武清区龙济男子好不好-【武清龙济医院 】,武清龙济医院 ,天津武清龙济医院做包皮手术费用,天津市龙济男科专科,武清区龙济男性专科医院好不好,天津武清区龙济医院泌尿专科医院网址,天津龙济医院泌尿外科在哪个位置,天津龙济医院男科官方QQ

(KGTV) - Is Spotify offering a new podcast just for dogs?Yes!"My Dog's Favorite Podcast" was created by animal experts.It features reassuring human voices, relaxing music, and ambient sounds.Spotify is also offering a range of playlists curated specifically for pets left alone all day. They're based on subscribers' musical tastes and pet species. In addition to dog and cat, the animal options include iguana, bird, and hamster. 440
(KGTV) — As demonstrations around the country call for police reforms, demands for cities to "defund the police" have increased.But what does that really mean? Is it a reduction in funding or eliminating departments? So far, the calls have included both."There are some advocates who would like to see a police-free environment in a lot of cities," Scripps National Political Editor Joe St. George tells 10News' Jon Horn. "Now for some people that is a terrifying thought. Police help prevent theft, they prevent violent crime. So it is something that is certainly going to be a hotly contested political issue."RELATED: San Diego City Council approves budget, adds Office on Race & EquitySt. George added that both Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden have both said they do not support calls to "defund the police," so the issue may fall on local cities.Policy proposals are still in the early stages. Supporters of the movement say they'd like to see less patrolling and reaction to major needs. But critics say patrolling helps prevent crimes from happening.If budget reductions are in the mix, depending on the amount, departments can either expect layoffs or a shift in priorities, according to St. George."If you're talking millions of dollars worth of cuts to a police department, there will have to be layoffs. If you're talking a couple hundred thousand, perhaps they would shift priorities from one program to another," St. George says.In San Diego, locals voiced their calls for decreasing the police department's budget for the 2021 fiscal year. City leaders voted Monday to approve the budget, which will increase SDPD's budget to 6 million.In contrast, Minneapolis' City Council has voiced intentions to disband the local department, calling their current department unreformable. City leaders have not announced plans for a future public safety agency.RELATED: Advocates calling to defund or disband police departmentsBudget changes could lead to different ways of serving the community, according to Isaac Bryan, Executive Director of the UCLA Black Policy Project. Cities may focus more on preventative efforts like education and services for low-income communities."I definitely think there are partnerships to be made and there's opportunity to be had, but that reimagining really first comes with having the resources to dream," said Bryan. "Right now, we don't have that because over half of our budgets, the discretionary funds go to law enforcement and policing."One thing that is likely, whether it be budget or policy changes, is that no two cities can expect to see the same response."Every city is going to be different. San Diego is going to respond differently than Los Angeles and California cities will respond differently than cities in Minnesota," St. George says. 2839

(CNN) -- Immigration and Customs Enforcement is pressing forward to arrest and deport families with court-ordered removals in 10 cities beginning Sunday, according to a senior immigration official, after President Donald Trump's tweet revealing an operation was imminent.But acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan has been hesitant about elements of the operation, according to two sources familiar with his thinking.ICE has said it was considering options to arrest and deport families who have gone through their legal proceedings but has refrained from publicly providing the scope and timeframe of the operation, which officials say could lead to a situation where a family is separated and could cause a backlash against the department.To that end, Trump's tweet Monday night that ICE, the enforcement arm of DHS, was preparing to deport "millions" of undocumented immigrants next week was striking, given the figure and the decision to disclose an operation prior to its execution."If you're here illegally, then you should be removed," acting head of ICE Mark Morgan told reporters Wednesday during a call prompted by the President's tweet. "And in this case, that includes families."RELATED: Trump admin considers temporary courts along the southern borderA senior administration official told CNN the operation had been planned for some time, but said the tweet had put the operation at the forefront."Certainly, the President's tweet helped prioritize things for people," the official said, adding that there had been internal debate about timing amid negotiations with Congress on additional funding and the upcoming 2020 budget.The official added that "there has been an effort to communicate what is likely to happen, without saying specifically when and where," contrary to the "zero tolerance" policy which was done without much advance notice to the media or Capitol Hill.Field agents at local field offices are receiving briefings and trainings, according to a senior immigration official. There are also preparations being put in place for mixed-immigration status families: for example, if a parent is undocumented, but has a US citizen child."Due to law-enforcement sensitivities and the safety and security of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, the agency will not offer specific details related to ongoing enforcement operations before the conclusion of those actions," ICE said in a statement Friday.Officials