濮阳东方医院看妇科价格便宜-【濮阳东方医院】,濮阳东方医院,濮阳东方看男科评价很不错,濮阳东方医院男科在线挂号,濮阳东方妇科医院做人流很正规,濮阳东方医院男科看早泄收费公开,濮阳东方看男科病值得信赖,濮阳东方看男科病评价
濮阳东方医院看妇科价格便宜濮阳东方看男科病评价好专业,濮阳东方医院男科割包皮安全,濮阳东方医院男科治疗早泄价格不贵,濮阳东方医院看男科病很专业,濮阳东方看男科技术值得放心,濮阳东方医院男科割包皮价格正规,濮阳东方专业
(KGTV) - Artificial intelligence may be able to perceive sexual orientation in faces better than the human brain, according to a Stanford University study.Dr. Michal Kosinski and Yilun Wang used deep neural networks to analyze more than 35,000 facial images.The programs correctly distinguished between homosexual and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 74% of cases for women, researchers said.Accuracy improved when artificial intelligence analyzed five images, including grooming styles, according to the study.Researchers found lower accuracy rates for human judges asked to interpret sexuality through facial images: 51% for men and 54% for women.The researchers suggested the findings of the study posed a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women.GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign denounced the study, saying it made inaccurate assumptions.“Technology cannot identify someone’s sexual orientation. What their technology can recognize is a pattern that found a small subset of out white gay and lesbian people on dating sites who look similar. Those two findings should not be conflated,” said Jim Halloran, GLAAD’s Chief Digital Officer.“At a time where minority groups are being targeted, these reckless findings could serve as weapon to harm both heterosexuals who are inaccurately outed, as well as gay and lesbian people who are in situations where coming out is dangerous," Halloran said. 1437
(KGTV) - Did Donald Trump tweet in 2012 that the president should be impeached if the Dow drops 1,000 points in 2 days?There is no evidence to support that.A search of Trump's tweets on November 6, 2012 shows no record of him sending that out. While it's possible he deleted it, there was no mention of that tweet before last week. 339
(KGTV) - Are diapers for chickens really a booming business?Apparently so.We found at least five companies selling them at prices ranging from to a diaper!Chickens have become a nouveau pet in some circles, but they're hard to housebreak. 254
(KGTV) - Does a picture really show an astronaut with a bag of pot in the International Space Station?No.The photo going around online is a doctored version of astronaut Chris Hadfield holding up a bag of plastic Easter eggs. 233
(KGTV) - California regulators are considering a plan to charge a fee for text messaging on mobile phones to help fund programs that make phone service accessible to the poor.The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is set to consider the proposal in a vote scheduled for next month, according to The Mercury News. It's not clear how much mobile phone users would be asked to pay under the proposal, but it would likely be billed as a flat surcharge, not a per-text fee, according to the paper.And wireless industry and business groups are not "LOLing." The groups are reportedly already trying to defeat the proposal before it makes its way to the commission.“It’s a dumb idea,” Jim Wunderman, president of the Bay Area Council business-sponsored advocacy group, told the Mercury News. “This is how conversations take place in this day and age, and it’s almost like saying there should be a tax on the conversations we have.”The new surcharges could generate a total of about .5 million a year, according to business groups. The same groups warned that under the proposal's language, the charge could be retroactively be applied for five years, totaling more than 0 million for consumers, the paper reported.Click here for a look at the proposal.The proposal argues that the state's Public Purpose Program budget has increased from 0 million in 2011 to 8 million in 2016, while revenues funding the program from the telecommunications industry saw a "steady decline" from .5 billion in 2011 to .3 billion in 2017.The report calls this "is unsustainable over time."In a statement to the Associated Press, CPUC spokeswoman Constance Gordon said, "from a consumer's point of view, surcharges may be a wash, because if more surcharge revenues come from texting services, less would be needed from voice services." 1845