濮阳东方医院看妇科病非常靠谱(濮阳东方男科医院割包皮价格透明) (今日更新中)

American reporters asked President Trump about Michael Cohen's testimony during a photo opportunity between Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un on Wednesday.Trump didn't answer. Less than an hour later, the White House blocked several reporters from attending the next media availability between Trump and Kim.Press secretary Sarah Sanders cited "the sensitive nature of the meetings."But the press limitations were an abrupt change -- suggesting that the president didn't want to hear any more questions about Cohen.The result: Fewer eyewitnesses were present at the start of Trump and Kim's controversial meeting in Hanoi, Vietnam.The episode came two days after the international media was forced to move out of a hotel in Hanoi because, it turned out, Kim was also staying there.TV networks and other news outlets had to relocate -- prompting grumbling from reporters who said that the White House should have stood up for the American pressPast administrations have pointedly advocated for press access during meetings with repressive governments. The idea was to demonstrate what American democracy looks and sounds like -- pesky reporters and all.Several White House correspondents said the Trump administration is behaving differently."A lot of catering to Kim Jong Un going on in Vietnam," CNN's Jim Acosta tweeted. "First press is kicked out of hotel where Kim is staying. Now some reporters are blocked from pool spray because the dictator doesn't like shouted questions.""Pool sprays" are when a representative group of journalists are allowed to witness a presidential event. Normally they also shout some questions when they see an opening to do so. This custom has existed for decades.Reporters from the Associated Press and Reuters asked about Cohen and North Korean denuclearization during Wednesday's first "pool spray" with Trump and Kim.Staffers from North Korea's government-controlled media were also in the room, but they don't have the same freedom to shout questions.American reporters were anticipating the same level of access for the evening's next photo op, during dinner, but then "Sanders informed us that no print reporters would be allowed in due to sensitivities over shouted questions in the previous sprays," according to Vivian Salama of the Wall Street Journal. Salama was Wednesday's assigned "print pooler," one of many people who serves in a rotation.So in other words, according to Salama, the White House was okay with photographers and camera crews being present -- to take pictures -- but not with the AP and Reuters reporters being there. Correspondents from the Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg were also blocked.Thanks to a show of press solidarity, the White House opened up access a little bit."When our photo colleagues joined us in protest, they decided to allow one print reporter in," Salama wrote.So Salama was in the room to witness Trump and Kim's Wednesday night dinner. The other reporters were not.According to Salama's recap, Trump asked the small group of journalists if they were all "having a good time."He pointed to photographer Doug Mills of The New York Times and told Kim that Mills is "one of the great photographers of the world."Sanders said in a statement that the White House "ensured that representation of photographers, tv, radio and print Poolers are all in the room.""We are continuing to negotiate aspects of this historic summit and will always work to make sure the U.S. media has as much access as possible," she added.A similar dispute happened during Trump and Kim's first summit in Singapore last year.Acosta was excluded "from the first couple of pool sprays," he said on CNN, "and the reason I was given is they were concerned that Kim Jong Un had not been around American reporters yelling questions, shouting questions and so on."After Wednesday's episode, The Associated Press issued a statement that sharply criticized the Trump administration."The AP decries such efforts by the White House to restrict access to the president," the news service said. "It is critically important that any president uphold American press freedom standards, not only at home but especially while abroad." 4198

