濮阳市东方医院评价很好(濮阳东方医院男科治疗阳痿价格便宜) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Extreme temperatures set several records in cities across San Diego County on Saturday.As the region sweltered under the heat, the mercury went soaring. Seven records were set, including:Escondido: 111 degrees (old record was 108 in 1984)Ramona: 112 degrees (old record was 102 in 2006)Alpine: 113 degrees (old record was 110 in 1984)El Cajon: 114 degrees (old record was 107 in 1984)Palomar Mountain: 97 degrees (old record was 96 in 1955)Campo: 108 degrees (old record was 104 in 1955)Borrego Springs: 117 degrees (old record was 113 in 1989)Poway unofficially set an all-time record of 113 degrees, but it falls out of the National Weather Services 30-year period of record.Temperatures across the county on Saturday were forecasted to hit as high as 122 while many coastal areas could see high 90s.Saturday into Sunday, overnight temperatures along the coast, inland, and mountain areas will hover in the 70s most of the night, and 90s and 80s in the deserts. A gradual return to cooler temperatures won't be in the mix until beginning Monday for coastal communities. Above normal temperatures are expected through next week. 1156

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Families that use their homes as vacation rentals to help survive financially are taking a significant hit.A South Bay family tells 10News the coronavirus pandemic and state Stay At Home order temporarily ended their small business."We were living the American dream until this happened about two weeks ago," said Chris Morrow.About six years ago, before the housing market got hot, Chris and her husband Marty leveraged their money and bought a home in Chula Vista.They turned the charm of the house into a small business: an Airbnb rental. It's a move that drastically changed their life. They were regularly hosting large groups and even had a wedding in the backyard. Chris said before COVID-19, their house was booked every weekend heading into spring break. Now things have changed."Nobody is booking anything for the foreseeable future," Marty said. "So right now, we don't know what to expect when it's going to happen again."At ,000-plus a night, with a two-night minimum, that loss of income they've relied on could be backbreaking."We're going through our budget and trying to find ways to cut corners," Marty said. "The expenses, of course, are lower, but our income is lower and we have to do what we can to make it."Instead of waiting to see how everything shakes out, the Morrow's are trying to use the tools they do have to make some money.Chris and Marty are currently living on their boat, something made possible from the Airbnb income.They are using the luxury of being out on the water to document their life through YouTube videos. The pair are recoding what they see along the way. "Every day, we're doing a temperature check on video, and we're also talking about our daily diary," Chris said.Some of their recent videos include an interview line outside of local Amazon building, sunrises on the bay, and what life is like living on a boat.They're hoping the videos might eventually be able to be monetized because right now, they don't know when the rental business will be back with bookings."There's just so many things going on, so diversifying is the way to go right now," Chris said.Airbnb has a section on its website answering questions for hosts and guests. 2220

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Flu cases are almost three times higher in 2017 than in the previous years, said the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency Wednesday.So far this year, three people have died from influenza A. There have been 445 cases, compared to 112 for the last three years.“We cannot predict just how severe a flu season is going to be, but a lot more cases are being reported than in previous years,” said County public health officer Dr. Wilma Wooten.The CDC recommends everyone 6 months and older get an annual flu shot. It takes two weeks for immunity to develop.Vaccination is especially important for: 638

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that would have required the State Justice Department to verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife before approving a firearm sale to a person under 21.The proposed legislation came after ABC 10News uncovered that suspected Poway Synagogue shooter John Earnest purchased the weapon used in the April 2019 attack with an invalid hunting license that went unchecked. Earnest was only 19 at the time he bought the assault-style weapon from San Diego Guns, when the state's age-limit was 21. The age limit, however, remained 18 for those who possessed a valid, state-issued hunting license. The Justice Department does not verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife, instead leaving it to the gun shop to make the only determination. The governor said creating the verification system would require a 30-month information technology project and could disrupt other firearm technology systems in development under seven other bills. "I am concerned that adding an information technology project will impede DOJ's ability to perform the work it has already been tasked," Newsom said in a veto statement. In an interview Wednesday, State Sen. Anthony Portantino expressed shock and disappointment that Newsom vetoed the legislation. "It's a loophole that needs to be closed," he said. "You can't have a system that relies on the validity of a license not being checked to make sure that that license is actually valid. The whole goal is to keep guns out of the wrong hands. This shooter in Poway got a gun based on a faulty license."Portantino vowed to continue pushing for the change, either through the governor's budget in January or a new bill next year. When making the purchase, Earnest presented a state hunting license that was not valid until July 1, 2019, two months after the alleged attack. That technicality meant the sale should have been rejected, Portantino said. It was Portantino's law that raised California's purchase age limit to 21 but created the hunting-license exemption for those 18 and older. Portantino's bill, Senate Bill 914, would have required the Justice Department to verify hunting licenses with Fish and Wildlife before approving a firearm sale to someone under 21. The bill passed both houses of the state Legislature before failing on the governor's desk.Still, legislators and Newsom did act in the aftermath of the shooting, by eliminating the hunting-license exemption for semi-automatic, center fire weapons. It still exists, however, for other guns, including bolt-action rifles and semi-automatic rimfire weapons. Israel Dahan, whose daughter Noya was injured by shrapnel during the attack, declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation related to the shooting. He said, however, that Noya, now 10, will likely need another minor surgery. He said physically she is holding up okay, but is still dealing with the aftermath psychologically.Earnest allegedly carried out the shooting the day after he picked up the gun, killing one congregant and injuring three others, including a child.A worker who answered the phone at San Diego Guns declined to comment Wednesday. 3176

