潮州泛发型白癜风症状(潮州中医治疗白癜风哪家好) (今日更新中)

#FreeCoreyMillerOn January 18, 2002 a tragedy occurred when a young man was killed. The next day Corey Miller was arrested for the murder.— Kim Kardashian West (@KimKardashian) August 16, 2020 200

(AP) — Experts say it’s going to take months to kick elite hackers widely believed to be Russian out of U.S. government networks. The hackers have been quietly rifling through those networks for months in Washington’s worst cyberespionage failure on record. Experts say there simply are not enough threat-hunting teams to identify all the government and private-sector systems that may have been hacked. RELATED: Trump downplays Russia in first comments on cyberattackFireEye is the cybersecurity company that discovered the worst-ever intrusion into U.S. agencies and was among the victims. It has already tallied dozens of casualties. It’s racing to identify more.This week, the cybersecurity unit of the Department of Homeland Security says the hack “poses a grave risk” to the U.S. government and state and local governments as well as critical infrastructure and private business."CISA has determined that this threat poses a grave risk to the Federal Government and state, local, tribal, and territorial governments as well as critical infrastructure entities and other private sector organizations," the alert issued by the agency said. "CISA expects that removing this threat actor from compromised environments will be highly complex and challenging for organizations."RELATED: Hack against US is 'grave' threat, cybersecurity agency saysWhile President Trump has downplayed Russia's involvement, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said, "this was a very significant effort and I think it’s the case that now we can say pretty clearly that it was the Russians that engaged in this activity."Officials at the White House had been prepared to put out a statement Friday afternoon that accused Russia of being “the main actor” in the hack, but were told at the last minute to stand down, according to one U.S. official familiar with the conversations who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. 1934

(CNN) -- California is the latest state to allow people to take home and eat animals they accidentally hit on the road, including deer, elk, pronghorn antelopes and wild pigs.Senate Bill 395 was among a handful of other bills Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law last week.The bill, brought forth by Sen. Bob Archuleta, authorizes the state's Fish and Game Commission to develop a pilot program which, through the help of an online portal, would issue free permits to anyone who wants to take the animal they killed on the road home to eat.To get permits, residents would have to record in the portal "the location, type, and description of the animal salvaged, the date and time of salvage, the basic characteristics of the incident and a description of the vehicle involved... and the destination where the carcass will be transported," the legislation says.More than 20,000 deer are hit on California roadways each year, the bill says."This potentially translates into hundreds of thousands of pounds of healthy meat that could be used to feed those in need."The program will not start immediatelyThe commission can only start creating the pilot program -- which would cover limited areas of the state -- once it receives funding from the legislature.The legislation merely gives the commission authority to create the program, and once created, it would cover a maximum of three areas identified as having a high number of vehicle-animal collisions.The commission will have until January 1, 2022 to create the program, if it receives funds.Archuleta says the law would help the California Department of Transportation and the Department of Fish and Wildlife "identify where roadway defenses can be enhanced and where future wildlife highway over-crossings should be located."Once this experimental program concludes, the bill says, officials will report to the commission the number of collisions during a certain time period, barriers to their collection of data and whether it's possible to make the system state-wide, as well as the estimated costs.The information, it says, could help find ways to prevent collisions.This is not a new ideaRoadkill salvage legislation has been passed in more than 20 states across the country, including Florida, Washington state, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.Illinois passed its roadkill salvage law in 2012.Most states, like California's rules, provide provisions on which animals may be taken for personal use and clarify whether a permit is required.Montana's law, for example, allows free salvage permits to be issued only for deer, elk, moose and antelope that were killed by cars.Michigan, which adopted its roadkill legislation in 2014, listed feedback received on the bill, including exposing residents to potential health risks."Drivers and law enforcement officers may not be able to make a determination of whether meat from game killed in a motor vehicle accident is safe for people to handle or eat," a memorandum says. "Furthermore, fresh meat must be properly dressed and stored relatively quickly in order to avoid the growth of potential pathogens."Legislators also warned that poachers may use the new law to unlawfully kill wild animals.Other states that allow the practice include Arizona, New Jersey, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Idaho, Oregon and Vermont.The pros and cons?Some animal rights activists seem to love the idea.PETA says eating roadkill is a "superior option to the neatly shrink-wrapped plastic packages of meat in the supermarket."Eating roadkill, the organization says, is much healthier than packaged meat as those animals most likely haven't consumed antibiotics, hormones and growth stimulants.It's also more humane, PETA said, as the animals who were killed on roads did not have to endure things like getting "castrated, dehorned, or debeaked without anesthesia" and other traumatizing conditions."Perhaps the animals never knew what hit them," the organization said.But other groups have raised concerns.The new legislation may prompt elk and antelope hunters who struggle getting a tag in the state to now kill the animals and report it as roadkill, the California Fish and Game Wardens' Association has previously said, according to CNN affiliate KOVR.Another concern the association raised was the safety of drivers who would stop on roadways and exit their vehicles in order to collect the animals. 4392

(CNN) -- A Michigan lottery winner must share the million windfall with his ex-wife, even though they were in the process of divorcing when he bought the ticket.Richard Zelasko won an million Mega Millions jackpot in July 2013 -- after taxes and fees his prize was ,873,628, according to an opinion issued last week by the Michigan Court of Appeals.The suburban Detroit man and his then-wife, Mary Elizabeth Zelasko, filed for divorce in late 2011. The case had gone to arbitration, and they were waiting for the arbitrator's opinion when Richard Zelasko won the prize.The couple were married in 2004 and have three children.The arbitrator ruled that the ticket was part of the couple's marital assets and awarded million to the wife and divided the rest of their assets, according to the opinion. He said that the "marital property includes all property acquired from the date of marriage until the date of entry of the divorce decree," including property acquired during a separation.The court also cited the arbitrator's opinion that the winning lottery ticket was probably not the first that Richard Zelesko had purchased during the marriage and that "(a)s losses throughout the marriage were incurred jointly, so should winnings be shared jointly."It's true that Zelasko spent to buy the winning ticket; however, "the dollar spent was arguably marital money and, as such, a joint investment," the arbitrator said.The appellate court said it found no errors that would require it to change the award."It's very difficult to overturn an arbitration," said Michael Robbins, who's represented Richard Zelasko since 2015.Robbins told CNN that the couple had been separated since 2009.An attorney for Mary Elizabeth Zelasko told CNN that he would not comment on the case because it is confidential.The couple's divorce was finalized in 2018.Robbins said his client can appeal the ruling and is "considering his options." 1945

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Students at National University tried to absorb a seismic announcement Tuesday: a 0-million gift from philanthropist T. Denny Sanford. The donation is the largest ever for any school in the county. The San Diego-based school will be renamed Sanford National University beginning in July."Putting National University on the national scene. That’s what it is," said Sanford at an announcement with school officials. School officials hope the gift will allow them to double the student population within a few years and climb the national rankings by investing in digital technology, lower-priced classes, and marketing.They're also hoping to slash the annual tuition in half, down to the ,000 to ,000 range. No timetable for the tuition drop was given."Amazing. People struggling with the debt. Won't be as big a burden. It's a significant amount," said nursing student Kyra Storkerson. 920

来源：资阳报