治疗包皮过长天津市武清区龙济信的过天津市武清区龙济在龙济,天津武清区龙济包茎,天津武清区龙济泌尿科医院治病怎么样,武清包皮手术选择天津市武清区龙济,天津市龙济秘尿专科,天津龙济泌尿医院预约门诊号,武清区龙济医院看男科如何

(KGTV) — As of Jan. 1, 2020, Californians won't have to pay sales tax on diapers or menstrual products for two years.The temporary ban is thanks to Senate Bull 92, which was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom last June as part of his state budget.The bill, authored by Assemblywomen Loran Gonzalez of San Diego and Cristina Garcia of Bell Gardens, bans sales and use tax on diapers for infants, toddlers, and children, and also on menstrual hygiene products like tampons, menstrual cups and sponges, and sanitary napkins.RELATED: New California laws to know starting on Jan. 1, 2020SB92 will expire on Jan. 1, 2022.“I’m so proud of the work we have done here in California to really tackle diaper need,” Assemblywoman Gonzalez said in June. “By passing a budget that expands our statewide diaper bank program and by repealing the sales tax on diapers, which we hope to eventually make permanent, we are setting an example for the rest of the nation of how to make a real impact in the lives of working parents.”Anyone who believes they've been wrongfully taxed since Jan. 1 can request a refund by bringing their receipt to the retailer and a copy of the notice from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration — found here. Anyone with questions can also reach out to the state DTFA at 1-800-400-7115. 1324

(KGTV) - Are candy canes shaped like a "J" to represent Jesus Christ?No.A school principal recently banned candy canes from classrooms for that reason.But it has no basis in fact. 187

(KGTV) - California regulators are considering a plan to charge a fee for text messaging on mobile phones to help fund programs that make phone service accessible to the poor.The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is set to consider the proposal in a vote scheduled for next month, according to The Mercury News. It's not clear how much mobile phone users would be asked to pay under the proposal, but it would likely be billed as a flat surcharge, not a per-text fee, according to the paper.And wireless industry and business groups are not "LOLing." The groups are reportedly already trying to defeat the proposal before it makes its way to the commission.“It’s a dumb idea,” Jim Wunderman, president of the Bay Area Council business-sponsored advocacy group, told the Mercury News. “This is how conversations take place in this day and age, and it’s almost like saying there should be a tax on the conversations we have.”The new surcharges could generate a total of about .5 million a year, according to business groups. The same groups warned that under the proposal's language, the charge could be retroactively be applied for five years, totaling more than 0 million for consumers, the paper reported.Click here for a look at the proposal.The proposal argues that the state's Public Purpose Program budget has increased from 0 million in 2011 to 8 million in 2016, while revenues funding the program from the telecommunications industry saw a "steady decline" from .5 billion in 2011 to .3 billion in 2017.The report calls this "is unsustainable over time."In a statement to the Associated Press, CPUC spokeswoman Constance Gordon said, "from a consumer's point of view, surcharges may be a wash, because if more surcharge revenues come from texting services, less would be needed from voice services." 1845

(KGTV) - Is a curb damaged 26 years ago by a city truck scheduled to be repaired by 2037 in Winnipeg?Yes.Calvin Hawley says a city snow removal machine wrecked the curb in front of his home on January 26, 1993. He's positive about the date because it's the day his second son was born.Since then, he has been getting the runaround about when it would be fixed.But when Winnipeg set up an electronic complaint system, Hawley finally got a date. The city promises the curb will be repaired by June 26, 2037!A city official says residential street are the lowest priority for repairs. 591

(KGTV) - Did a hospital really accidentally circumcise a 70-year-old man and he didn't realize it?Yes.Terry Brazier went to Leicester Royal Infirmary in England for a bladder procedure.But hospital staff mistook him for another patient and circumcised him instead.Brazier says he was so distracted talking to a nurse he didn't notice something was wrong until it was too late.The hospital says it's deeply sorry for the mistake and is giving him ,000 in compensation. 478