天津武清龙济医院泌尿男科医院就诊天津龙济医疗,武清区龙济阳痿医院,天津武清龙济泌尿外科男科医院在哪里,天津天津市武清区龙济男科门诊怎样,武清龙济有男科吗,天津省武清龙济医院,武清龙济医院包皮怎么样

SAN DIEGO, Calif. (KGTV) - Wild and violent parties at short-term vacation rentals like Airbnbs continue to make headlines. This past Spring in La n la Jolla, gunfire erupted during a party at an Airbnb mansion, terrifying neighbors. Team 10 investigative reporter Jennifer Kastner has spent weeks looking into whether vacation rental platforms are doing enough to protect our San Diego communities. Popular platforms Airbnb and Vrbo notified 10News that they do background checks, but the system isn’t infallible. Meanwhile, some local safety advocates say that the City of San Diego is, in part, to blame for the problem.10News’ cameras captured the chaos and cop cars on La Jolla’s Blackgold Road after shots rang out in May at a multimillion-dollar mansion that was being rented out on Airbnb. After filing a public records request, 10News recently learned new details from a report released by police. The report describes the "shell casings in the street," "[subjects] refusing to come out," and "[subjects] running upstairs."“I moved here actually 43 years ago,” says Val Arbab. The 87-year-old lives across the street and says the mansion is often rented out for big, loud parties. “It’s always many, many people. It's always adults. I only see males,” she tells us.Arbab and other neighbors say that partygoers clutter the street with cars and trash. The mansion owner declined an interview with 10News.Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVRs) have made headlines across the country after parties at STVRs got out-of-control. Security video from an STVR in Arizona shows a huge crowd. Partiers are seen leaving with the homeowner’s personal belongings, like his clothes. “[I was] watching my house and [I was] seeing them carry out item after item after item,” the homeowner later told a news crew. Security video from Sacramento shows someone firing off a handgun at a party hosted in an STVR. In Arizona, video obtained by a local news crew shows crime scene tape woven through a neighborhood where, earlier, a party at an STVR turned into a fight, leaving a young man dead.Other news crews captured video out of Pennsylvania after a party at an STVR became violent. “A dozen or so gunshots woke me up,” said a neighbor.Ann Kerr is the President of the La Jolla Town Council. We met at her home, a few miles south of the mansion where shots rang out. She's Chair of the San Diego Working Group on Short Term Rentals, which is pushing for better regulation of STVRs.“Our fundamental policy is that we welcome [STVRs] but not at the degradation of the quality of our neighborhood and we want good neighbor policies enforced,” says Kerr.The San Diego Working Group on Short Term Rentals has released 2019 recommendations for STVR regulations. These include establishing a new enterprise fund dedicated to the administration, monitoring, and enforcement of STVRs. The fund would hold all fees, taxes, and fines from the STVR industry. It would be used to help with operations related to permitting, monitoring, and enforcing STVRs. Another primary recommendation to deal with noise and nuisance is to assign STVR complaints to special STVR code compliance officers in an effort to relieve sworn police officers and regular City code compliance officers from responding to STVR issues. The status of STVRs remains a gray area in the City of San Diego. They're technically not permitted, but no one is cracking down on them until the Mayor's office and City Council adopt a resolution on how to regulate and enforce. “Who's enforcing this?,” we ask Kerr. She responds, “That's the whole question. Who's enforcing any of this? No one is right now,” she tells us.The San Diego Working Group is urging the City to adopt its recommendations as a new ordinance. “The longer that the politicians wait to put some kind of enforcement and compliance system in, the more vacation rentals will be established,” she says. She explains that in that time, the less peaceful neighborhood could become.Both Airbnb and Expedia Group (Vrbo and Homeaway) have an online submission form where neighbors can report concerns. An Airbnb spokesperson writes, “The overwhelming majority of Airbnb hosts and guests are good neighbors and respectful travelers. We encourage hosts to outline clear rules regarding minimum night stays, noise, parties, and events and we will take appropriate action -- including suspension or removal -- when our Community Standards have been violated.” On the issue of background checks, Airbnb writes, “While no background check system is infallible, we screen all hosts and guests globally against regulatory, terrorist, and sanctions watch lists. For United States residents, we also run background checks looking for prior felony convictions, sex offender registrations, and significant misdemeanors. We are