如何乘车到天津龙济(天津市武清区龙济医院男科医院好不好啊) (今日更新中)

CHESAPEAKE, Va. – The Chesapeake Police Department, the Chesapeake Jubilee Committee, the Chesapeake Crime Line, Kroger and several sponsors have partnered together to give away a Turkey instead of a ticket to several drivers in Chesapeake.This will take place on Friday, December 13. If the circumstances of the traffic stop and demeanor of the driver allow, the officer will offer a turkey instead of a ticket.This act of kindness began with local Rodney Foster. He raised money from several sponsors. The Chesapeake Jubilee and Kroger assisted Foster, then teamed up with the Chesapeake Police Department and the Chesapeake Crime Line.The money raised will be donated to the Chesapeake Crime Line.This is the 724

CLEVELAND — Chuck and Angie Graham have been married 33 years.They have been through a lot together in that time, but perhaps their biggest challenge yet came in January.The Diagnosis"I woke up in the morning to go to work and I lost my balance a couple times and fell down," Chuck said.Angie said she heard something and yelled up to him if he was OK."He said he was falling and couldn't walk," Angie recalled, tearing up.An ambulance ride, and several tests and scans later, the Grahams had their answer — and it was devastating."She said that I had a very aggressive tumor in my brain and it was malignant," Chuck said.Such a diagnosis can make you feel so helpless, Angie said.The DenialThey say the next blow was just as unexpected.Their health insurance provider denied covering the procedure Chuck's neurosurgeon recommended to treat his cancerous brain tumor, saying it was "experimental" and "investigational."The laser ablation procedure was FDA-cleared a decade ago, but that does not guarantee coverage.The Grahams appealed the decision. Chuck was prepped for surgery hoping for a last-minute approval that never came, and he was sent home."Just the look on his face, broke my heart," Angie said."He's a veteran. He's a dad. He's a husband, a grandpa and a friend who would do anything for you. How could they not value him?"Fighting BackChuck's family took action.His daughter Jen Koons led the charge."They've just always been there for us," Jen said.And now she wanted to be there for them.Jen turned to the power of social media.She had previously sent the letter to the company before posting it to Facebook.It began: "An open letter to SummaCare and our health insurance industry..."Jen wrote about her father's fight with brain cancer and health insurance.The letter continued: "I hope thousands of people read this letter and understand that our physicians do not get to decide what's best for us, insurance companies do."Her post was shared nearly 3,000 times. Hundreds commented. Her message resonated.Fighting Back"I would say don't give up," Jen said.She learned about the right to an external review. It is a free service all health plan issuers must provide once the internal appeals process has been exhausted.An independent organization reviewed Chuck's case and overturned the denial.Two weeks after he had been sent home from the hospital, Chuck got the surgery his doctor had recommended."I just think we would've had a whole different scenario today if he hadn't had that surgery," Angie said.The external reviewer found Chuck's procedure "medically necessary" and "beneficial" for his condition."I just want people to understand their rights and to find their voice," Jen saidChuck's tumor is shrinking, and Jen is happy how things turned out for her dad, but angry, she says, for the people who don't have someone to advocate for them."There's how many people who go home and think, 'Oh, this is just the way it is,' " she said.In her open letter she wrote, "People deserve better. People deserve to count on their health insurance. They are more than a premium payment."Chuck's provider called the procedure "experimental and investigational." It was FDA-cleared a decade ago, but that does not guarantee coverage.There are not clear guidelines as to what defines "experimental and investigational."It can create a gray area where patients seeking innovative uses for a procedure are caught up."I'd like to see legislation around experimental procedures," said Tracy H. Porter of Cleveland State University.She said she'd like to see clarification and rules put in place, like with pre-existing conditions."I would also like to see something where we're educating patients more on their rights," Porter said.That is why Chuck and his family said they wanted to share their story; they want to help others navigate the often murky waters of a diagnosis and a denial.Jen has kept meticulous track of her father's paperwork. She has two bulky binders filled with research, correspondence with doctors, the hospital, insurance and notes from outside agencies.WEWS did reach out to SummaCare for this story.They provided us with this statement:"First and foremost, at SummaCare, we want what is best for our members in all cases. In accordance with federal privacy laws, we cannot discuss the specific medical care or associated claims of any of our members."ResourcesJen said she also found helpful resources through the 4465

