天津龙济医院欧式微雕环切术武清龙济有男科吗,天津武清区龙济医院拉包皮手术多少钱,天津武清区龙济医院泌尿外科医院咋样,天津市龙济泌尿专科要预约吗,治疗包皮过长到武清区龙济医院,天津武清龙济医院泌尿医院预约门诊号,天津武清龙济医院看病好不好

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday he expects to release a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's nearly report "within a week," but he does not plan to provide Congress with an unredacted version of the report, setting the stage for a showdown with congressional Democrats.Barr told a House subcommittee Tuesday that the redactions process was going "very well," and he would explain the rationale for the redactions that are made from Mueller's nearly 400-page report. But he said he would not accede to Democrats' demands that he provide the full, unredacted report to Congress, arguing that he cannot legally release grand jury material and that he did not plan to ask a court to release it."I don't intend at this stage to send the full, unredacted report to the committee," Barr said.Barr's comments Tuesday come ahead of a brewing clash between Congress and the Trump administration over the Mueller report, as Democrats are indeed prepared to go to court in an effort to obtain the unredacted Mueller report and the special counsel's underlying evidence. Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have already authorized a subpoena for the full Mueller report and the underlying evidence, which House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said Tuesday he is waiting to see what Barr releases before moving forward on the subpoena."The question is what we receive -- do we receive a full copy of the Mueller Report and the documentation underneath it?" Nadler said. "Do we receive most of it with a little redaction or do they completely expurgate it? We'll have to take a look at it."Asked Tuesday about the grand jury material, Barr told a House Appropriations subcommittee: "The chairman of the Judiciary Committee is free to go to court."Four types of information would be redacted from the report he submits, Barr said, including grand jury material, classified information, material tied to ongoing investigation, and information that could harm "peripheral third parties."Barr defends four-page summaryDemocrats pressed Barr on his decision to release a four-page summary of Mueller's conclusions, particularly in light of reports that some on Mueller's team have told others they were unsatisfied with how Barr characterized the investigation.Barr said that Mueller was given the opportunity to review the summary Barr released last month detailing the Mueller's conclusions, and the special counsel declined to do so. He said he suspected that members of Mueller's team wanted more from him, but he explained that he wasn't trying to summarize the full report with his four-page letter, which stated Mueller's investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump's team and Russia, and that Mueller reached no conclusion on the question of obstruction of justice."I suspect that they probably wanted more put out," Barr said. "In my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize, because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once."Barr said the White House did not review his letter, but he declined to answer questions about whether the White House has been briefed on the report."I've already laid out the process that is going forward to release these reports hopefully within a week. And I'm not going to say anything more about it until the report is out and everyone has a chance to look at it," Barr said.Barr's answers did not appear to satisfy Democrats, who repeatedly urged Barr to release the full report and fully explain any redactions that Barr decided to make."I think it would strike a serious blow to our system, and yes, to our democracy, if that report is not fully seen," said New York Rep. Jose Serrano, the chairman of the Commerce, Science and Justice Subcommittee holding Tuesday's hearing. "We're not here today to be in a confrontational situation with you. We want to help you do the job, and you need to help us do ours."House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey told Barr that his handling of Mueller's report was "unacceptable" and the summary he released "raises more questions than it answers.""I look forward to reviewing the Mueller report myself, and I know my constituents do as well," Lowey said. "I understand that portions of it must be redacted as a matter of law, but my hope is that you will stop there and bring transparency to this process as soon as possible."Republican lawmakers, on the other hand, have not so far asked questions about Mueller and are focusing on budget issues in the hearing. GOP Rep. Robert Aderholt of Alabama, the top Republican on the subcommittee, did not mention Mueller in his opening statement.Barr is scheduled to return to Capitol Hill on May 1 and May 2 for hearings before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees specifically to answer questions about the Mueller investigation.Barr told Congress earlier this month he expected to release a redacted version of Mueller's nearly 400-page report by "mid-April, if not sooner." 5184

AT&T announced this week that its streaming TV service DirecTV Now has increased prices and reduced its offering of channels.When the service launched in late 2016, it was seen as an affordable alternative to cable. For those who signed up for the service in its early days, a monthly fee was good for nearly 100 channels. But the service's launch was plagued by sluggish and inconsistent service. But starting in April, the pricing and number of offerings will change. The cheapest option for DirecTV Now will be the DirecTV Now Max package, which offers 40 channels for a month. For more, consumers get 10 added channels, which includes Cinemax and regional sports networks. DirecTV Now's price increase is part of a trend of streaming services increasing prices. 793

By several accounts, security was present and conspicuous at the Garlic Festival in Gilroy, California, over the weekend.The Gilroy Police Department had a "compound" on site, the police chief said. Patrons at the family-friendly food festival reported seeing officers on horses and motorcycles.Yet, a 19-year-old, identified by police as Santino William Legan, was able to cut through a back fence and begin shooting people at random. The mayhem Sunday left three people dead and at least 12 injured.It also put a spotlight on soft targets, places like festivals, schools and churches where people often think they can let their guard down and live freely and safely. Another shooting at a festival in New York Saturday that left one dead and 11 injured also emphasized the precariousness of such spaces.Law enforcement experts say that despite heavier security at festivals, schools and churches, there's really little that can be done to prevent attacks from happening."No one would associate the Garlic Festival with an attractive target," said James Gagliano, a CNN law enforcement analyst and retired FBI supervisory agent.Patrons offer different views of festival securityPolice were present all three days of the festival, Gilroy Police Chief Scot Smithee told reporters Monday."We actually create a police compound where we have a command center, a booking area, you know, all the things you would need to run a major operation like this," Smithee said. "The officers are deployed throughout the park and they're assigned to different regions of the park so they're spread out, we don't have officers all in one spot."Christian Swain, whose band 1667

Becky Ianni is still haunted by years of sexual abuse that happened at the hands of her priest when she was a young child."I had buried my head, because he told me I'd go to Hell if I told on him," Ianni said about the priest. "This was my darkest secret."After coming forward, it took a year-and-a-half for church leaders to agree to a settlement, she said.Last week, Pope Francis issued a new church law that requires all Catholic priests and nuns to report clergy sexual abuse and cover-ups to church authorities. Churches have until mid-2020 to comply with setting up a reporting system. The new law does not require them to report to police, as victims such as Becky have demanded. Previously, such reporting was left up to the conscience of individual priests and nuns. "Nuns and priests are now mandatory reporters? Well, reporters to who? Religious authorities, not to police, " Ianni said. Every suspected child abuse case should be turned directly to police. They're the ones who can independently investigate it."The Vatican has argued legal systems in different countries make a universal reporting law impossible, and that imposing one could endanger the church in places where Catholics are a persecuted minority.After decades of sexual abuse scandals, critics point out there is no punishment for priensts and none who choose not to report cases of abuse.Jeff Anderson, an attorney for other victims of church sex abuse cases, calls the new law ineffective."They have demonstrated for over three decades they are incapable of handling this issue themselves and they do not want outsiders in the closed clerical culture," Anderson said. The rules also says victims can't be forced to keep quiet and must be welcomed and listened to by church leaders ... and offered medical and psychological assistance.The new law starts in June and can be changed after a three-year trial run. 1904

ATLANTA, Ga. – A Kennesaw State University women’s basketball player has been charged with murder in connection with a deadly shooting over the summer.The shooting happened in the early hours of July 16. Officers found the victim, 21-year-old Nashiem Hubbard-Etienne, dead in an Atlanta parking deck, 313