濮阳东方医院看妇科口碑好收费低濮阳东方妇科需要预约吗,濮阳市东方医院几路车,濮阳东方医院男科治早泄技术值得放心,濮阳东方医院看妇科口碑好收费低,濮阳东方妇科在哪,濮阳东方妇科挂号电话,濮阳东方医院好不好啊

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - An uptick in DUI arrest rates and excessive speeding citations occurred around San Diego County during March and April, even as less drivers were on the roadways due to stay-at-home orders amid the COVID-19 pandemic.San Diego police, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department and the California Highway Patrol all had moderate increases in their DUI arrest rates in March and April compared to the same two months in 2019, 2018 and 2017, according to an analysis of data requested from those agencies.SDPD arrested an average of three DUI drivers for every 100 traffic infractions in those two months the previous three years, but saw that rate jump to 4.71 during March and April this year.The California Highway Patrol logged a similar rise in DUI apprehensions, with the rate increasing from about six DUI arrests for every 100 infractions the three previous years to 7.66 this year.The Sheriff's Department saw the most dramatic rise. It had a rate of about six DUI arrests for every 100 infractions during the two-month span in 2019, 2018 and 2017, rising to 11.79 DUI arrests for every 100 infractions this year.The reasons behind those increases remain unclear, but some law enforcement officials said fewer vehicles on the road might have helped officers catch intoxicated drivers."When we're out there with less motorists, it's easier to spot more of who is weaving or swerving on the roadways," said Salvador Castro, public information officer for the CHP San Diego office.Jake Sanchez, public information officer for the CHP Border Division, agreed with that assessment."If that's the only car out there on the roadway in front of me, it's going to be a lot easier to observe and make sure that person is driving appropriately," Sanchez said.SDPD Traffic Division Sgt. John Perdue said he has noticed a change in the areas where a majority of DUI drivers are apprehended."It's kind of an odd thing because ... we typically get more DUIs out of the areas that have a lot of bars." Perdue said. "However, I've noticed now some of the DUIs we get are near the fast-food restaurants."He said in his experience, the drivers have usually been drinking at home before stopping to get food, despite the availability of food delivery services such as UberEats, Postmates and Doordash.San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stephan said she has also noticed a troubling new trend involving DUIs this year. In a six-week span from May 4 to June 17, there were seven deaths from DUI-related crashes in the county, she said."I actually don't recall a time that we've had that many in a short period of time," Stephan said. "So that's of a lot of concern."From January through April, the county recorded five DUI-related deaths -- down from eight, 12 and seven, respectively, in the same time period in 2019, 2018 and 2017, according to data provided by the D.A.'s office.The deadliest DUI crash so far this year happened around 8:30 p.m. on May 5, when a driver fatally struck a 50-year-old woman, her 33-year-old boyfriend and her 10- and 11-year-old grandsons in Escondido while allegedly under the influence of an unspecified drug.Deputy District Attorney Laurie Hauf said at Ashley Rene Williams' June 10 arraignment that the 28-year-old defendant was driving on a suspended license due to a previous DUI drug conviction.Speeding tickets have also taken a jump this year compared to overall traffic infractions.CHP officers throughout the county issued 920 tickets to drivers traveling over 100 mph in March and April, compared to 505 and 390, respectively, in the same time frame in 2019 and 2018."Growing up in Southern California myself and knowing how traffic has always been since I first started driving 30 years ago, to see this light amount of traffic on our highways, it's weird. You're not used to it," Sanchez said. "(The speeding) is something we will probably have to keep dealing with as long as the freeways are as open as they are now."Perdue said he has also seen drivers speeding more frequently on roadways in the city of San Diego.While the overall number of speeding tickets issued by SDPD is down this year, speeding violations over 65 mph represent a greater percentage of overall traffic infractions.During March and April this year, SDPD issued 395 tickets for drivers going over 65 mph. That represented 7.3% of overall infractions, while the rate for those violations was 3.44% in 2019, 4.02% in 2018 and 4.38% in 2017."It's a little insane. I couldn't believe the uptick in speeding citations and the speed itself," Perdue said. "I still tell (drivers) `Be cautious. Just because it's an open roadway you still want to drive with your safety in mind."'Like many services and programs throughout the county, DUI awareness and prevention programs have had to adapt to guidelines discouraging face-to- face interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic."Some (programs) are working out and some have had to take a backseat during this COVID time," Stephan said.One of the affected programs was a live DUI sentencing with a real defendant that would have taken place at a local high school. Stephan said her office has talked about converting to a Zoom format, but no immediate plans have been finalized.The SDPD suspended DUI checkpoints in recent months, but continued saturation patrols, during which officers conduct traffic stops in targeted areas and look for signs of impaired driving, Perdue said."Since bars were closed, we just didn't want to expose officers to such a mass quantity of drivers," he said.However, the SDPD plans to hold its first DUI checkpoint in roughly two months from 11 Thursday evening to 3 a.m. Friday at an undisclosed location.The CHP has continued to post DUI awareness messages on social media and has replaced its in-person educational talks with Zoom sessions, Sanchez said."It is, in a sense, a good thing that we're kind of adapting and we'll now have better ways, or other ways, of reaching the public, as well," he said. 6014

