郑州飞秒激光手术(郑州郑州附属医院眼科专家) (今日更新中)

It’s a morning routine unlike any other.With every inhale and exhale Brother Sage starts feeling the flow.Once this spiritual healer centers his chi, he then decides to drink his own pee.“So, this is the water of life,” Brother Sage said while holding a bottle of his urine. “Some people know it as the water of auspiciousness.”Brother Sage is a believer in urine therapy and has practiced this technique for decades, using urine to wash his eyes, clean his feet and clear out his sinuses.He calls urine therapy a cleansing for the mind, body and spirit. Now he’s sharing this ideology with others.About once a week at the Boulder Public Library the Urine Therapy Group of Colorado meets up, with members discussing how drinking their pee has cured them from all sorts of ailments.“It is beneficial in any situation,” said Indira Bhatt Gupta. “If you have stomachache, drink that — it goes away. So many benefits.” For some, the benefits aren't just physical, they’re mental, too.“I feel like it cured my depression,” Dylan Flora said.When asked how long it took to feel the change, Flora replied, “instantly.”Urine therapy has been practiced in ancient Eastern cultures for thousands of years and now Western doctors are trying to clear up any misconceptions about believed medicinal benefits from ingesting urine.“It is entirely possible to get chlamydia or gonorrhea of the mouth from drinking someone’s urine if they have those diseases,” said Dr. James Wilk of UCHealth in Colorado.Wilk claims drinking urine can be dangerous, saying pee belongs in a toilet and not in your mouth.“Actual scientific studies failed to show any kind of benefit,” Wilk said. “There’s nothing, except for exercise, that is a panacea that works for so many diseases.”Brother Sage, however, is questioning modern science. “If you have a bee sting, a wasp sting, you stepped on something that's going to start bleeding," he said, "(urine) switches the pH to alkaline so the body starts to heal faster." 1995

In an effort to focus on his health, John Crist has made the decision to postpone his 2020 tour dates. We are sorry for the inconvenience & any confusion this might have caused. Thank you for your understanding & continued support of John.Questions: support@premierproductions.com 301

In a heartbreaking letter, a mother described losing her 29-year-old son to opioid addiction and explained what she would say if she could speak with him again: 172

Kamala Harris took command of the debate stage on Thursday night time after time -- from quieting a chaotic stage by admonishing her rivals not to engage in a food fight to demolishing Joe Biden with an impassioned critique of his comments about working with segregationists and his record opposing aspects of busing.In what was unquestionably the most difficult moment of the night for the former vice president and front-runner, Harris challenged him for invoking his work with segregationists at a recent fundraiser. She then went on to disassemble his record on busing.It was a spell-binding moment that showed not only her skills as a tough and unsparing debater, but also the fierce side of her persona, which her supporters believe will be devastating up against President Donald Trump."Vice President Biden, I do not believe you are a racist and I agree with you when you commit yourself to the importance of finding common ground, but I also believe and it's personal and it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country," Harris said.She said Biden had worked to prevent the Department of Education from integrating school busing during the 1970s, and that decision hurt a little girl in California."That little girl was me," Harris said with emotion swelling in her voice. "So I will tell you that on this subject, it cannot be an intellectual debate among Democrats. We have to take it seriously. We have to act swiftly."It was a moment that put Biden on the defensive with his voice rising as he defended his record, as he would do often in the debate."It's a mischaracterization of my position across the board," Biden said. "I do not praise racists. That is not true. Number one. Number two, if we want to have this litigated on who supports civil rights, I'm happy to do that."After 1928

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -- The NCAA opened the door for college athletes to get paid from use of their name, image and likeness in a major shift in the rules governing collegiate sports.While some view this as a step in the right direction, others think this could lead to more problems.What this means is that college athletes will now be able to make money from sales of jerseys, commercials and signing endorsements.NCAA board members have asked each division to create new rules no later than January 2021.The rule will affect 1,1000 member schools encompassing nearly 500,000 athletes.This decision came one month after California passed a law allowing players to profit off their name which takes place in California in 2023.“As a national governing body, the NCAA is uniquely positioned to modify its rules to ensure fairness and a level playing field for student-athletes,” the association president Mark Emmert said in a statement. “The board’s action creates a path to enhance opportunities for student-athletes while ensuring they compete against students and not professionals.”This decision is currently being debated whether it’s a step in the right direction.Brian Gearity, a professor of sports coaching at the University of Denver, is an advocate for college athletes getting paid.“The idea that now we’re able to let athletes be compensated for their own images like we would anyone else is a good thing,” Gearity said. “Is it opening the floodgates to something else or power shifting – absolutely.” Before this new ruling, athletes did not see any profit for any type of memorabilia sold with their names on it.New York has a similar bill to California; however, it is proposing athletes could see 15 percent of the profits.“There’s going to be bumps in the road and there’s fear and anxiety and still people holding onto their power,” Gearity said. “But the point is to not get distracted. The ultimate goals are this is going to be a fairer and more equitable thing.”Cody McDavis, a former Division I basketball player for the University of Northern Colorado disagrees.McDavis said that he believes the NCAA did the right thing by making this a national ruling after California passed its law.“What you have if only one state has this is a huge recruiting advantage,” McDavis said. “But I still don’t think this is a fair and equitable ruling. What happens when we have student athletes receiving more than their teammates for the same amount of work on the team? What happens when we have women that are not being paid at all but are as equally deserving as their men counterparts?” McDavis said other sports like swimming, soccer and track could be left behind in the profits. “We’re talking about men’s basketball and football here,” McDavis said. “We’re talking about the best athletes in those sports. The truth is, there are options for those athletes. And it’s called the NFL or the NBA.”Joe Goldhammer, a professor of sports law and labor law, said this isn’t the final solution.He believes this could push athletes to a similar direction that was shot down at Northwestern University which is to create a union.“The Devil is in the details,” Goldhammer said. “The specifics of that are going to be very hard to work out and very complicated. The problem with this whole system is that it lacks equality and lacks fairness for the players. And you’re going to create another level of unfairness if we’re not careful. College athletes have been exploited over the years. The best thing for them is to stand up for themselves sand say what’s best for them and form a labor union.” 3615

来源：资阳报