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- For decades internal documents about officers' use of force were limited to just law enforcement.A new California law changed that, and now some of the most private materials are being released to the public.Documents released by the San Diego Police Department show how incidents are investigated and what type of evidence is collected before use of force cases are submitted to the San Diego County District Attorney's Office.10News asked the department to analyze a case to help the public understand how a report is created. An internal affairs captain also explains how the public getting access to internal documents is helping bridge the gap between the department and the people it serves.2016 Officer-Involved ShootingIn November 2016, Juan Carlos Fernandez shot four people, killing two in the 3800 block of Marlborough Avenue. Police shot and killed Fernandez after officers repeatedly ordered him to lay on the ground, but he refused and continued pointing the handgun at a female, according to police. A 2016 San Diego Police Department press release stated, "An officer, fearing for his life and the safety of the female, fired one round from his service weapon. The round struck the suspect, knocking him to the ground. The suspect was pronounced deceased at the scene by paramedics."The San Diego County District Attorney's Office cleared the officer in the shooting.Under a new California law, Senate Bill 1421, the investigative file and supporting audio and video documents were released to 10News through a public records act request.10News asked the department to talk about what goes into an investigative case file and how the department investigates its own after an officer-Involved shooting.Case Deconstruction"The initial examination is going to be from a criminal standpoint, and the homicide unit is going to roll out there, and they are going to start their investigation," said Internal Affairs Captain Wes Morris.Part of the homicide investigation includes an initial walkthrough at the scene.Using the documents released to Team 10, an initial audio walkthrough of the 2016 shooting identified 15 law enforcement officials, including the officer involved in the shooting, a representative from the San Diego County District Attorney's office, and a member of the Internal Affairs Department."You can get very accurate information right away, and you can start to get a feel for what actually occurred," Morris told 10News.Morris said the homicide team would speak with anyone who was at the location of the shooting, anyone who could have been at the location, and/or anyone who was close to the location and knew anyone involved.All the evidence collected goes into what's called an Officer-Involved Shooting Report.Using the 2016 case as an example, the department report totaled 612 pages. While some of the information was redacted, the report contained sub-reports including: forensic biology report, chain of custody report, firearms lab report, crime scene lab report, vehicle report, witness statement, officer interview, death in custody report, property report, DNA sample report and a report with 586 pages of photos. The San Diego Police Department also released more than 100 audio and video recordings of 911 calls, radio traffic, witness interviews, officer interviews, and body-worn camera."It's not a rubber stamp," Morris said. "There's a lot of work that goes into it. People that really do want to find the truth of what happened in these types of incidents."The report is turned over to the San Diego County District Attorney's Office.According to the DA's website, "The police agency with jurisdiction over the location of the shooting or death conducts the primary investigation of the incident. After the police agency completes their investigation, the District Attorney's Office reviews it, which it does for all officer-involved shootings and in-custody deaths in San Diego County. If the District Attorney wants additional information to supplement the investigation, a request can be made to the jurisdictional agency to obtain the information, or the District Attorney's Office can conduct the additional investigation. The District Attorney's Office does not do a separate, new investigation of the incident." The District Attorney's Office states that when a review is completed, "If the District Attorney's Office determines there is criminal liability, charges will be filed against the officer or deputy. If there is no criminal liability, a letter is written summarizing the facts, evidence, and available statements of those involved. The letter is delivered to the Chief of Police or Sheriff of the jurisdictional agency indicating the actions of the officer or deputy was legally justified. The letter is also posted on the DA's website where any member of the public can read it."If there are no criminal charges pending, internal affairs will take the criminal investigation and do their investigation. Internal Affairs "With an officer-involved shooting, the most important thing we're looking at was if that use of force was within our policy," Morris said.He explained when the case gets to internal affairs, it is assigned to a detective sergeant. The detective sergeant will review the entire case, looking at whether the lethal use of force was within the department's policy and if the officer followed the proper procedures."There are times where we will bring that officer back in again and interview them," Morris said. "We narrowly focus it to what we're looking at, but we may interview them on something that we've seen or some sort of policy and procedure concern, or it could be something outside of that particular use of force."Morris said once the detective sergeant's investigation is complete, it will be put through a review process in-house. The completed investigation will be submitted to the Community Review Board on Police Practices (CRB)."Their main task is to make sure that we haven't left any stone unturned and that we've looked at every aspect of the investigation and that our investigation is thorough, complete, and impartial," Morris said. 6178

来源：资阳报