天津武清龙济泌尿专科医院地址天津武清区龙济泌尿外科治疗阳痿好吗,武清割包皮找天津市龙济,武清长途东站到天津武清龙济医院,龙济医院泌尿系统外科,天津武清龙济中医院早泄,天津市龙济医院泌尿专科医院十佳,龙济包茎

Should you pay sales tax on your online purchases?Chances are good you already do, even though the law requires online retailers to collect the tax only in states where they have a physical presence.Amazon and Walmart, two of the giants of online retailing, collect sales tax on all their sales in the 45 states that have a statewide sales tax.But many other smaller retailers don't collect sales tax unless they have a physical presence in the state where the buyer lives, relying on a 26-year old Supreme Court decision that was related to catalog retailers. Many of the sales on Amazon's and Walmart's sites are actually done by smaller retailers using those sites as their platform. For example, Amazon says half of the sales on the site are by small and medium size retailers.On Tuesday the Supreme Court is hearing arguments whether to overturn its 1992 decision when it hears a new case focused on online purchases, South Dakota vs. Wayfair.A reversal could mean that all online retailers must collect sales tax everywhere. It's an issue that brick-and-mortar retailers insist will provide a level playing field with online competitors, and help to provide state and local governments with the tax revenue they deserve."The current tax system favors online retailers over brick-and-mortar businesses, and undermines fair and open competition in the marketplace," the National Retail Federation argues in a brief it filed in the case.President Donald Trump has claimed Amazon doesn't collect sales taxes, even though the company does.The Trump administration will join the oral argument in favor of online retailers being required to collect sales taxes everywhere.Those fighting the change say that it would impose an undue burden on small retailers who would owe not just state sales taxes but local sales taxes that many states and counties also impose. Wayfair argues more than 16,000 different taxing units could demand sales tax collections.South Dakota says it is looking to start collecting taxes only for future online sales, but But Wayfair's attorneys argue in court filings that many other states and local governments could demand years of back sales taxes, forcing retailers to go through costly audits of past sales and make back payments that could bankrupt some companies."South Dakota's choice to forego its remedy for back taxes in the event that the Court were to overrule [existing law] will not limit the retroactive application of such a ruling with respect to other state and local jurisdictions," said Wayfair's attorneys.And while the issue is portrayed as one of fairness for small brick-and-mortar retailers that have to compete against online retailers, experts say those small retailers could be among the ones that get hurt.Many small retailers depend on online sales. If they have to start complying with the complexities of collecting and remitting sales taxes nationwide, many could be forced to abandon that part of their business."Those smaller retailers are now starting to see an ability to compete with the big guys like Amazon and Walmart," said Sam Cinquegrani, CEO of ObjectWave, a digital strategy and services firm. "Now it might be something else that is going to take them back a step." 3256

showers at Coachella campground caught on fire...“everybody out of the showers now!” - someone in their towel running out pic.twitter.com/WPPUHjXgxe— ?? (@spxheda) April 13, 2019 192

Several of President Donald Trump's outside advisers have told him over the past week he requires neither a chief of staff nor a communications director, at least in the traditional definition of those jobs, according to a person familiar with the conversations.Trump has absorbed the advice, but offered little indication whether he's interested in taking it, the person said. He's been warned by other confidants that it's impossible to run the West Wing without a chief of staff.There are no signs Trump is ready to dismiss top aide John Kelly. But the option of running his White House without a chief of staff has been planted in Trump's mind, and he's not rejected it outright, the person said. 708

