蓝田县高三学校正规提分快长安区应届生复读学校怎么样,漯河高考应届补习班正规提分快,郑州高考复习班哪里有联系方式,渭南初三学校正规怎么样,西安高考高中专业,鄠邑区民办高中哪里有多少钱,长安区民办高中专业好吗

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Weeks after storms flooded University of California San Diego dorms, students are still reeling from the damage.UCSD officials said 41 students, from Thurgood Marshall and Revelle Colleges, were relocated after the flooding Nov. 20. By Dec. 6, they said 19 had moved back into their rooms.Students showed 10News their dorms that smelled of mold. Friday, a dorm in the Thurgood Marshall Lowers Apartments had a hole in the ceiling. Students said the hole was cut after water fell from the ceiling days after the Nov. 20 storm."I noticed something dropping and it's like starting to smell," a student said. "It started dropping from three holes in the ceiling ... It started pouring in so I had to get like three trashcans to hold the water."The student said every time it rained after the original storm they saw leaks through the same hole.READ RELATED: UC San Diego students reeling from flooded dorms after storm10News visited UCSD Dec. 6 and were invited into another Thurgood Marshall Lowers Apartment, where fans and a dehumidifier were whirling.The student said he had to move out, his clothes reeked and water seeped through a window in his bedroom each time it rained."It smells moldy, it's super hot, and it's just a nasty kind of humid feel that hasn't gone away in two and a half weeks," he said frustrated.UCSD said they were working to repair the dorms, using dehumidifiers, replace drywall and carpet if necessary. 1455

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- We know the importance of wearing a mask to protect the nose and mouth from the novel coronavirus, but some new research is raising questions about whether the general public should wear goggles, glasses or a shield to protect their eyes.The CDC already urges healthcare workers to wear eye protection. The agency updated its guidance in July, encouraging even healthcare workers in low-transmission environments to wear eye protection when it was previously listed as “optional.”Experts think the nose is still the main entry point for the virus because of the mechanics of breathing, but the surface of the eye is lined with the same mucous membrane to which the virus likes to bind.Animal studies have shown SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can enter through the eyes and there have been viral particles detected in human tears, but there’s no clear-cut data so far showing the eyes are a major entry point, said ophthalmologist Dr. Annie Nguyen at the USC Roski Eye Institute.However, some observational studies have suggested protecting the eyes may lower the risk of infection.In June, a study in the Journal Lancet suggested face shields, goggles and glasses could lower the risk of infection from 16 percent to 6 percent.Another study published this month suggests that simply wearing eyeglasses could help.Researchers examined 276 hospitalized patients in Suizhou, China. Based on trends in that region, they expected about 31 percent of the patients would wear eyeglasses. Instead, just 5 percent of the hospitalized patients wore glasses.The researchers noted the observational study had limitations, but theorized that eyeglasses may offer a protective barrier against the virus.“I wouldn’t be quick to make the recommendation for everyone to run out and wear glasses,” Dr. Nguyen said.An editorial published alongside the eyeglasses study urged caution. “Although it is tempting to conclude from this study that everyone should wear eyeglasses, goggles, or a face shield in public to protect their eyes and themselves from COVID-19, from an epidemiological perspective, we must be careful to avoid inferring a causal relationship from a single observational study,” wrote Dr. Lisa Maragakis at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Experts say more evidence is needed because urging people to wear eye protection could have harmful side effects, like causing the wearer to inadvertently touch their face more frequently.“If there is additional evidence that builds up, then that’s the point that we change guidelines,” said Dr. Christian Ramers of Family Health Centers of San Diego.“People have had whiplash from things changing and going back and forth,” he added, citing the change in guidelines on face coverings.Still, some experts say people with underlying conditions should consider adding eye protection, as long as they’re careful not to touch their face.Doctors have suggested that people who wear contact lenses might want to switch to eyeglasses to cut down on the number of times they touch their eyes, but Dr. Nguyen said there’s no hard data yet showing contact lens-wearers are at greater risk from the virus. 3184