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Live Nation and the city of El Cajon Tuesday announced a Sept. 13 opening date for the recently renovated East County Performing Arts Center, which has been renamed The Magnolia.The 1,200-seat theater will open with "Countess Luann and Friends,'' a cabaret show starring Luann de Lesseps of "Real Housewives of New York City'' fame.Live Nation, which will operate, book and market The Magnolia, also confirmed future performances by Pat Benatar, Dream Theater, Patti Labelle and Art Garfunkel, among others, with dates booked through March 2020."This is a special moment for not only El Cajon but the entire San Diego region,'' said El Cajon City Manager Graham Mitchell. "The completely renovated Magnolia represents another jewel in the continued growth of the entire region.''The city of El Cajon shuttered the performing arts center in 2009 amid the recession in an effort to cut budget expenditures. Since then, Live Nation has renovated the theater's interior, adding a VIP lounge, new bars and added legroom between rows."The Magnolia will offer an amazing elevated entertainment opportunity for both artists and music fans,'' said Ben Weeden, chief operating officer of Live Nation's clubs and theaters division. "In addition to a spectacular outdoor Plaza Bazaar featuring unique pre-and post-show dining, the theater will offer new state-of-the-art sound, lighting and projection systems. We're thrilled to join the El Cajon team.''To buy tickets for upcoming shows and see the full lineup, go to magnoliasandiego.com. 1554

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - An Italian restaurant in Encinitas agreed to pay ,800 to settle a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by a former employee who alleged her hours were substantially cut, and she was ultimately fired, after she told her employer she was expecting, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced Tuesday.After informing the owner in 2015 that she was expecting, the server was told that she "should stay home since she was pregnant, that her pregnancy had caused coverage problems, and that (the owner) would offer a position with less pay for more work so that she would not come back from her pregnancy leave," according to the complaint filed against Maurizio Trattoria Italiana LLC.She was fired in the summer of 2015, while less experienced servers were hired, according to the complaint.RELATED: Lawsuit aims to stop California's AB 5 from taking effect"Women should not be penalized for having children," said Christopher Green, director of the EEOC's San Diego office. "The EEOC takes pregnancy discrimination seriously and will vigorously protect the rights of pregnant employees."According to the EEOC, that conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.In addition to the financial settlement, the restaurant operator agreed to review and revise its policies to bring it into compliance with Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, according to the EEOC."We commend Maurizio Trattoria Italiana for agreeing to comprehensive injunctive remedies that are intended to prevent future pregnancy discrimination," EEOC Regional Attorney Anna Y. Park said. "The EEOC continues to see pregnancy discrimination as an ongoing problem. We encourage other employers to follow suit and review their policies and practices relating to pregnancy discrimination to ensure they are in compliance with federal law." 1917

