山东怎么排尿酸快山东全国痛风治疗专家医院,山东尿酸高的治疗方法,济南痛风一定有结晶吗,济南痛风吃怎么治疗,山东痛风石会长在脸上吗,济南痛风石的溶解,山东痛风病可以吃哪些食物

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Two local strip clubs ordered to close down amid a surge of COVID-19 cases and deaths across California are allowed to remain open, a judge ruled Wednesday. The court order also appears to offer protection to restaurants prompting the county to suspend enforcement of the state's COVID-19 public safety policy on barring indoor-outdoor dining.In the nine-page ruling, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the cease-and-desist order from being enforced on strip clubs and "San Diego County businesses with restaurant service" from operating.The order, effective immediately, still requires businesses to adhere to COVID safety protocols.Eateries had been ordered to close indoor operations in November when the county fell into the state's purple tier restrictions, then were restricted to takeout and delivery service only earlier this month. RELATED: New COVID-19 stay-at-home order takes effect in San Diego CountySan Diego County spokesman Michael Workman told ABC 10News that both state and county authorities are examining Wednesday's ruling and will seek clarity from the court. Until then, the county will cease pursuing the shutdown of restaurants and strip clubs."Until we have clarity, we have suspended enforcement activities against restaurants and live entertainment establishments," Workman wrote in a statement. "With record numbers of new infections, deaths, and ICUs at capacity, we want to remind everyone to do your part. Please don’t gather, socially distance, wear a face covering, and wash your hands."Wohlfeil cited the lack of evidence from the County that proves the two live adult entertainment venues would increase the risk of exposure to patrons or that the establishments have impacted ICU bed capacity throughout Southern California, “much less in San Diego County.”“Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have been devoid of COVID, have done nothing to contribute to the spread of COVID, and have honored their representations to Dr. Joel Day and the County,” said Wohlfeil, according to court records.Wohlfeil also said that the harm of denying the injunction would be greater to the strip clubs more than the harm to the County.Wednesday’s ruling is effective pending the trial in the case brought by Midway Ventures and F-12, the owners of Pacers Showgirls and Cheetahs Gentleman's Club against the County of San Diego and state in October over COVID-19 restrictions that forced them to close. A preliminary injunction was granted to the strip clubs on Nov. 6 protecting them from any enforcement, though the businesses must comply with rules surrounding a 10 p.m. curfew and close early.RELATED: Young San Diego COVID-19 long-haulers still sick months after testing positiveWohlfeil's order comes after California Governor Gavin Newsom and the state’s Attorney General officials served a cease-and-desist letter over the weekend to the two San Diego strip clubs operating amid the state's stay-at-home order.The letter to the attorneys representing Pacers Showgirls and Cheetahs Gentleman's Club said the state was informed the locations had been operating indoors despite restrictions forcing restaurants to offer only take-out and delivery services under the order."We are informed and believe that MIDWAY AND F-12 are continuing to conduct indoor operations notwithstanding the Regional Stay at Home Order currently in effect in the County of San Diego. Such indoor operations violate the terms of the Regional Stay at Home Order, which permits restaurants, such as those run by MIDWAY AND F-12, to operate for take-out and delivery services only," the letter said.Last week, Supervisor Nathan Fletcher said that the majority of the board doesn't view strip clubs as essential and "felt that was consistent with common sense.""I’m guessing most folks aren’t going there with all the members of their household, so you have multiple households interacting together in a high-risk setting and so we ordered them closed," Fletcher said. 4068

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — While California's new regional stay-at-home order forces many business sectors to close or adjust restrictions, the state is encouraging residents to continue outdoor recreation safely.In the new order, the state says, "to promote and protect the physical and mental well-being of people in California, outdoor recreation facilities may continue to operate." The order adds that outdoor recreation facilities cannot sell food or drink on-site. Overnight stays at campgrounds are also banned. According to San Diego County, campgrounds are open for day-use but county community centers, gyms, teen centers, and nature centers will be closed.RELATED:San Diego County attractions prepare to close amid new stay-at-home ordersCounty urges San Diegans to heed new health orders as COVID-19 cases surgeSan Diego restaurant workers dread latest shutdownCalifornia's order encourages residents to safely enjoy parks, the beach, hiking, walking, or bike riding with members of their own household.Gyms will be allowed to operate outdoors only under the order, while still meeting COVID-19 safety guidelines for outdoor recreation facilities."Gyms in counties in a region that is impacted by the order must stop indoor operations," California's website states. "Outdoor gyms meet the essential workforce definition of an outdoor recreational facility for the purpose of facilitating personal health through physically distanced outdoor exercise and may continue operations."In the City of San Diego, golf courses and pools that are already open can stay open, but reservations will be required.While parks and preserves remain open, playgrounds — outdoor and indoor — must close under the health order. Though at times outdoors, museums, zoos, aquariums, and family entertainment centers must also close.Outdoor recreation facilities will still require social distancing and mask-wearing, county and state public health officials say. The new regional stay-at-home order will last for at least three weeks starting Dec. 6 at 11:59 p.m., until the county is approved to move back to the state's blueprint for reopening tier system. 2148

