天津市武清区龙济医院可以治男科吗天津龙济医院男性专科医院排名,武清区龙济医院治包皮包茎怎么样,天津市武清区龙济医院男性专科医院怎么样,天津武清区龙济泌尿外科早泄手术,天津市武清区龙济泌尿专科阴囊潮湿,天津武清龙济男科医院好,天津武清龙济医院男科专科医院

A Texas police officer shot his adult son Saturday, thinking he was an intruder.Dispatchers received a call around 6 p.m. CDT from a man reporting a shooting at his home. The man said he was an off-duty Dallas officer who mistook his son for an intruder and accidentally shot him, according to a release from the DeSoto Police Department. DeSoto is a city south of Dallas.When officers arrived on scene, they found the victim bleeding from his right forearm. The victim was taken to a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries, the release said."It was a startling situation, it was an accident," Pete Schulte, DeSoto police spokesman, told 655

After years of investigating, 500 witnesses interviewed and a metric ton of ink spilled, Congress and the public is set to get its first real look at special counsel Robert Mueller's report Thursday morning.The report is 233

A phone bill for more than 0,000. That’s what Dr. Rosa Galvan-Silva’s dental office received from AT&T for hundreds of international calls she said she never made.In 40-plus years of dentistry, about 30 at her office in South Holland, Illinois, Galvan-Silva still hasn’t seen it all.“Something is really wrong,” she said about receiving an ,224.32 bill from AT&T, the first of two monstrous phone bills.The bill said her office made more than 100 calls – some as long as two hours – to the United Kingdom in late July and early August.“Oh my goodness, somebody’s talking a lot to the UK, but it’s not us,” she said. “They’re having good conversations there.”Galvan-Silva said she called AT&T and the company came out to investigate, but couldn’t figure out the problem. She said the calls are still tying up her phone lines–with problems happening as recently as last week.“We’re hurting. You know, we’re losing business,” she said.The bill showed many of the calls happen hours before her office opens, but not all of them.“When we come in the office, all the lines are busy. We cannot receive any phone calls. We cannot make any phone calls,” she said. “My staff are all here, and I’m with them. So it’s no way somebody’s gonna be making those phone calls here without me knowing.”Instead of ,000, she paid her typical bill of about 0. She did the same thing after the next bill came, totaling 3,576.05.That bill showed three phone lines tied up at the same time on the morning of Aug. 19. Those calls cost hundreds of dollars each.It appears Dr. Galvan-Silva’s phone system was accessed by fraudsters who made the unauthorized calls.She got a letter from AT&T’s fraud resolution group on Oct. 22, offering a settlement agreement, asking her to pay the company just 1 plus fees and taxes.The letter didn’t say why she would pay that amount, and she said she shouldn’t owe a penny.After AT&T was contacted, the company agreed to wipe away the bogus international charges.But Dr. Galvan-Silva says no one has told her whether the issue is fixed.“It is frustrating, because we are trying to do whatever we can on our part. Our equipment has been checked, we made all the phone calls that we have to make, and still we don’t have any resolution,” Galvan-Silva said. 2313

A Northeast Ohio school district is trying to make sure students never go hungry or feel embarrassed if they can't pay for lunch.According to the School Nutrition Association, about 75 percent of school districts reported having unpaid student meal debt at the end of the 2016-2017 school year. That means sometimes kids are singled out and given an alternate lunch because they are out of money.Avoiding alternate lunches and embarrassmentJan Williams started in food service as a line worker, and the policy where she worked stated that if students couldn't pay, workers had to take away their lunches."I couldn't do that, so a lot of times I would just reach into my own pocket. I would pay for their lunch," Williams said. "Most of the other employees that I worked with would do the same." 806

American reporters asked President Trump about Michael Cohen's testimony during a photo opportunity between Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un on Wednesday.Trump didn't answer. Less than an hour later, the White House blocked several reporters from attending the next media availability between Trump and Kim.Press secretary Sarah Sanders cited "the sensitive nature of the meetings."But the press limitations were an abrupt change -- suggesting that the president didn't want to hear any more questions about Cohen.The result: Fewer eyewitnesses were present at the start of Trump and Kim's controversial meeting in Hanoi, Vietnam.The episode came two days after the international media was forced to move out of a hotel in Hanoi because, it turned out, Kim was also staying there.TV networks and other news outlets had to relocate -- prompting grumbling from reporters who said that the White House should have stood up for the American pressPast administrations have pointedly advocated for press access during meetings with repressive governments. The idea was to demonstrate what American democracy looks and sounds like -- pesky reporters and all.Several White House correspondents said the Trump administration is behaving differently."A lot of catering to Kim Jong Un going on in Vietnam," CNN's Jim Acosta tweeted. "First press is kicked out of hotel where Kim is staying. Now some reporters are blocked from pool spray because the dictator doesn't like shouted questions.""Pool sprays" are when a representative group of journalists are allowed to witness a presidential event. Normally they also shout some questions when they see an opening to do so. This custom has existed for decades.Reporters from the Associated Press and Reuters asked about Cohen and North Korean denuclearization during Wednesday's first "pool spray" with Trump and Kim.Staffers from North Korea's government-controlled media were also in the room, but they don't have the same freedom to shout questions.American reporters were anticipating the same level of access for the evening's next photo op, during dinner, but then "Sanders informed us that no print reporters would be allowed in due to sensitivities over shouted questions in the previous sprays," according to Vivian Salama of the Wall Street Journal. Salama was Wednesday's assigned "print pooler," one of many people who serves in a rotation.So in other words, according to Salama, the White House was okay with photographers and camera crews being present -- to take pictures -- but not with the AP and Reuters reporters being there. Correspondents from the Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg were also blocked.Thanks to a show of press solidarity, the White House opened up access a little bit."When our photo colleagues joined us in protest, they decided to allow one print reporter in," Salama wrote.So Salama was in the room to witness Trump and Kim's Wednesday night dinner. The other reporters were not.According to Salama's recap, Trump asked the small group of journalists if they were all "having a good time."He pointed to photographer Doug Mills of The New York Times and told Kim that Mills is "one of the great photographers of the world."Sanders said in a statement that the White House "ensured that representation of photographers, tv, radio and print Poolers are all in the room.""We are continuing to negotiate aspects of this historic summit and will always work to make sure the U.S. media has as much access as possible," she added.A similar dispute happened during Trump and Kim's first summit in Singapore last year.Acosta was excluded "from the first couple of pool sprays," he said on CNN, "and the reason I was given is they were concerned that Kim Jong Un had not been around American reporters yelling questions, shouting questions and so on."After Wednesday's episode, The Associated Press issued a statement that sharply criticized the Trump administration."The AP decries such efforts by the White House to restrict access to the president," the news service said. "It is critically important that any president uphold American press freedom standards, not only at home but especially while abroad." 4198