濮阳东方医院男科治疗阳痿好不(濮阳东方医院口碑很好放心) (今日更新中)

Saturday marks the "First in the West" nomination race with Democrats in Nevada caucusing at a critical time in the campaign for the remaining Democratic field. While New Hampshire and Iowa gave Sen. Bernie Sanders and Mayor Pete Buttigieg some early momentum, Nevada is the first state that will include a diverse voting base. The Nevada Democratic Party says the Nevada Caucuses is a good litmus test on who could best represent the party and be the Democrats' standard-bearer in 2020. After Iowa, all eyes on the tabulationUnlike most primaries, which are run by state boards of election, caucuses are run by the party. Two weeks ago, the Iowa Democratic Party came under fire for a failed vote tabulation as results took several days to be compiled. The fiasco in Iowa was caused by a glitch in an app, and forced the state party chair to step down. Democrats are hopeful that technology does not fail them again. Nevada Democrats too are going to rely on technology. Precincts will each use an iPad with a Google Drive document used to report real-time numbers back to the party. Precinct chairs will also be asked to call the Democratic Party, and send a picture via text message of the paper tabulation that is signed off by representatives of the viable campaigns. How a caucus worksCaucuses are more akin to community events rather than a typical election. Rather than using a secret ballot, caucus goers will first hear from supporters of the candidates, representatives of the campaigns, or perhaps even from the candidate themselves.Then, those on hand will literally "take sides," and join with other supporters of that campaign. At the precinct, a determination is made of viable and non-viable candidates (generally 15% is the threshold).The supporters of non-viable candidates will then be given 15 minutes to join a viable campaign, or abstain. Once the 15 minutes are up, a tally is taken, and the Nevada Democratic Party releases the number of delegates won by each candidate, which is the most important figure of the day. The party will also release popular vote totals.How are ties brokenIf there is a tie at a caucus site that would affect the number of delegates, the precinct chair will use a deck of cards to break the tie. This is Nevada after all. What is at stake on SaturdayFor Saturday's Nevada Caucuses, a total of 36 national delegates will be up for grabs. The Democrats divvy delegates in a proportional basis, meaning with a wide-open field, it is likely that a candidate will not receive a majority of the delegates on Monday.But with Nevada representing some of the first votes cast in the nomination process, it is important to do well for fundraising and momentum purposes.Where the race standsButtigieg holds a slight lead in delegates over Sanders (23-21). Other candidates with delegates are Sen. Elizabeth Warren (8), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (7) and VP Joe Biden (6). Mayor Michael Bloomberg did not enter the first two nominating contests, and will sit out Saturday’s Nevada Caucuses and the South Carolina Primary on Feb. 29.Although Buttigieg holds the lead in delegates, it is hard to describe him as the frontrunner. Sanders has a plurality of votes, and leads national polling.Polls in recent weeks have consistently shown Sanders in the lead in Nevada. He also has been leading nationally.Real Clear Politics tracks major opinion polls, and an aggregate of polls show that Sanders has seen his share of the vote go from 19% to 27% in the last three weeks. During that time, Bloomberg has seen his numbers more than double, as he has gone from the back of the pack to nearly even with one-time frontrunner Biden for second.But on March 3, the biggest night of the nominating race awaits as more than a dozen states, including Texas and California, hold primaries. These states are already conducting early voting, meaning Wednesday’s debate could be the final opportunity for candidates to make an impression before a crucial Super Tuesday race. 4002

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens accused President Donald Trump of exceeding his presidential powers in an interview published Thursday, telling 172

Scammers are now finding victims through text message.The Better Business Bureau says tech scams still make up a fairly small number of all reported scams, but they are on the rise.The BBB says scammers are getting smarter and they're sending people texts that appear to come from their bank and they'll say they've found a fraudulent transaction on your account and ask if it was you.You'll likely say "no" because that transaction never happened. So then they'll ask you for your personal information to fix it. The BBB says don't be so quick to hand it over. "When someone reaches out to you — whether it's by phone, by text message, on social media or email — when someone reaches out to you, that's when you need to be especially cautious and not share personal information," says Katherine Hutt with the BBB.If you believe there may be a concern about your bank account, you should be the person issuing the call. The BBB says you can find your bank's phone number from the back of your card.Also, getting a gift card in the mail sounds great, but 1071

Representatives from Facebook and Google will be on Capitol Hill today to face questions from lawmakers about how their platforms are used by white supremacists.The hearing, which is being conducted by the House Judiciary Committee, comes just a few weeks after a terror attack in New Zealand that was streamed live on Facebook. Fifty people at two mosques were killed in the attack.The representatives from the two big tech companies' policy teams will appear on an eight person panel that will also include representatives from civil rights groups such as the Anti-Defamation League, and Candace Owens of the conservative group Turning Point USA. Google has received criticism for the role online search plays in spreading hateful ideologies, but its video sharing site YouTube has increasingly been slammed for hosting such content and its algorithms surfacing it.The New Zealand attack "underscores the urgency" of addressing the white supremacy problem on social media, Kristen Clarke, the head of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, told CNN Business.The attack, Clarke said, is "exhibit A in how violent white supremacists abuse the Facebook platform to promote their dangerous, fatal activities." She will be part of the panel testifying on Tuesday.The mass shootings in New Zealand highlighted two key challenges for the social media platforms: The way in which they are used to spread extremist ideologies and rally people to those ideologies, and how people who commit violence on behalf of those extremist ideas use the platforms to promote their actions.Two weeks after the massacre, Facebook announced that it would ban all "praise, support and representation of white nationalism and separatism" on Facebook and Instagram. Previously, the company had banned white supremacy, but had viewed white nationalism differently. The company said it had decided to ban white nationalism after months of consultation with civil rights groups.Neither YouTube nor Twitter have enacted similar blanket bans of white nationalism but both companies say they have policies to fight hate and the incitement of violence on their platforms.Despite investments in human moderators and artificial intelligence, Facebook failed to interrupt the video stream of the mass murder as it was streamed live.Facebook and YouTube said they spent the days after the attack removing millions of reuploads of the video. Facebook said it had stopped the upload of 1.2 million versions of the video, but that 300,000 copies had made it onto the platform and were later removed.A statement from the House Judiciary Committee said Tuesday's hearing "will examine hate crimes, the impact white nationalist groups have on American communities and the spread of white identity ideology. The hearing will also foster ideas about what social media companies can do to stem white nationalist propaganda and hate speech online. " 2927

