濮阳东方医院看早泄技术很哇塞濮阳东方妇科医院口碑评价高,濮阳东方妇科技术非常专业,濮阳东方男科医院评价好吗,濮阳东方医院治疗阳痿收费很低,濮阳东方医院治早泄技术很哇塞,濮阳东方医院治疗阳痿可靠吗,濮阳东方看妇科口碑好很不错

The White House has flatly rejected the House Judiciary Committee's request for documents in its sweeping investigation into possible obstruction of justice and abuses of power, accusing the Democratically-controlled committee of seeking to recreate the special counsel investigation to harass the President.White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent a letter Wednesday to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler arguing that the committee's request for documents was illegitimate."It appears that the Committee's inquiry is designed, not to further a legitimate legislative purpose, but rather to conduct a pseudo law enforcement investigation on matters that were already the subject of the Special Counsel's long-running investigation and are outside the constitutional authority of the legislative branch," Cipollone wrote."Congressional investigations are intended to obtain information to aid in evaluating potential legislation, not to harass political opponents or to pursue an unauthorized 'do-over' of exhaustive law enforcement investigations conducted by the Department of Justice," he added.The letter adds yet another layer to the escalating feud between the White House and House Democrats over their numerous investigations into the Trump administration and President Donald Trump's businesses and finances.Trump has already declared that his administration will fight all of the House subpoenas — several of which are now being fought in court. The Judiciary Committee voted last week to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt for not providing the full Mueller report and evidence and the Ways and Means Committee has issued a subpoena for Trump's personal and business tax returns.Nadler and other House Democratic leaders are now raising the prospect they will hold numerous administration officials in contempt at the same time as part of a package to highlight the Trump administration's stonewalling of Congress. Some Democrats are also talking about invoking Congress' so-called inherent contempt powers to fine or jail those who defy congressional subpoenas.Cipollone's letter, which was first 2133

The owners of Maximum Security, the horse that was disqualified at the Kentucky Derby, have filed a federal lawsuit, seeking to overturn the disqualification.The horse led the derby from wire to wire and crossed the finish line 1 3/4 lengths ahead of Country House but was disqualified for interference while turning for home. Stewards decided that Maximum Security impacted the progress of War of Will, which in turn interfered with Long Range Toddy and Bodexpress.The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, challenges the evidence and process used to disqualify Maximum Security. The suit claims the disqualification violated the plaintiff's right to due process because they could not appeal. The stewards "abused their discretion," the lawsuit says.Gary and Mary West, who own the 3-year-old colt, are seeking the reinstatement of the original order of finish."The insubstantiality of the evidence relied on by the Stewards to disqualify Maximum Security, and the bizarre and unconstitutional process to which Plaintiffs were subjected before and after the disqualification, are the subjects of this action," the lawsuit said.Maximum Security's owners and jockey Luis Saez "were denied any part of the ,860,000 share of the Derby purse as well as a professional accomplishment that any horseman would cherish for life, plus the very substantial value that a Kentucky Derby winner has as a stallion," the lawsuit said.The lawsuit names the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, its members and the stewards as defendants.Susan West, a spokeswoman for racing commission, declined to comment on pending litigation.Country House was declared the winner. Chief steward Barbara Borden read a statement to the media after the ruling -- which said Maximum Security had veered out of his path -- but took no questions.After interviewing jockeys and watching video for nearly 20 minutes, all three stewards agreed to penalize Maximum Security."Despite the fact that no objection had been lodged by the owner, trainer, or jockey of War of Will or Bodexpress, the Stewards unilaterally determined that Maximum Security had committed a foul and then lied to the public that they interviewed the "affected riders" when they knew they did not interview War of Will's jockey, Tyler Gaffalione, nor Chris Landeros, Bodexpress's rider," the lawsuit said.Maximum Security was the "leading horse," the lawsuit said, meaning the colt is "entitled to any part of the track."Last week, the state commission last week swiftly denied Maximum Security's appeal of the disqualification, saying the stewards' decision is not subject to appeal, because there is no right to appeal a disqualification under Kentucky lawOn Sunday, the 2761

The parents of a middle school student are suing a Houston-area school district and school officials in federal court for allegedly coloring in his hair design earlier this year with a black permanent marker.According to the lawsuit filed Sunday, officials at the Berry Miller Junior High in Pearland, Texas, claimed the design in the then-seventh grader's haircut violated the Pearland Independent School District's dress code policy.The suit alleges, "They laughed as they took many minutes to color 13-year-old J.T's scalp which took many days of scrubbing to come off."Lawsuit says incident came day after haircutThe lawsuit says Juelz Trice got a fade haircut April 16 and the next day when he was in the cafeteria for breakfast he was told by an assistant principal to go to the office.The civil rights lawsuit names the then-assistant principal Tony Barcelona (since promoted to principal), discipline clerk Helen Day and teacher Jeanette Peterson as defendants as well as the school district.CNN has reached out to the individuals named in the lawsuit and has not immediately heard back.The boy, who is African-American, allegedly was given two options by the two administrators.He could use a black Sharpie to color his scalp, the lawsuit says, or go to in-school suspension. Juelz didn't want a suspension affecting his track team eligibility so he chose the permanent marker option, the lawsuit says.The black Sharpie made the design line in Juelz's hair more prominent, the complaint says.Day took the marker from Juelz and began to blacken Juelz's scalp, the court document says. Peterson -- who, like the administrators, is identified in the court document as white -- came into the office and was asked to use the marker on the boy's scalp and did so, the lawsuit says.Attorney says school district has done nothing but change policyRandall Kallinen, attorney for the student's parents Dante Trice and Angela Washington, said Tuesday that the school never tried to notify the family before coloring their son's scalp.The discipline clerk should have known better how children should be disciplined, he said.The attorney says other than changing the dress code, the school district has done nothing to attempt to rectify the situation.The 2265

The Trump administration is planning to expand a procedure to speed up deportations to include undocumented immigrants anywhere in the US who cannot prove they've lived in the US continuously for two years or more.The change casts a wider net of undocumented immigrants subject to the fast-track deportation procedure known as "expedited removal," which allows immigration authorities to remove an individual without a hearing before an immigration judge.In doing so, the administration would be provided greater latitude in quickly deporting undocumented immigrants.Previously, undocumented immigrants who were caught within 100 miles of a land border and within 14 days of arrival were subject to the procedure.The notice, filed in the Federal Register Monday, drastically changes the designation of expedited removal to include undocumented immigrants nationwide who can't prove they've been in the country continuously for two years. It would therefore apply to thousands more people who recently arrived to the US and are living around the country.As of June, Border Patrol has arrested nearly 700,000 migrants who illegally crossed the border this fiscal year, according to 1192

The visitation ban on nursing home has been necessary due to the novel coronavirus. However, it hasn't been easy for families with loved ones inside care facilities.One organization in Lawrenceburg, Kentucky, is making sure that their patients can let their families know that they are okay. Signature HealthCARE at Heritage Hall Rehab and Wellness Center took photos of their residents with messages to their loved ones."We know you may be concerned regarding your loved ones. Here is a message from our residents. They wanted to check-in and let everyone know that they are doing fine. We are doing our best to protect your loved ones," reads a post by the organization.The center does have the capability to do video chat. You can call them to schedule a call with your family member.This article was written by Melissa Ratliff for 847