郑州多大岁数可以做眼睛激光手术郑州弱视的治疗方法,郑州征兵近视眼激光手术,郑州300度近视建议手术吗,郑州郑州激光眼睛手术,郑州孩子眼睛4.8算近视吗,郑州眼睛斜视手术多少钱,郑州近视眼可以治疗嘛

CIBOLA COUNTY, N.M. — A historic section of Route 66 runs through western New Mexico’s Cibola County. That’s been this county’s claim to fame for nearly a century. However, over the past year, Cibola has become known for something else. In January, County Sheriff Tony Mace came up with the idea to make Cibola County a "Second Amendment Sanctuary." The people in Cibola voted on the resolution and it passed. In a "Second Amendment Sanctuary" county, law enforcement, essentially, makes a proclamation to refuse to enforce and dedicate resources to newly passed gun control legislation. Legislation like universal background checks that were enacted this year in New Mexico. “As the sheriff I can choose not to enforce that law,” Mace says. “It's called discretion.”It is discretion that is controversial. New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has called Mace a "rouge sheriff." She said in a tweet from March that Mace doesn’t “care who wants a gun, whether it is a dangerous criminal, a terrorist, someone in crisis.”Her strong criticism has received national attention, yet it doesn’t seem to be stopping Mace. “You know, there's enough gun laws on the books currently to be able to do what we need to do in law enforcement to protect people, and so to be enacting more laws ... that infringes on those rights,” Mace said. “Really becomes an issue.”Since Cibola passed its Second Amendment sanctuary resolution, Mace has helped 29 of the other 32 counties in the state follow suit. Beyond New Mexico, over the past 10 months, more than 150 other counties in at least 15 states have also become Second Amendment sanctuary counties. Most of those counties are in the central part of the country. However, there is at least one Second Amendment sanctuary county in Florida, a handful in California and more than a dozen in Illinois. An additional five states have implemented similar resolutions under a different name. Many who voted for these Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions are from rural communities, like Cibola.“We’re not out just gun slinging, being crazy,” said Diane Rowe, a resident of New Mexico. “We just want to be able to keep our families safe and protect ourselves.”“I have had people call and leave crazy messages on my phone, threatening me from other states to say, 'how can you not care?' I do care," Mace explains. "I mean, it's horrible when I turn on the news and I see a shooting in an inner city where I see people having to bury a loved one. It's sad but we need to quit attacking the tool and probably take a different approach and focus more on the criminal element and focus more on mental health issues. Let's try going down that road for once instead.” So far, Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions haven’t been challenged in the courts. However, Mace says, under the current political climate, that could change any day. 2880

Chicago Blackhawks assistant coach Marc Crawford has been suspended by the organization on Monday, one day after a former player under Crawford accused the coach of kicking him during a game. According to an interview with the 239

Congressional Democrats have issued subpoenas to the Trump Organization and other Trump businesses tied to a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of profiting from foreign governments in violation of the Constitution, but the Justice Department is now asking an appeals court to step in and block the move.Democrats sent more than three-dozen subpoenas, demanding a response by July 29, seeking to collect evidence about the President's financial records, after a federal judge ruled last month that Democrats could proceed with the legal discovery process in their lawsuit.But the Justice Department, defending Trump in his presidential capacity, has requested that an appeals court Monday overrule the lower court's decision and prevent the subpoenas from going forward. If the Democratic members of Congress collected evidence in the emoluments lawsuit, DOJ wrote, Trump "is likely to suffer irreparable injury" because of "intrusive discovery into his personal finances based on the public office he holds."The escalating court fight represents a new front in Democrats' quest to obtain the President's financial records, a battle that's now playing out across multiple congressional committees and judicial jurisdictions.The new subpoenas come from the Constitutional Accountability Center, which is representing a group of House and Senate Democrats led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York, who are alleging Trump is violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.The judge overseeing the suit, Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court in Washington, gave the Democrats permission to subpoena the documents and take depositions beginning June 28.The Justice Department asked in its filing Monday for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to hear their case before Sullivan finishes resolving it at the trial level. The department says Sullivan was wrong in his interpretation of congressional power and the constitutional clause that prohibits officials from receiving benefits from foreign powers.Sullivan previously told the Justice Department that it could not yet appeal his decisions that allowed the case to move forward into evidence-collection."If the district court's clearly erroneous orders are allowed to stand, this improper suit will proceed and the Members will commence discovery aimed at probing the President's personal financial affairs because he holds federal office," the Justice Department wrote to the DC Circuit on Monday.It's an extraordinary step for the Justice Department to go around a lower court's decision before a case is resolved. However, it's not unheard of. The Justice Department used the same maneuver in another case about emoluments, before the federal court in Maryland. The Fourth Circuit, which looks at appeals from Maryland, has not yet decided that case.The DC Circuit hasn't yet decided what it will do.The Democratic subpoenas seek the President's companies' tax returns and other financial information about Trump's business assets. They also request information about three Trump towers in New York, the Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC, a San Francisco building, and the President's Palm Beach club Mar-a-Lago.Blumenthal said the subpoenas were intended to provide "information about foreign government payments accepted by six Trump properties, as well as trademarks granted to Trump businesses by foreign governments.""Unsurprisingly, the Trump Administration is still seeking to delay, delay, delay, but we are confident that the D.C. Circuit will recognize the well-reasoned logic of the District Court, and allow discovery to proceed," Blumenthal said in a statement.Democrats seek Trump finances through multiple channelsThe emoluments lawsuit has plodded along in the federal court since 2017, but the judge's decision on subpoenas gives Democrats a potential new avenue to obtain the President's financial records. While it's the earliest case where Democrats took the President to court, they now are also fighting Trump and his administration in additional court cases to obtain his tax returns and financial records from the Trump Organization's banks and accounting firms.The various cases may take several months -- if not much longer -- to be resolved. Democrats say they're seeking the financial information to conduct oversight of the Trump administration, but if they do obtain the records they're seeking, the documents could also provide them additional evidence beyond what was uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller should they decide to pursue an impeachment inquiry into the President.Trump has repeatedly accused Democrats of "presidential harassment" in their efforts both to obtain his financial records and haul in his closest aides to testify. In this case, the Justice Department has argued in court that the Constitution's emoluments provision doesn't apply to Trump's business situation, and that any evidence collection for the legal challenge would be too distracting for the President. In other court cases, Trump's private legal team has argued that 5133

DUVAL COUNTY, Fla. — As Floridians prepare for Hurricane Dorian, a Publix cake decorator decided she wanted to bring smiles to shoppers' faces during the stressful time with the help of hurricane-themed cakes. 222

DOUGLAS COUNTY, Colo. – The mother of a 7-year-old girl who went on ride-alongs with Denver police officers as part of a bucket list before she died in 2017 was 173