濮阳东方医院看妇科病很靠谱(濮阳东方看男科价格不贵) (今日更新中)

In a victory for employers and the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Monday said that employers could block employees from banding together as a class to fight legal disputes in employment arbitration agreements.Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the opinion for the 5-4 majority, his first major opinion since joining the court last spring and a demonstration of how the Senate Republicans' move to keep liberal nominee Merrick Garland from being confirmed in 2016 has helped cement a conservative court."This is the Justice Gorsuch that I think most everyone expected," said Steve Vladeck, CNN contributor and professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law. "Not only is he endorsing the conservative justices' controversial approach to arbitration clauses, but he's taking it an important step further by extending that reasoning to employment agreements, as well."Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took the rare step of reading her dissent from the bench, calling the majority opinion in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis "egregiously wrong.""The court today holds enforceable these arm-twisted, take-it-or-leave-it contracts -- including the provisions requiring employees to litigate wage and hours claims only one-by-one. Federal labor law does not countenance such isolation of employees," she said.In the majority opinion, Gorsuch maintained the "decision does nothing to override" what Congress has done."Congress has instructed that arbitration agreements like those before us must be enforced as written," he said.As the dissent recognizes, the legislative policy embodied in the (National Labor Relations Act) is aimed at 'safeguard[ing], first and foremost, workers' rights to join unions and to engage in collective bargaining," he wrote. "Those rights stand every bit as strong today as they did yesterday."Gorusch, responding to Ginsburg's claim that the court's decision would resurrect so-called "yellow dog" contracts which barred an employee from joining a union, said that "like most apocalyptic warnings, this one proves a false alarm."The case was the biggest business case of the term, and represented a clash between employers who prefer to handle disputes through arbitration against employees who want to be able to band together to bring their challenges and not be required to sign class action bans.It also pitted two federal laws against each other.One, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), gives employees the right to self organization to "engage in concerted activities for the purpose of mutual aid or protection" the other, the 1925 Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows employers to "settle by arbitration."Lawyers for employers, who have long backed arbitration as a means of resolving disputes, argued that class action waivers are permissible under the 1925 law. They say the NLRA does not contain a congressional command precluding enforcement of the waivers.The Trump administration supported the employers in the case, a switch from the Obama administration's position.  3034

In a rare public appearance since he was fired from office, former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called President Donald Trump "undisciplined" and claimed that Trump would often ask him to do things unaware that such actions would violate the law."When the President would say, 'Here's what I want to do and here's how I want to do it.' And I'd have to say to him, 'Well Mr. President, I understand what you want to do, but you can't do it that way. It violates the law. It violates treaty,'" Tillerson said Thursday night at a fundraiser in Houston for the MD Anderson Cancer Center, according to video of the event posted by CBS News.He went on to add, "He got really frustrated ... I think he grew tired of me being the guy every day that told him you can't do that and let's talk about what we can do."In response, Trump tweeted, "Rex Tillerson, didn’t have the mental capacity needed. He was dumb as a rock and I couldn’t get rid of him fast enough. He was lazy as hell."Mike Pompeo is doing a great job, I am very proud of him. His predecessor, Rex Tillerson, didn't have the mental capacity needed. He was dumb as a rock and I couldn't get rid of him fast enough. He was lazy as hell. Now it is a whole new ballgame, great spirit at State!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 7, 2018 1312

In 2135, NASA says an asteroid the size of the Empire State Building could slam into Earth.According to the Washington Post, scientists say, though the chance is small, the asteroid could slam into Earth on September 22, 2135, destroying lots of living things on the planet.The odds of the asteroid, named Bennu, actually hitting Earth are one in 2,700. If the asteroid does get too close for comfort, the geniuses at NASA have hatched a plan.NASA says they could send a nine-ton “bulk impactor” to push the asteroid out of Earth’s orbit. The plan is called HAMMER, which stands for (deep breath) Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response.Though the odds are slim that the massive asteroid will hit Earth, in 1908, what is believed to be an asteroid crashed in Siberia with force 185 times as powerful as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.The impact flattened 80 million trees and killed hundreds of reindeer. Scientists say Bennu isn’t all bad.The asteroid is giving scientists a chance to test theories. NASA’s OSIRIS-Rex will also map Bennu and figure out what the asteroid is made of.To learn more about Bennu, click here. 1153

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Maryland, introduced legislation Friday that establishes a Congressional commission that would be able to investigate a President's health under the 25th Amendment.While President Donald Trump's health has come into question following his COVID-19 diagnosis, Pelosi and Raskin insisted that while Trump's health prompted their bill, it would not be used to remove him from office.Instead, Raskin said the commission would be a bipartisan effort that would be set up in case the health of other presidents came into question.Passed in 1967, the 25th amendment to the U.S. Constitution spells out the presidential line of succession.The amendment has four sections:1- When a president dies or resigns, the vice president finishes the term.2- When there is a vice presidential vacancy, the House and Senate votes to confirm a replacement nominated by the president.3 - When a president needs to temporarily cede power, he or she can hand the duties to the vice president who then becomes the acting president.4 - The vice president and a majority of secretaries can vote to remove the president if the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. The section also grants power to a body "established by Congress" to invoke the amendment and transfer power to the Vice President.Raskin said his bill would establish that "body" that could investigate the health of the president. For Congress to invoke the 25th Amendment, the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate must provide "written declaration" that the President is "unable to discharge powers and duties of his office." Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is the current President pro tempore and will unlikely make such a declaration. In addition, the President could object to the Congressional body's findings. Reports surfaced later on Thursday that the House is planning to introduce legislation to institute a commission to evaluate the president's health.Pelosi then criticized the White House for not stating the president last submitted a negative coronavirus.“I think that the public needs to know the health condition of the President. There’s one question they refuse to answer. Before he got the virus and admitted to it, when was his last negative test? When was his last negative test? To make a judgment on the actions that were taken after that,” Pelosi said.Editor's note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Congress has no authority to remove the president under the 25th Amendment. 2582

If you’re tuning into the new “Looney Tunes Cartoons” on HBO Max, you may notice a slight edit made to the classic show’s “wabbit” hunter.In the 2020 reboot, producers decided that Elmer Fudd would no longer carry a gun in his endless pursuit of Bugs Bunny. Neither will any other characters for that matter.“We’re not doing guns,” showrunner Peter Browngardt told The New York Times.Browngardt said other forms of “Looney Tunes” violence is still baked into the show, whether that involve sticks of dynamite, intricate booby traps, falling anvils or bank safes.“But we can do cartoony violence — TNT, the Acme stuff. All that was kind of grandfathered in,” Browngardt added.It seems Elmer Fudd may have a new weapon on choice in the show, In a scene titled “Dynamite Dance,” he’s seen chasing Bugs with a scythe before the famous bunny outsmarts him with sticks of dynamite.Producers of the show are wrapping production on the first 1,000 minutes of cartoons, which comes to about 200 cartoons in all, The Times reports.The “Looney Tunes” reboot premiered on HBO Max on May 27, with a total of 30 shorts in 10 episodes. 1128

来源：资阳报