濮阳东方医院男科治疗阳痿价格收费低濮阳东方妇科医院预约电话,濮阳东方医院男科看早泄评价很不错,濮阳东方医院男科收费不贵,濮阳东方妇科医院做人流口碑好收费低,濮阳市东方医院线上医生咨询,濮阳东方医院做人流价格合理,濮阳东方评价好很不错

CHULA VISTA, Calif. (KGTV) - There were heated moments Wednesday while a group was defending the Christopher Columbus statue at discovery park in Chula Vista.Chula Vista City Councilman John McCann, with members of the Knights of Columbus standing by his side, called for the statue to be left alone."You can't change history," he said. "We should be able to accept all groups, you can't lift one group by destroying another group.""We're here to oppose the removal of the statue," said Rene Trevino, a member of the Knights of Columbus.The statue, which has been in place for nearly three decades, has stirred up controversy in the past.Thursday the city's Human Relations Commission will vote on a resolution to not only remove the statue and change the name of discovery park, but to change Columbus Day to Indigenous People's Day in Chula Vista.Last Columbus Day someone splashed red paint all over the statue, and before that someone plaque set in front of the statue was stolen."It's been a community family park and we've had opponents of Christopher Columbus use violence to vandalize and destroy the park multiple times, costing tax payers," said McCann.Many people have called the meaning behind the statue and the name of the park both painful and offensive.A woman in a car driving by the park Wednesday began shouting, "This is indigenous land, take that statue down!"She went on to say Christopher Columbus was just the beginning of an attempted assassination of Indigenous peoples.The topic caused people to clash at the park."You have these people trying to advocate for an idea that we're sick and tired of living under," said Rafael Bautista, who wants the statue removed.He was then confronted by a man who opposes the removal."What are you living under?" the man asked him. "What are you living under?"At one point Chula Vista Police officers arrived at the park, but things had settled down."Instead of trying to argue over things that happened over 500 years ago, we should be tackling today's issues," said McCann.Raeanne Herrera, a resident of Eastlake and part of the Jicarilla Apache Nation stopped by the park to offer her take."We can right the wrongs that have been done," she said. "That statue is the constant reminder of a beginning of a genocide. They tried, but they didn't."She went on to say change needs to start with education."Native American issues were never taught in school, what was I taught? Oh, that the pilgrims and Indians got together and shared a meal. That's an absolute lie, it was a celebration for a massacre that occurred," she explained.Both groups say they will continue effort to get their way, no matter what City of Chula Vista officials ultimately decide.If Thursday's resolution passes, it will head to the full city council for the final decision. 2818

CHULA VISTA, Calif. (KGTV) - The City of Chula Vista is launching a new pedestrian safety initiative after seeing a sharp increase in fatal crashes last year.According to the Chula Vista Police Department, nine pedestrians were killed in 2017 on city streets. That’s up 125% from 2016.In the first three months of 2018 there have already been three fatal pedestrian crashes, a 200% increase from the same period last year. Police say it's the first time in four years they’ve had more than one pedestrian killed within the first quarter of the year.The map below shows those killed in auto-pedestrian crashes between January of 2017 to March of 2018. In an effort to combat the trend and educate the public, the city unveiled a new campaign on Thursday called “Stay Safe Chula Vista.”To kick off the program they have named April as “Pedestrian Safety Awareness Month.” The Chula Vista Police Department along with the Fire Department and Department of Traffic Engineering will be working together on enforcement and education.CVPD will have increased patrols targeting both drivers and pedestrians who violate traffic laws. Along with the ticket, violators may also relieve pamphlets with information on the “Stay Safe Chula Vista” campaign. Of the nine fatal collisions in 2017, CVPD said pedestrians were found to be at fault in seven of them.The announcement came a little over a month after a 90-year-old man was killed while crossing the street.RELATED: 90-year-old dies hit, killed by two cars in Chula Vista Police say the man was crossing East H Street when he wasn’t supposed to when he was struck and killed.Similarly, in January of 2018, a 94-year-old man was hit and killed on the 1500 block of Third Avenue. In that incident, police said the suspect fled the scene after striking the 94-year-old.A law firm in 2017 commissioned a study that revealed the most dangerous intersections for pedestrians in San Diego. Click on the image below to see the statistics:On Thursday, police held a news conference about the program. Watch the news conference in the player below.  2116

