Ê×Ò³ ÕýÎÄ

APPÏÂÔØ

Ö£ÖÝÑ۵ļ¤¹â¼¼Êõ(Ö£ÖݺÓÄÏÖ£ÖÝÑÛ¿ÆÒ½ÔºÄǼҺÃ?) (½ñÈÕ¸üÐÂÖÐ)

¿´µã
2025-05-31 23:01:31
È¥AppÌýÓïÒô²¥±¨
´ò¿ªAPP
¡¡¡¡

Ö£ÖÝÑ۵ļ¤¹â¼¼Êõ-¡¾Ö£ÖÝÊÓÏ×ÑÛ¿ÆÒ½Ôº¡¿£¬Ö£ÖÝÊÓÏ×ÑÛ¿ÆÒ½Ôº,Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖÝÊÐÊÓÏ×ÑÛ¿ÆÒ½Ôº,Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖÝ ½üÊÓ½ÃÕý,Ö£ÖÝÑÛ¾¦É¢¹âʲôÒâ˼,Ö£ÖÝ150¶Èµ½100¶ÈÖ®¼äµÄ½üÊÓÑÛ¿ÉÒÔÖÎÁÆÂð,Ö£ÖÝ×¼·Ö×Ó¼¤¹âºÍ°ë·ÉÃë²î±ð,Ö£ÖÝÖ£Öݼ¤¹âÑÛ¾¦ÊÖÊõ

¡¡¡¡Ö£ÖÝÑ۵ļ¤¹â¼¼Êõ ¡¡¡¡

ENCINITAS, Calif. (KGTV) - A 13-year-old boy suffered burns to his face after a science experiment at Capri Elementary School in Encinitas went awry.Priest Rivera, a 6th-grade student, said a teacher was attempting to show a group of students an experiment known as the ¡°black snake¡± or ¡°carbon snake¡± when it exploded in his face.The experiment involves mixing sugar and baking soda with a flammable liquid and lighting it on fire to create a snake-like reaction.Rivera said the teacher told them to stand in a semi-circle around her on the field as she lit the experiment on fire.¡°The teacher kept on pouring more rubbing alcohol onto the flame itself because the flame wasn¡¯t building up,¡± said Rivera.That¡¯s about all he remembers before waking up in an ambulance with a sharp pain all over his face.¡°My face was constantly burning and burning,¡± he said. ¡°I still feel it right now.¡±He spent six days in the hospital and underwent four surgeries, according to his mom Gina Rivera.¡°It was just hell,¡± she said about the experience. ¡°He kept saying, ¡®mom am I going to go blind?¡¯¡±Priest kept his eyesight but two weeks after the accident, still had bandages around his face to protect the burn areas.Gina said it¡¯s still unclear how bad the injuries will end up being though she said the effects will be long-lasting. ¡°It has halted his life. It¡¯s changed his life,¡± she said.The outgoing superintendent of the Encinitas Union School District, Timothy Baird, told 10News they could not comment on any specifics because the incident involved a student. Though, he did say the district is investigating what happened.The Rivera family has hired a lawyer and plans to sue the district. 1692

¡¡¡¡Ö£ÖÝÑ۵ļ¤¹â¼¼Êõ ¡¡¡¡

Everybody knows.. #fixerUpper is where we¡¯ve been and @magnolianetwork is where we¡¯re going! But what if we tied both together as a tribute to this new journey¡ªfor old times¡¯ sake. Fixer Upper: meet Magnolia Network. Magnolia Network: meet Fixer Upper! Feels pretty good to me.. pic.twitter.com/BxKZzac61f¡ª Chip Gaines (@chipgaines) August 4, 2020 355

¡¡¡¡Ö£ÖÝÑ۵ļ¤¹â¼¼Êõ ¡¡¡¡

Europe is proposing a ban on single-use plastic items such as cutlery, straws?and cotton buds in a bid to clean up the oceans.The European Commission wants to ban 10 items that make up 70% of all litter in EU waters and on beaches. The list also includes plastic plates and drink stirrers.The draft rules were unveiled Monday but need the approval of all EU member states and the European Parliament. It could take three or four years for the rules to come into force.The legislation is not just about banning plastic products. It also wants to make plastic producers bear the cost of waste management and cleanup efforts, and it proposes that EU states must collect 90% of single-use plastic bottles by 2025 through new recycling programs.The European Commission estimates that these rules, once fully implemented in 2030, could cost businesses over €3 billion (.5 billion) per year. But they could also save consumers about €6.5 billion (.6 billion) per year, create 30,000 jobs, and avoid €22 billion (.6 billion) in environmental damage and cleanup costs.The Rethink Plastic Alliance -- an association of environmental organizations -- called the proposals "a leap forward in tackling plastic pollution" but criticized some perceived shortcomings.The proposals do not set targets for EU countries to reduce the use of plastic cups and food containers, it said."This could result in countries claiming they are taking the necessary steps as long as any reduction is achieved, regardless of how small," the alliance said in a statement.The proposal also faced criticism from the plastics industry.Plastics Europe, which represents manufacturers, said it supported the "overarching objective" of the proposal but said there must be more resources dedicated to "waste management" to ensure better collection of used plastic."Plastic product bans are not the solution," it said in a statement, and noted that "alternative products may not be more sustainable."On a global basis, only 14% of plastic is collected for recycling. The reuse rate is terrible compared to other materials -- 58% of paper and up to 90% of iron and steel gets recycled.Research shows there will be more plastic than fish by weight in the world's oceans by 2050, which has spurred policy makers, individuals and companies into action.Last month a group of more than 40 companies including Coca-Cola, Nestle, Unilever and Procter & Gamble pledged to slash the?amount of plasticthey use and throw away in the United Kingdom.Starbucks also announced in March it was launching a  million grant challenge to solicit designs for a cup that's easier to recycle. 2689

