濮阳东方医院看早泄收费公开(濮阳东方医院治疗阳痿收费不高) (今日更新中)

(CNN) -- If California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs a bill passed by the state Senate Friday, state university clinics will be required to offer abortion pills to students as of 2023."The state has an interest in ensuring that every pregnant person in California who wants to have an abortion can obtain access to that care as easily and as early in pregnancy as possible," the bill states.California's legislation comes as several other states are moving to tighten abortion restrictions or to ban them with very limited exceptions."In a time when states across our country are rolling back women's health care and access to abortion, California continues to lead the nation to protect every individual's right to choose," Sen. Connie Leyva, who authored the bill, said in a statement. "SB 24 reaffirms the right of every college student to access abortion."Giving students access to abortion by medication means students won't have to "choose between delaying important medical care or having to travel long distances or miss classes or work," Leyva said.If it becomes law, the initiative would be funded by "nonstate entities, including, but not necessarily limited to, private sector entities and local and federal government agencies," the bill says.There are more than 400,000 women students at California's state university campuses, according to the bill.Former California Gov. Jerry Brown last year vetoed a similar bill. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Newsom said last year that he would have signed that one. 1533

(KGTV) -- Billions of dollars could be at stake with Proposition 15.If passed, it would tax some commercial properties based on current market value instead of when it was bought. It could potentially bring in anywhere between .5 to .5 billion in new funding to local schools and governments, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.Brandon Foster is a small business owner in Oceanside. Even though he rents the space where his two gift shops are located, he is against Prop. 15.“We already have been told by our landlords, if that passes, they will be passing on that cost to us,” Foster said. “The landlords, a lot of them, have vacancies and things like that where they are struggling themselves. I understand why they need to pass that cost onto us.”The ad for No on Prop. 15 highlights a small business owner who said he had to close twice during the pandemic. The ad said Proposition 15 would raise “property taxes and rents on small business and they admit homeowners are next.”The change in property tax assessment would apply only to commercial or industrial properties valued at more than million. It would tax those properties at current market value rather than when it was bought.Residential and agricultural properties are not affected under Prop. 15.“They are very emotional, as ads are supposed to be,” said Lynn Reaser, chief economist at Pt. Loma Nazarene University.The ad has major funding from the California Business Roundtable, California Business Properties Association, and the California Taxpayers Association.“You would see a big effect especially on these older companies, not necessarily the big companies, but all companies that bought their properties some years ago,” Reaser said. “They could face more problems in terms of survival.”The ad lacks detail about time frame for Proposition 15, not making clear that it would take effect in 2022.While the ad said homeowners are next in line for property tax increases, Reaser said “no one knows” if that is actually true.“All the businesses, they’re all going to have to pass on the money, the expense, to somebody,” Foster said. 2131

(KGTV) — An elderly driver led Los Angeles-area officers on a slow-speed pursuit on the 101 Freeway Wednesday, before being taken into custody.The driver began the pursuit with California Highway Patrol officers just after 1 p.m. in the San Gabriel Valley area, according ABC-affiliate KABC. CHP officers tried to pull the driver's SUV over for a carpool violation but the vehicle continued down the freeway, KABC reported.Officers followed the driver at normal highway speeds through Glendale and into the San Fernando Valley, before officers pulled in front of the driver's SUV and slowed the vehicle down.As officers approached the vehicle, the driver was cooperative and stepped out of the vehicle without incident.The driver, who appeared to be an elderly man, seemed disoriented as officers took him into custody, KABC reported. 842

(KGTV) - Does a video really show Paul George's uniform number change from 13 to 14 on camera after a dunk?No.George's uniform folded briefly after the dunk during the NBA All Star Game, and the light hit it in such a way to make it appear the 3 was a 4. 262

(CNN) -- In a landmark ruling, a court in Mexico City has said two people should be allowed to use cocaine legally.The ruling means the unnamed pair can use, but not sell, small amounts of cocaine, according to Mexico United Against Crime (MUCD), an NGO that filed legal papers in the case as part of its strategy to change the country's drug policy.This is the first time cocaine use has been made legal in Mexico, but the ruling still needs to be ratified by a higher court.It comes at a time when Mexico is grappling with its drug policy under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, whose official development plan for 2019-2024 pledges to reform a "prohibitionist approach" that it calls "unsustainable" due to the "violence and poor public health outcomes" it has generated.The court ruling orders Mexico's national health regulator, Cofepris, to authorize two people to legally possess, transport and use cocaine.However, a Cofepris official told the AFP news agency that such an authorization is outside its remit, and it has blocked the court order as a result.The order was delivered in May but will now be reviewed by a tribunal, according to AFP.In a statement, MUCD emphasizes that the ruling will only be enforced if it is upheld by the tribunal, and underlines that it does not legalize cocaine.The organization said the ruling marks a new stage in the judiciary's understanding of drugs and offers an opportunity to call for an end to the war on drugs and the redistribution of public resources to fight other crimes."We have spent years working for a more secure, just and peaceful Mexico," said Lisa Sánchez, MUCD's director."This case is about insisting on the need to stop criminalizing users of drugs... and design better public policies that explore all the available options, including regulation."Mexico is a major transit point for cocaine en route to the United States, and trafficking gangs have grown in size and power thanks to the vast profits of the trade.The country's war on drugs began in 2006, when then-President Felipe Calderón sent in the army to fight traffickers.According to a 2018 US Congressional Research Service report, "many sources indicate" that about 150,000 intentional homicides in Mexico since 2006 were linked to organized crime.In 2018, Mexico recorded 33,341 homicides, the highest number since the country began keeping records.MUCD wants the government to reform drug policy as a way of improving public security and has also campaigned for changes to legislation on marijuana.In 2017, marijuana was legalized for medical and scientific purposes, and in November 2018 the Supreme Court ruled that a blanket ban on recreational use was unconstitutional, Reuters reports.That same month, López Obrador's government submitted a bill that would allow recreational use and create a medical marijuana industry, according to Reuters.For now, Cofepris grants permits to use marijuana on an individual basis.Gunther Baumgarten, editor at consultancy firm Latin News and Canning House associate, told CNN that any potential advance through the judicial system is likely to be a slow process.It took three years for the marijuana case to reach Mexico's supreme court, and judges could decide cocaine poses too much of a public health risk, he said.Plus, there is less of an economic incentive to act on cocaine than marijuana."In the case of marijuana there is already an international legal market but there is no such thing for cocaine," said Baumgarten.And López Obrador could be discouraged after calculating the political risk."He might get into some rocky territory," said Baumgarten, explaining that a majority of Mexicans were against the legalization of marijuana."It's not necessarily popular."Baumgarten also said "it's not clear" whether decriminalizing cocaine use would improve public security, as such a measure wouldn't affect drug smuggling to the US, which is the main driver of violence. 3959

来源：资阳报