济南痛风患者注意点什么济南哪家医院专业治疗痛风关节炎,山东痛风尿酸值多少正常,山东尿酸值575容易降下来吗,济南尿酸偏高会自己降低吗,济南痛风病是什么原因,山东痛风手术大概需要多少钱,济南老痛风怎么治疗

Public hearings in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump kicked off Wednesday as two Trump administration officials appeared before the House Intelligence Committee. 192

Singer R. Kelly appeared in a Chicago court Wednesday, where a judge said he would like to set a trial date for early next year and prosecutors turned over a DVD allegedly showing pornographic images involving a minor.Kelly pleaded not guilty earlier this month to 11 new charges in his sexual assault and sexual abuse case, according to his attorney, Steve Greenberg.During the brief hearing Wednesday, state prosecutors turned over DVDs allegedly containing pornographic evidence involving a minor."We'll see what it shows, we'll make our assessment on it," Greenberg told reporters after the hearing.Kelly, wearing a dark suit and flanked by his legal team, did not address the court or the media after the hearing.Judge Lawrence Flood placed a protective order on the DVDs and warned both parties against leaking them."If there's any violation of this protective order, I'm going to impose sanctions, severe sanctions," he said. "I just want everybody on notice with that. Plus, there could be criminal implications to violation of this protective order."Kelly remains free on bonds totaling million that were set in February. The next hearing in his case is scheduled for August 15.After the hearing, Kelly's spokesman Darrell Johnson said the singer looked forward to the start of the trial."I think that's great ... The faster the better," Johnson said of an early 2020 trial, adding that Kelly is "living on royalties right now."Greenberg, outside court, enumerated what he said were a number of problems with the case, including improperly collected and tested scientific evidence and issues with the statute of limitations.Kelly initially was charged in February with 10 counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse -- a Class 2 felony -- involving four alleged victims, including three who prosecutors say were underage girls. The charges, to which he pleaded not guilty, cover allegations from 1998 to 2010.In late May, a grand jury indicted him with 11 more charges pertaining to one of those four accusers. Those charges included not only aggravated criminal sexual abuse but also more serious charges: aggravated criminal sexual assault, a Class X felony; and criminal sexual assault, a Class 1 felony.A person convicted of Class X felonies generally can be sentenced to up to 30 years in prison, according to Illinois law. Class 1 and 2 felonies generally carry lower maximum penalties.Kelly, 52, has vehemently denied any allegations of sexual misconduct.The singer also was released on bail in March in a case in which authorities have said he failed to pay his ex-wife child support of 1,000.Kelly has faced accusations of abuse, manipulation and inappropriate encounters with girls and young women for more than two decades.In a March interview with CBS, he said: "I'm very tired of all of the lies. I've been hearing things and seeing things on all of the blogs and I'm just tired." 2919

Special counsel Robert Mueller believes that Paul Manafort was sharing polling data and discussing Russian-Ukrainian policy with his close Russian-intelligence-linked associate, Konstantin Kilimnik, while he led the Trump presidential campaign, according to parts of a court filing that were meant to be redacted by Manafort's legal team Tuesday but were released publicly.Manafort discussed a Ukrainian peace plan with Kilimnik, his lawyers acknowledged. He also shared polling data related to the 2016 presidential campaign with Kilimnik, Manafort's legal team acknowledges in their court filing.The details accidentally released Tuesday are the closest public assertion yet in the Mueller cases of coordination between a Trump campaign official and the Russian government, as Kilimnik is believed to be linked to Russian military intelligence. It's a major acknowledgment from the Mueller team that their investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election is finding potential contact between at least one Trump campaign official and the Kremlin.The Ukraine peace plan that they discussed likely would have dealt with Russian intervention in the region. At around the same time, Russian government operatives were allegedly hacking Democratic computers to help Trump and orchestrating a social media propaganda scheme to sway voters against Trump's electoral opponents.Kilimnik has long been suspected to be central to Mueller's investigation into Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election. The revelations in the court filing Tuesday seem to confirm that.Manafort's filing also acknowledges he met with Kilimnik in Madrid. Later Tuesday, Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni said that meeting was in January or February 2017, after Trump was elected. There are two known meetings during the campaign between Manafort and Kilimnik.The sentences revealed in the filing certify for the first time Mueller's interest in Kilimnik's political actions during the campaign. Manafort has not been charged with crimes related to his work for Trump. Kilimnik only faces a charge from Mueller related to allegedly helping Manafort tamper with witnesses following his arrest.Kilimnik has not entered a plea in US courts, and Manafort has pleaded guilty to the witness tampering allegation and has been convicted on several lobbying-related financial crimes.Prosecutors have previously said they believe Kilimnik has ties to the military intelligence unit the GRU, which allegedly hacked the Democratic Party and leaked damaging emails while Manafort ran Trump's campaign operation. Manafort and Kilimnik have been close colleagues for years.The errant admissions in Manafort's court filing also acknowledge that a person wanted to use his name when meeting President Donald Trump.Errant redactionsThe revelations come in Manafort's written response to accusations that Manafort lied to Mueller's team during cooperation interviews. Those portions had been redacted given Mueller's sensitivities toward ongoing investigations, Manafort's lawyers said, but the redactions were able to be read in the document filed with the federal court online.Manafort says he did not intentionally mislead Mueller. His legal team offered explanations of human nature as the reasons for his misstatements. He also tried to help the investigation in several ways, such as by handing over his computers, email accounts and passwords to Mueller, he says in a new filing.Previously, the special counsel's office outlined five areas in which they believe Manafort lied, including about his contact with Kilimnik, who is of interest to the Mueller investigation, and about his communication with White House officials as recently as last year, but redacted some details of what they know and how they know it.Mueller's accusation that Manafort lied already pulled into question the former campaign chairman's possibility for leniency in the justice system and his usefulness to federal authorities -- though it raised the possibility President Donald Trump could see Manafort as an ally and offer him a pardon.The special counsel's office declined to comment Tuesday.Manafort's attorneys did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday about the filing error, though they corrected it in the court's official record.Manafort's situationManafort has been in jail since June, after prosecutors 4388

Since 1978, the rainbow flag has been a symbol of pride for the LGBTQ community.Artist Gilbert Baker designed the first rainbow flag 144

RICHMOND, Va. – Thousands of gun-rights activists and other groups crowded the streets around Virginia’s Capitol to protest plans by the state's Democratic leadership to pass gun-control legislation. Citing credible threats of violence, Gov. Ralph Northam declared a temporary state of emergency days ahead of Monday’s rally, banning all weapons including guns from Capitol Square, where the event was set to be held. Virginia's highest court has upheld the ban. The Supreme Court issued its decision late Friday, rejecting an appeal from gun-rights groups that said the ban violated their Second Amendment right to bear arms.The court did not rule on the merits of the case, however. The justices said they did not have enough information to decide whether a lower court judge had ruled appropriately. The Southern Poverty Law Center says that threats of violence have been “rampant” online among anti-government and far-right groups.Militia groups and white supremacists were expected to mix with gun-rights activists, raising fears that the state could again see the type violence that exploded in Charlottesville in 2017.The protest came to a close Monday afternoon with no known incidents.WATCH VIDEO OF THE EVENT BELOW: 1237