Staff at a Chicago elementary school made a boy leave the building on a cold March day, coatless and in short sleeves, then lied about what happened, according to a lawsuit that alleges a pattern of abuse and harassment by the staff and the boy's classmates.The fourth-grader had been bullied from the time he enrolled at Fiske Elementary School at the start of the school year, his mother, Yvonne Pinkston, told journalists Tuesday. But the school staff "failed to take any action" to protect the boy and "even became abusive towards him," according to the complaint filed in US district court in Illinois on Monday.The lawsuit against the City of Chicago, its Board of Education, the school's principal, a counselor and a security guard alleges a hostile educational environment, saying the school lacked proper policies and training for discipline and didn't investigate allegations of misconduct. It also alleges battery, excessive force and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiffs are asking for a jury trial.In surveillance video from the school, shown by the family's attorney at a news conference Tuesday, a man identified by the family as the school security guard yanks the boy into an office. A few minutes later, a different camera shows the man ushering the child toward an exterior door.The principal, the counselor and the guard "created a barrier" to keep the boy from staying in the building, the lawsuit alleges. The surveillance video shows two adults following the boy to the door as he exits, and other adults watching it happen.With all other school doors locked, the fourth-grader "sat outside in the cold, with a polo shirt on, for 30 minutes, scared, traumatized and freezing," Dan Herbert, the family attorney, told reporters Tuesday. "Thankfully, the police showed up."A child "being harassed and bullied by the caretakers, that's what makes this case overly egregious, and that's why we filed suit for this young child," Herbert said.The incident happened March 26, 2019, when the low temperature was 27 degrees and the high reached 46 degrees, according to the lawsuit.'Anything could have happened to my son out there,' mom saysThe school made a 911 call to report a missing child minutes after the boy left the building, the lawsuit said. In a Chicago Police Department document regarding the call that's attached to the lawsuit, a note says a boy "walked out of school and needs a report.""They said that this kid ran out of the school. He was thrown out of the school," Herbert said. Police arrived after a second 911 call, the lawsuit says.The boy is identified only as "K.S." in the lawsuit.The school is in a "predominantly impoverished and high-crime community," according to the lawsuit."Anything could have happened to my son out there," Pinkston said. "Anything. In that neighborhood? Anything could have happened."CNN has reached out to the teacher's union to find out whether the defendants have an attorney.Asked for comment on the lawsuit, Chicago Public Schools spokeswoman Emily Bolton said the security guard involved was "removed from his position" Tuesday and the district is looking into the principal's actions.CPS leadership didn't know about the allegations before Tuesday, Bolton said, and the reason for that is under review as well.School district says allegations are 'deeply disturbing'"These allegations are deeply disturbing, and we are fully committed to holding accountable any adult whose actions could have endangered a student," Bolton said.CNN hasn't been able to reach the principal or the school.Herbert did not say how he obtained the surveillance video.The incident started when a student hit the boy and K.S. hit back, according to the complaint. School staff believed the second boy and other students, who said K.S. had been the aggressor.That fits what K.S.'s mother, grandparents and lawyer call a pattern of mishandled complaints."He continuously went and told his counselor, the principal, anyone that would listen to him, he would talk to them about how he was being bullied," Herbert said."The school didn't like the fact that he was making complaints," Herbert said. "The school, the principal didn't like the fact that his mother and his grandparents were doing what they're supposed to do, and that is, hold the school accountable."About half an hour after the first 911 call, a school employee called again, this time saying that "K.S. fought everyone and was kicking, biting and scratching," according to the lawsuit. In the CPD's document of the call, attached to the complaint, a note says the child "left and now returned," and that police had arrived during the call."The school called the police because they were required to make a report," Herbert said. "They lied. They said this kid was biting, scratching, kicking other kids. It didn't happen."K.S. had transferred to Fiske in the fall of 2018 from an Indiana school and was immediately bullied because he "was an outsider and because he was different" from the other students there, Herbert said. "He was not a hard kid. He was a sweet young boy."K.S.' teacher told his mother the other kids "thought that he was lame and stuff like that, because he didn't use profanity and he wouldn't do certain things," and he would speak up if he saw another child doing something he felt was wrong, Pinkston said.K.S. had loved going to his school in Indiana, and is now at a charter school where he is happy, his family said. But he talks a lot about the experience at Fiske, his mother said, and is seeing a counselor for what the lawsuit says are "lasting, emotional wounds.""We're trying to get past it," Pinkston said. 5690

来源：资阳报