working with additional governments around the world to identify where we can do more background checks.”A spokesperson for the Expedia Group writes, “We use technology to verify user accounts, giving travelers confidence in the authenticity of owner identities, and we conduct certain background screenings where we're able to. Although we take steps to confirm the identities of our community members, we advise travelers to always read owner profiles and reviews. We will continue to make investments to build impactful trust and safety policies, solutions and support. We support owners by educating them about best practices for creating safe and private spaces for travelers, and we use technology to verify the identities of owners and travelers whenever possible. We advise our community to follow state and local laws that may apply.”The San Diego City Attorney’s Office writes, “Short term rentals are not permitted under the San Diego Municipal Code. However, the Code Enforcement Division of the Development Services Department has not referred to our Office any cases for prosecution. Proposals such as the ones you listed fall under the jurisdiction of the City‘s policy makers, the City Council and Mayor, and can be addressed by them.”Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s Office sent 10News the following statement. "Following through on his commitment, the Mayor introduced a common-sense plan to regulate short term rentals last year. The Council adopted that framework but made modifications, which ultimately resulted in a referendum that prompted the City Council to rescind the ordinance. Our office continues to believe the Mayor’s original proposal was a fair compromise, and will continue meeting with stakeholders to determine if there is a legislative solution to this issue."In a follow-up email, his Office wrote, in part, “…the Mayor has always supported using revenue generated from fees applied to short-term rentals for code enforcement…Mayor Faulconer is committed to active enforcement to ensure hosts, guests and online platforms for short-term rentals are in compliance with the new regulations. That includes a new team of police and code enforcement officers to work evenings and weekends to address code complaints; the creation of a license and registration system that interfaces with City databases; and a new complaint hotline or mobile application for residents to report violations…”We asked the Mayor’s Office and other City communications officers for an update on when the issue of STVRs will be on the Council agenda again, so that a decision can be made about how to regulate and enforce them. The Mayor's Office referred us to Council President Georgette Gómez's Office. A spokesperson reported that there are currently no plans to put the issue on the docket.Arbab is hoping for any resolution to party problems so her street might one day return to what it used to be. We all knew each other and I was very happy,” she adds. 7792

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — California voters are right to think they already weighed in on how big cages should be for egg-laying hens.In 2008, voters ushered in Proposition 2, which sought to free egg-laying hens from tiny cages. It didn't outlaw cages but barred California farmers from keeping hens — as well as calves raised for veal and breeding pigs — in pens so small they virtually couldn't move.Since then, supermarket shelves have filled with cage-free egg varieties. Corporations like McDonald's, Costco and Taco Bell have committed to using cage-free products.RELATED: Proposed California initiative seeks to end high-speed railBut a decade later, voters are being asked to revisit the issue with Proposition 12, the Farm Animal Confinement Initiative.The Humane Society of the United States, the issue's primary proponent, says the measure is needed to update California standards and to apply those standards to out-of-state farmers selling their products in California. The earlier initiative simply stated the three types of animals must be able to turn around freely, stand up and fully extend their limbs — but set no specifics.A "yes" vote for Proposition 12 would create new minimum size requirements for confinement pens for all three animals and require that all egg-laying hens be cage-free by 2022.It would also ban the sales from other states not meeting California's standards.RELATED: No vote coming in 2018, but measure to expand convention center qualifies for ballotThe Humane Society calls the measure a "commonsense reform" that strengthens a decade-old animal cruelty law and gives farmers a phase-in time to shift to more humane practices."Most of the eggs sold in California come from birds confined in cages where it's hard for them to even move. They have to eat, sleep, defecate and lay eggs in the same small space every day for their entire life," said Josh Balk, vice