濮阳东方医院妇科做人流手术怎么样濮阳东方医院割包皮安全吗,濮阳东方医院做人流评价非常好,濮阳东方妇科医院做人流收费低,濮阳东方妇科评价很不错,濮阳东方医院男科看阳痿价格便宜,濮阳市东方医院好吗,濮阳东方妇科医院好不好

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Chicano history will be celebrated in San Diego this week at one of the city's most historic parks.On April 20, the Logan Heights community will celebrate the 49th annual Chicano Park Day at the famed park underneath the Coronado Bridge. The free festival brings together community members annually for art, education, entertainment, and honoring Chicano culture and the park.This year theme will be "Danzantes, Protectors of Our Traditions and Chicano Park, 500 Years of Anti-Colonial Struggle."Performances are scheduled by a lineup of traditional and cultural dance groups and one of the largest Aztec Indigenous dance performances by Danza Azteca Calpulli Mexihca. In addition to dancing, kids art workshops, speakers, and more than 325 classic lowrider cars and bikes will be on display. Attendees can also visit various arts and crafts, and informational booths throughout the colorful park.And, of course, there's the food, which will be sprinkled throughout the park at various booths.The event comes a couple days before the official establishment of Chicano Park on April 22, 1970, by activists. The site was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2013 and became a National Historic Landmark in 2016.The park is known for an array of colorful murals lining the Coronado Bay Bridge's legs that make up the Chicano Park Monumental Murals. Artists illustrate Chicano history and culture through murals and sculptures throughout the park. 1487

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Body-worn cameras are now in widespread use across San Diego County.They catch some of the most controversial and impactful moments of police officer interactions with the public.As part of the Team 10 Transparency Project, 10News set out to learn more about local departments policies and what type of impact the cameras are having in the community."Body-worn camera, in my opinion, is just another piece of evidence to what occurred," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Sergeant Rob Samuels.Under Senate Bill 1421, a recent law enforcement transparency law, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department released a handful of body-worn camera recordings.The recordings are the end product, capturing moments that could be used in court to prosecute a suspect, exonerate a member of law enforcement or sue a department.But to get to that end, departments have laid out policies that guide how and when to use the cameras."Whenever a deputy is anticipating they are going to be taking some enforcement action they should be turning it on," Samuels said.The Sheriff's Department policy is only a few pages, but it covers everything from training to camera position, when and where to record, and rules for reviewing that video.According to the policy, "Deputies/community services officers shall activate the [body worn camera] BWC to record all law enforcement related contacts. While away from department facilities, deputies shall keep their BWC powered on and in stand-by mode."MORE LIKE THIS Police expert says improvements needed in law enforcement complaint processExclusive: How San Diego law enforcement responds to mental health crisesInvestigating Officers: How SDPD investigates its own after an officer-Involved shootingAccording to the policy, deputies will typically not allow citizens to review recordings; however, deputy discretion is allowed to replay the recording for citizens at the scene to mitigate possible minor complaints."On average, we see about 60 minutes of recording per camera per day and at any given time and point we have about 250 cameras out in the field," said San Diego County Sheriff's Department Chief Information Officer Ashish Kakkad.Kakkad said deputies are allowed to review only their body camera recordings. Access is extremely limited.The policy states, "A deputy may not review the BWC video of other involved deputies before writing a report or giving a statement unless necessary for evidentiary purposes and with the express permission of a supervisor."It's very much a role-based access," Kakkad said. "What is your role? What are you doing? What is your function? And based on your function, your appropriate access is determined."Kakkad said no deputy has the power to edit or delete video.In the two years, the body-worn camera program has been up and running, the department hasn't deleted any video, he said.The heads of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department's program believe it's been a good thing.But are cameras doing anything to bridge the gap between the public and the people they serve?"You won't really ever know what it may have prevented in the way of a complaint," Samuels said.Numbers do show substantiated and unsubstantiated complaints are down for the Sheriff's Department.10News wanted to see if body cameras had an impact on how San Diego County law enforcement interacts with the public.Team 10 requested use of force data dating back five years from departments across the county.Use of force is the type of action law enforcement uses to mitigate an incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm.Here's what we found from departments that have responded to our request at the time of this writing.Oceanside initially saw a significant increase in use of force in 2018 when the cameras were deployed. Although officials tell us it was a staggered deployment. So far this year, use of force numbers show a significant decrease.In the three years since El Cajon deployed body-worn cameras use of force increased. The department said use of force numbers could increase for several reasons, and there also may be no direct correlation between those numbers and body-worn cameras. In San Diego, a 2017 report noted that since officers began wearing body cameras, there were fewer instances of greater controlling/defending force, a reduction in complaints and allegations, and de-escalation of some situations.While statistics vary, the Sheriff's Department said the cameras are just another tool."We still do business like we've always done business, we write accurate reports, and the video we record on body-worn camera just supports what the deputy writes," Samuels said. 4707

