, there's nothing stopping people from filing these lawsuits. There have been at least nine across the country. But businesses that win can pursue legal fees from the other party. 2548

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Fire investigators have determined that a blaze that scorched 100 acres in the San Pasqual Valley Monday was not intentionally set.  169

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Firefighters have extinguished the fire that caused a hotel near Harbor Island Park to be evacuated Wednesday afternoon. Firefighters say the two-alarm fire broke out at the Sheraton on the 1300 block of Harbor Island Drive. No one was injured, but the fire, which took place in the hotel's elevator shaft, caused at least 0,000 in damage. Firefighters were alerted to the fire after they say people reported heavy smoke coming from the elevator shaft.At this time, the cause of the fire is unknown.  551