徐州怀孕了上厕所有点血是怎么回事徐州四维需要准备什么,徐州四维彩超在什么时间做较好,徐州孕期做四维彩超,徐州医院那里四维彩超好,徐州4维彩超做多长时间,徐州早孕一个月什么症状,徐州怀孕25天能做四维彩超吗

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The target at the center of a murder for hire plot is suing his former business partner and his associates. Ninus Malan says, he suffers from severe emotional distress as a result of his business partners actions."I wish this would go away, but I wake up every morning, and it's there," Malan told 10News. In November, federal authorities charged Salam Razuki, Sylvia Gonzales and Elizabeth Juarez with offenses related to a conspiracy to kidnap and kill a business associate over a dispute involving real estate investment properties, most of which were leased to marijuana dispensaries.   According to a complaint filed on November 2018, in October of that year, Salam Razuki and Sylvia Gonzales met with a Confidential Human Source and asked the source to arrange to kill Malan. The complaint says according to Razuki and Gonzales, they had invested in multiple properties and business ventures together and were not involved in a civil dispute over their assets. The complaint alleges, "Razuki and Gonzales told CHS1 (confidential human source) that they wanted CHS1 to 'Shoot him in the face,' 'to take him to Mexico and have him whacked,' 'or kill him in some other way.'"Federal authorities say Elizabeth Juarez later joined Razuki and Gonzales, and the three talked about having Malan killed.The complaint says the confidential human source, Gonzales, and Juarez discussed a cost of ,000 for "the job." Federal authorities say during one of the meetings, Gonzales went to the Goldn Bloom Dispensary and returned with ,000 cash. "After the meeting, CHS1 provided agents with ,000 case provided by Gonzales," the complaint says.Federal authorities say, "according to the complaint, on November 15, 2018, the source met with Razuki and stated, 'I took care of it.'" Razuki replied, "So he will take care of it, or it's done?" The source replied, "Done." Malan told Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin that he's now forced to live his life day by day afraid for his family's safety. "My nine-year-old daughter had to see this on the news, and she knows all about it," Malan said. "I don't know how to explain it to her." Malan is suing Razuki, Gonzales, Juarez and a handful of businesses. The lawsuit alleges, interference with exercise of civil rights, unfair competition, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. The lawsuit says the "defendants committed the acts herein despicably, maliciously, and oppressively, with the wrongful intention of injuring plaintiff, from an improper and evil motive amounting to malice, and with the conscious disregard of the rights and safety of Plaintiff and others." "Mr. Malan and Mr. Razuki were involved in a number of businesses together," said Malan's attorney John Gomez of Gomez Trial Attorneys. "That relationship kind of fell apart, so litigation commenced." Gomez says Razuki brought a civil suit against Malan and Malan filed a lawsuit against Razuki. "That's a big litigation involving a lot of money," Gomez said. "Mr. Razuki apparently thought it was ok to put a hit on Mr. Malan to eliminate him from the litigation." Gomez told 10News all the businesses and entities named in the lawsuit are affiliated with Razuki and participants in the litigation. "When he puts a hit on Mr. Malan to advance the litigation he's doing it on behalf of all of these businesses and people," Gomez said. With a criminal case underway, Malan was limited in what he was willing to discuss. He thanked the FBI, his family and told Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin he'll always be looking over his shoulder. "In the courts is where I'm seeking justice, not only for me but for my family who were terrorized by these people," Malan said. Criminal defense attorneys for Gonzales and Juarez have not yet responded to 10News requests for comment.Razuki's attorneys told 10News they have no comment. 4194

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The six hours of impeachment debate pre-empted television programming across the country Wednesday. Throughout the day, both Democrats and Republicans repeated the same points over and over again. Political analysts say that’s only expected to continue. “The president used the power of his public office to obtain an improper personal political benefit at the expense of America's national security,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi kicked off the debate, summing up the argument to impeach President Donald Trump. RELATED: Rallies being held around San Diego County ahead of impeachment vote against TrumpRepublican Doug Collins of Georgia quickly fired back, calling a political rush job. “To the clock and calendar, facts don't matter. The promises to the base matter, and today is a promise kept for the majority,” Collins said. The speeches continued for hours, Democrats and Republicans each taking a minute or two to state their case. Very rarely did either party directly respond to each other. “You are not going to convince the person next to you. They are not your audience,” said Thad Kousser, UC San Diego Political Analyst. Kousser says the way this is set up is purely for show. Different representatives are trying to reach their constituents, who may not be watching live. The clips of them either deriding or defending President Trump could serve them well come election season. RELATED: Impeachment trial in Senate would look very different from a regular court case“So it is, get your press release out, get your talking points out, put them on video,” Kousser said. Kousser says nobody expects the Senate to convict President Trump and that American voters will ultimately judge the President and, by association, the impeachment. 1789