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — As states continue to count votes, one thing is clear: the pre-election polls were off again.Pollsters underestimated support for President Donald Trump by a wider margin than they did in 2016, prompting a number of theories about what went wrong and why changes adopted after the 2016 election proved ineffective.Heading into Election Day 2020, candidate Joe Biden led Trump nationally by an average of 8.4%, according to FiveThirtyEight’s polling average. We won’t know the final margin until all the votes are counted, but it looks like Trump’s support was underestimated by about 3.5%.That’s wider than the national popular vote miss in 2016, when the polls underestimated Trump’s support by 1.1%.“Polling emerged from 2016 with a black eye. This is fair to say a second black eye in 2020,” said Jay Leve of polling firm SurveyUSA.Leve said the industry thought it had corrected its 2016 mistakes. Polling in the 2018 midterms was very accurate.In 2020, pollsters made sure to weigh for education level and include enough non-college-educated white voters to try to capture a representative sample of the electorate.But state polls show it didn’t work. In Ohio, there was a nearly 8-point miss. In Wisconsin, there was a nearly 10-point miss. In Florida, the polls missed by 5 points and incorrectly showed Biden in the lead.“While pollsters attempted to correct for the mistakes that they made in 2016, President Trump was busy hammering home a narrative that, number one, the media is the enemy of the people. And number two, polls are fake polls,” Leve said.Leve thinks that skepticism and distrust caused Trump supporters to ignore pollsters at a higher rate, causing them to be underrepresented in samples.San Diego State political scientist Dr. Stephen Goggin says there are other theories as well.“Between mail-in balloting, the pandemic, between all the early voting and all the confusion it creates, it’s possible some of that played a role in creating the error we saw this time,” he said.Goggin said the pandemic may have made the models used to predict voter turnout less accurate this cycle. Many surveys heading into the election showed an unusual trend: Biden was polling better among so-called “likely voters” than among registered voters overall. Typically Republicans hold an edge among likely voters, Nate Cohn of the New York Times noted.There’s also some early data suggesting once the pandemic hit, Democrats started responding to surveys more frequently, something that could have shifted the poll numbers.There may have also been issues surveying certain demographic groups. Pre-election polls showed Biden chipping away at Trump’s lead with seniors compared to 2016, but Biden actually did worse than Clinton with that demographic in certain key states. Trump’s support among Hispanic voters in Florida also surprised pollsters. If exit polling data shows that trend continued in other states, it might explain about one-quarter of this year’s polling error, according to the New York Times.“Many of these errors are fixable when they find out what went wrong and you can still get high-quality samples,” Goggin said.Pollsters are planning to do detailed autopsies on the election once they have final turnout data and results by precinct. Polling firms will eventually post detailed data from their results to the Roper Center for more finely tuned analysis.ABC 10News used SurveyUSA this election cycle to poll 11 state and local races. The final polls accurately predicted the winner in all 11 races, although the margins weren’t perfect.The ABC 10News/Union-Tribune scientific polls actually overestimated Trump’s support in California by about 4 points, relative to vote totals as of November 12. 3757

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Busy families can get help from the United States Department of Agriculture, which has tips for stretching your food budget and eating well when money is limited.Buy in season: Sticking to fruits and vegetables that are in season can lower the cost and add to the freshness.Go back to basics: Convenience foods like pre-cut fruits and vegetables and take-out meals often cost more.Meal prep: Make a large batch of favorite recipes and freeze in individual containers. If you use them throughout the week, you can avoid spending on take-out meals.Find deals right under your nose: That may include peel-off coupons on items, signs on aisle shelves, or coupons with your receipt.Search for coupons: Don’t overlook your junk mail! Many stores still mail coupons and ads, or you can find them online.Look for savings in the newspaper: Brand-name coupons are found in paper inserts every Sunday. Some stores offer double value on coupons on some days of the week.Join your store’s loyalty program: You can receive savings and electronic coupons when you provide an email addressFind out if your store will match a competitor’s coupon: Many stores will accept coupons for the same item.Get a coupon buddy: Swap coupons you won’t use with a friend.Stay organized: Sort your coupons so they’re easy to find.The USDA has sample two-week menus, recipes and a shopping list that can be used by anyone wanting a healthy diet at a modest price. The USDA created recipes using basic kitchen equipment and made lunches designed to be packable so they can be taken to work or school. 1619

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- As we cast our ballots in this year's election, it's a good time to reflect on how our freedom to vote came at a cost. A member of the Greatest Generation looks back at how he and his fellow service members risked their lives to preserve that freedom and how his love for America began about 90 years ago.It started in North Carolina in the 1930s during the Great Depression. Forrest "Huff" Huffstetler, 96, says, "I remember how people suffered back then and I remember people lining up to get a bowl of soup."Despite the hardship, he remembers his life growing up on a farm fondly."We had our own pigs, fresh vegetables and we had cans. My mother and my grandmother would can all the food for us for the winter. We had it pretty good."It's that optimism that motivated Huff to make a decision that would change his life."I was delivering newspapers at 4 o'clock in the morning and that's when the post office had out a picture of Uncle Sam pointing a finger at you."The poster he saw encouraged people to enlist. He says his instant reaction was, "Man this is a good deal, I'd like to get in the Army."He was 15 and a half years old. He managed to enlist by convincing the notary public, who was also his aunt, that he was 18. He says it was well worth it. "I loved the Army. We had three meals a day, I had all my clothes given to me and I wanted nothing. It was wonderful."For more a month, Huff signed on to become a paratrooper with the 82nd Airborne Division. After two tours of duty came D-Day and that defining moment, the jump over Normandy. He remembers seeing the tens of thousands of service members around him."There were paratroopers everywhere and ships out in the channel, there in the channel as far as you could see."The first town Huff helped liberate was Sainte-Mere-Eglise, which explains the hero's welcome back he received last year on the 75th anniversary of D-Day. He looks back at the unity in their fight for freedom back then and says it makes him sad to see people divided today."It breaks my heart. All these men died fighting for this country," he says, "Freedom doesn't come for free, there's nothing for free."That's why Huff votes."I remember the first time I ever voted was when I came out of the service. I was 21 years old, and it was an honor for me to go vote," he says.He wants everyone to exercise that freedom and says he also thinks things will get better. "Things are going to change. We're going to get our country back together working together." After his service, Huff worked in the restaurant industry including owning a restaurant for 20 years. He eventually made a home in San Marcos. In December, Huff will turn 97 years old. 2717