濮阳东方医院割包皮很便宜(濮阳东方男科医院很靠谱) (今日更新中)

Traffic fines are meant to be a deterrent, but now California Governor Gavin Newsom is saying the fines and other added fees are getting too high. "They should be held accountable... but if it is a speeding ticket going eight miles over the speed limit- I think you should get a break," said David Murcia, a Santa Maria resident.In his latest budget proposal, Governor Newsom wants to expand a pilot program that lowers traffic fines.It could mean those who make less than about ,000 a year will only pay half of what other drivers pay and allow them to make payments.A recent study found that high fines led to drivers simply not paying them, which means less money for the state and more people at risk of having their license suspended.A pilot program was started in four counties to test out the low income fine reductions."They are pretty extreme on a lot of the fines for the citations... and I would be more inclined to pay mine if they were reasonable," said Rory Medlin, an Oceano resident.Even though it was not part of the pilot program, San Luis Obispo County already has an ability to pay program set in place.The local program uses a person's financial history to determine fine reductions, and the new state-wide proposal is similar. The governor said the program is a first step toward undoing the effect of extra fees and assessments tacked onto the base traffic fines.The fines for traffic violations have not increased, but more and more fees designed to supplement the general fund have increased dramatically. According to the budget proposal, in most counties not stopping for a red light will cost about 0.00... only 0.00 of that represent that actual traffic fine, the rest is made up of various fees.The California Highway Patrol and the Santa Maria Police Department tell KSBY that if and when the proposal gets put into place, it will not change who gets a citation or how they are issued.If approved, the judicial council will implement the program which will be phased in with multiple counties joining each year. 2064

Tornadoes kill an average of 60 people a year in the United States, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Many of the deaths are caused by flying or falling debris.They are most common in the Central Plains and southeastern United States.Here are the 10 deadliest tornadoes to touch down in the United States, according to 363

The parents of a middle school student are suing a Houston-area school district and school officials in federal court for allegedly coloring in his hair design earlier this year with a black permanent marker.According to the lawsuit filed Sunday, officials at the Berry Miller Junior High in Pearland, Texas, claimed the design in the then-seventh grader's haircut violated the Pearland Independent School District's dress code policy.The suit alleges, "They laughed as they took many minutes to color 13-year-old J.T's scalp which took many days of scrubbing to come off."Lawsuit says incident came day after haircutThe lawsuit says Juelz Trice got a fade haircut April 16 and the next day when he was in the cafeteria for breakfast he was told by an assistant principal to go to the office.The civil rights lawsuit names the then-assistant principal Tony Barcelona (since promoted to principal), discipline clerk Helen Day and teacher Jeanette Peterson as defendants as well as the school district.CNN has reached out to the individuals named in the lawsuit and has not immediately heard back.The boy, who is African-American, allegedly was given two options by the two administrators.He could use a black Sharpie to color his scalp, the lawsuit says, or go to in-school suspension. Juelz didn't want a suspension affecting his track team eligibility so he chose the permanent marker option, the lawsuit says.The black Sharpie made the design line in Juelz's hair more prominent, the complaint says.Day took the marker from Juelz and began to blacken Juelz's scalp, the court document says. Peterson -- who, like the administrators, is identified in the court document as white -- came into the office and was asked to use the marker on the boy's scalp and did so, the lawsuit says.Attorney says school district has done nothing but change policyRandall Kallinen, attorney for the student's parents Dante Trice and Angela Washington, said Tuesday that the school never tried to notify the family before coloring their son's scalp.The discipline clerk should have known better how children should be disciplined, he said.The attorney says other than changing the dress code, the school district has done nothing to attempt to rectify the situation.The 2265

The third and final supermoon of 2019 is set to be seen on Wednesday, just ahead of the official start of spring in the U.S.The next supermoon won't rise again until Feb. 9, 2020, 192

The Top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor testified Tuesday that he had been told President Donald Trump would withhold military aid to the country until it publicly declared investigations would be launched that could help his reelection chances — including into former Vice President Joe Biden, according to a copy of Taylor's opening statement obtained by CNN."During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 US election," according to the testimony.Sondland told Taylor he'd also made a mistake earlier by telling the Ukrainian officials that a White House meeting with Zelensky "was dependent on a public announcement of the investigations," Taylor said."In fact, Ambassador Sondland said, 'everything' was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance," Taylor testified.He testified that Trump wanted Zelensky "in a public box" by making a public statement about ordering the investigations."Ambassador Sondland tried to explain to me that President Trump is a businessman. When a businessman is about to sign a check to someone who owes him something, he said, the businessman asks that person to pay up before signing the check," Taylor testified, adding that Volker had used the same phrase."I argued to both that the explanation made no sense: the Ukrainians did not 'owe' President Trump anything, and holding up security assistance for domestic political gain was 'crazy,' as I had said in my text message to Ambassadors Sondland and Volker on September 9," Sondland added.Democrats described Taylor's testimony as damning for the President."All I have to say is that in my 10 short months in Congress ... it's my most disturbing day in Congress so far," said Rep. Andy Levin, a freshman Democrat from Michigan."This testimony is a sea change. I think it could accelerate matters," said Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts. "This will, I think, answer more questions than it raises. Let's put it that way."In a lengthy and detailed opening statement, Taylor said that he and Sondland spoke by phone about why the aid was frozen, and Sondland cited the need for Ukraine to open an investigation among other reasons, according to the sources. Sondland told Taylor that the investigations potentially included both Ukraine's involvement in the 2016 election and Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that hired former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden, the sources said.Asked about Taylor's comments, a source familiar with Sondland's testimony said that Sondland cited, in addition to the investigations, that the aid may have been frozen because the Europeans weren't giving Ukraine enough and corruption in general. The source said Sondland was only speculating when he referenced the political investigations into the 2016 election and Burisma."He made very clear in his testimony that nobody would give him a straight answer" about why the aid was being held up, the source said about Sondland's testimony. 3148

来源：资阳报