济南脚部痛风石可以消除吗北京秋水仙碱能治疗痛风吗,济南哪个医院治疗痛风专业,山东痛风石怎么能快速溶解,山东痛风吃什食物么东西好,山东大脚趾红肿,济南尿酸576算很高吗,山东手腕痛风怎么治

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Tierrasanta woman whose toddler died after being discovered in a car was arrested Thursday, San Diego Police said. Police said they waited this long to make the arrest to build evidence for a trial.Twenty-month-old Scarlett was found unresponsive outside the home at 10304 Leary St. on Aug. 5. Paramedics tried to resuscitate the child but were unsuccessful. Police said the girl’s mother, Pricilla Marquez Harris, called them at 12:45 p.m. that day to say she could not find her daughter. Harris later called back to say the girl was in her Nissan Altima and not breathing. RELATED: San Diego police: Child found inside parked vehicle in Tierrasanta dies Two days after the girl died, Harris’ cousin and the cousin’s boyfriend suffered possible drug overdoses at the Tierrasanta home. Harris was taken to a hospital for a psychiatric evaluation the same day, officials confirmed to 10News.Harris is charged with child endangerment, inflicting great bodily injury on a child under the age of five years, and personal infliction likely to produce great bodily injury or the death of a child. RELATED: 2 people overdose at Tierrasanta home where child was found dead in parked car10News is monitoring developments in this story. 1257

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The San Diego Unified School District Board voted Tuesday evening to support a package of bills making their way through Sacramento that would put a moratorium on new charter schools. There are four separate bills before the state legislature. Among other things, the measures would put a five year moratorium on new charter schools, increase local control by preventing charter schools from locating outside their district and put a cap on the number of charter schools that can open. San Diego Unified Trustee Richard Barrera helped draft the resolution in support of the bills. "We've got plenty of great examples of seeing laboratories of innovation that have happened over the past 25 years; however, what I think the law did not predict, was that charters have expanded very rapidly. There are organizations that kind of create chains of charter schools that go and pop up in different places around the state," said Barrera. He said the moratorium would not affect existing charter schools. "Let's think about the whole system; let's think about what's good for every kid, nothing in these bills affects existing charter schools. In fact, I believe these bills protect existing charter schools because they are as vulnerable to some new school popping up, that may or may not succeed, but in the meantime, you've got that movement of students back and forth," said Barrera. Barrera said roughly 16% of students in the district attend charter schools at a cost of approximately million dollars a year. There are nearly 50 charter schools in the district. Supporters of charter schools said the board's vote was motivated by politics and money. "I think they're kind of greedy, the public schools. They're wanting the money, for each student they get so much money," said Charles Taich, whose daughter attends a charter school. The California Charter Schools Association says the resolution the board passed isn't focused on students or families. "It really isn't about students. If you look at the resolution itself, it doesn't talk about parents and students. It just talks about districts and money and the information is not factual, so we want to address that," said Miles Durfee, Vice President of Regional Advocacy for the California Charter Schools Association. Durfee said they'll continue their fight at the state level. "The Charter Schools Association has worked really hard with members to really make sure we increase the quality of charter schools and we know schools need to continually improve, but we really believe that charter schools are one vehicle to do a great job to give choice to parents," said Durfee. 2667

