濮阳东方评价怎么样(濮阳东方妇科医院收费很低) (今日更新中)

Former Vice President Joe Biden revealed on Tuesday that his family is on board with a 2020 run and he's "very close" to making a decision in his most direct comments to date about his thinking on jumping into the campaign.Speaking at the University of Delaware, Biden said that he has discussed a run with his family, including his grandchildren, noting that the "most important people in my life want me to run.""The first hurdle for me was deciding whether or not I am comfortable taking the family through what would be a very, very difficult campaign. No matter who runs, it's a very difficult campaign," he said, mentioning both the Democratic primary and a possible general election match-up against President Donald Trump."I'm certain about where the family is," he added. "But the second piece is that I don't want this to be a fool's errand and I want to make sure that if we do this -- and we're very close to getting to a decision -- that I am fully prepared to do it."At one point someone in the audience shouted, "Oh God, just say yes!""We're in the final stages of that decision but it would be the greatest honor of my life to be president of the United States, but also it is something that I have to make sure that I could run a first rate effort to do this and make clear where I think the country should go and how to get there." 1361

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks is not responding to any questions about her time at the White House in a closed-door congressional interview Wednesday, angering Democrats who say they expect to go to court to force her to answer their questions.White House attorneys are objecting to all questions related to the White House, Democrats say, all the way down to where Hicks sat in the West Wing. But Hicks is answering questions about her time on the Trump campaign, which is not covered by executive privilege.The White House is not asserting executive privilege, but arguing that Hicks has absolute immunity from testifying as a senior adviser to President Donald Trump. Democrats called that legal claim "ridiculous" and "absurd" as they signaled they will likely challenge it in court."There is no such thing as absolute immunity that prevents someone from answering questions about any subject related to their work in an administration. It just doesn't exist," said Rep. David Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat. "This is an ongoing effort by the president of the United States to obstruct, to prevent Congress from finding the facts and behaving as if he's above the law."House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler told reporters as he exited the interview, which is still ongoing, that she was answering some questions."Ms. Hicks is answering questions put to her and the interview continues," the New York Democrat said. He declined to say what his next steps would be.Although many questions from Democrats were not answered, Hicks did provide some responses, such as when she was asked about her House Intelligence Committee testimony from 2018 in which she said that she sometimes told white lies on behalf of the President.Under Democratic questioning, Hicks told the panel that she never lied about anything "substantial," according to multiple sources. Hicks said that the lies were about small matters such as scheduling, which was similar to her previous testimony.Hicks' appearance is the first time a member of Trump's inner circle is appearing before a Democratic committee investigating the President, which comes as Nadler's committee wrestles with whether to begin an impeachment inquiry.Trump weighed in on Hicks' interview on Twitter Wednesday, accusing Democrats of "extreme presidential harassment.""The Dems are very unhappy with the Mueller Report, so after almost 3 years, they want a Redo, or Do Over. This is extreme Presidential Harassment," Trump tweeted. "They gave Crooked Hillary's people complete Immunity, yet now they bring back Hope Hicks."Republicans criticized Democrats for trying to interview Hicks in the first place. Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the committee, called Hicks' appearance merely an attempt from Democrats to generate a "press release." And Rep. Steve Chabot, an Ohio Republican, called the interview a "total waste of time" as he left the room.The White House's objections to Democrats' questions were expected, as White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent the House panel a letter Tuesday evening arguing that Hicks was immune from testifying about her time at the White House as one of the President's senior advisers, citing executive privilege protections."Because of this constitutional immunity, and in order to protect the prerogatives of the Office of President, the President has directed Ms. Hicks not to answer questions before the Committee relating to the time of her services as a senior adviser to the President," Cipollone wrote.The White House's stance means that Nadler, a Democrat from New York, could end up in court to try to enforce the subpoena of Hicks, just as the committee says it will do to compel the testimony of former White House Counsel Don McGahn."If she doesn't testify, then Jerry Nadler will, I assume, unleash the full power of the House Judiciary Committee and the United States House of Representatives that could include, but is not limited to, contempt," said Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic caucus chairman, who sits on the Judiciary Committee.Asked Tuesday about the White House instructing Hicks not to answer questions, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: "Obstruction of justice."But Democrats plan to ask Hicks about more than just her time at the White House. Judiciary Committee aides said they also intend to ask one of Trump's longest-serving campaign aides about her knowledge of the payments that were made during the 2016 campaign to silence women alleging affairs with Trump.The decision to focus on the hush-money payments underscores that the committee is broadening the focus of its probe into the President -- which Nadler has said the panel is undertaking before a decision is made on impeachment, to go beyond the episodes outlined in the Mueller report.Still, the committee is eager to speak to Hicks about her time at the White House. Committee aides said there were five episodes Mueller documented that they wanted to press Hicks about, including the firing of then-national security adviser Michael Flynn, the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions' recusal from the Mueller probe and Trump's efforts to dismiss Mueller from overseeing the probe and to curtail the special counsel's investigation.The committee plans to release a transcript of Hicks' interview afterward, potentially within 48 hours. The Judiciary Committee wants to bring in witnesses to talk about the Mueller report publicly, but so far it has held only open hearings with experts."I hope eventually she and all witnesses will be in the public," said Rep. Madeleine Dean, a Pennsylvania Democrat on the committee. "It's our job. I really believe it's our job to get the facts before the American public. ... The best, most effective way to do our oversight is to make sure it's in the public."Also looming: whether the committee will interview Mueller himself publicly -- and if it will need a subpoena to do so. Nadler declined to comment on those negotiations Tuesday.Republicans argued that Hicks' interview is proof that Democrats' claims of White House stonewalling are overblown."Judiciary Democrats have been their own barrier to information by choosing to escalate instead of negotiate at every turn," said Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the Judiciary panel. "The White House has offered to negotiate with Democrats for documents that Ms. Hicks can't provide, and the committee could probably have heard from her earlier if Democrats didn't take a scorched-earth approach to pursuing information."Hicks has previously testified behind closed doors before the House and Senate Intelligence committees, and she left her job at the White House the day after appearing before the House panel. At those interviews, Hicks also did not discuss her time at the White House, Cipollone wrote.Democrats have argued that Hicks cannot claim executive privilege when she spoke to the special counsel's office about the same topics, but the Trump administration has countered that being interviewed in an executive branch investigation does not waive privilege for a legislative branch probe. That question is also one that's likely to end up in court for a number of witnesses the panel is seeking to interview.One potential point of contention is the presidential transition before Trump took office. Although Democrats -- and some Republicans, like former Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina -- have argued that executive privilege does not apply to the transition, Cipollone argued in his letter Tuesday that Hicks' transition work would likely be privileged because it involved decisions that would be made after Trump was inaugurated. 7754