CHULA VISTA (CNS) - A Chula Vista church that challenged California's COVID-19 restrictions in a legal fight that went before the U.S. Supreme Court has filed an amended complaint in its bid to see churches reopened during the pandemic.South Bay United Pentecostal Church and its pastor, Arthur Hodges III, filed the new complaint last week in San Diego federal court, nearly two months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold COVID-19 restrictions placed on religious gatherings by Gov. Gavin Newsom.At the time, the church accused the state of arbitrarily allowing certain sectors considered essential to stay open, while discriminating against religious institutions, a move they claimed "intentionally denigrated California churches and pastors and people of faith by relegating them to third- class citizenship."California imposed restrictions this month on a number of indoor activities due to a spike in COVID-19 cases, and the church is seeking an injunction that will allow it to open under the same standards as other sectors when those businesses are allowed to reopen.This time, the church renews its objections while also taking aim at alleged favoritism toward the police protests that began in late May following the Memorial Day Minneapolis death of George Floyd."When the public sentiment began to favor race-based political protest instead of compliance with the pandemic restrictions, public officials were all too eager to grant a de facto exception for those favored protestors," the complaint states. "This favoritism has caused amazing harm in the form of a general loss of confidence by the American people in the merits of the pandemic restrictions at all."The church again says that a number of secular industries were allowed to reopen, while alleging they may have presented more of an infection risk than places of worship.It also takes issue with restrictions Newsom placed on churches when they were allowed to reopen, including attendance caps of 100 people or 25% occupancy, and prohibitions against singing indoors. The injunction South Bay United seeks would also prevent California from banning singing or chanting during worship services, or issuing any other "allegedly neutral ban...that clearly targets worship."As in its earlier filings, the church states that indoor services are needed for proper worship and that tele-conferenced or outdoor services are "inadequate substitutes."In the amended complaint, the church states its preference that "the entire congregation meet at once" and that placing capacity restrictions on services "would be like holding a family reunion in three sessions."In its allegations of discriminatory practices, the church alleges "ordering that `worshippers may not gather' is not different than -- and equally repugnant as -- ordering that `African-Americans may not gather' or `Chinese may not gather,"' in addition to comparing the restrictions on worship to "providing specific (mandatory) guidance for heterosexuals, homosexuals and other sexual minorities."The complaint also alleges the state's shutdown orders are too restrictive in the face of a "generally non-lethal disease."South Bay United's attorneys allege that death rates from COVID-19 are declining and that California's death rate "has largely stabilized."While California recently overtook New York as the state with the highest number of COVID-19 cases nationwide, and ranks fourth in total deaths, the church states California has the 30th-highest death rate in the nation, while also alleging that death rates in San Diego County have been low."In a society hostile to religion, banning worship might be justified to prevent deaths, but not common, flu-like symptoms," the complaint states.Both a San Diego federal judge and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the church's challenges, leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection in late May in a 5-4 decision.Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote in an opinion denying the request that "Although California's guidelines place restrictions on places of worship, those restrictions appear consistent with the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Similar or more severe restrictions apply to comparable secular gatherings, including lectures, concerts, movie showings, spectator sports and theatrical performances, where large groups of people gather in close proximity for extended periods of time. And the order exempts or treats more leniently only dissimilar activities, such as operating grocery stores, banks and laundromats, in which people neither congregate in large groups nor remain in close proximity for extended periods."The majority opinion noted: "The precise question of when restrictions on particular social activities should be lifted during the pandemic is a dynamic and fact-intensive matter subject to reasonable disagreement. Our Constitution principally entrusts `[t]he safety and the health of the people' to the politically accountable officials of the states to guard and protect."Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote the dissenting opinion joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch."I would grant the church's requested temporary injunction because California's latest safety guidelines discriminate against places of worship and in favor of comparable secular businesses. Such discrimination violates the First Amendment," according to the opinion, which also noted that "comparable secular businesses" were not subject to occupancy caps. 5507