president at the Humane Society of the United States. "Proposition 12 ensures that the pork sold in California, the veal sold in California and the eggs sold in the state come from (animals) not confined in cages."Specifically, the measure would require, starting in 2020, a calf confined for production to have at least 43 square feet (4 square meters) of floor space to roam in, while each pig would have to be given 24 square feet (2.2 square meters) of floor space starting in 2022.RELATED: California gas tax repeal qualifies for November ballotEgg-laying hens, starting in 2020, must be given 1 square foot (0.1 square meter) of floor space each, and have to be cage-free by 2022, according to Proposition 12.According to findings of the state's nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, the measure would likely result in an increase in prices for eggs, pork and veal partly because farmers would have to remodel or build new housing for animals."Changes in housing systems, which come with significant costs that increase food prices, should be driven by consumer purchasing decisions, not the agenda of any activist group," Jim Monroe, National Pork Producers Council spokesman, told the Los Angeles Times.RELATED: Private DMV office provides services to California lawmakersThe Association of California Egg Farmers also opposes the measure, saying the expedited timeline could lead to supply disruptions, price spikes and a shortage of eggs for sale.The Legislative Analyst's Office concluded that if approved, the measure could cost the state as much as million a year to enforce, and millions of dollars more per year in lost tax revenues from farm businesses that choose to stop or reduce production because of higher costs.Other opponents of Proposition 12 say it doesn't go far enough to stop animal cruelty.Bradley Miller, a spokesman for Californians against Cruelty, Cages and Fraud, which is leading a "No on Proposition 12" campaign, says the measure is misleading because the phase-in period implicitly makes cages legal until at least 2022."We're opposed to legalizing cages in our state," said Miller, who is also president of the Humane Farming Association. "These are ever-changing, never-arriving deadlines." 4160

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — California voters are right to think they already weighed in on how big cages should be for egg-laying hens.In 2008, voters ushered in Proposition 2, which sought to free egg-laying hens from tiny cages. It didn't outlaw cages but barred California farmers from keeping hens — as well as calves raised for veal and breeding pigs — in pens so small they virtually couldn't move.Since then, supermarket shelves have filled with cage-free egg varieties. Corporations like McDonald's, Costco and Taco Bell have committed to using cage-free products.RELATED: Proposed California initiative seeks to end high-speed railBut a decade later, voters are being asked to revisit the issue with Proposition 12, the Farm Animal Confinement Initiative.The Humane Society of the United States, the issue's primary proponent, says the measure is needed to update California standards and to apply those standards to out-of-state farmers selling their products in California. The earlier initiative simply stated the three types of animals must be able to turn around freely, stand up and fully extend their limbs — but set no specifics.A "yes" vote for Proposition 12 would create new minimum size requirements for confinement pens for all three animals and require that all egg-laying hens be cage-free by 2022.It would also ban the sales from other states not meeting California's standards.RELATED: No vote coming in 2018, but measure to expand convention center qualifies for ballotThe Humane Society calls the measure a "commonsense reform" that strengthens a decade-old animal cruelty law and gives farmers a phase-in time to shift to more humane practices."Most of the eggs sold in California come from birds confined in cages where it's hard for them to even move. They have to eat, sleep, defecate and lay eggs in the same small space every day for their entire life," said Josh Balk, vice president at the Humane Society of the United States. "Proposition 12 ensures that the pork sold in California, the veal sold in California and the eggs sold in the state come from (animals) not confined in cages."Specifically, the measure would require, starting in 2020, a calf confined for production to have at least 43 square feet (4 square meters) of floor space to roam in, while each pig would have to be given 24 square feet (2.2 square meters) of floor space starting in 2022.RELATED: California gas tax repeal qualifies for November ballotEgg-laying hens, starting in 2020, must be given 1 square foot (0.1 square meter) of floor space each, and have to be cage-free by 2022, according to Proposition 12.According to findings of the state's nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, the measure would likely result in an increase in prices for eggs, pork and veal partly because farmers would have to remodel or build new housing for animals."Changes in housing systems, which come with significant costs that increase food prices, should be driven by consumer purchasing decisions, not the agenda of any activist group," Jim Monroe, National Pork Producers Council spokesman, told the Los Angeles Times.RELATED: Private DMV office provides services to California lawmakersThe Association of California Egg Farmers also opposes the measure, saying the expedited timeline could lead to supply disruptions, price spikes and a shortage of eggs for sale.The Legislative Analyst's Office concluded that if approved, the measure could cost the state as much as million a year to enforce, and millions of dollars more per year in lost tax revenues from farm businesses that choose to stop or reduce production because of higher costs.Other opponents of Proposition 12 say it doesn't go far enough to stop animal cruelty.Bradley Miller, a spokesman for Californians against Cruelty, Cages and Fraud, which is leading a "No on Proposition 12" campaign, says the measure is misleading because the phase-in period implicitly makes cages legal until at least 2022."We're opposed to legalizing cages in our state," said Miller, who is also president of the Humane Farming Association. "These are ever-changing, never-arriving deadlines." 4160

SAN DIEGO (KGTV)- The fight continues fort tenants in Oak Park who say they soon won't be able to pay their rent if it continues to go up. The group met with the San Diego Housing Commission Friday morning. Many of the tenants are seniors living on a fixed income. Some of them say they've already seen their rent increased twice this year. "There doesn't seem to be any protections for people like us," says one of the tenants who spoke during Friday's board meeting. "We're on a fixed income; we get a two percent raise every year. My rent was raised by 50 percent."Olive Wood Gardens is a low-income housing complex for seniors and those who are disabled. Tenants say they are scared for their future. "I don't know what to do now," says Kathy Blackstock. "I don't think I can go back to homelessness."They're not only asking help from the San Diego Housing Commission; the tenants are hoping the state would pass Assembly Bill 1482. Last week, a rally was held outside of the complex in support of the bill. It would make it illegal for property owners to raise rents more than seven percent in one year. The Senate Committee is currently reviewing the bill. The San Diego Housing Commission board says they've referred the tenants' comments and information to the staff. They will work on making some progress before next month. 1342

SAN DIEGO, Calif. (KGTV) - An East County woman was devastated to find out the money she spent to buy a new cat likely went to con artists.“I just felt like I lost my sense of love for humanity,” Suzi Moon told Team 10. Moon’s Maine Coon cat, Teka, recently passed away. She was 15-years-old and a longtime member of her family.“He was the best cat ever,” Moon said. When he died, she was heartbroken.“I was in an emotional mode,” Moon said. “I wanted to get another one because I just was so used to that cat.”Moon searched online and found a website that advertised pure Maine Coone cats. She emailed the website and got a response. “They emailed me back and this cat that I saw on the website was a gray cat. Beautiful,” she said.She also spoke to someone on the phone, who sounded legitimate. The man asked her questions, such as whether or not she was having the cat indoors and if she was declawing the cat. Moon eventually scraped up 0 and sent the money through Zelle, something she now regrets.The day the supposed seller was supposed to ship the cat to her, he asked for more money for a special crate. “We need to have you cash app, send ,000 more,” Moon said. After back and forth with the seller and refusing to pay more, Moon said they eventually blocked her number. The 0 she paid was gone. The website, puremainecoons.com, is no longer active. Team 10 found the website on petscams.com, a site that bills itself as a pet watchdog website. The Better Business Bureau said pets are the top scam when it comes to online purchases. The average loss is 0. Moon wanted to share her mistake with others in hopes nobody else falls victim to this scam.“I just felt violated. There [are] people out there taking advantage like that. It’s disgusting,” Moon said.Team 10 called the person Moon said she spoke with about the cat. That man hung up before answering any questions. The BBB suggests do not buy a pet without seeing it in person. The organization also recommends conducting an internet search of the photo. If you see the same picture on different websites, it could be fraud. 2112