SPARTA, Tenn. — A Distract Attorney has asked the FBI to investigating after body camera footage allegedly shows a Tennessee sheriff's deputy repeatedly ordering a dog to attack a suspect that had already surrendered.Tonya Qualls, 40, suffered wounds to her arms and legs.After District Attorney Bryant Dunaway viewed body camera video of the arrest, he asked the FBI to investigate, and his office withdrew the resisting arrest guilty plea Qualls made days after her arrest.Body camera footage shows the moment deputies with the White County Sheriff's Department entered the apartment where Qualls ran to hide on April 3. Qualls has a history of non-violent drug offenses and was wanted on a probation violation.Video shows that Deputy Brandon Young warned Qualls that his dog would bite her if she didn't come out.When Young released the dog, it began searching each room in the apartment. They eventually found Qualls hunched down in a bathroom closet, unarmed.Qualls eventually told Young that she would come out of the bathroom closet.The next few violent moments became the focus of an Internal Affairs Report by the White County Sheriff's Department.The report stated that the deputy told his dog to "engage Qualls 12 times."Richard Brooks, an attorney, who has sued White County in the past, but is not involved in this case, said he believes Young was egging the dog on."That's what he kept saying. Get her buddy. Get her buddy. Get her buddy," Brooks said.The video shows Qualls screaming as Young ordered the dogs to keep attacking. The dog continued biting Qualls' leg, even as officers placed her in handcuffs.Young kept demanding to see Qualls' hands.In his report, Young claimed Qualls "began to resist the dog by trying to shove him away."Young also wrote that it was "unknown if Qualls had any weapons" — even though Qualls was unarmed.Young charged Qualls with resisting arrest, and days later, Qualls pleaded guilty. Brooks disagreed with the charge."She's not resisting. What's she done to resist? How is she going to resist that dog?" he said.The body cam video later shows Qualls in an ambulance after her arrest with wounds to her arms and legs."She's going to have scars, and plastic surgery is going to have to be done," Brooks said.In court documents dated May 27, District Attorney Bryant Dunaway said that after viewing the body camera footage, he would drop the drop Qualls' conviction."The State of Tennessee does not believe that all elements of the offense of Resisting Arrest were committed by Defendant Tonya Qualls," Dunaway wrote.He further stated it would be an "injustice for that conviction to stand."Other charges against Qualls remained, but the resisting arrest conviction was withdrawn.Dunaway said he then asked the FBI to investigate."I think that was definitely an excessive use of force," Brooks said.That's what White County's own Internal Affairs investigation found. It stated, "possible criminal charges could arise against the deputies."But according to the Internal Affairs report, White County Sheriff Steve Page did not want the case to go outside his department."(Young) is getting suspended for four days, being sent for more training and is getting a write up in his file and that's the end of it!" Page said, according to investigators. "It is not going any further! Does everyone understand?"White County investigators pushed back against Page and "suggested if we do not involve another agency in the investigation, it may give the appearance the Sheriff's Department is not willing or able to police itself."Captain John Ford, the man who oversaw the Internal Affairs report, was fired shortly after it came out. Ford, an 18 year veteran of the White County Sheriff's Department, says he believes he was fired because he wanted to take the case to the District Attorney.Ford has hired an attorney and declined to comment.In a statement, Page called the Internal Affairs investigation "incomplete.""The case file did not obtain significant material information that pertained to allegations of misconduct," his statement read. He later added that he did not want to "subject an employee to an external investigation without first gathering critical evidence."Page said Ford was terminated because he was "habitually insubordinate.""Any interpretation of his termination that suggests otherwise is inaccurate," his statement continued.Page said that Young resigned from his position on July 1. Dunaway said in a statement that he would dismiss an additional 25 cases brought by Young from the month of June.Below is the entire statement from the White County Sheriff's Office: This story was originally published by Ben Hall on WTVF in Nashville, Tennessee. 4768

Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigators met with members of President Donald Trump's legal team on the same day that the FBI was launching a raid targeting the President's personal attorney, according to sources familiar with the matter.The timing of the Monday raid made for an awkward meeting, which had been previously scheduled as part of preparations for a possible interview between the President and Mueller's team.Jay Sekulow, who leads the President's legal team, did not comment on the timing of the meeting."We do not discuss conversations we have had or have not had with the special counsel," he said.The raid on Cohen's home, hotel room and office brings the Mueller investigation deep inside the President's inner circle -- Cohen has worked with Trump for years and is treated as a confidant and a member of his family.A source close to the President said there have been ongoing negotiations between Mueller's team and the President's legal team for a potential interview, but the raid on the President's personal attorney has upended those discussions. CNN reported last week that members of the legal team have been informally prepping the President for a possible interview, though no decision on the matter has been made.The President's anger over the raid as well as a new assessment of what the implications of the raid could be for Cohen's most prominent client, Trump, are factors that the President's legal team has to take into account. 1477