have previously raised concerns about the operation being perceived as separating families again, though Morgan said Wednesday, "Our goal is not to separate families."The intent, Morgan said, is to deter migrants from coming to the US-Mexico border, and the operation is expected to include families who are on an expedited court docket.It is not yet known if San Diego is one of the cities being targeted by ICE.2,000 people targetedLast year, the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees the nation's immigration courts, announced that it had begun tracking family cases filed by the Department of Homeland Security in 10 immigration court locations: Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York and San Francisco.The cases are being expedited to try to process the families in under a year.Morgan said ICE had worked closely with the Justice Department on the family expedited docket and that the "results were very disappointing," claiming that some families haven't attended their immigration hearings.In February, ICE sent around 2,000 letters to families who already had received final orders of removal by judges in absentia, asking them to self-report to local ICE offices by March to comply with the orders, Morgan said. The upcoming operation is expected to target approximately 2,000 people, according to the senior immigration official.Once arrests take place, families will likely be moved to ICE family residential detention centers as the agency works with consulates to obtain travel documents, according to the official. Some people will likely appeal their cases, but eventually some will be removed.The official added that when there are US citizen children in the family, the parents will be fitted with an ankle bracelet and allowed to stay with that child to allow time to get affairs in order while other undocumented family members remain in custody, the official added, nothing that no one wants a situation where a child is left alone.Advocacy groups say they're mobilizing beginning Sunday in anticipation of an upcoming operation.Morgan, who took over the director role in an acting capacity weeks ago, stressed that there hasn't been a shift in direction for the agency but rather a continuation of its policy not to exclude any demographic for arrest and deportation. The operation is expected to encompass worksite enforcement, as well as families with court-ordered removals and individuals with final orders for removal.CNN first reported last month that the administration had been considering deporting migrant families with court-ordered removals in an attempt to "send a message" to smugglers, according to a senior administration official.As part of the consideration, the administration had been looking at an operation rolled out in the late years of Barack Obama's presidency -- and revived in Trump's first year in office -- that also targeted family units. Obama initially focused on felons.A plan months in the makingLast year, at the request of DHS, the Justice Department put together the accelerated family court docket or the so-called "rocket docket," according to a former administration official."The goal was to get to consequence quicker," so that "people would get their hearings, they would get ordered removed, and then a significant number" of people would be put back into ICE custody and removed from the US, said the official.Sometime around March, ICE officials took additional planning steps. The former acting ICE Director Ron Vitiello had several conversations about a potential operation with then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, who at the time requested additional information, according to the official. But before DHS was fully prepared to carry out the operation, both Nielsen and Vitiello left the administration amid a purge of top DHS officials in April.There was an understanding that an operation targeting families would be "tough and difficult" for everyone involved, said the official."You go to a home that's a family and maybe the father is present, but the mother is not or vice versa. People are in medical care. Other members of the family may be in legal status," said the former official. "There's a lot of stuff to consider in a situation like this."Additionally, there were also discussions about family separation and whether this operation would comply with current court orders, as well as the President's executive order to end family separation.Trump doubles down on illegal immigrationTrump's tweet about a massive operation came on the eve of his re-election rally. The President had made illegal immigration a cornerstone of his 2016 campaign and appeared to be reverting back to that message hours before taking the stage in Orlando.But the mass deportations he previously warned of haven't materialized and deportation numbers have lagged behind those seen during Obama's presidency.According to ICE data, deportations increased about 13% between fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2018, when 256,085 people were deported. That's still significantly less than the number of people deported during fiscal year 2012, when Obama's administration deported more than 400,000 people.Staffing limitations and budget constraints generally limit how many people the US can detain and deport -- and how quickly that process happens. Deporting millions of people would cost far more than Immigration and Customs Enforcement's current budget allows -- and require a vast amount of resources.The administration contends that interior enforcement will deter migrants from journeying to the southern border. The swell of migrants illegally crossing the border in recent months has overwhelmed DHS. In May alone, nearly 133,000 migrants were arrested for illegally crossing the border, according to Customs and Border Protection data, including more than 11,000 unaccompanied children. Many of them turn themselves in to Border Patrol.In an emergency budget request made last month, the White House is seeking .5 billion more from Congress "to address the immediate humanitarian and security crisis at the southern border of the United States," including .7 million more to fund ICE transportation and removal, and more than 0 million to fund thousands more beds in immigrant detention facilities.But that request is still making its way through Congress -- and it's likely to face pushback, particularly from House Democrats who've repeatedly noted their concerns about the Trump administration's approach to immigration enforcement. 9078
