濮阳东方医院看男科病比较好(濮阳东方男科口碑评价很好) (今日更新中)

WASHINGTON — Federal prosecutors have declined to charge former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, closing an investigation into whether he lied to federal officials about his involvement in a news media disclosure. That's according to a statement from McCabe's legal team on Friday. The decision resolves a criminal investigation that spanned more than a year and began with a referral from the Justice Department’s inspector general, which said McCabe repeatedly lied about having authorized a subordinate to share information with a newspaper reporter for a 2016 article about an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Prosecutors told McCabe’s lawyers they decided “not to pursue criminal charges" against him after careful consideration. 762

Voters in Denver, Colorado may soon have another big decision to make this coming May.In a place where pot is already permitted, is it ready for magic mushrooms as well?A group advocating the decriminalization of mushrooms Denver turned in more than enough signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot this May.The group of backers, Decriminalize Denver, said it had submitted more than 9,000 signatures to the Denver County Board of Elections. Of those, at least 4,726 signatures must be valid to qualify the measure which is called the Denver Psilocybin Mushroom Decriminalization Initiative.Voters could make Denver the first city in the country to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms.While there are plenty of people who would be happy to see this happen, others believe it's a long, strange trip the Mile High City can't afford to take.This is uncharted territory. So, Denver7 is going 360 to explore it.Kevin Matthews is the man who has high hopes of taking the measure to the May ballot.“Denver has a strong history of drug policy reform," Matthews said. “The timing is right, and we’ve modeled our language on this initiative after cannabis legislation in 2005 and 2007.”Matthews says shrooms have helped him break his own cycle of depression. "Mushrooms have enabled me to look outside the box that depression creates," he said. “We’re working to keep people out of prison for non-violent drug offenses. A drug that has proven medical value and is non-addictive.”But Jeff Hunt adamantly disagrees."This is a psychedelic drug where you're typically going to go into some type of trip that could last three to six hours,” said Hunt, vice president of public policy for Colorado Christian University and director of the think tank The Centennial Institute.Hunt wonders how far it will all go. First it was weed, then supervised injection sites for heroin and opioid addicts and now decriminalizing psychedelic shrooms."It's a terrible idea,” Hunt said. “Denver is quickly becoming the illicit drug capital of the world. The truth is we have no idea what the long-term health effects of these drugs are going to do to the people of Colorado."While the Denver Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Denver Partnership have taken no position on the issue yet, Hunt sees a definite economic downside."At a certain point, parents are going to look at the city of Denver and say, 'I don't want to take my kids to that city,'" Hunt said. “And I don't think tourists are going to want to come to this state."In a statement, the Downtown Denver Partnership said, “At this time, the Downtown Denver Partnership has not convened our Board to review this proposed initiative and determine whether or not we will take an opinion.”The matrix gets even more complex with patients like Chris who has end-stage spinal and brain tumors."The mushrooms seem to have calmed them better than any drugs that they've been able to give me,” Chris said. He asked us not to use his last name. “I'm not saying it's a panacea, or that it's for everyone. I just want to be comfortable."And still, others argue shrooms are less habit-forming than opioids or other drugs."We need to see the therapeutic benefits that are there," said signature gatherer Hope Mellinger. “And create an environment where people can talk about set, setting and dose."Those 9,000 signatures are now under review, as the future of fungus fuels a fiery debate."It is a medicine," argued Matthews. “Right now, individuals are facing jail time, or could lose their jobs and their families. Frankly, that’s absurd for a substance that has proven to be non-addictive, non-habit forming and non-violent.”Hunt argued the studies on the drug are inconclusive at best.“Let’s slow down,” Hunt said. “Let’s do the research. We have a process in this country that’s called the FDA that looks at this. And if it concludes it’s beneficial, by all means – let’s get behind it. I'm concerned we're going in the wrong direction - rather than really encouraging people to lead healthy and productive lives." 4086

Walmart CEO Doug McMillon thinks the federal minimum wage is "too low." Now the head of the country's largest private employer is calling on Congress to raise it beyond .25 an hour."The federal minimum wage is lagging behind," Doug McMillon said at Walmart's 273

