濮阳东方医院男科割包皮价格比较低濮阳东方医院看妇科评价很好,濮阳东方看男科评价比较好,濮阳东方医院看妇科病非常的专业,濮阳东方医院看早泄技术很哇塞,濮阳东方男科医院割包皮便宜,濮阳东方医院看妇科很不错,濮阳东方医院做人流手术便宜不

San Diego (KGTV) Over 3,000 volunteers worked Pride Weekend to make sure all the events ran smoothly. But one volunteer says a brutal attack in 2016 almost kept him from being out there. He was stabbed and beaten for wearing Pride T-shirt. “I came back because I found my pride again,” says volunteer Chris Keiser. He was one of the many volunteers up early Saturday morning making sure everyone was in place for the large parade. “I make sure everyone has their radios so they can communicate and check out their cart. We kind of rally the people together, get them excited.”But this was the first time in two years Keiser found himself volunteering after struggling to find his excitement again for the pride community. “I was going to volunteer every year after that and I just couldn’t I just couldn’t bring myself to.”In 2016, Keiser was jogging in his Oak Park neighborhood wearing a Pride T-shirt when he was beaten and stabbed on College Drive. His memory is still fuzzy about what happened. “I do remember a car, the derogatory names, then hearing a car again, and then next thing I know I was on the phone calling whoever for help.”Keiser says it was the pride community that helped him through that dark time. This year San Diego Pride is celebrating 50 years since the Stonewall Riots in New York. Keiser says he’s finding his strength in knowing others paved the way for San Diego to have such a celebration. “You made me try to silence myself and take away my pride, but all you did was make me come back stronger, and I’m louder than before.”San Diego Police investigated Keiser’s attack as a hate crime. He was not able to get a good description of the suspects who are still on the run. 1712

SAN DIEGO (KGVT) - For many students across California, school is either back in session or will start soon in a virtual setting.With uncertainty about what the school year will look like for all children, the parents of students identified as needing special education services are raising serious concerns about their child’s access to necessary supports and resources."Right now, school is virtual," said Sally Sachrison. "It’s been quite a challenge".Sachrison's 12-year-old son just started the 7th grade. That's an achievement, but the emotions she's feeling are not the typical excitement of going back to school."It's just overwhelming because distance learning doesn't always work for everybody, and I feel like they have abandoned our kids that really the special services," Sachrison said.Her son has Down syndrome and is autistic. His unique needs can’t be met over a computer, Sachrison said.“The conflict is that my son needs like a special education teacher, he needs a speech pathologist, he needs an occupational therapist, and these are specialized, trained professionals," she explained.Sachrison said she’s already noticed her child regressing just since schools moved to remote learning in mid-March to prevent the spread of COVID-19. By May, he was slurring his speech and having trouble with other tasks, she described.Regression and lack of services are a concern heard by attorney's and advocates from parents across the state."How do you take a parent and say hey we're going to train you to do occupational therapy even though you're not licensed to do it?” said Nicole Shelton, the executive director of Advocacy Associates Inc. "You don't have that background and still have that done virtually."Advocacy Associates Inc. is an origination that helps families of students with specials needs get the services to which they are entitled by law.In California, once a child is found eligible for special education, the family will participate in the process by attending an individualized education program or IEP.It's both a process and a written document.Shelton explained the IEP team, which includes representatives from the school and district, meets once every three years to conduct an assessment to ensure the student still qualifies. The team must also meet annually to review progress on goals, create new goals, and see what accommodations the student needs.She said parents are concerned that won't happen."I think it's important for parents to be requesting IEP meetings right now," Shelton said.There are also concerns about services not being provided and compensating students if they've regressed because they weren't provided with appropriate services and support."I think parents absolutely need the first step to be asking for that emergency IEP," she said. "We need to talk about services, and we need to talk about accommodation."In Sachrison's case, the district told 10News, "Providing equitable educational experiences to all students including students with disabilities is a key priority for us and we want the service you receive to reflect that principle. Due to the current school closure emergency that prevents in-person instruction, student Individualized Education Plans will be implemented through distance learning to the greatest extent practical via online resources and other means. The IEP will be provided by means of ‘distance learning’, as determined by your child's teachers, in light of the emergency circumstances."A district spokesperson explained, “‘Distance learning’ means instruction in which the pupil and instructor are in different locations. ‘Distance learning’ may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: (1) Interaction, instruction, and check-ins between teachers and pupils through the use of a computer or communications technology. (2) Video or audio instruction in which the primary mode of communication between the pupil and certificated employee is online interaction, instructional television, video, tele-courses, or other instruction that relies on computer or communications technology. (3) The use of print materials incorporating assignments that are the subject of written or oral feedback. This applies to the special education and related services in the IEP to the greatest extent possible in light of the emergency circumstances. Under current public health and CDE guidelines we cannot provide services either at the school, or in person, for more than 10 days due to the qualifying state of emergency. The parent will be notified as to the specific means by which the student's IEP will be provided, given the emergency circumstances present at that time. The IEP will be provided by alternative means as necessitated during the period of emergency conditions only."The district said IEP meetings are being scheduled to take place virtually and it is dependent upon the IEP team to determine whether new goals will be developed on an individual basis.When asked how the district plans to handle learning regression from the spring and forward and whether the state has provided any guidance a spokesperson explained, "When ‘regular’ school hours resume there will certainly be a need to discuss each students' services since distance learning falls short of providing optimal outcomes. At that time students with disabilities, in addition to ALL students in the general education setting, will have to undergo some form of instructional/educational recuperation. Our district is currently considering multiple options to meet this need."A spokesperson for the California Department of Education said students who are receiving special education services through their school district have an IEP and the services and/or accommodations they receive are listed in that IEP."The federal government has not waived the federal requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and local educational agencies (LEA) should adhere to IDEA requirements. In the upcoming school year, local educational agencies in consultation with their local health agency may offer in-person instruction, distance learning, or a combination of both. Section 43503(b)(4) specifies that distance learning shall include "Special education, related services, and any other services required by a pupil's individualized education program pursuant to Section 56341, including the requirements of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 56345, with accommodations necessary to ensure that individualized education programs can be executed in a distance learning environment." 6617