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Three rescued pilot whales have been transported to San Diego to continue their recovery from a mass stranding in 2012.SeaWorld San Diego welcomed 7-year-old short-finned pilot whales — Ace, Ava, and Piper — to the park Monday from SeaWorld's Orlando park. The three whales are the only surviving pilot whales from a mass stranding event near Fort Pierce, Fla., in 2012.The trio was rescued and rehabilitated by SeaWorld Orlando, but the National Marine Fisheries Service determined the three whales couldn't be returned to the wild since they were dependent calves at the time of their rescue.The whales will also join Argo, a pilot whale rescued after stranding on a beach near Kamogawa, Japan, in 2004. Argo was transported from Japan to San Diego in 2012.The new pilot whales are currently adjusting to their new habitat at the Dolphin Amphitheater and will be introduced to Argo over the next several days, SeaWorld says.As part of the transport, two of SeaWorld San Diego's beluga whales have been relocated to SeaWorld San Antonio. 1065

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The San Diego County Fair is an annual tradition for many locals.The rides, games, foods, and exhibits always bring out the best of summer for San Diegans. But the costs can add up. Thankfully, there are several ways to save on admission and attractions at the fair by buying tickets outside of the fair or on specially designated days.MORE SD FAIR INFO: What to know | Parking and transportation | Admission discounts | Rides and games | Concert headlinersTo help, we've crunched the numbers for you to get an idea of how much you're looking at for a day at the fair. Considering a family of four (two adults and two children), here's the math:Parking (onsite, general parking): Admission:Two adults ( each): Two children ( each): Rides and games:28 tickets: Food:Meals for four people ( each): Total: 3Mind you, this is only an estimate. A family may not spend per person on food or even anything on games, potentially saving to . Free, off site parking is also available, taking off another for the family.Admission deals also offer ways to save. Value packs from Costco (four one-day tickets, one passport book, 50 credits toward rides and games, four 2-for-1 drink coupons, one parking pass) can be purchased for or from the fair (four one-day admission tickets, one passport book, 20 credits toward rides and games, four 2-for-1 drink coupons, one parking pass) for .Purchasing tickets from Vons or Albersons locations will save customers on adult admission and on child admission, another in savings from our calculations above.Then, there's plenty of specially-reduced admission days to take advantage of to help cut costs.Check out the "admission discounts" link above for more ways to save. 1786

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The San Diego Unified School District Board voted Tuesday evening to support a package of bills making their way through Sacramento that would put a moratorium on new charter schools. There are four separate bills before the state legislature. Among other things, the measures would put a five year moratorium on new charter schools, increase local control by preventing charter schools from locating outside their district and put a cap on the number of charter schools that can open. San Diego Unified Trustee Richard Barrera helped draft the resolution in support of the bills. "We've got plenty of great examples of seeing laboratories of innovation that have happened over the past 25 years; however, what I think the law did not predict, was that charters have expanded very rapidly. There are organizations that kind of create chains of charter schools that go and pop up in different places around the state," said Barrera. He said the moratorium would not affect existing charter schools. "Let's think about the whole system; let's think about what's good for every kid, nothing in these bills affects existing charter schools. In fact, I believe these bills protect existing charter schools because they are as vulnerable to some new school popping up, that may or may not succeed, but in the meantime, you've got that movement of students back and forth," said Barrera. Barrera said roughly 16% of students in the district attend charter schools at a cost of approximately million dollars a year. There are nearly 50 charter schools in the district. Supporters of charter schools said the board's vote was motivated by politics and money. "I think they're kind of greedy, the public schools. They're wanting the money, for each student they get so much money," said Charles Taich, whose daughter attends a charter school. The California Charter Schools Association says the resolution the board passed isn't focused on students or families. "It really isn't about students. If you look at the resolution itself, it doesn't talk about parents and students. It just talks about districts and money and the information is not factual, so we want to address that," said Miles Durfee, Vice President of Regional Advocacy for the California Charter Schools Association. Durfee said they'll continue their fight at the state level. "The Charter Schools Association has worked really hard with members to really make sure we increase the quality of charter schools and we know schools need to continually improve, but we really believe that charter schools are one vehicle to do a great job to give choice to parents," said Durfee. 2667