WESTERVILLE, Ohio - One stage. Twelve candidates. Tuesday’s CNN/New York Times Democratic Party Debate will feature the most candidates at any one time for a televised presidential debate in recent memory. Last month’s Democratic presidential debate featured 10 candidates who qualified based off DNC criteria. In two previous debates, 20 candidates qualified, with the presidential hopefuls being split between two nights. Democratic party leaders said they’re hopeful having the debate on one night, even with a large number of candidates, will mean better viewership. It also means that 12 candidates will divvy up three hours of time, although in past debates, the higher polling candidates generally received more talk time. Joe Biden has led the talk time in all three debates held so far this year.Also, viewership for the last debate, which was only on one night, was on par with the second debate, which was held over two nights. The September debate's viewership was also far below the viewership for the first debate.When: Tuesday, Oct. 15, 8-11 p.m.How to watch: CNN or CNN.comThe candidatesFormer Vice President Joe BidenNew Jersey Sen. Cory BookerSouth Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete ButtigiegFormer Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián CastroHawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (did not qualify for September’s debate)California Sen. Kamala HarrisMinnesota Sen. Amy KlobucharFormer Texas Rep. Beto O'RourkeVermont Sen. Bernie SandersEntrepreneur Tom Steyer (first debate)Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth WarrenEntrepreneur Andrew YangCandidates qualifying for the debate received at least 2 percent in four national or early primary state polls and raised money from 130,000 unique donors. Among the candidates who did not qualify for this month’s debate are Rep. Tim Ryan, Gov. Steve Bullock, author Marianne Williamson, Sen. Michael Bennet and Rep. John Delaney.And the road to qualifying for future debates will become even more challenging for lower and mid-tier candidates. The fundraising threshold for November’s debate will increase to 165,000 unique donors, and candidates will need to hit 3 percent nationally and/or 5 percent in early states in four different recognized polls. Moderating the debateCNN anchors Erin Burnett and Anderson Cooper and New York Times national editor Marc Lacey will moderate Tuesday’s debate. Cooper moderated two Democratic Party presidential debates in 2016, in addition to a general election debate. Previously, Cooper moderated a GOP presidential debate in 2012 and 2008 as well as a Democratic Party presidential debate in 2008. PollingThere has a rather significant shift in polling since the last debate on Sept. 12. Then, Biden was a clear frontrunner in the Democratic Party. Now, his lead has practically vanished in several national polls. A Quinnipiac University poll has Warren now leading Biden 30-27. But in a Fox News poll released last week, Biden leads 32-22. A recent CBS poll showed a tied race in Iowa, and Warren leading 32-24 in New Hampshire. Sanders has consistently stayed in third place in the polls in recent weeks. Buttigieg has gone into fourth place in many polls as Harris has seen a steady drop in support after she saw a spike following the first debate.Sanders on stageAlthough he has not been on the campaign trail in the last two weeks, Sanders plans on being on stage for three hours on Tuesday night after he had a heart attack in Las Vegas. Sanders is expected to resume campaign activities on Saturday. Impeachment as a topicTuesday’s debate marks the first since House Democrats announced a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukraine’s president requesting an investigation into the Biden family. Democrats, and even a handful of GOP leaders including Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, say the phone call was inappropriate. Biden will likely get the opportunity to address whether how he handled his relationship with Ukraine was appropriate given that his son was working for a Ukrainian company under investigation by that country’s government. Other candidates have focused their attacks on Trump’s conduct rather than Biden’s. Could that change at Tuesday’s debate? Also, whether the moderators will delve into Trump’s impeachment remains to be seen. An impeachment inquiry will be a moot point in 2021 if one of the candidates on stage becomes president. On SyriaThe United States’ role in the Middle East could get a lot of airplay on Tuesday, especially given that American troops are withdrawing from Syria. This decision by the Trump administration has drawn ire from Democrats and a number of Republicans. The U.S. leaving Syria has left Kurdish fighters vulnerable to attack from the Turkish military. Kurdish fighters were holding 11,000 Islamic State group prisoners on the United States’ behalf, according to the New York Times. On Monday, Trump tweeted that he believed that the Kurds were intentionally releasing prisoners to draw the U.S. back into the conflict. While the landscape of the Middle East could be altered by 2021 given recent events, candidates should be expected to expound on their views of Middle East policy, and whether the U.S. should keep troops permanently in the region. Justin Boggs is a writer for the E.W. Scripps National Desk. 5298