CHULA VISTA (KGTV) -- After years of a growing demand for cafeteria lunches at South Bay middle and high schools, frustrated parents say the lunchrooms have become overcrowded.Some parents say the problem was predictable. The proliferation of housing developments and road congestion surrounding eastern Chula Vista schools were strong signals that campuses would be impacted. Others say the district’s multi-million dollar budget shortfall is to blame.However, while parents and students struggle to navigate the crowds during lunch, district officials say the current situation is routine early in the school year.“As students become more comfortable or reacquainted with the campus, class schedules, and learn to prioritize lunch, the flow of the meal service will improve,” says Manny Rubio, Sweetwater Union High School District spokesperson.That’s not so, say families at Otay Ranch High, Eastlake middle and high schools, and Rancho Del Rey. The problem has gotten worse over the years, according to these families. "Yes my kids never get to eat at Eastlake High they always come home with headaches not enough time to eat and by the time they make it thru the line theres no choices of food,” one parent told 10News on Facebook.Some hope to land a fourth-period class near the cafeteria to get to the lunch line quicker."My son mentioned that to mom yesterday. I was a bit skeptical so I downloaded the daily schedule for ELM [Eastlake Middle School]. How the ---- do they expect kids to get from their class, wait in line for food, and eat in 30 minutes?"Another parent said the overcrowding had left her students with few to no meal choices.“If your child shows up a few minutes late they're not going to get any food. My high schooler and middle schooler always brought their own food because of this,” said another parent.Rubio says that he hears the public's concerns but insists the current situation inside the lunchrooms and at various points of sale is only temporary. “At all of our schools we aim for about a 1.5-2 minute wait time. At most of our schools we see lines cleared within 10-15 mins – meaning that after that time there are no lines and wait time is less than 1 minute,” Rubio says.Given those figures -- plus factoring in the time it takes to walk to and from the cafeteria -- a student would have roughly have 5-10 minutes to eat, in a worst-case scenario. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that students get at least 20 minutes for adequate time to eat.“My high school graduate never had enough time to get a school meal. We had to send him food for him to eat because of the lines and wait times,” said one parent.Waiting it out is a risky strategy, according to some parents and students.“At Rancho del Rey Middle they run out of food while kids are still in line. We've been bringing lunch for a few years now, for my peace of mind,” said one mom.DISTRICT: FINANCIAL SCANDAL A NON-FACTORSome parents have speculated that the district's inability to properly tackle the problem is due to a financial scandal that came to light last year. They argue the district has reduced the issue of crowded lunchrooms to a low priority.Currently, SUHSD is working to climb out of a million debt and is facing a state audit for possible fraud.“There aren’t enough resources at the schools for the number of students they have going there! This needs to be corrected!,” one parent said.Rubio says the district’s financial shortfall has nothing to do with the perceived lunchtime problem, and that schools have the resources to ensure they are meeting student needs.SUHSD has routinely overspent its tax-supported Government funding to operate its food services, according to Ed-Data records. The district has spent nearly million more than it was granted between 2011-2018.By comparison, San Diego Unified School District, the county’s largest school district, received a total of 7.8M in funding and spent 3.1M.SUHSD’s most significant expenditure was recorded during the 2017-2018 fiscal year when the district spent .2M of the .9M it was granted for its Cafeteria Special Revenue Fund, according to Ed-Data.Rubio says the district is equally vulnerable to the rising costs in the food service industry, which includes an increase in vendor, menu item, and transportation costs. “We are constantly trying to negotiate lower prices for items, but overall we, like most others, have seen costs go up,” Rubio says.Data on three other San Diego County school districts -- La Mesa-Spring Valley, Fallbrook Union High, San Diego Unified -- show they either underspent or stayed within ,000 of their cafeteria funding between 2013-18. 4693

CHULA VISTA Calif. (KGTV) - Arson investigators are looking into a fire that damaged a Mexican restaurant in Chula Vista late Thursday evening.The fire at Tacos Y Mariscos Imperial, located on 2490 Main Street, was reported at around 10:15 p.m., according to fire officials at the scene.Firefighters said the blaze started outside and quickly spread to the front of the restaurant.No one was inside the restaurant at the time of the fire.The cause of the fire is under investigation. 491