¡¡¡¡

ESCONDIDO, Calif. (KGTV) - Retired officer Al Owens does an amazing job running the Escondido Police Athletic League.10News LEADership recognizes Al Owens¡¯ efforts in getting kids off the streets, out of gangs and also fostering a stronger police community relationship.   285

¡¡¡¡

FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AP) ¡ª States are having to consider whether they can afford a plan from President Donald Trump to extend additional unemployment benefits.The plan requires states to provide 25 percent of the funds, and it's unclear whether states have the money or the will to do it. Trump issued an executive order Saturday to provide an additional 0 a week in benefits after Congress failed to extend a 0 weekly benefit. But Trump's plan requires states to kick in 0 a week, and many states are already suffering budget woes related to the coronavirus. When asked Saturday at the press briefing what would happen if states did not cover their portion, the president said "if they don't, they don't" and said "they have the money."Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont says it would cost his state alone 0 million to provide the extra benefit through the rest of 2020. 882

À´Ô´£º×ÊÑô±¨

·ÖÏíÎÄÕµ½
˵˵ÄãµÄ¿´·¨...
A-
A+
ÈÈÃÅÐÂÎÅ

Ö£ÖÝÖÎÁƽüÊÓÄǸöÒ½Ôº±È½ÏºÃ

Ö£ÖÝÑÛ¿ÆÊÇʲô¿Æ

Ö£ÖÝÅ®±ø½üÊÓ

Ö£ÖÝÄÄÀïÒ½ÔºÑۿƱȽϺÃ

Ö£ÖݺÓÄÏÐÂÏçÑÛ¾¦½üÊÓ×ö¼¤¹âÊÖÊõ

Ö£ÖݽüÊÓ×î¸ßÄÜ´ïµ½¶àÉÙ¶È

Ö£Öݵ±±øÊÓÁ¦ÒªÇóÊǶàÉÙ

Ö£ÖÝÈ«·ÉÃ뼤¹â½üÊÓÊÖÊõ·ÑÓÃ

Ö£ÖÝСº¢½üÊÓ175¶ÈÔõô°ì

Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖݽüÊÓÊÖÊõÒ½Ôº

Ö£Öݶþ°Ù¶à¶È½üÊÓËãÑÏÖØÂð

Ö£ÖÝ×ö×¼·Ö×Ó¼¤¹â½üÊÓÊÖÊõ֮ǰÐèÒª×öʲô

Ö£ÖݽüÊÓÑÛ¿ÉÒÔ×öË«ÑÛÆ¤Âð

Ö£ÖÝ×¼·Ö×Ó¼¤¹âÊÖÊõ¼Ûλ

Ö£ÖÝÑÛ¾¦É¢¹â¿ÉÒÔÖÎÁÆÂð

Ö£ÖÝÆ½¶¥É½ÑÛ¿ÆÒ½Ôº

Ö£ÖÝÄÄÀï¸øÑÛ¾¦×ö½üÊÓÊÖÊõÄĸöÒ½ÔººÃ

Ö£ÖݽüÊÓÊÖÊõÓÐЧÆÚ

Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖÝÒ½Ôº½üÊÓ½ÃÕýÊÖÊõ·ÑÓÃ

Ö£ÖÝбÊÓÖÎÁÆ·ÑÓÃ

Ö£ÖÝÑÛ¾¦½üÊÓ700¶È¿ÉÒÔ×öÊÖÊõÂð

Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖÝÑÛ¿Æ×¨¿ÆÒ½Ôº

Ö£ÖݽüÊÓÊÖÊõÉ¢¹â

Ö£Öݼ¤¹âÑÛ¿ÆÊÖÊõ

Ö£ÖÝÐí²ýÑÛ¿ÆÄĸöÒ½Ôº×îºÃ

Ö£ÖÝÖ£ÖÝÑۿƼ¤¹âÊÖÊõ¼Û¸ñ