河南高三学校靠谱的有哪些汉中补习老师专业提分快,长安区全日制学校专业升学率,铜川高三学校联系方式,蓝田县初三高考复读怎么办,西安高三高中复读好吗,阎良区高考冲刺班实力哪家好,西安高三补习学校提分快

Turns out they will not always be there for you."Friends" is leaving Netflix by spring 2020 as WarnerMedia launches its new streaming service called HBO Max, 169

The Supreme Court could now decide as early as Wednesday afternoon whether an unnamed foreign-owned company will have to pay daily fines for avoiding a grand jury subpoena related to Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation.The company submitted a reply under seal to the Supreme Court earlier today, following written arguments it and the Justice Department made last week.The filing Wednesday tees up a vote by the full Supreme Court.The company has been trying to avoid a subpoena from a DC-based grand jury, and faced court-imposed fines for every day it did not turn over information.After losing at an appeals court, the company took its challenge to the Supreme Court and asked for a freeze on the mounting penalties.Chief Justice John Roberts allowed it a temporary pause last month, but the full court is now expected to weigh in on whether the freeze should stay in place.A denial from the court would be an apparent win for Mueller's team. Grand jury matters in the federal court system are typically kept secret, unless a witness decides to speak about the subpoenas they receive or their experience testifying.However, the case has still been one of the most secretive in years to progress through the court system.It apparently included two face-offs between special counsel office prosecutors and the unnamed company's private attorneys.After losing at the trial level, the DC Circuit Court closed a floor of the courthouse during appellate arguments to keep the identities of the arguing attorneys completely under wraps.The company has kept nearly all its filings secret -- with the exception of a log of when it submits information to the appeals courts.Though the Supreme Court allows for cases like this to be secret in their early requests, the high court has never heard a known case where all parties and arguments stayed confidential. 1907

Tune in to a brand new episode of @wrongfulconviction SPECIAL EDITION: Un-making a Murderer first & only interview with Brendan Dassey & Laura Nirider 171

The President's former attorney Michael Cohen testified that Donald Trump directed his charity organization to refund a "fake bidder" for a portrait of himself."Mr. Trump directed me to find a straw bidder to purchase a portrait of him that was being auctioned at an Art Hamptons Event," Cohen told the House Oversight Committee in a public hearing Wednesday."The objective was to ensure that his portrait, which was going to be auctioned last, would go for the highest price of any portrait that afternoon," Cohen said.According to Cohen, the "fake bidder" purchased the portrait for ,000.Cohen alleged that Trump directed the Trump Foundation to use its funds to reimburse the bidder and kept the art, which Cohen claims currently hangs in one of Trump's country clubs.Cohen also provided the House panel with an article about the portrait auction that Trump wrote on and sent to Cohen.Trump tweeted about the portrait sale back in 2013."Just found out that at a charity auction of celebrity portraits in E. Hampton, my portrait by artist William Quigley topped list at K," Trump wrote then. 1111

The Trump administration has rolled back health care protections for transgender patients.The protections were an Obama-era policy that prohibited health care providers from discriminating against transgender patients, 231