上海肺下玻璃样小结节(上海甲状腺三级用治疗吗) (今日更新中)

The third and final supermoon of 2019 is set to be seen on Wednesday, just ahead of the official start of spring in the U.S.The next supermoon won't rise again until Feb. 9, 2020, 192

The Philadelphia Police Department is looking for a man suspected of robbing a Rite Aid on Friday, January 3, citing a "sick child" as his reason for the crime. 172

The Transy Rambler was denied media access to cover President Donald Trump's rally tonight at Rupp Arena in downtown Lexington. Rambler staffers received an email from Trump’s Press Office this weekend rejecting media credentials for two student editors. It gave no reason why. 290

Tuesday marked the first day consumers could purchase Apple's new Mac Pro desktop computer, and it is already being scorned on social media for its price tag. While a basic model of the Mac Pro sells for ,999, Apple's upgrades to the computer could set a buyer back more than ,000. Yes, a computer on the consumer market is selling for more than most cars. There is no word on whether solitaire comes preinstalled. While the computer is on the consumer market, its designed for those who require "extreme performance." “We designed Mac Pro for users who require a modular system with extreme performance, expansion and configurability. With its powerful Xeon processors, massive memory capacity, groundbreaking GPU architecture, PCIe expansion, Afterburner accelerator card and jaw-dropping design, the new Mac Pro is a monster that will enable pros to do their life’s best work,” said Phil Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of Worldwide Marketing. The computer features some expensive upgrades, which could add thousands to final cost. For instance, upgrading from an eight-core processor to a 28-core processor could add an additional ,000. Upgrading the memory to the computer from 32GB to 1.5 TB adds ,000 to the purchase price. An upgraded graphics card could cost as much as ,800. An upgrade to the story also could add ,400 to the price. The Mac Pro's large price tag has prompted many to poke fun at Apple on social media. 1464

The Pentagon notified Congress Monday night that it has authorized the transfer of billion to begin new wall construction along the US-Mexico border, drawing immediate objections from Democratic lawmakers.A Pentagon budget reprogramming notification sent to Capitol Hill on Monday and obtained by CNN indicates that up to billion will go toward building 57 miles of fencing, improving roads and other measures on the southern border.The Department of Defense authorized the Army Corp of Engineers to begin planning and construction for the project Monday night. The department will direct the funds toward 18-foot-high fencing along the Yuma and El Paso sections of the border, according to a letter acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan sent to Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.In February, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in order to funnel billions of dollars to wall construction. As part of his announcement, he directed the use of counterdrug monies to partially fund new wall construction. Under the national emergency, other funds can also be dedicated to building the wall and related infrastructure, including military construction funds.Monday's announcement was just the first billion the administration is making available for wall funding. The administration said previously it plans to shift an additional .5 billion at some point in the future.These initial counterdrug funds will ultimately flow from the Department of Homeland Security to the Army Corps of Engineers to begin construction.Senate Democrats immediately objected to the transfer of money to build fencing along the southern border to block drug smuggling.Every Democratic senator on the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittees on Defense and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies signed on to a letter written to Shanahan objecting to moving billion in personnel funds to counter drug funds to go toward the wall. The senators say the Pentagon did not seek permission before notifying the committee of the transfer."We strongly object to both the substance of the funding transfer, and to the Department implementing the transfer without seeking the approval of the congressional defense committees and in violation of provisions in the defense appropriation itself," the senators wrote. "As a result, we have serious concerns that the Department has allowed political interference and pet projects to come ahead of many near-term, critical readiness issues facing our military."The letter was signed by Sens. Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont; Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois; Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island; Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii; Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana; Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington; Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut; Tammy Baldwin, Democrat of Wisconsin; Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California; and Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico. 2962

来源：资阳报