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, announced late Sunday that he deleted his Twitter account. He made the announcement on Twitter.He also changed his display name to read "Daddy DotCom," which could perhaps be a nod to Father's Day. Neither Twitter or Musk has clarified what exactly is happening, leaving social media users confused about Musk's behavior. As of 8 a.m. EST, Musk's tweet about deleting his account has more than 13,000 retweets and tons of comments.This isn't the first time the CEO of Tesla has done some strange things on the social media site. In July 2018, the billionaire caused quite a stir when he 639

Evan Stratton, and his three other crew members, set sail Thursday to row across the Atlantic Ocean -- all 3,000 miles of it.“We didn’t know each other seven months ago,” John Fannin, one of the crew members, said. All four of the men are U.S. Veterans.“More people have been and climbed Mount Everest and been in space than they’ve ever rowed an ocean,” Stratton said about the trans-Atlantic ocean row. They work in shifts, three hours rowing and three hours sleeping non-stop or days.“We’re shooting for 40 [days] but really just trying to get there in one piece,” Stratton said.This is all part of the Talisker Whiskey Atlantic Challenge, an annual ocean rowing race that starts in the Canary Islands off of the Spanish coast and finishes in Antigua near Puerto Rico. The journey takes at least a month.And this year, the four-man “Fight Oar Die” rowing crew is the only American team to attempt it. This is also the second time in its history an all-Veteran team has attempted it.“They won’t say it because they’re too humble but I’ll brag on them,” Fannin said. “Luke and Evan will be the first U.S. veteran combat wounded to do it.”It’s a physical feat, but one of mental endurance as well.“We’ll be periodically checking in with the rowers throughout,” Shelly Smith-Acu?a, Dean of the Graduate School of Professional Psychology at Denver University, said. Researchers at the school helped the rowers prepare mentally, and are studying them and their journey to better understand resilience.“They’re doing this, again to spread a message about strength and resilience, recovery, and again about facing adversity,” Smith-Acuna said.“We all want to be challenged, we all want to do something great with our lives,” Fannin said.“I think it’s amazing for veterans to go out and showcase what their abilities are,” Amanda Steele, a Veteran Affairs Office Recreation Therapy Supervisor, said. “Overcome that external stigma but also that internal stigma that our veterans face, such as the belief that they’re not able to be successful.”While the four veterans take off on this challenge as part of the rowing team for the nonprofit organization Fight Oar Die, they are also raising awareness for veteran mental health issues.“One of the things in common in the mission is to raise awareness about mental health issues and mental wellness in the veteran community,” Smith-Acuna said. 2396

CINCINNATI, Ohio — Comprehensive multi-platform reporting and collaboration with news outlets are trends among winners of the 2018 Scripps Howard Awards. "Their work embodies the meaning of journalism that brings important truths to light, holds the powerful accountable and changes our world," said a release from the Scripps Howard Foundation. Winners of its 66th awards competed in 15 categories. The Scripps Howard Foundation will present more than 0,000 in prize money to the winning organizations and journalists at its annual awards show on April 18 in Cincinnati. Here are the winners for this year:Breaking News: South Florida Sun Sentinel (Deerfield Beach) for “Parkland: A Breaking News Story that Demanded a Long-Term Commitment” – Coverage of the shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School.Judges’ comments: “Breaking news coverage is not often an area where demonstrable impact can be shown, but the Sun Sentinel’s dogged real-time pursuit of every angle of the breaking story and underlying contributors to this tragedy has had a lasting impact on Parkland, on journalism and on the national conversation about guns in America.” Finalists: The Kansas City (Missouri) Star – “Tragedy on Table Rock Lake”; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – “Tree of Life Shooting” Broadcast – Local Coverage: KNTV (San Jose, California) for “Transgender Kids: A Changing Student Body” – A story exploring the issue of transgender reassignment decisions. Judges’ comments: “The winner in this category, in part, wins for taking on a subject that, 20 years from now we will likely look back on and wonder why it was a subject at all. We were most impressed at the mature, non-sensational way this story treated the subject.” Finalists: KARE (Minneapolis) – “A Pattern of Denial”; KUSA (Denver) – “Lien on Me” Broadcast – National, International Coverage: MSNBC for “Putin’s Covert War” – An investigation into the main players in the 2016 election meddling story. Judges’ comments: “MSNBC reporter Richard Engle goes inside one of the most important and hard-to-crack stories of our time – the spread of Russian influence on international affairs and on U.S. politics. He shows, through audio recordings, for example, how American troops confront Russian-hired mercenaries in Syria, and he tracks down a former KGB spy turned double agent now living in London to learn more about how Russia put out ‘hit contracts’ on opponents.” Finalists: Frontline PBS and ProPublica – “Documenting Hate”; Vice News – “After the Fall” Business/Financial Reporting: International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, NBC News Investigative Unit, Associated Press and more than 50 media partners for “Implant Files” – An investigation into the medical devices and implants industry and its related injuries and deaths. Judges’ comments: “Excellently planned, researched, documented, reported and written with key findings highlighted throughout. The compelling personal stories of patients give life to the numbers.”Finalists: Bloomberg – “Sign Here to Lose Everything”; Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting, PRX, Associated Press and PBS NewsHour – “Kept Out” Community Journalism: Knoxville (Tennessee) News Sentinel for “The Devastation of TVA’s Coal Ash Spill” – Coverage of the workers who were sickened cleaning up the country’s worst coal ash spill. Judges’ comments: “Reporter Jamie Satterfield delivers excellent watchdog work that truly holds the powerful accountable. Her investigation is deeply reported and swarms all the important angles. The series of stories were well sourced and contained videos with on-the-record accounts that hit viewers between the eyes. Satterfield’s extraordinary efforts result in change-inducing and life-saving journalism.” Finalists: The Marshall Project and Tennessean (Nashville) – “Tennessee’s ‘Safekeepers’”; The Post and Courier (Charleston, South Carolina) – “Minimally Adequate” Environmental Reporting: National Geographic for “Planet or Plastic?” – Reporting on the alarming volume of plastic in our world. Judges’ comments: “National Geographic’s ‘Planet or Plastic?’ has catapulted the conversation onto a global platform by creating awareness and catalyzing action. Journalism like this shines a light on policy flaws and irresponsible manufacturing and empowers citizens and communities to be proactive about protecting our environment and the people and animals it supports.” Finalists: Center for Public Integrity, The Texas Tribune (Austin), Newsy and Associated Press – “Blowout: Inside America’s Energy Gamble”; Charleston (West Virginia) Gazette-Mail and ProPublica – “The New Power Brokers: West Virginia’s Natural Gas Industry” Distinguished Service to the First Amendment: The Dallas Morning News for “Pain and Profit” – An investigation into the failures in Texas’ privatized Medicaid system. Judges’ comments: "The impact of the investigation is impressive. Sick people are getting the services they are entitled to; the state has spent million on 100 new regulators; the legislature is considering a package of bills expected to lead to a crackdown on companies that deny medically needed services…none of this could have been accomplished without the use of public records requests and resourceful use of duplicate records held by other states when their requests were denied.” Finalists: Atlanta Journal-Constitution and WSB-TV (Atlanta) – “How Atlanta Trampled the Public’s Right to Know”; The Denver Post – “Shrouded Justice” Human Interest Storytelling: The New York Times and ProPublica for “Blood Will Tell” – An investigation of a forensic technique used in the criminal justice system, despite concerns about its reliability. Judges’ comments: “Extraordinary storytelling with careful selection and organization of a massive amount of material. The story somehow manages to present a troubling indictment of blood spatter analysis and its misuse in our courts — and at the same time, to tell the deeply human tragedy of this husband and wife and all those decades the man spent in prison.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Lost in the Storm”; Univision – “America First: The Legacy of an Immigration Raid” Innovation: BBC for “Anatomy of a Killing” – A project that used forensic analysis of viral video footage to prove the occurrence of a series of executions in Cameroon, Africa.Judges’ comments: “This is a story where the innovation was integral to the journalism instead of just enhancing the story. This investigation done from laptops in London taps readily available digital tools to show the potential power of investigative journalism when traditional skills are paired up with modern digital resources. The genesis of this project – a video that went viral – is one that can serve as a replicable model for other newsrooms.