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Wednesday, the San Diego District Attorney's Office has released its findings on four officer-involved shootings and one in-custody death in San Diego County.The shootings took place between June 11, 2019, and Feb. 27, 2020. In each instance, the DA found that the officers involved "acted reasonably under the circumstances and bear no state criminal liability for their actions."An analysis of each case from the DA's Office release is included below:Suspect in stolen car shot by officer in El CajonOn February 12, 2020, two El Cajon police officers responded to a report of a stolen vehicle and located the car parked on South Johnson Avenue. An officer approached the car, which was occupied by Keith Crenshaw, 21, who appeared to be asleep in the driver’s seat. There was no one else in the car. A third El Cajon police officer arrived and also approached the vehicle. A Psychiatric Emergency Response Team (PERT) clinician was with the third officer. The PERT clinician stood behind the patrol vehicle because the scene was not secured. As Crenshaw appeared to wake up, one of the officers drew his gun and directed Crenshaw to show his hands, put his hands up, and get his hands out of his shirt at least ten times. The other two officers on scene directed Crenshaw to put his hands up or get his hands out of his shirt at least five times. Crenshaw’s hands were concealed under his clothing. Crenshaw did not comply with the officers’ orders, instead telling the officers, “Shoot me.” Crenshaw moved his right hand towards his waistband and made jolting and jerking movements toward one of the officers through the open passenger door. The officer fired two rounds, striking Crenshaw in the upper body and arm. Crenshaw remained conscious after he was shot telling the officer to, “Kill me please.” The officer continued to give Crenshaw commands to get his hands out of his shirt. Crenshaw complied and was removed from the vehicle. Officers provided medical assistance to Crenshaw until paramedics arrived and Crenshaw was taken to the hospital where he was treated for non-fatal gunshot wounds. A search of Crenshaw and his vehicle revealed that he possessed no weapons at the time of the incident. Fortunately, Mr. Crenshaw survived. He gave a recorded statement confirming the officer’s observations that he simulated actions wanting the officer to believe he had a gun because he wanted the officer to shoot him. In reviewing the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the call, Crenshaw’s failure to abide by commands to show his hands, Crenshaw reaching for his waistband with right hand and jerking towards the officer, viewing the situation in light of an objectively reasonable officer, the officer would have reason to believe that there was an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm, either to himself or others, that needed to be instantly confronted. Therefore, the officer was justified in his actions and bears no state criminal liability.The DA’s detailed review can be found here.Officers responding to a reported attack are confronted by man wielding a shovelOn August 24, 2019, San Diego Police received a call from a citizen about her nephew’s erratic behavior. SDPD dispatched two officers, telling them that Dennis Carolino, 52, had thrown a brick at his aunt. Two San Diego police officers responded and interviewed the victim, who told officers Carolino was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Officers attempted to locate Carolino to evaluate him for a mental health referral. As officers made their way into a backyard and toward a shed that Carolino had been living in, the door to the shed suddenly opened and Carolino charged toward officers holding a long-handled shovel. Officers told Carolino to drop the shovel, but he continued to advance on officers and ignored their commands. Both officers believed Carolino was going to hit them with the shovel. One officer deployed his taser while the second officer fired his handgun, striking Carolino five times. Life saving measures where attempted but Carolino was pronounced dead at the scene. A review by the District Attorney found the officer used his gun in defense of himself, the civilian witness and the other officer.Based on these circumstances, the officer who fired his handgun acted reasonably and bears no state criminal liability for his actions.The District Attorney’s detailed review can be found here.Man dies from methamphetamine toxicity after being detainedOn June 11, 2019, a man called San Diego Police to report a burglary, saying he found a man he did not know inside his home who had apparently broken in.The first responding officer arrived with a civilian PERT Clinician and contacted Buddie Nichols, 40. The officer attempted to handcuff Nichols, but he began to resist the officer’s handcuffing efforts. Two more officers arrived, and it took all three officers to handcuff Nichols. Nichols resisted enough that the officers used physical force in order to take him into custody by hitting him with a flashlight on his shoulder. During the time the officers were handcuffing Nichols, he displayed symptoms of being under the influence of a controlled substance and continued to do so after he was handcuffed. Nichols was screaming and thrashing about and the officers held him in place on the ground to limit his movements.The officers requested paramedics respond to the location. As the paramedics arrived, the officers noticed Nichols appeared to be unconscious. Fearing he may be in medical distress, the officers removed the handcuffs. Paramedics could not detect a pulse from Nichols and began CPR. Nichols was transported by ambulance to UCSD hospital where he was pronounced deceased.The medical examiner determined Nichols’ cause of death was resuscitated arrest due to sudden cardiac arrhythmia due to excited delirium while intoxicated on methamphetamine. He also stated the manner of death was accident.Based upon a review of the facts and circumstances surrounding Nichol’s death, the law enforcement personnel involved in his restraint acted reasonably under the circumstances and bear no state criminal liability for their actions.The DA’s detailed review can be found here.Man reportedly grabs officer’s gun during struggle fatally shotOn January 24, 2020, two San Diego Police Officers observed Toby Diller, 31, illegally holding an open container of alcohol. Officers stopped the patrol vehicle to speak to Diller who immediately began running away and into lanes of busy traffic on 54th Street. The officers chased Diller on foot, giving him multiple commands to stop. Diller tripped while running through a planter, got back up and was tackled in the middle of a frontage road. Both officers were positioned over Diller as a violent struggle ensued.During the struggle, Diller grabbed the holstered gun on an officer’s duty belt. Diller managed to break the gun from the officer’s duty belt. The officer saw the holster in Diller’s hand, and it appeared Diller was trying to remove the gun from the holster. The officer yelled, “He has my gun, shoot him.” Another officer fired one shot striking Diller on the left side of his cheek. Diller was pronounced dead at the scene by medics. An autopsy showed methamphetamine in Diller’s system.Due to the imminent nature of the threat posed by Diller’s possession of the loaded handgun, it is objectively reasonable that an officer in the same situation would believe that Diller had the present ability, opportunity, and apparent intent to cause death or serious bodily injury to the officer and his partner.Based on these circumstances, Officer Johnson acted reasonably and bears no state criminal liability for his actions.The DA’s detailed review can be found here.Non-fatal shooting of a man in a homeless encampmentOn February 27, 2020, San Diego Police Officers were working a joint operation with the Chula Vista Police Department, San Diego Park Rangers and Environmental Services. Officers and Park Rangers went into the encampment and located Carlos Soto, 70, the only person in the encampment, inside one of the structures. San Diego Police Officers identified themselves and told Soto to come out of the structure. As Soto was coming out the officer could see the butt of a handgun in Soto’s right front jacket pocket. A second officer also saw the gun, which later was determined to be a “BB” air pistol.Both officers gave Soto multiple commands to get on the ground. Instead, Soto grabbed the gun from his jacket pocket and both officers fired. Soto sustained three gunshot wounds which were non-life threatening.Based on the totality of the circumstances the officers reasonably believed Soto presented an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to each of the officers. He removed what appeared to be a firearm from his pocket after they had given him several opportunities to come out of the tent and get down on the ground. In light of all the facts, the officers were justified in their actions and bear no state criminal liability for them.A copy of the DA’s detailed analysis can be found here. 9145