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- There are concerns about whether the difference between federal and state mental procedures is creating a danger in the community.A gun violence restraining order petition filed by the San Diego County Sheriff's Department suggests Department of Defense requirements don't translate into California's strict mental health evaluation and treatment laws.Local Court CaseStanding in front of a San Diego County judge, a Navy Sailor explained why he believes his guns seized by the San Diego County Sheriff's Department should be returned to him.10News is not naming the sailor because he was never accused of a crime.The Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class told the judge the Sheriff's Department got it wrong; he's not a danger to himself or others.In May, deputies confiscated his firearms after they responded to a call of a suicidal male at what's described as his residence.According to a petition for a gun violence restraining order, the sailor was in a bathroom with a gun in his hand threatening to kill himself.The petition states once deputies got him outside of the home, he told them he's in the military and felt alone. According to the document he "had been thinking of his best friend who had died, he is having relationship problems with his wife and his family does not speak with him. He had lost all hope today and wanted to kill himself. He drank (2) Four Loco's and laid in his bathtub full of water. He thought he would pass out and drowned [sic]. He did not pass out, so since he could not shoot himself, he was going to have law enforcement shoot him when they arrived."According to the deputies' written narrative, they believed he met the criteria for being a danger to himself because he was suicidal, and they placed him on a 72-hour hold pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 51-50."If an active duty military member lives within the Sheriff's jurisdiction, outside of a base, then they are responsible to obey the laws of the state of California," said a Sheriff's Deputy who spoke to 10News on a condition of anonymity.10News is not naming the member of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department because they work undercover. One of their jobs is to handle gun violence restraining orders, or GVROs for short.These civil restraining orders prohibit someone from having a gun or ammunition. Law enforcement or close family members can request it if they're afraid someone will hurt themselves or others. A temporary order is issued until a court hearing for a permanent one takes place."If we have the ability to demonstrate that this person is a danger to themselves or others, we could use GVROs to proactively prevent him from being in possession of firearms," the Sheriff's Department source said.The Sheriff's Department filed a petition for a gun violence restraining order against the U.S. Navy sailor after releasing him to staff at Balboa Naval Hospital in San Diego.According to the GVRO, "Active-duty military members placed on involuntary mental health holds at federal military treatment facilities are governed by the requirements of the Department of Defense (DoD) and implement military service instructions. The current governing instruction of DoD Instruction 6490.04. The DoD standards do not translate into California's "5150- 5152," "5250" (and related statutory) requirements, so it is not currently possible to use California's electronic Mental Health Reporting System for an active-duty member placed on a hold under DoD standards. Therefore, he would not be subject to a firearm prohibition without the issuance of a Gun Violence Restraining Order."In California, if you're taken in on a code 5150 and admitted to a mental health facility, state law makes it unlawful to possess firearms for a period of time. Experts tell 10News the patient receives a formal notification of the firearms prohibition report and the required information about the process for appeal to a judge, if they wish to appeal it.According to the California Department of Justice, a firearm prohibiting category is: "Any person who is taken into custody as a danger to self or others under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150, assessed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5151, and admitted to a mental health facility under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 5151, 5152, or certified under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 5250, 5260, and 5270.15."Experts 10News spoke with say things can work differently if an active duty member of the military is taken to a DOD facility."The reporting system on the federal side is a lot different than we have in our law enforcement on the state level," said San Diego attorney Vik Monder.Monder has no connection to the case but represents clients in civilian and military courts.Monder said just because someone is placed on a 72-hour hold and taken to a DoD facility doesn't mean federal authorities can permanently remove their firearms. There needs to be due process."Under the federal regulation, title 18 United States Code section 922, in order to take away someone's federal rights to a firearm that person must have been adjudicated where they've committed a crime or found guilty of committing some sort of act that warrants that individual to have their gun rights being taken away," Monder said.The sailor was released after being taken to Balboa Naval Hospital. In court he told the judge he was never admitted.In his case the judge ruled he can keep his guns.10News tried to speak with him outside of court, but he said he had no comment and told Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin he needed to check with his command staff if he could speak with 10News.The sailor never got back in touch and no one answered the door at his listed address.The San Diego City Attorney's Office said they're aware of four gun violence restraining orders involving active duty military members in the City of San Diego.A spokesperson for the City Attorney says California's GVRO does not extend to military personnel when they are on federal land or installations. 6076

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Thirty-seven people were charged with drug and firearms trafficking throughout North San Diego County, according to unsealed indictments — in some case, feet away from schools.More than 100 members of the North County Regional Gang Task Force, the FBI SWAT team, and other local agencies arrested 18 of the 37 defendants Wednesday.Heroin, methamphetamine and fentanyl and firearms, including a semi-automatic pistol, revolvers, and a two AR-15 style assault rifles, were also seized during the arrests, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of California.Officials said the drugs and firearms being trafficked were stored and sold in North County, including near Libby Lake Park and several schools: Jefferson Middle School, Clair W. Burgener Academy, Mission Elementary School, San Marcos High School, and Joli Ann Leichtag Elementary School.Wednesday's arrests are part of a federal and local investigation into street gangs operating in Encinitas, San Marcos, Oceanside, Vista, Carlsbad, Escondido, and elsewhere. Many of those arrested reportedly have ties to the Mexican Mafia, officials said.In total, 27 of the 37 being charged are in custody, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of California. The remaining 10 are being sought."We have a special resolve to go after gangs that have the audacity to operate on the boundaries of our schools, where children play and learn," U.S. Attorney Adam L. Braverman said in a release. "The gangs are always on our radar, but when they endanger our most precious and vulnerable population – our children - we will act decisively."Some of the narcotics trafficked were obtained in Tijuana, Mexico, investigators said, and then brought to North County gang members via "unsanitary methods.""They repeatedly smuggled small quantities of narcotics in body cavities, via pedestrian lanes at the San Ysidro and Otay Mesa border crossings," the U.S. Attorney's Office release said.In one instance, one alleged gang member, Theresa Lapolla, was found in possession of more than 100 grams of heroin at her home, located less than 700 feet from three Oceanside schools. 2214

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- This Veteran's Day hundreds gathered at the Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial, honoring those who've selflessly served and sacrificed for the nation.Wayne Thompson, who served in the Navy for 30 years, says he attends the Mt. Soledad ceremony every year.“This world would be a lot different if we didn’t have the people that are on this wall. If they didn’t give their lives for the people in this country," said Thompson.Thompson did three tours in Vietnam and now suffers from health complications due to Agent Orange. He's had 11 seizures but says he would serve all over again if asked.“I kept wanting to serve, I don’t know, I just felt like I was doing something for the country, it’s hard to understand, but you get a fulfillment out of serving somebody," said Thompson.He says he's grateful for those who served before him and those serving now.Col. Charles B. Dockery, commanding officer of Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, was the keynote speaker at Monday's event. 1009