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -  There are disturbing allegations that the foster system in San Diego County failed children it was supposed to protect.Critics question whether the rules of confidentiality designed to protect children are doing more to shield social services from scrutiny."My children are going to have to live a lifetime trying to get over and deal with this trauma,” said Melanie. 10News is not sharing Melanie’s last name to protect her adopted children. She is an adoptive mother and foster parent."I became a foster parent because I did want to make a difference in children's lives that didn't have families,” she said.Melanie said she became a foster parent about a decade ago. She wanted to give children in need a safe, loving home.However, Melanie says a potential adoptive child placed with her in 2015 ripped the joy right out of her home.The foster child “ended up sexually assaulting all three of Melanie's adopted sons,” said Melanie’s attorney Jomo Stewart.Stewart said they filed a lawsuit against the County of San Diego, several county employees, and a national foundation that focuses on foster care alleging they all were negligent in placing the child with Melanie’s family.The lawsuit said the county assured Melanie the potential foster child had no history of sexual misconduct, mental illness or any history of wrongdoing.The suit claims that social services concealed the child's past issues and put her sons in unreasonable harm.According to Melanie’s lawyer, Melanie "asked social services whether or not these children had any type of mental health issues, had any previous history of being sexually abused or any previous history of sexually acting out and all answers to those questions were no.”Court documents claim about a month after taking the child into her home the child began to act out, including incidents such as smearing feces on the wall and downloading and watching pornography. Court documents stated that the child “took one of the boys’ cell phones and again downloaded homosexual child pornography.”Then things escalated.The suit claims there were several incidents of sexual violence against the other children in the home over the next year.Melanie says her son was traumatized and is still in counseling trying to deal with it.After each incident, Melanie said she reached out to county social services employees seeking help."Sometimes there was no response at all,” Melanie said. “Sometimes they said that they were going to place a report, I'd follow up on the report, I wouldn’t get any information.”According to a representative with the County of San Diego’s Child Welfare Services division, as of July 2017, there were more than 3,692 open child welfare cases and more than 2,365 kids placed in foster care, which is less than the year before There are 712 caseworkers but not everyone directly handles a foster child's case.Although there is no mandate for how many cases a social worker can carry the county says caseloads are monitored and assigned on a monthly basis. Case count per caseworker often fluctuates based on changing circumstances of every case.A spokesperson for the county denied all interview requests for this story. However, attorneys for the county did respond to the lawsuit in a court filing asking that it be dismissed.The response noted the records in the county's possession at the time the foster child was placed in the home didn't include any information that would have alerted them that the child may pose a risk of harm.They also claim there are no factual allegations to support that they failed to take appropriate action. After each incident, they did take action by filing a report and commencing an investigation, according to the county's court filing.Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin asked San Diego attorney Shawn McMillan if it’s surprising to see allegations like the ones in Melanie’s complaint against San Diego County and the foster system. “No, no the foster system not just in San Diego County, but statewide is completely and totally broken,” McMillan said. McMillan is one of only a handful of attorneys in California who specializes in child welfare cases. He said one of the most significant problems in the system is that everything is done in secret."I've dealt with San Diego County for a long time,” he said. “These specific attorneys defending this case, I have cases with them right now, and it's typical to see what they're doing here, it's blame assignment, denial -- a refusal to be held accountable.”According to Melanie's lawsuit, the district attorney's office filed felony delinquency charges against the foster child for sexual abuse, after the placement with Melanie.Melanie said had she known the child's history there's no way the placement would have taken place. 4928

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Winter holidays are right around the corner and that means it’s time to send gifts off to loved ones. Shipping companies have already released holiday shipping deadlines for those starting to plan. According to the U.S. Postal Service, the week of December 16 is expected to be the busiest time for mailing, shipping and delivery this year. Check out the list below for more deadlines: USPSDec. 14 – USPS retail ground Dec. 20 — First-Class Mail (including greeting cards)Dec. 20 — First-Class packages (up to 15.99 ounces)Dec. 21 — Priority MailDec. 23 — Priority Mail ExpressClick here for more information from USPS. RELATED: The best stores for Black Friday dealsUPSDec. 13 – UPS GroundDec. 19 – UPS 3 Day Select Dec. 20 – UPS 2nd Day Air Dec. 23 – UPS Next Day AirClick here for more information from UPS.RELATED: Laptop and computer Black Friday 2019 deals: Are they worth it?FedExDec. 9 – FedEx SmartPostDec. 16 – FedEx Home Delivery and FedEx GroundDec. 19 – FedEx Express SaverDec. 20 – FedEx 2Day and FedEx 2Day a.m. Dec. 23 – FedEx Standard Overnight, FedEx Priority Overnight and FedEx First OvernightDec. 25 – FedEx SameDay, FedEx SameDay City Priority and FedEx SameDay City DirectClick here for more information from FedEx. 1267

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) – With testing of potential COVID-19 vaccines speeding up and clinical trials underway, there are some who say they won’t be getting one once a vaccine is in production.Gwen Strickland said her son experienced a severe reaction to a common vaccine."It was something that had never crossed my mind until I witnessed it,” Strickland told ABC 10News.When Strickland hears talk of a potential coronavirus vaccine, she's skeptical the benefits outweigh the risks.RELATED: San Diego clinic to begin trials of coronavirus vaccine"I'd want to see some really long-term data that could guarantee it before I'd be comfortable injecting it into my body or my family," she said.As the pandemic continues on, the race to create a reliable vaccine pushes forward. Some companies are already in the later phases of their trials, including American biotech company Moderna.Moderna’s Phase 3 trial is being conducted at UC San Diego, under the supervision of principal investigator Dr. Stephen Spector.While earlier stages involved healthy people, these new patients will be those at higher risk of developing the disease or with underlying conditions."They are the people who can most benefit and we want to make sure if we have a vaccine it works in these individuals," said Spector.Spector said this particular trial will include 30,000 patients around the country.The size is designed to give researchers a better idea of how safe it could be in the larger population.He said one of the most frequent questions he gets is: Can I get coronavirus from the vaccine?"The answer is absolutely no, the vaccine does not contain the virus,” said Spector.While Dr. Spector and other health experts say a vaccine is the key to getting the virus under control, parents like Strickland say they won't be lining up to get injected. 1830