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — You may have seen signs in front of businesses asking customers for card transactions or cash only with exact change. That's because the coronavirus pandemic is causing a national coin shortage.Money is money. But right now, paper is not as valuable as metal for Pacific Beach resident, Michele Pagnano."I go through a good amount of change on a regular basis," Pagnano said.He uses his apartment complex's coin laundry about three to four times a week. So when he was running low on coins, he headed to the bank, like he always does."Three weeks ago, I was at Wells Fargo," Pagnano said. "I wanted to get worth [of quarters] so that it could hold me over for a couple of weeks. And the teller says she could only give me . I went around to a few more banks, and they all had that same practice in place."There's a reason for that. The Federal Reserve says there is a coin shortage caused by the pandemic. Weeks ago, the US Mint reduced coin production to protect its employees from the virus. Plus, with more people shopping online or using touch-less payment methods, cash, especially coins, is not circulating like it use to."If there's none in circulation, it becomes a toilet paper panic again, just like at the beginning of the pandemic," Pagnano said.But Pagnano says he was not going to give up on clean clothes that easily."I even went around to a couple of laundry mats to try to get some quarters from them," Pagnano. "None of them were allowing you to take the quarters off the premises. One guy even told me that he only had in circulation for their entire laundry mat."He also went on Facebook to see if any of his neighbors can do a swap. He even contacted his landlord for help."I already reached out to the landlord and asked if we could buy back the quarters that are already in the machines," Pagnano said. "Hopefully, that is something we can make happen to alleviate the problem, at least for our complex."His last resort? On a whim, Pagnano says he walked into San Diego County Credit Union, which is just down the street from his home. To his surprise, he got lucky."We got the million-dollar quarters right here!" Pagnano laughed.The Federal Reserve believes the coin shortage will be resolved, and more coins will be back in circulation once more of the economy reopens. 2333

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Video showing Customs and Border Protection agents detaining a mother of three in National City has sparked outrage in the community. 160