濮阳东方医院妇科做人流很正规濮阳东方妇科医院技术非常哇塞,濮阳东方男科医院割包皮很正规,濮阳东方男科医院割包皮价格透明,濮阳东方医院男科割包皮口碑很不错,濮阳东方妇科医院做人流价格不贵,濮阳东方男科很不错,濮阳东方医院看早泄很靠谱

This is the extraordinary tale of how a massive, strange-looking fish wound up on a beach on the other side of the world from where it lives.The seven-foot fish washed up at UC Santa Barbara's Coal Oil Point Reserve in Southern California last week. Researchers first thought it was a similar and more common species of sunfish -- until someone posted photos on a nature site and experts weighed in.What transpired after that surprised researchers from California to Australia and New Zealand.It turned out to be a species never seen before in North America. It's called the hoodwinker sunfish."When the clear pictures came through, I thought there was no doubt. This is totally a hoodwinker," said Marianne Nyegaard, a marine scientist who discovered the species in 2017. "I couldn't believe it. I nearly fell out of my chair."How the hoodwinker got its nameNyegaard spent years chasing the hoodwinker sunfish before she located and named the fish. All cases of the big fish were found in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Chile, she said. Except for one time in the 1890s, when drawings and records documented the fish appearing in the Netherlands.Scientists say there are five species of saltwater sunfish, and they come from different places. One enjoys tropical waters, another likes the subtropics and the hoodwinker prefers temperate water, Nyegaard told CNN. She works in the marine division at the Auckland War Memorial Museum in New Zealand."This is why it's so intriguing why it has turned up in California," she said. "We know it has the temperate distribution around here and off the coast of Chile, but then how did it cross the equator and turn up by you guys? It's intriguing what made this fish cross the equator."The antics of this wayward fish are comical, especially considering how the species got its name.As Nyegaard researched the fish, she realized some species of sunfish had been misidentified. One species that was thought to be rare was very common, while another fish thought to be common was misidentified, she said."It had gone unnoticed because no one really realized it looked different. There's a long history of confusion about the species in the sunfish family," Nyegaard said. "This fish had managed to stay out of sight and out of everybody's attention. It had been taken for mola mola (an ocean sunfish) so it was hoodwinking us all."And a bit of hoodwinking is what it was doing to researchers in California, too.Scientists first thought it was a different type of sunfishAn intern at Coal Oil Point Reserve alerted conservation specialist Jessica Nielsen to the dead beached sunfish on February 19. When Nielsen first saw it, the unusual features of the fish caught her eye."This is certainly the most remarkable organism I have seen wash up on the beach in my four years at the reserve," Nielsen said in a UC Santa Barbara press release.She posted some photos of the fish on the reserve's Facebook page. When colleague Thomas Turner saw the photos later that day, he rushed to the beach with his wife and young son.Turner, an evolutionary biologist who is six feet tall, stretched out his arms to show the scale of the seven-foot-long fish. He snapped some photos of what he thought was an ocean sunfish, a rare sight up-close, he said."It's the most unusual fish you've ever seen," said the UC Santa Barbara associate professor. "It has no tail. All of its teeth are fused, so it doesn't have any teeth. It's just got this big round opening for a mouth."Turner posted his photos on 3545

The website My Dog's Name announced on Wednesday that Bella was the most popular dog name not only for the year 2019, but the entire 2010s.Bella has held the top spot as the most popular female dog name for the entire decade, the website said. The website analyzes data from its users who selected their favorite dog names when searching."Bella skyrocketed to the top spot following the popularity of the Twilight books and movies 10 years ago," says Kyle Larson, founder of My Dog's Name. "But what's fascinating is that the name is still the number one pick today, long after the mania of the Twilight series has subsided."Top 10 Female Dog NamesBellaDaisyLunaWillowRoxyBaileyLolaHarperRosieNalaTop 10 Male Dog namesBearMiloCharlieArchieOreoBaileyBlueTigerDukeTeddyThe website says it predicts that Frozen and Star Wars names will move up the list thanks to new movies being released. Justin Boggs is a writer for the E.W. Scripps National Desk. 960

The U.S. Senate unanimously voted to pass the PACT Act on Tuesday, which will make animal cruelty a federal felony. The "Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act" was introduced by Congressmen Vern Buchanan and Ted Deutch. The House voted to pass the act on Oct. 23. “This is a milestone for pet owners and animal lovers across the country,” Buchanan said. “For the first time, a national law has been passed by Congress to protect animals from cruelty and abuse.”The act specifically bans crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, impaling or otherwise subjecting animals to serious bodily harm. "This is commonsense, bipartisan legislation to bring some compassion to our animal laws," Deutch said. In 2010, Congress passed legislation making it illegal to create and distribute so-called "animal crush videos" that showed people brutally killing and torturing animals. The underlying acts themselves are still legal under federal law. The PACT Act aims to close those loopholes. “The torture of innocent animals is abhorrent and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law,” Buchanan said. “Protecting animals from cruelty is a top priority for me and I’m proud to work with Congressman Deutch on this important issue.”President Trump is expected to sign the act in the near future, according to a press release from Congressman Buchanan. 1370

The State Department evacuated 14 Americans suffering from COVID-19, better known as the coronavirus, from a cruise ship docked off the coast of Japan despite objections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 235

The US House of Representatives has ordered an investigation into whether the Department of Defense experimented with ticks and other insects as biological weapons.In an amendment passed last week, the House calls for the Defense Department's Inspector General to look at whether any such experiments were done between the years 1950 and 1975.The amendment was introduced by New Jersey Rep. Chris Smith who said he was inspired to write it by "a number of books and articles suggesting that significant research had been done at US government facilities including Fort Detrick, Maryland, and Plum Island, New York, to turn ticks and other insects into bioweapons.""If true, what were the parameters of the program? Who ordered it?" Smith 749