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A woman was drunk when she drove her large family off a Northern California cliff last month and her wife and several children had large amounts of a drug in their systems that can cause drowsiness, authorities said Friday.Police had previously said they believed the Hart family died in a suicide plunge from a scenic overlook. The crash happened just days after authorities in Washington state opened an investigation following allegations the children were being neglected.Preliminary toxicology tests found Jennifer Hart had an alcohol level of 0.102, said California Patrol Capt. Bruce Carpenter. California drivers are considered drunk with a level of 0.08 or higher.Toxicology tests also found that her wife Sarah Hart and two of their children had "a significant amount" of an ingredient commonly found in the allergy drug Benadryl, which can make people sleepy. Toxicology results for a third child killed are still pending, Carpenter said.Carpenter said none of the car's occupants were wearing seatbelts.Sarah and Jennifer Hart and their six adopted children were believed to be in the family's SUV when it plunged off a cliff in Mendocino County, more than 160 miles (250 kilometers) north of San Francisco.Authorities have said data from the vehicle's software suggested the crash was deliberate, though the California Highway Patrol has not concluded why the vehicle went off an ocean overlook on a rugged part of coastline. A specialized team of accident investigators is trying to figure that out with help from the FBI, Carpenter said."We believe that the Hart incident was in fact intentional," he said.Carpenter said the family stopped in the small town of Naselle, Washington, about 80 miles (128 kilometers) northwest of their Woodland, Washington, home, during their drive to the California cliff. But investigators are still trying to determine why they stopped in Naselle, which added an hour and a half to their trip, and whether they contacted anyone. Naselle is near U.S. Highway 101, a popular, scenic route along the coast.Five bodies were found March 26 near the small city of Mendocino, a few days after Washington state authorities began investigating the Harts for possible child neglect, but three of their children were not immediately recovered from the scene.Two more are missing and another body has been found but not identified.The 100-foot (31-meter) drop killed the women, both 39, and their children Markis Hart, 19; Jeremiah Hart, 14; and Abigail Hart, 14. Hannah Hart, 16; Devonte Hart, 15; and Sierra Hart, 12, have not been found.Devonte drew national attention after he was photographed in tears while hugging a white police officer during a 2014 protest.A neighbor of the Harts in Woodland, Washington, had filed a complaint, saying the children were apparently being deprived of food as punishment.Long before the crash, Sarah Hart pleaded guilty in 2011 to a domestic assault charge in Minnesota over what she said was a spanking given to one of her children.And authorities have said social services officials in Oregon contacted the West Linn Police Department about the family in 2013 while they were living in the area. Alexandra Argyropoulos, who told The Associated Press previously that she contacted Oregon child welfare officials, said in an email Friday that Jennifer Hart ran the household "like a regimented boot camp."Argyropoulos wrote that as a family friend she initially thought Jennifer Hart was a loving mother. But after spending two weeks with the family Argyropoulos said she noticed kindness, love and respect for the children was largely absent. She says the six kids were regularly punished for common childlike and adolescent behavior, such as laughing too loudly.Argyropoulos says the family's story has spurred her to start a petition calling for a national child abuse registry that would alert states of prior reports of abuse.___AP writer Lisa Baumann contributed to this story from Seattle. 4012

