濮阳东方医生电话濮阳东方医院男科割包皮手术值得信赖,濮阳东方看男科技术好,濮阳东方医院男科看阳痿好,濮阳东方非常靠谱,濮阳东方男科医院上班到几点,濮阳东方妇科医院收费标准,濮阳东方医院治阳痿非常便宜

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The San Diego Metropolitan Transit System is joining the effort to make more affordable housing. The MTS Board of Directors recently greenlit a new 410-unit housing development at the Grantville trolley station. 156 of the units will be affordable and 254 will be market rate ‘student-oriented’ apartments. MTS is partnering with developers Affirmed Housing and Greystar on the project. It is estimated the total population housed on the planned trolley station property will be 1,049 people. The development would be built on top of the current parking lot. The developers will be making their own parking spaces on the site and MTS will be adding 96 replacement parking spots, according to transit officials. In a statement on the prospective parking concerns MTS wrote, “we average about 80 to 120 commuters per weekday that use the park and ride, so we are in the wheelhouse of demand.” MTS says it is currently looking into developing four more of its stations into similar housing in downtown, El Cajon and Chula Vista. Construction is set to begin June 2020 and finish by June 2022. 1116

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The San Diego City Council voted in favor Tuesday of an affordable housing plan which critics say could raise rents and home prices across San Diego.The vote, which came after hours of public comment, was five to four in support of the proposal.Council President Georgette Gomez moved to require developers to reserve 10 to 15 percent of new housing units in complexes for low to moderate income households. The plan includes other options, but if all else fails the proposal would raise the affordable housing in-lieu fee developers pay by 72 percent. For a typical 1,800 square foot unit, that would be an additional ,000 in construction costs that could be passed on to tenants. “We’re in a royal housing mess, and I almost would like to say, today, believe it or not, are the good old days for housing, because we’re staring straight into a bigger problem,” said Borre Winckel, who heads the San Diego Building Industry Association. But supporters of the proposal say the city needs the housing. Many workers are now being forced to commute from far away because there is no housing available. A report last year found the region still needed more than 140,000. "We’re certainly not trying to drive the cost of housing. Our number one goal here is to try to incentivize and regulate in a more fair manner the building of affordable housing,” said Keith Maddox, of the San Diego Imperial Counties Labor Council. Councilman Scott Sherman, who opposes the proposal, said the larger fee would add to a market rate rental and ,000 to the price of a home. The money from the fee would go into a pot used to pay for affordable housing developments. Marissa Tucker, a robotics marketing manager who lives in North Park, said her life success is only because she was able to grow up in an affordable home. “My dad, he works at a grocery store,” she said. “My mom was never able to hold a stable job because she has a mental disability, and so without having affordable housing and be able to provide that stability, we’re not always afforded the same opportunities.” Under the proposal, developers would also avoid the fee by rehabilitating existing units - or donate land that could be used for affordable housing. On Tuesday, the council was hearing more than three hours of public comment, and both of the city’s overflow rooms were full. 2374

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The San Diego Humane Society launched an investigation into possible animal neglect Monday.  The investigation is focused on the former Carmel Mountain Ranch Country Club.The golf course shut down in July.A spokesman with the Humane Society says someone reported that the declining state of one of the ponds on the course was endangering koi and other wildlife.Homeowners living near the course say they often smell a foul stench coming from the pond.The Humane Society says they’ve they’ve reached out to the owner of the country club and golf course.The Humane Society sent 10News a statement that says in part:"Because it is an open investigation, we cannot discuss details, but we take reports like this very seriously. We encourage anyone who has information relevant to this investigation to come forward and call San Diego Humane Society’s Humane Law Enforcement at 619-299-7012." 934

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The San Diego Registrar of Voters is revising down its expected turnout numbers for the March primary from earlier projections. With an estimated 290,000 ballots still outstanding as of Thursday evening, turnout is now expected to fall between 47 and 52 percent of the county's registered voters. This means turnout will look similar to 2016's primary, which had about 50 percent participation. Original projections in January from the Registrar of Voters showed expectations of turnout between 55 and 60 percent. That number was revised in February to between 50 and 55 percent."It looks like turnout in this primary is about what it was in 2016 in San Diego," said professor Thad Kousser, department chair of the UC San Diego political science department. "We didn't see the spike we were expecting."However, Kousser points out that using turnout percentage can be misleading. Because of California's new Motor Voter law, there are more than 300,000 more registered voters in San Diego County than there were in 2016. Therefore, a matching 50 percent turnout would actually mean tens of thousands of new voters cast ballots in the 2020 primary. 1173