America's Dairyland is in crisis. More and more Wisconsin dairy farmers are going out of business. Part of the solution might actually involve milk — but not in the way one might think.About 700 Wisconsin Dairy farms went out of business last year — more than two each day."The dairy industry has been struggling for a while, but now the problem has become acute and we must act and we must act now," said Wayne Weber, Dean of the College of Business, Industry, Life Science, and Agriculture at University of Wisconsin-Platteville.That action starts at a farm tucked away in the rolling hills of Southwest Wisconsin. Professor Tera Montgomery helps run the Pioneer Farm at UW-Platteville. The cows and calves are part of her classroom."It's a living and learning laboratory so there is something going on all the time," Montgomery said. "It's a working farm."Platteville is one of three UW schools hoping to get a share of million in research dollars from the state to start the first ever Dairy Innovation Hub — a center dedicated to tasks like finding new dairy products, but also looking for unconventional ways to use milk.One of those techniques involves combining manure and cheese byproducts in a digester, creating energy. Montgomery says that this energy could potentially run communities local to dairy farms.Students at the Pioneer Farm are also hoping to develop new products to help people with allergies or an intolerance to milk enjoy it."It's making sure we are making unique products that are going to be what the consumer wants and what the consumer needs," Montgomery said.It's not just about finding ways to produce more milk. Weber believes the research dollars will produce results for an industry that already contributes billion to Wisconsin's economy."It's going to provide an infrastructure by which we can work with, together, industry partners - researchers, to start to deal with those questions on how do we move the dairy industry into a positive and viable industry in the future," he said.Not only for America's Dairyland, but for America.The research money for the Dairy Innovation Hub made it out of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions with a unanimous vote. It still needs to clear the Senate and Assembly before getting to the desk of Wisconsin Governor Tony Ever. 2356

A Miller Park Zoo flamingo was euthanized Monday after an elementary school student threw a rock inside the animal's exhibit.A representative from the Bloomington, Illinois, zoo told 195

All states holding presidential primaries next Tuesday say voting will take place as scheduled, despite the novel coronavirus pandemic.In a 152

A wedding is supposed to be the most beautiful day in a couple's life. But for thousands of couples this year, it's become a nightmare, because they have to cancel their reception, and couples are finding they can't get a refund due to the contract they signed months ago with their reception venue.Kristina Finley's dream wedding was scheduled for May 30, until COVID-19 and her governor changed her plans.Despite a state shutdown of big events, her mother, Becky Finley, said her daughter can't get her money back from her venue."She asked for a refund, and they said actually my daughter owed them the second half of the payment," Finley said.The wedding venue still has their ,500 deposit, half the total cost of the ,000 wedding and reception, the family said.It offered new dates next year, but Finley's daughter does not want to wait, and instead she has selected a small church wedding and backyard party for the original date."My daughter picked May 30, 2020. All the invitations, the pre-engagement announcements, everything had that date on it," Finley said. "And she said, 'I've been waiting a year for this, and I'm not going to reschedule.'"Rules vary by venueWhen it comes to weddings and other events, every event center has different rules.Some will give brides and grooms a refund if there is no other option, owner Drew Hester said.Drew Hester, owner of one hall, said that unlike many other halls, he has given full refunds to several brides, and he took the financial hit. "I just believe in karma. I believe in good," he said. "The emotional loss for them has been awful. You work with these brides for a year, and now they are devastated. And on top off that I am not going to say, 'You lost ,500, sorry.'"But many wedding contracts do not allow refunds; only credits toward a future date.What you can doForbes Magazine said many brides and grooms are facing thousands of dollars in losses this year due to canceled weddings. It suggests people:Request a refund as soon as possible; do not wait for the date to approach.Ask if you can get a discount for a smaller gathering, if they are still open.If they refuse a refund or discount, dispute the charge through your credit card if you paid the deposit that way.File a complaint with the Better Business Bureau.If all else fails, contact a lawyer, who for a few hundred dollars can examine the contract and send a letter to the center explaining that since this is an "act of god," the contract should be null and void.Finley hopes to get something back, and said her daughter is just heartbroken having to cancel her dream reception."It's what every little girl dreams of, and it just fell apart," she said,One other option: Some reception centers have gardens where you can move everything outdoors, and where, if allowed by local laws, you can still have that dream wedding.________________________Don't Waste Your Money" is a registered trademark of Scripps Media, Inc. ("Scripps"). 2977

来源：资阳报