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A federal judge blocked on Friday President Donald Trump from building sections of his long-sought border wall with money secured under his declaration of a national emergency. U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. on Friday immediately halted the administration's efforts to redirect military-designated funds for wall construction. His order applies to two projects, scheduled to begin as early as Saturday, to replace 51 miles of fence in two areas on the Mexican borderGilliam issued the ruling after hearing arguments last week in two cases. California and 19 other states brought one lawsuit; the Sierra Club and a coalition of communities along the border brought the other. His ruling was the first of several lawsuits against Trump's controversial decision to bypass the normal appropriations process to pay for his long-sought wall."The position that when Congress declines the Executive's request to appropriate funds, the Executive nonetheless may simply find a way to spend those funds `without Congress' does not square with fundamental separation of powers principles dating back to the earliest days of our Republic," the judge wrote in granting a temporary injunction to stop construction.At stake is billions of dollars that would allow Trump to make progress in a signature campaign promise heading into his campaign for a second term.Trump declared a national emergency in February after losing a fight with the Democratic-led House over fully paying for the wall that led to a 35-day government shutdown. As a compromise on border and immigration enforcement, Congress set aside .375 billion to extend or replace existing barriers in Texas' Rio Grande Valley, the busiest corridor for illegal crossings.Trump grudgingly accepted the money, but he declared the emergency to siphon money from other government accounts because he wanted to spend billion on wall construction. The funds include .6 billion from military construction funds, .5 billion from Defense Department counterdrug activities and 0 million from the Treasury Department's asset forfeiture fund.The president's adversaries say the emergency declaration was an illegal attempt to ignore Congress, which authorized far less wall spending than Trump wanted."We welcome the court's decision to block Trump's attempts to sidestep Congress to build deadly walls that would hurt communities living at the border, endanger wildlife, and have damaging impacts on the environment," said Andrea Guerrero, a member of the Southern Border Communities Coalition.The administration said Trump was protecting national security as unprecedented numbers of Central American asylum-seeking families arrive at the U.S. border.The courtroom showdowns come amid a flurry of activity to accelerate wall construction.Kenneth Rapuano, an assistant secretary of defense, said in a court filing last month that work on the highest-priority, Pentagon-funded projects could begin as soon as Saturday. The Defense Department has transferred .5 billion to border wall coffers. The Defense Department transferred billion to border wall coffers in March and another .5 billion earlier this month. Patrick Shanahan, the acting defense secretary, is expected to decide soon whether to transfer an additional .6 billion.The Army Corps of Engineers recently announced several large contacts with Pentagon funding. Last month, SLSCO Ltd. of Galveston, Texas, won a 9 million award to replace 46 miles (74 kilometers) of barrier in New Mexico.Last week, Southwest Valley Constructors of Albuquerque, New Mexico, won a 6 million award to replace 63 miles (101 kilometers) in the Border Patrol's Tucson, Arizona, sector. Barnard Construction Co. of Bozeman, Montana, won a 1.8 million contract to replace 5 miles (8 kilometers) in Yuma and 15 miles (24 kilometers) in El Centro, California. The administration has planned to use 1 million in Treasury money to extend barriers in the Rio Grande Valley. 4013

SAN DIEGO (KGTV)-- As more than more children are carried into Emergency Rooms with gunshot wounds, the Medical community is coming together to say enough is enough. With their rifles drawn and heads on a swivel, deputies escort students at Saugus High School in Santa Clarita-- the latest location of a deadly school shooting. Just as law enforcement and educators are speaking out about the tragedy, so is the medical community."There's no more of a horrible feeling than to tell a family member that their child is now deceased and no longer can play," Jeffery Upperman, MD, said. Vanderbilt Children's Hospital's Surgeon-In-Chief, Dr. Upperman said Thursday morning's incident hit home. He is a long-time resident of Los Angeles County, who just recently transferred to Tennessee. "Hearing about the tragedy, I could've been one of those trauma doctors in the bay."He is in San Diego this week with more than 500 medical professionals at the Pediatric Trauma Society Conference, to learn about the latest medical treatments that focus on the care of injured children. Dr. Peter Masiakos is the Pediatric Trauma Director at Massachusetts General Hospital. He is speaking about the effects of gun violence. "We all know that it's far better to act on the side of prevention, instead of acting to fix the wounds," Dr. Masiakos said. He said too many kids come into the E.R. with gunshot wounds - via homicide, accident, or suicide. He said new federal policies need to be enacted to protect them, just like seat-belt legislation and the fight against tobacco."We have to engage the community like in the same way that Dr. C. Everett Koop did almost 40 years ago when he identified the issue of smoking and mitigated that," Dr. Masiakos said. They said school shootings are no longer just a gun issue, a school issue, or a law enforcement issue. They said it is a public health crisis."Physicians, seeing what we see, we are in our lane, and we talk about the issue of gun violence as we know what it is. And people need to step up and figure out a way to fix this because another Santa Clarita is not acceptable to us," Dr. Masiakos said. 2148