临汾工业吸尘器厂家(益阳工业吸尘器厂家) (今日更新中)

– also from YPCCC – shows that in 2018, the national average of registered Republicans who think global warming is happening was 52% and Democrats 91%. One key difference between the YPCCC studies and Boven’s is that Boven included all people, and not just registered voters. That’s why he suspects his percentage for Republicans may be higher because it included younger conservatives who aren’t registered to vote.“The younger conservatives are much more likely to believe in climate change, and they’re much more likely to talk to their family members who are also likely to be conservatives,” Boven said. Republican Jimmy Sengenberger says while climate change may not be a priority for the Republican Party, he’s personally noticed an increasing number of Republicans caring about the issue. “It’s more among the younger crop of Republicans, but I think that when I talk to a lot of older folks on the Republican side, they’re also recognizing that it’s an issue that conservatives and Republicans cannot and should not just ignore,” Sengenberger said.So, where did this misconception about climate come from? And why have people considered it a highly-politized issue? Boven says it’s hard to know for sure, but he believes it’s likely come from political leaders.“And so, we had this environment where Democratic and Republican leaders became very divided in their discourse on climate change, and that caused ordinary Democrats and Republicans to believe there was this sharp division between other ordinary Democrats and Republicans,” Boven said.In actuality, Boven says he’s found most people don’t want such a large divide between parties.“Most Americans, they value bipartisanship. They value thinking open mindedly about ideas from the other side.”The independent, Democrat and Republican in this story all agree it’s important to take care of our planet and the people on it.“My personal philosophy is that the earth and the environment are a gift to us, and that we’re charged to take care of it,” independent Mason said.“When I look at my youngest granddaughter, my heart just aches because I don’t know what’s in her future,” Democrat Dike said.“I don’t think there’s any American that wants to destroy the environment or destroy the world climate. We’re all together in the idea that we should protect the environment. It’s more how you go about it I think than anything else,” Republican Sengenberger said.“I would say that climate change has become a bipartisan issue, yes. Now whether solutions to climate change will become bipartisan, that may be a more difficult question,” Boven said.  2617

YouTube announced Thursday that it had made updates to its hate and harassment policies that resulted in a further purge of videos about the QAnon conspiracy theory.In a blog post on Thursday, YouTube said it was updating the policies "to prohibit content that targets an individual or group with conspiracy theories that have been used to justify real-world violence."The social media platform said the new policy would ban videos that "threatens or harasses someone by suggesting they are complicit in one of these harmful conspiracies, such as QAnon or Pizzagate."It's unclear how many videos, users or channels would be removed from the platform due to the policy changes.YouTube is the latest social media platform to crack down on content that espouses the conspiracy. In July, Twitter eliminated thousands of QAnon-linked accounts and limited others from spreading content linked to the conspiracy. Last week, Facebook said it would ban any page, group or Instagram account that represents QAnon.QAnon is a conspiracy theory that began on anonymous imageboard 4chan in 2017, which alleges that President Donald Trump is fighting a secret cabal of pedophiles and Satanists run by his political opponents, A-list celebrities and other global leaders. After jumping from 4chan to Reddit, the conspiracy spread to more mainstream social media outlets and exploded over the summer under social media groups with names like "Save Our Children."QAnon believers have been associated with several violent incidents, including a 2018 incident where an armed man prompted a standoff with police on the Hoover Dam.President Donald Trump has praised the conspiracy's supporters."I don't know much about the movement other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate," Trump said in August.Multiple Republicans running for Congress have also voiced support for the conspiracy theory. 1901

as part of the proposed tentative agreement reached with the United Automobile Workers union (UAW). The plant will close if the UAW-Ford Council and rank-and-file members approve the contract.The news comes one day after the union and automaker reached a proposed tentative agreement, which still has to be voted on by the national council to become an official tentative agreement and then ratified by 55,000 Ford-UAW workers.According to sources, the 600 employees who work at the engine plant will be offered jobs at the Ford Van Dyke Transmission Plant, which is located about 14 miles away. Workers can also take buyout packages and retire.Sources say no other plants will close under the proposed contract.The union began negotiations on Monday with Ford for a new contract. There has been no work stoppage with Ford employees, a stark contrast to the 40-day work stoppage General Motors employees wagered last month.Plant closings were a major issue between GM and the UAW after the company announced it would close four plants this year. Those plants included Warren (Michigan) Transmission, Lordstown, Ohio Assembly and Detroit Hamtramck Assembly. Detroit Hamtramck will remain open, building all-electric trucks and vans. Hundreds of workers in Lordstown had to move to seven other states to continue working for GM. Workers in Warren have transferred to Flint and other plants in distant cities.The Ford UAW Council will travel to Detroit from 18 states and will vote whether to send the Tentative Agreement to the rank and file tomorrow. Then, 55,000 Ford workers will have about a week to vote yes or no through their local unions in those 18 states.This story was originally published by Jim Kiertzner on 1722

issued Tuesday."The use of cats as part of any research protocol in any ARS [Agricultural Research Service] laboratory has been discontinued and will not be reinstated," the release states.A report issued in March by the White Coat Waste Project helped shed light on the experimenting: It said hundreds of cats and dogs were purchased from "Asian meat markets". The taxpayer watchdog group reported scientists at the USDA's lab in Beltsville, Maryland 454

-- arguing that the data is too easily falsified and the indicators used irrelevant to what makes a school worthy. Then again, Forbes publishes their own college ranking list every year, too.Forbes isn't the only one against the rankings. In a 2012 opinion piece for CNN, former George Washington University President Stephen Joel Trachtenberg dismissed the rankings, saying they don't "begin to express the quality, comprehensiveness and special character of the more than 4,000 colleges and universities in the country."The rankings create a national obsession, pushing the false belief that if a student doesn't get into a select school, which is typically accompanied by a high price tag, then "life will never be worth living," Trachtenberg writes. He also discusses the ways in which schools can falsify their data, which Forbes also points out.And they're not wrong.In May, seven years after Trachtenberg wrote his piece, it was revealed that the University of Oklahoma gave "inflated" data on its alumni giving rates for twenty years, in an effort to improve their ranking. Alumni giving, an indicator used by U.S. News to detemine a school's rank, is weighted at 5%.Even before Oklahoma, Claremont McKenna College in California 1238

来源：资阳报