(CNN) -- In a landmark ruling, a court in Mexico City has said two people should be allowed to use cocaine legally.The ruling means the unnamed pair can use, but not sell, small amounts of cocaine, according to Mexico United Against Crime (MUCD), an NGO that filed legal papers in the case as part of its strategy to change the country's drug policy.This is the first time cocaine use has been made legal in Mexico, but the ruling still needs to be ratified by a higher court.It comes at a time when Mexico is grappling with its drug policy under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, whose official development plan for 2019-2024 pledges to reform a "prohibitionist approach" that it calls "unsustainable" due to the "violence and poor public health outcomes" it has generated.The court ruling orders Mexico's national health regulator, Cofepris, to authorize two people to legally possess, transport and use cocaine.However, a Cofepris official told the AFP news agency that such an authorization is outside its remit, and it has blocked the court order as a result.The order was delivered in May but will now be reviewed by a tribunal, according to AFP.In a statement, MUCD emphasizes that the ruling will only be enforced if it is upheld by the tribunal, and underlines that it does not legalize cocaine.The organization said the ruling marks a new stage in the judiciary's understanding of drugs and offers an opportunity to call for an end to the war on drugs and the redistribution of public resources to fight other crimes."We have spent years working for a more secure, just and peaceful Mexico," said Lisa Sánchez, MUCD's director."This case is about insisting on the need to stop criminalizing users of drugs... and design better public policies that explore all the available options, including regulation."Mexico is a major transit point for cocaine en route to the United States, and trafficking gangs have grown in size and power thanks to the vast profits of the trade.The country's war on drugs began in 2006, when then-President Felipe Calderón sent in the army to fight traffickers.According to a 2018 US Congressional Research Service report, "many sources indicate" that about 150,000 intentional homicides in Mexico since 2006 were linked to organized crime.In 2018, Mexico recorded 33,341 homicides, the highest number since the country began keeping records.MUCD wants the government to reform drug policy as a way of improving public security and has also campaigned for changes to legislation on marijuana.In 2017, marijuana was legalized for medical and scientific purposes, and in November 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that a blanket ban on recreational use was unconstitutional, Reuters reports.That same month, López Obrador's government submitted a bill that would allow recreational use and create a medical marijuana industry, according to Reuters.For now, Cofepris grants permits to use marijuana on an individual basis.Gunther Baumgarten, editor at consultancy firm Latin News and Canning House associate, told CNN that any potential advance through the judicial system is likely to be a slow process.It took three years for the marijuana case to reach Mexico's supreme court, and judges could decide cocaine poses too much of a public health risk, he said.Plus, there is less of an economic incentive to act on cocaine than marijuana."In the case of marijuana there is already an international legal market but there is no such thing for cocaine," said Baumgarten.And López Obrador could be discouraged after calculating the political risk."He might get into some rocky territory," said Baumgarten, explaining that a majority of Mexicans were against the legalization of marijuana."It's not necessarily popular."Baumgarten also said "it's not clear" whether decriminalizing cocaine use would improve public security, as such a measure wouldn't affect drug smuggling to the US, which is the main driver of violence. 3959
(CNN) -- Mike Tyson isn't shy about his love for marijuana.On Monday's episode of his podcast, aptly named "Hotboxin' with Mike Tyson," the former heavyweight champion shared just how much he spends on the psychoactive drug."What do we smoke a month?" he asked his co-host, former NFL player turned marijuana advocate Eben Britton. "Is it ,000 a month?""We smoke 10 tons of weed at the ranch a month," Britton said, referencing Tyson Ranch, the boxer's forthcoming 40-acre marijuana farm and "resort.""Is that crazy?" Tyson asked, though it seemed he already knew the answer.His guest, rapper Jim Jones, widened his eyes."That's a lot of weed," he said. "That's nonstop, every second weed right there."Tyson's latest career pivot might be his most lucrative.Shortly after California's recreational marijuana laws went into effect in 2018, he launched Tyson Ranch, which sells nine strains of cannabis flower, potent extracts and soon, edibles.In addition to production facilities, the luxury resort is set to feature an edible factory, amphitheater and "glamping" campgrounds. 1087
来源:资阳报