濮阳东方妇科专业吗-【濮阳东方医院】,濮阳东方医院,濮阳东方妇科医院值得选择,濮阳市东方医院看病好又便宜,濮阳东方医院看男科病评价高,濮阳东方妇科医院口碑怎么样,濮阳东方妇科地址,濮阳东方医院男科治疗阳痿口碑评价很好
濮阳东方妇科专业吗濮阳东方医院治疗阳痿评价非常高,濮阳东方医院妇科做人流手术收费标准,濮阳东方医院治阳痿口碑评价很好,濮阳东方医院男科咨询专家在线,濮阳东方专业吗,濮阳东方看男科病价格低,濮阳东方医院做人流收费正规
(CNN) -- It may seem like an ordinary scene: Children and adults playing on pink seesaws, carelessly laughing and chatting with each other.But this is a playground unlike any other. These custom-built seesaws have been placed on both sides of a slatted steel border fence that separates the United States and Mexico.The idea for a "Teeter-Totter Wall" came from Ronald Rael, an architecture professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and Virginia San Fratello, an associate professor of design at San Jose State University -- and it was a long time coming.In 2009, the two designed a concept for a binational seesaw at the border for a book, "Borderwall as Architecture," which uses "humor and inventiveness to address the futility of building barriers," UC-Berkeley said.Ten years later, their conceptual drawings became reality. Rael and his crew transported the seesaws to Sunland Park, New Mexico, separated by a steel fence from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.People from both sides came together Monday to play in a "unifying act," the University of California said in a statement. Participants on the Mexico side had no planning, it said.In an Instagram post, Rael said the event was "filled with joy, excitement, and togetherness at the borderwall.""The wall became a literal fulcrum for U.S -Mexico relations and children and adults were connected in meaningful ways on both sides with the recognition that the actions that take place on one side have a direct consequence on the other side," he wrote.Rael says that counterproposals for the wall created by his studio "reimagine, hyperbolize, or question the wall and its construction, cost, performance and meaning," according to the book's website. 1719
(KGTV) - Has Nike really sold out of its new 'Jesus Shoes' that come filled with holy water?Yes.The soles of the Nike Air Max 97s are injected with holy water from the Jordan River. The shoes also feature a crucifix and the bible verse Matthew 14:25 which describes Jesus walking on water.Topping it all off is a blood drop on the tongue and frankincense-scented insoles.The shoes start at ,400 but some select sizes cost as much as ,000. But they have already sold out. 483
(KGTV) -- Democrat Scott Peters has won reelection in the 52 Congressional District, beating his opponent Republican Jim DeBello, the Associated Press reports. Peters was elected to the seat in 2020 after beating Congressman Brian Billbray.Peters served on the Committee on Energy and Commerce from 2019 through 2020 and has also served on the Committee on Armed Forces.DeBello is a tech entrepreneur who says he’s focused on homelessness and the Tijuana water sewage problems.During the March Primary, Peters bested Jim DeBello 49 percent to 32 percent. 562
(KGTV) - A baby badger, once lethargic and in need of care, is recovering after treatment at the San Diego Humane Society’s Project Wildlife Center. The Department of Animal Services got a call Thursday about the badger in the Jewel Valley section of Boulevard in East San Diego County. The caller told animal experts the badger had not moved all day. An animal control officer responded to the scene and found the badger to be lethargic. The officer took the animal to the Humane Society facility on Gaines Street in Mission Valley for treatment. Veterinarians are bottle-feeding the badger, which weighs about two pounds, according to animal care expert Lauren DuBois. When the badger reaches adulthood, its diet will consist of small animals including ground squirrels and pocket gophers. DuBois said the badger will possibly be released to Fund for Animals in Ramona. Badgers can be aggressive and require ample space, according to DuBois. By Friday morning, Dan DeSousa, Director of Animal Services reported “the badger is doing well and is feisty.” Badgers, though rarely seen in San Diego, are native to the area, according to wildlife experts. “In my thirty years with Animal Services here in San Diego County, this is the first badger that our Department has ever encountered” said DeSousa. “We are thankful to have Project Wildlife here in our community to provide the needed care for these animals in their time of need.” Anyone who encounters a wild animal in distress can call 619-299-7012 to report the matter. 1532
(KGTV) - A group of San Diego lawmakers, water agencies and business leaders are joining forces in opposition of a possible new state tax on tap water.Under the proposed State Senate Bill 623, Californians would see an additional 95 cents per month on their water bills.SB623 is one of two articles of legislation being discussed by state lawmakers that could see residents’ water bills go up by more than per month.The goal of the tax would be to clean polluted groundwater around the state, particularly agricultural areas where water is considered undrinkable -- with arsenic, lead and nitrate levels that have been compared to Flint, Michigan’s crisis.State Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel), who authored the bill, said SB623 "will establish the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund to provide an ongoing source of funding to finance water improvement projects throughout California.Approximately 300 water systems in California currently have pollutant violations, such as arsenic, lead, nitrates, and uranium that have been linked to nausea and vomiting, cancer, reduced mental functioning in children, nervous system decline, miscarriages, and numerous other health issues.Support of the fund will come from a fertilizer mill fee, a fee on dairies, and a fee assessed on water bills of no more than a month per household, and is anticipated to generate 0 million a year. Low-income rate exemptions are provided for households under 200% of the federal poverty level."Numerous agricultural groups and environmental organizations have come out in support of SB623, but many, including the San Diego County Taxpayers Association and other local groups, have said the bill is “counterproductive because it will make it harder for low-income residents to afford this necessity. A precedent-setting tax also could lead to additional taxes on water for a variety of project and programs.” 1905