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- There are concerns about whether the difference between federal and state mental procedures is creating a danger in the community.A gun violence restraining order petition filed by the San Diego County Sheriff's Department suggests Department of Defense requirements don't translate into California's strict mental health evaluation and treatment laws.Local Court CaseStanding in front of a San Diego County judge, a Navy Sailor explained why he believes his guns seized by the San Diego County Sheriff's Department should be returned to him.10News is not naming the sailor because he was never accused of a crime.The Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class told the judge the Sheriff's Department got it wrong; he's not a danger to himself or others.In May, deputies confiscated his firearms after they responded to a call of a suicidal male at what's described as his residence.According to a petition for a gun violence restraining order, the sailor was in a bathroom with a gun in his hand threatening to kill himself.The petition states once deputies got him outside of the home, he told them he's in the military and felt alone. According to the document he "had been thinking of his best friend who had died, he is having relationship problems with his wife and his family does not speak with him. He had lost all hope today and wanted to kill himself. He drank (2) Four Loco's and laid in his bathtub full of water. He thought he would pass out and drowned [sic]. He did not pass out, so since he could not shoot himself, he was going to have law enforcement shoot him when they arrived."According to the deputies' written narrative, they believed he met the criteria for being a danger to himself because he was suicidal, and they placed him on a 72-hour hold pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 51-50."If an active duty military member lives within the Sheriff's jurisdiction, outside of a base, then they are responsible to obey the laws of the state of California," said a Sheriff's Deputy who spoke to 10News on a condition of anonymity.10News is not naming the member of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department because they work undercover. One of their jobs is to handle gun violence restraining orders, or GVROs for short.These civil restraining orders prohibit someone from having a gun or ammunition. Law enforcement or close family members can request it if they're afraid someone will hurt themselves or others. A temporary order is issued until a court hearing for a permanent one takes place."If we have the ability to demonstrate that this person is a danger to themselves or others, we could use GVROs to proactively prevent him from being in possession of firearms," the Sheriff's Department source said.The Sheriff's Department filed a petition for a gun violence restraining order against the U.S. Navy sailor after releasing him to staff at Balboa Naval Hospital in San Diego.According to the GVRO, "Active-duty military members placed on involuntary mental health holds at federal military treatment facilities are governed by the requirements of the Department of Defense (DoD) and implement military service instructions. The current governing instruction of DoD Instruction 6490.04. The DoD standards do not translate into California's "5150- 5152," "5250" (and related statutory) requirements, so it is not currently possible to use California's electronic Mental Health Reporting System for an active-duty member placed on a hold under DoD standards. Therefore, he would not be subject to a firearm prohibition without the issuance of a Gun Violence Restraining Order."In California, if you're taken in on a code 5150 and admitted to a mental health facility, state law makes it unlawful to possess firearms for a period of time. Experts tell 10News the patient receives a formal notification of the firearms prohibition report and the required information about the process for appeal to a judge, if they wish to appeal it.According to the California Department of Justice, a firearm prohibiting category is: "Any person who is taken into custody as a danger to self or others under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150, assessed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5151, and admitted to a mental health facility under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 5151, 5152, or certified under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 5250, 5260, and 5270.15."Experts 10News spoke with say things can work differently if an active duty member of the military is taken to a DOD facility."The reporting system on the federal side is a lot different than we have in our law enforcement on the state level," said San Diego attorney Vik Monder.Monder has no connection to the case but represents clients in civilian and military courts.Monder said just because someone is placed on a 72-hour hold and taken to a DoD facility doesn't mean federal authorities can permanently remove their firearms. There needs to be due process."Under the federal regulation, title 18 United States Code section 922, in order to take away someone's federal rights to a firearm that person must have been adjudicated where they've committed a crime or found guilty of committing some sort of act that warrants that individual to have their gun rights being taken away," Monder said.The sailor was released after being taken to Balboa Naval Hospital. In court he told the judge he was never admitted.In his case the judge ruled he can keep his guns.10News tried to speak with him outside of court, but he said he had no comment and told Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin he needed to check with his command staff if he could speak with 10News.The sailor never got back in touch and no one answered the door at his listed address.The San Diego City Attorney's Office said they're aware of four gun violence restraining orders involving active duty military members in the City of San Diego.A spokesperson for the City Attorney says California's GVRO does not extend to military personnel when they are on federal land or installations. 6076