Two California police officers who killed Stephon Clark, an unarmed black man who was fatally shot in his grandmother's backyard last year, will not face criminal charges, Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert said Saturday.Schubert described a young man going through a tumultuous time in his life, facing jail time after being accused of assaulting his girlfriend and mother of his children days earlier. She said toxicology reports showed Clark had Xanax and alcohol in his system and that he had researched ways to commit suicide before his encounter with the officers."Was a crime committed?" Schubert told reporters. "There is no question a human being died. ... The answer to that question is no and, as a result, there was no criminal liability."Schubert would not characterize what happened as a "suicide by cop" but said "many things were weighing heavily" on Clark's mind at the time of the shooting.Clark was unarmed when he was shot seven times, including three times in the back, according to an autopsy released by the Sacramento County Coroner's office. An independent autopsy found that Clark was shot eight times, with six of those wounds in his back, according a forensic pathologist retained by Clark's family.The case became a symbol of strained relations between the police and the community as well as racial tensions in the state capital.Jamilia Land, a friend of Clark's family and member of CA Families United for Justice, in a statement said no prosecutor's "ruling can change the most important fact -- Stephon should be alive.""Stephon was unarmed and in no way a threat. Instead, they shot 20 times and hit Stephon at least 8 times. Even then, they did not call for medical care even though he was bleeding profusely. Now the Sacramento District Attorney says it's unjust to charge these officers with Stephon's murder—where is Stephon's justice?"Authorities said the two Sacramento officers who shot Clark were responding to a report that a man had broken car windows and was hiding in a backyard. Police chased the man -- later identified as Clark -- who hopped a fence into his grandmother's property. He was shot in her backyard on the night of March 18, 2018.Schubert, who opened her news conference with an apology to the Clark family, said she met with his mother Saturday morning.The prosecutor went through a lengthy presentation involving body worn cameras, helicopter surveillance video and photos. Clark vandalized three cars, moved to a backyard and broke a sliding glass door to a room where an 89-year-old man was watching television, and then jumped to another yard.Directed to Clark's location by the sheriff's helicopter, the officers chased Clark to a backyard."Hey, show me your hands," the lead officer said. "Stop. Stop."Schubert said, "Both (officers) describe that Mr. Clark was sanding with his arms extended in a shooing stance. Both officers believed he was pointing a gun at them."One officer saw a spark that he thought was a muzzle flash from a gun, she said. The other thought the flash was light reflecting off a gun."Show me your hands," one officers said, breathing heavily. "Gun. Gun."Clark was about 30 feet away behind a picnic table when the officers opened fire, the prosecutor said.After the shooting, protests erupted for several days in Sacramento as tempers flared. Frustrated residents and Black Lives Matter activists urged accountability for the shooting. At one point, protesters blocked the entrance to the Golden 1 Center, where the Sacramento Kings play, forcing them to play a game against the Atlanta Hawks in a nearly empty arena.Police said the officers who fired at Clark believed he was pointing a gun at them. But investigators determined Clark was actually carrying a cell phone.Clark's family last month filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the officers involved and the city of Sacramento.The federal lawsuit alleges the young man was racially profiled, and the officers used excessive force in the shooting incident. The two officers failed to identify themselves or issue a verbal warning before firing approximately 20 shots, the suit said. The lawsuit also alleges the officers did not get him medical attention immediately after the shooting.Mayor Darrell Steinberg devoted much of his 2019 "State of the City" speech to the shooting and apologized to Clark's family and the community, CNN 4416

来源：资阳报