天津龙济医院做精索静脉曲张好不好天津市龙济治疗早泄到底多少钱啊,天津武清区龙济医院在男科方面怎么样,龙济男科治包皮多少钱,天津市武清区龙济医院男那条路,天津武清龙济医院做泌尿科能靠的住吗,天津市武清区龙济医院泌尿外科医院口碑,天津市龙济医院泌尿天津市龙济医院男科医院

(KGTV) - House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer Wednesday announced they had come to an agreement with President Donald Trump over protections for young immigrants.In a joint statement posted online, Pelosi and Schumer said they had met with President Trump over dinner in which they discussed the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.RELATED: University of California sued Trump over DACA protecting immigrant studentsAmong the highlights, the leaders said they agreed with President Trump that DACA's protections needed to be made law "quickly" and they would include a border security package - that excludes the wall - that's "acceptable to both sides." 726

(KGTV) - California regulators are considering a plan to charge a fee for text messaging on mobile phones to help fund programs that make phone service accessible to the poor.The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is set to consider the proposal in a vote scheduled for next month, according to The Mercury News. It's not clear how much mobile phone users would be asked to pay under the proposal, but it would likely be billed as a flat surcharge, not a per-text fee, according to the paper.And wireless industry and business groups are not "LOLing." The groups are reportedly already trying to defeat the proposal before it makes its way to the commission.“It’s a dumb idea,” Jim Wunderman, president of the Bay Area Council business-sponsored advocacy group, told the Mercury News. “This is how conversations take place in this day and age, and it’s almost like saying there should be a tax on the conversations we have.”The new surcharges could generate a total of about .5 million a year, according to business groups. The same groups warned that under the proposal's language, the charge could be retroactively be applied for five years, totaling more than 0 million for consumers, the paper reported.Click here for a look at the proposal.The proposal argues that the state's Public Purpose Program budget has increased from 0 million in 2011 to 8 million in 2016, while revenues funding the program from the telecommunications industry saw a "steady decline" from .5 billion in 2011 to .3 billion in 2017.The report calls this "is unsustainable over time."In a statement to the Associated Press, CPUC spokeswoman Constance Gordon said, "from a consumer's point of view, surcharges may be a wash, because if more surcharge revenues come from texting services, less would be needed from voice services." 1845

(KGTV) - Artificial intelligence may be able to perceive sexual orientation in faces better than the human brain, according to a Stanford University study.Dr. Michal Kosinski and Yilun Wang used deep neural networks to analyze more than 35,000 facial images.The programs correctly distinguished between homosexual and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 74% of cases for women, researchers said.Accuracy improved when artificial intelligence analyzed five images, including grooming styles, according to the study.Researchers found lower accuracy rates for human judges asked to interpret sexuality through facial images: 51% for men and 54% for women.The researchers suggested the findings of the study posed a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women.GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign denounced the study, saying it made inaccurate assumptions.“Technology cannot identify someone’s sexual orientation. What their technology can recognize is a pattern that found a small subset of out white gay and lesbian people on dating sites who look similar. Those two findings should not be conflated,” said Jim Halloran, GLAAD’s Chief Digital Officer.“At a time where minority groups are being targeted, these reckless findings could serve as weapon to harm both heterosexuals who are inaccurately outed, as well as gay and lesbian people who are in situations where coming out is dangerous," Halloran said. 1437

(KGTV) - Dramatic video shows how a plane crash and rescue of the pilot and passenger unfolded off the coast of Northern California. David Lesh purchased his Beechcraft Bonanza a few weeks ago and asked a fellow pilot to record aerial video from a second plane. “We were gonna go fly over the Golden Gate bridge, and do a whole bay tour... obviously didn't make it there,” Lesh said. During the flight, Lesh lost all power five miles off Half Moon Bay Harbor. “I would guess that we probably didn't have much more than maybe a minute or two from the time I figured something was wrong to the time we hit the water,” said Lesh. Lesh’s friend Owen Leipelt was piloting the second plane and watched as Lesh went down. “At one point I lost them. I had been circling and I couldn't see them anymore and David called me on the phone as he was bobbing in the water and he turned me around and he guided me right to where he was,” said Leipelt. Lesh and his passenger Kayla climbed on the wing, eventually bobbing in the ocean after the plane sank. #NEW The last time David Lesh saw any part of his Beech Craft Bonanza. #abc7now pic.twitter.com/FA3rSKbSMb— Amanda del Castillo (@AmandaABC7) August 21, 2019 The U.S. Coast Guard was stationed in nearby El Granada and was guided to the crash site thanks to Leipelt’s position. “What was truly amazing about tonight was there was another aircraft on-scene that quickly responded, contacted air traffic control who knew to contact airborne Coast Guard asset and get us on-scene quickly,” said Lt. Commander Joshua Murphy. The Coast Guard team got Lesh and Kayla safely to Stanford Hospital for an evaluation.Lesh blamed bad gasoline for the engine failure, the Associated Press reported.KGO contributed to this report. 1765

(KGTV) - If the House votes to impeach President Trump but the Senate fails to convict, does that nullify Trump's first term and allow him to run two more times?No.Conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec tweeted "These Democrats don't realize that if they impeach Trump and the Senate doesn't confirm it then nullifies Trump's first term and he gets to run two more times."But that is completely untrue.If the House votes to impeach but two-thirds of senators fail to convict, President Trump would stay in office. But it would not nullify his current term.This is exactly what happened with President Bill Clinton in 1998.The Senate failed to convict after the House voted to impeach. But Clinton, who was in his second term, wasn't allowed to run again. 759