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A jury Monday began deliberating the fate of a man accused of fatally beating a senior citizen and going on a shopping spree with the victim's credit cards nearly two decades ago.Prosecutor Christina Arrollado asked jurors to find 39-year-old Edward Jamar Brooks guilty of first-degree murder.The 71-year-old victim, LeRay Parkins, was found in an alley off the 3700 block of 28th Street on Aug. 23, 2000. He died at a hospital three days later of injuries that included two skull fractures and brain bleeding.According to prosecutors, Parkins was out on a morning walk when he encountered Brooks and co-defendant Lester Bell.Brooks allegedly struck Parkins in the head with a bat, then rifled through the victim's pockets and took his wallet. Purchases were made with Perkins' credit card less than two hours later at a Spring Valley gas station and an Escondido clothing store, according to the District Attorney's Office.A baseball bat was later found at a Spring Valley home frequented by Bell and the getaway driver, Terrence Maurice Brown, but authorities lacked sufficient evidence at the time to arrest the trio for the murder, according to previous court testimony.The three were arrested in different states last summer: Brooks in North Carolina, Bell in Colorado and Brown in Arizona. Brown, 38, recently pleaded guilty to a robbery charge, while Bell, 39, pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter. Both men have yet to be sentenced.Brooks "took a baseball bat to the (victim's) skull," and his DNA was found on the victim's short pockets, Arrollado alleged in her closing argument.She said Parkins was a senior on his morning walk to stay healthy, and claims that he was "willing to get into a full-blown fight" with the defendants are false."Instead of coming home healthy and more vibrant, (Parkins) lay dying in alley, choking on this own blood," she told jurors.Arrollado also dismissed claims by Brooks' attorney, Robert Ford, that Bell and Brown were the real culprits who conspired against Brooks."If this is a frame-up job, it's the worst frame-up job in history," the deputy district attorney said. "These three set out looking for victims."Ford countered that if three people are involved in such a crime, accomplices "will say anything to save their own skin -- don't convict Mr. Brooks unless it's based on evidence." That evidence, Ford said, would include DNA on the baseball bat.Brooks admits to taking Parkins' wallet, and DNA evidence supports a robbery -- but not murder, the defense attorney said. Ford said Parkins deserves justice, but the DA's office "cannot prove any malice in the heart of Mr. Brooks.""I hope and pray that each and every one of you will agree on one theory, and that he's not guilty," Ford told jurors. "If he's an innocent man, he should be able to walk out that door."Ford has alleged that Brown actually beat Parkins with the bat and that he and Bell -- two "lifelong friends" who grew up in North Park together -- conspired to blame Brooks, the "odd man out."Ford earlier told jurors that as the three defendants prepared to leave, Brown got into a fistfight with Parkins, which the victim was winning, despite being much older than Brown. He also said his client went to North Park with Bell and Brown on Aug. 23 to buy marijuana, but the dealer was not home. 3344

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A wrongful death lawsuit was filed Monday on behalf of the family of a 24-year-old woman who died last fall at the Las Colinas Detention Facility in Santee.Elisa Serna died Nov. 11, 2019, a few days after she was booked into the county jail.Earlier this year, the sheriff's department said Serna died from complications of drug abuse, with a contributing factor of early intrauterine pregnancy.The lawsuit filed in San Diego federal court alleges jail staff were aware of Serna's substance abuse and subsequent withdrawal symptoms, but did not provide her with treatment. Though Serna was fainting, had low blood pressure, was vomiting regularly and displaying odd and incoherent behavior, jail staff "ignored the obvious signs of medical distress" and "failed to provide proper medication as Elisa's condition was worsening," the complaint alleges.Sheriff's officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the suit, which names San Diego County and Sheriff Bill Gore as defendants.Plaintiffs in the suit include Serna's parents, Michael and Paloma Serna; her husband, Brandon Honeycutt, and a minor child referred to as S.H.The sheriff's department has come under fire recently over a spate of deaths among county jail inmates, which were referenced within the complaint.The lawsuit cited news reports indicating the county had the highest jail mortality rate among the state's largest counties, and said prior deaths from inmates suffering from withdrawal symptoms should have made jail staff aware of the potentially fatal consequences of those symptoms.The suit also alleges staff are inadequately trained and in-custody deaths at county jails are not being properly investigated."Even though inmates are dying or suffering catastrophic injuries at an alarming rate at San Diego County jails, the medical and correctional staff whose actions or inactions cause the deaths are not investigated; not informed of their failures; not given further training or remedial instruction; and are not monitored or closely supervised after these adverse events," the lawsuit alleges. 2111