Hours after conservative political activist Roger Stone was sentenced to 40 months in prison on Thursday, President Donald Trump said he felt that Stone had a "very good chance at exoneration."Trump said he wanted to "see it play out," but added that he didn't believe that Stone's case had been a "fair process."Trump also addressed reports that the foreperson on the jury at Stone's trial, Tomeka Hart, had posted anti-Trump sentiments on her social media accounts in the past."The foreperson of the jury was totally tainted," Trump said. "...how can you have a jury pool tainted so badly? It's not fair."Trump added that he hopes the judge considers Hart's potential bias on appeal."If she's not tainted, that's fine too," Trump said.According to the 766

FALMOUTH, Kentucky — How you do find evidence of a 40-year-old murder? In pieces, mostly, according to Towson University associate clinical professor Dana Kollmann: Fragments of bone and enamel, rusted buttons and zippers, the rubber sole of a rotten shoe. Kollmann, a group of her criminal justice students and dozens of other volunteers spent the afternoon waving metal detectors and sifting through the topsoil at Kincaid Lake Park in search of these small tokens of 17-year-old Randy Sellers’s existence. Some were fresh off conversations with his family, where his parents passed around a picture of the smiling, dark-haired teenager and cried.“Not one of these students out here is getting a college credit,” Kollmann said. “They’re getting nothing but experience for this. They’re out here because they want to be here. They want to find Randy Sellers.”Sellers disappeared Aug. 16, 1980, according to police. Officers found him drinking at the Kenton County Fairgrounds that day and gave him a ride most of the way home. He vanished between there and the front door. Jack Isles, who identified himself Monday as a friend of Sellers's and claimed to have also been at the fairgrounds that day, said he often thought back to that night and regretted not driving Sellers home himself."I wish I could have told him to come on home," he said. "Let him go with me. I wish he was here, God-honest truth with you."Fourteen years later, serial murderer Donald Evans would confess to killing Sellers and burying his body at Kincaid Lake State Park — a killing in line with his self-described modus operandi, which involved preying on people at rest areas and parks. He drew a map leading investigators to the burial site.When they arrived and dug, however, they found nothing. The map was a lie or the work of a bad memory.It would take another three decades, Kenton County police Capt. Alan Johnson said Monday, for them to realize they might have misinterpreted Evans's drawing. “The park ranger here reviewed the case not too long ago,” he said. “They determined there was a possibility that the suspect may have held the map upside down.”Monday’s search was based on a new interpretation of the map, which Johnson hopes will finally unearth Sellers’s remains and allow his parents the relief for which they’ve waited most of their lives.“Any lead we get, it’s our obligation to investigate it to the fullest to bring closure to the family,” he said, adding later: “We’ve stayed in close contact (with his parents) through the whole process. They’ve been very appreciative and expressed a great deal of gratitude for the efforts going on.”According to Kollmann, any makeshift grave in Kincaid Lake State Park would have to be shallow. Anyone who dug further than two feet down would hit limestone.The clues, then, must have stayed in the top layer of soil or become tangled in the roots of trees as animals and weather shifted the landscape. That's if they’re really there.She and her students hope they are, she said.“It’s easy to become robotic in the field and to emotionally remove yourself,” she said. “I think you have to have that connection that we’re looking for people. People still missing after all this time.” 3234

Hey, Taylor Swift fans, the pop star just teased a new concert from a tiny desk.The Tiny Desk Concerts are part of NPR Music and filmed in Washington, DC, at the desk of All Songs Considered host Bob Boilen. Swift posted on her Twitter that she was the next artist to take the desk."Tiny desk, BIG mood. Thank you @NPR for that awesome experience, I can't wait to relive it when #tinydesk comes out!"A video producer for NPR, Morgan Noelle Smith, gushed about working with the artist in an Instagram post, saying that the experience was "unreal.""We have a lot of people who come to perform at the desk, but it is SO humbling to see someone as famous, as huge, as ICONIC as Taylor Swift just come in, sit behind the desk, and play her music the same way it was written ... just her on a guitar and at the piano," Smith wrote.The acoustic set list is rumored to include "Lover," "The Man," and throwback "All Too Well" from her 2012 album "Red."As far as the release date, all we know is "soon."The announcement follows Swift's performance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live," in which she performed stripped-down versions of some of her recent hits. 1156

来源：资阳报