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Visual Forensics”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Parkland” Investigative Reporting: Reuters for “Myanmar Burning” – Reporting on the expulsion of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. Judges’ comments: “Brave, intrepid collection of reporting. Reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo gathered comprehensive evidence from survivors, witnesses and families of the victims to tell the story of atrocities that may otherwise not have been brought to light. The reporters remain imprisoned in Myanmar, but the work they began resonated throughout the world.” Finalists: Star Tribune (Minneapolis) – “Denied Justice”; The Wall Street Journal – “Trump’s Hush Money” Multimedia Journalism: Frontline PBS and The GroundTruth Project for “The Last Generation: An Interactive Film on the Marshall Islands” – A collaborative reporting project on climate change and its effect on the population of the Marshall Islands.Judges’ comments: “Frontline and GroundTruth introduce viewers to this issue through the lens of a generation of children on the Marshall Islands, their lives likely be displaced by rising waters. Using a smartly presented mix of documentary video, explainer text and illustrated graphics to present the science, ‘The Last Generation’ gives a space for these kids to articulate what climate change means for their futures. And as viewers navigate through the story, they might also glimpse their own potential fate." Finalists: The Oregonian/OregonLive.com (Portland) – “Ghosts of Highway 20”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Unprepared and Overwhelmed” Opinion: Palestine (Texas) Herald-Press for “What Are They Hiding?” – Commentary that questioned two issues affecting the Palestine community: an athletic commission’s treatment of a football player and the state of Texas’ rush to execute condemned prisoners. Judges’ comments: “In their clarity and detail, the editorials would be worthy of the best efforts of the largest metro newspapers in America. The fact that they were all published by a small Texas paper with less than a 10,000 circulation is an example of journalism that speaks truth to power when doing so could invite truly unpleasant consequences.”Finalists: Bloomberg – Tim O’Brien columns for Bloomberg Opinion; Capital Gazette (Annapolis, Maryland) – “Capital Gazette Shooting and Aftermath” Radio/Podcast: Michigan Radio for “Believed” – A podcast that tells the stories of survivors of abuse by former Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. Judges’ comments: “The lifelong costs and consequences of childhood sexual abuse were made vividly, urgently clear in the superb Michigan Radio series ‘Believed.’ Using interrogation tapes, archival audio and in-depth interviews with the victims and their families, the Michigan Radio reporters skillfully led listeners through a staggering loss of innocence.” Finalists: WBEZ-FM (Chicago) and Chicago Tribune – “16 Shots”; WNYC Studios – “Aftereffect” Topic of the Year: Midterm Elections: Vice News for “She’s Running” – A four-part web series on female candidates running for office in the 2018 midterm elections. Judges’ comments: “What Vice News did so impressively in its series “She’s Running” was document just how hard it is to be a young female candidate running for the first time on her own terms – and winning. Each episode was filled with candid moments that revealed what it takes to run for office. We were impressed by Vice’s choice to do this in a non-narrated way, giving the viewer front-row seats to the unfolding drama of this race."Finalists: CBS News: “60 Minutes” – “As Texas Goes”; The Washington Post – “Midterm Election” Visual Journalism: Marcus Yam of the Los Angeles Times for his newspaper photojournalism portfolio. Judges’ comments: “Each submission demonstrated his mastery of key photographic elements such as light, composition and an intimacy that builds a visual narrative that draws the reader in and connects you to the subjects so that one feels their plight and our shared humanity. In this, he fulfilled one of journalism’s highest principles, giving voice to the voiceless.” Finalists: David Goldman photography portfolio for the Associated Press; BBC – “Trail of the Deadly Drug Trade” Journalism Education AwardsThe Scripps Howard Foundation, in partnership with the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, also announced the winners of its two journalism education awards:Teacher of the Year: Jinx Broussard – Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge) Finalists: Kathleen Culver – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Meenakshi Gigi Durham – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Iowa (Iowa City)Administrator of the Year: Dean Diane McFarlin – College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida (Gainesville) Finalist: Director Judy Oskam – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Texas State University (San Marcos) 11825

来源：资阳报