信阳工业吸尘器乐山工业吸尘器厂家,惠州大功率工业吸尘器,曲靖工业吸尘器,包头工业吸尘器,十堰工业吸尘器厂家,儋州工业吸尘器,济宁大型工业吸尘器

They changed the ABC song to clarify the LMNOP part, and it is life ruining. pic.twitter.com/TnZL8VutnW— Noah Garfinkel (@NoahGarfinkel) October 26, 2019 165

The Syracuse Police Department confirmed that one person was injured in a shooting at a local mall on Friday evening.The shooting occurred just after 7 p.m. at the Destiny USA Mall.The suspect in the incident is currently on the run.The victim's injuries were described as "non-life threatening" gunshot wound to the leg.Syracuse police also tweeted that shoppers locked down in stores were now permitted leave if they avoided the food court.More on this as it develops. 482

Tonight marks the second night of the second set of Democratic Party debates and will feature the frontrunner and several of his top foils. 152

There has been talk around the country lately of a recession and what to do to prevent it from happening.President Donald Trump has pushed the idea of significantly lowering interest rates.So, what would that mean for the average American? "What it does is it shifts the economic balance of power towards borrowers and away from lenders,” said Miles Kimball, Professor of Economics at the University of Colorado Boulder. “And guess what, people who borrow money are people who are more eager to spend than lenders." This could make getting a loan easier and more affordable.Kimball says if interest rates drop, it encourages people to spend money they've been saving rather than leave it in the bank."All of a sudden you think about a zero percent loan, obviously the economic benefit is huge there," said a new home buyer, Todd.Zillow says the average price of a home is 1,000. With a 3.8% interest rate, a payment would be ,144, but even if the rate dropped to just 1%, it would be 8. Although that sounds amazing, banks would have to charge fees because they would be handing out more money than depositors are putting in. 1146

The Pentagon notified Congress Monday night that it has authorized the transfer of billion to begin new wall construction along the US-Mexico border, drawing immediate objections from Democratic lawmakers.A Pentagon budget reprogramming notification sent to Capitol Hill on Monday and obtained by CNN indicates that up to billion will go toward building 57 miles of fencing, improving roads and other measures on the southern border.The Department of Defense authorized the Army Corp of Engineers to begin planning and construction for the project Monday night. The department will direct the funds toward 18-foot-high fencing along the Yuma and El Paso sections of the border, according to a letter acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan sent to Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.In February, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in order to funnel billions of dollars to wall construction. As part of his announcement, he directed the use of counterdrug monies to partially fund new wall construction. Under the national emergency, other funds can also be dedicated to building the wall and related infrastructure, including military construction funds.Monday's announcement was just the first billion the administration is making available for wall funding. The administration said previously it plans to shift an additional .5 billion at some point in the future.These initial counterdrug funds will ultimately flow from the Department of Homeland Security to the Army Corps of Engineers to begin construction.Senate Democrats immediately objected to the transfer of money to build fencing along the southern border to block drug smuggling.Every Democratic senator on the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittees on Defense and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies signed on to a letter written to Shanahan objecting to moving billion in personnel funds to counter drug funds to go toward the wall. The senators say the Pentagon did not seek permission before notifying the committee of the transfer."We strongly object to both the substance of the funding transfer, and to the Department implementing the transfer without seeking the approval of the congressional defense committees and in violation of provisions in the defense appropriation itself," the senators wrote. "As a result, we have serious concerns that the Department has allowed political interference and pet projects to come ahead of many near-term, critical readiness issues facing our military."The letter was signed by Sens. Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont; Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois; Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island; Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii; Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana; Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington; Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut; Tammy Baldwin, Democrat of Wisconsin; Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California; and Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico. 2962